Case Study #1

AN ISLAND FIRESTORM

If you were the official concern, what would you do after knowing the
findings of the chemist? How would you show commitment to public interest in
this case?

As a representative of the government, it is incumbent upon me to promote the

overall well-being of the community. I am responsible for educating the residents about
proper waste disposal, which demonstrates my commitment to the collective welfare. To
ensure constant safety, it is essential to conduct training sessions on waste segregation
techniques.

Moreover, my efforts will extend to disseminating accurate information on

rejuvenating the island's safety and enhancing its natural splendor. Visual aids such as
banners, and informative materials will be employed to showcase both the island's
former magnificence and its present condition. These resources will also incorporate a
section dedicated to guiding and preserving the island's environment.
Case Study #2
WANTED: DEAD HEROES

If you were in Rick’s shoes, how would you respond to the situation? Will
you allow Alonzo to pass through or not? Why and why not?

If I were in Rick's position, I would not allow someone claiming to be an Army

Colonel named Alonzo to proceed due to a legal violation. Despite being outnumbered, I
would immediately place a call to the local police station using a helpline.

I would take it upon myself to inform Alonzo about his legal rights, emphasizing
that his actions are in direct violation of laws against unlawful logging. Considering his
status as a colonel, he is undoubtedly aware of the distinction between right and wrong.
It's crucial to communicate that any breach of the law could lead to either criminal or
administrative repercussions.

Given that Alonzo holds the rank of colonel, he is already familiar with ethical
guidelines. It's important to stress that disregarding the law would result in potential
legal consequences. The Philippine Army plays a pivotal role in nation-building and
serves as a guardian of the Filipino population.
Case Study #3

WHAT ELSE I CAN DO?

Do you agree with Glenda? Why?

Is whistle-blowing to the media as acceptable as whistle-blowing to an elected
official?

Yes, I agree with Glenda. Because I am a government employee, I should

uphold the internet of the public over and above my interests.

As a public official, you should always adhere to the proper rules and regulations
for the welfare of the Filipino people

Glenda’s decision to report to the Chairman of the Committee on Environment

and Natural Resources is tenable because she has no other choice but to report it to the
higher authorities. If she will grant the request of her division chief, what will happen?
The proposed project will be hazardous to the environment and the community.

If ever, Senator Enriquez will not take any action regarding the complaint, she
can go and report it to the press or media.
Case Study #4
PICK ME UP

Ronnie is now in a quandary. Now, if you are in Ronnie’s shoes, what will you do?

Gift-giving is a part of our culture. Being a government employee you can accept
only gifts that are nominal and insignificant.

In this case, Ronnie de Guzman did his job promptly and effectively, hence, the
title was awarded to Ms. Santos immediately. Ronnie performs his duties and
responsibilities but he did not demand any money or gift from Ms. Santos.
What was given by Ms. Santos is taken of application and cannot be considered
as a bribe since it is given after the service without any hint of bribery.

But if I were in Ronnie’s shoes, I would follow Ms. Santos and return the
envelope. But if I can’t find her anymore I will keep it and give it to the church or charity
offices.
Case Study #5

BRING HOME OFFICE GOODIES

Which side would you take? Cynthia’s side or Mely’s? Why?

I would take Cynthia’s side. Being a government employee even if you are a
clerk you have no right to bring home office supplies to be used for personal interest
because it is unethical and unbecoming.

A government property should be utilized properly whether it is just a simple

office supply. Using government properties in any form personal is not proper. Those
supplies came from public funds sourced from the taxpayer, not for the employee’s use
but for official business only.

RA 6713 that public officials and employees shall have utmost devotion and
dedication to their duty. Finally, a government employee has the responsibility to take
care of every government property and utilize it properly for public internet and not for
personal ones.
Case Study #6

MORE THAN JUST CASINOS

Is something legal also automatically moral? What do you think?

If something is legal it doesn’t mean that it is automatically moral. Some things

are legal but immoral. There is a big difference but mean legal and moral.

Legality refers to acts that conform to the law. Morality is based on an individual
belief and not the law. In the given example, PAGCOR, like the Lotto and sweepstakes
symbolizes gambling. It is considered legal because it is allowed by the government and
the revenues remitted to the government helps a lot in building school and other project
of the government. It also helped sick people with their medication and hospitalization.
But we cannot deny that it symbolizes gambling. Gambling destroyed many lives and
has broken many families. It is a game of chance in which people bet even they will get
their money wallet hoping that they will win, and get money in many folds. Lotto and
sweepstakes are legal, but since they symbolize gambling, become immoral.
Case Study #7

I CAN AFFORD ANYWAY

If you were this employee, would you agree with her opinion regarding the CSC’s
dress code?

The law states that public official and employees and their families. They shall
not indulge in an extravagant display of wealth in any form.

I don’t agree with the employee's opinion regarding the dress code of CSC. Since
she is a government employee, she must abide by the law. Although she can indeed
afford to buy expensive jewelry still it is not proper to wear it in reporting to work. This
might be bad for public service degradation. So, to maintain an image public servant or
as a government employee, it is proper to follow the code as mandated by the CSC.
The jewelry and other expensive materials can be used on other occasion.
Case Study #8

GIFTS GALORE

Who do you think between Adora and Josie is right? Why?

Gift-giving is an act that gives happiness to the receiver regardless of the amount
of the gift given. It is an act that is appreciated so much by anybody. There is nothing
wrong with gift giving, but if it is given in exchange for a favor that is asked or for a task
that was accomplished especially given to a government employee is no longer good.
People will think that the gift was given as payment for what she did for them, and next
time, if their people ask to favor her again, she cannot refuse because of the gift that
was given to her.
 The law states that public officials and employees shall not solicit or accept
directly or indirectly any gifts, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan, or anything of
monetary value. Public employees should do their duties and that is to serve the people
for free because they are well-paid by the government for that.

Case Study #9

FOR OFFICIAL USE ALSO

If you happen to chance upon a government service vehicle parked in places

where you least expect a government official may transact business with, what
will you do? Will you take time to report the incident to the Ombudsman? If not,
what will you do? Why?

If I happen to chance upon a government service vehicle parked in a place where

I least expect a government official may transact business, the first thing I will do is
think of the reason why the government official using the government vehicle just
dropped by from an official business transaction near the place. But if I happen to see it
more than twice, then I’ll try to know the reasons why the vehicle is parked there. Since
I am aware that government vehicles should only be used for official business only them
I have to inform the proper authorities so that their act will be stopped and aside from
that this will serve as a warning also to the other government officials who are using
government vehicles for personal interest. Government vehicle property is issued to
government officials to perform their tasks and serve the people and not for personal
interest.

Case Study #10

HE DOES, I DO

What do you think? Who is right, Roy or his boss?

A government employee or official should always possess the spirit of

professionalism by reporting to work on time. It is not good to see employees reporting
late many times, that people who need his service are already waiting for him. Very
embarrassing and repulsive. In the situation given, Roy is right when he said that his
boss should not be expected for the policy. As an employee, it is his responsibility to
report to the office on time (the boss). He should be a model to his subordinates. Even if
his house is far from the office still he should find a way to be in the office on time.

It is not proper that a boss say that Ray should wait until he becomes a boss. To
avoid complaints he should come to the office on time, this is because the law excuses
no one. The law was made for everyone. In government offices, no law says that a
boss is exempted from going to office late.