You are on page 1of 6

756

24. Struik, L. C. E., "Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers 27. Wortmann, F.-J., Rigby, B. J., and Phillips, D. G., The
and Other Materials," Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978. Glass Transition Temperature of Wool as a Function of
25. Watt, I. C., and D’Arcy, R. L., Water Vapour Adsorption Regain, Textile Res. J. 54, 6-9 ( 1985).
Isotherms of Wool, J. Textile Inst. 70, 298-307 (1979). 28. Yositomi, T., Nagamatsu, K., and Kosiama, K., On the
26. Wortmann, F.-J., and Zahn, H., The Influence of Water Stress Relaxation of Nylon 6, J. Polym. Sci. 27, 335-
and Organic Solvents on the Rheological Properties of 347 (1958).
Individual Wool Fibers (in German), in "Proc. 6th Int.
Wool Textile Res. Conf. Pretoria," vol. II, 1980, pp. 323-
337. Mamm’ript received Febmary 8. /985: accepted Jllne 27, 1985.

An Evaluation of Nep Formation at the Cotton Gin


1
GINO J. MANGIALARDI, JR.
U.S. Cotton Ginning Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, U.S.A.

ABSTRACT
Experiments were conducted to determine the effects of moisture content, processing
rate, and gin machinery type on nep formation. Using a seed cotton cleaning machinery
sequence recommended by the USDA ginning laboratories for Midsouth spindle har-
vested cotton, two lint moisture levels were tested at two process rates with three stages
of saw cylinder lint cleaners. Samples for nep count analyses were obtained at seven
locations in the ginning machinery sequence. These were tested with the USDA AMS
standard method, which measures the number of neps in 645 cm 2 of web. For the
treatments studied, the gin stand and saw cylinder lint cleaners were the major con-
tributors to the formation of neps at gins.

Cotton neps are created when fibers become tangled is used for counting neps in yarn. This is an electronic
during the harvesting, ginning, and processing opera- instrument that gives the number of yarn neps per
tions. They may be a source of trouble in manufac- 914.4 m [10].
turing and finishing, and they detract from appearance Chapman and Stedronsky showed in tests on Acala
in yarn and fabric [ 10]. cottons in the Southwest that saw ginned lint from ma-
For the nep count test conducted by the Agricultural chine picked defoliated cotton had slightly more neps
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a than did the lint from undefoliated cottons, and fibers
lint sample is mechanically blended and then processed from late-harvested cottons were more susceptible to
into a thin web using special equipment. The neps in nepping than early-harvested cotton. This was attrib-
the web are counted by technicians and the results uted to the defoliated and late-harvested cottons
having
converted to the number of neps per 645 cm2 of web. more immature fibers that were low in micronaire
The Uster evenness testerz with imperfection indicator readings or very fine [3].
In studies on nep formation in cotton during ginning,

In cooperation with Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Ex- Leonard showed that mechanical treatment of seed
periment Station, Delta Branch, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776. cotton prior to ginning affects the number of neps in
2
Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equip- both saw and roller ginned lint, the neps increasing
ment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the U.S. De-
partment of Agriculture and does not imply approval of the product with more severe treatment. He also showed that saw
to the exclusion of others that may be available.
gin seed roll density affects nep formation, with neps

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015
757

7% each to be processed at rates of 2.2 and 4.4 bales/


increasing with increased roll density [6]. Other re-
searchers confirmed that low nep count in ginned lint hour. The control would be the lot ginned at 4.4 bales/
is typical of roll ginned cotton when compared to the hour and at 7% fiber moisture content - about that
count for saw ginned cotton [5]. recommended by the USDA ginning laboratories for
Lint cleaning of Midsouth cottons in 1967-68 im- Midsouth spindle harvested cotton. The 3% moisture
level cotton would be considered over-dried [4].
proved the grade classification but increased the num-
ber of neps in the card web. Card webs produced in Moisture content was controlled by adjusting the
spinning tests contained an average 15, 22, 29, and 30 drying temperatures. For the higher moisture level,
tower drier no. 1 operated at ambient to 82°C and no
neps/645 CM2 for cottons ginned with none, one, two,
and three stages of saw cylinder cleaning, respec- heat was used on tower drier no. 2. Both driers operated
at 121 °C on the low moisture treatment.
tively [7].
In 1982, researchers at the U.S. Cotton Ginning Ginning by adjusting the feed at the
rate was set
master feed controller and extractor feeder. Except for
Laboratory, Stoneville, Mississippi, examined the ef-
fects of cotton moisture content, processing rate, and the low moisture and low feed rate treatments, the ma-
gin machinery type on total nep formation in a ginning chinery used in the experiments operated according to
system. This report presents the result of that study. manufacturer’s recommendations for commercial cot-
The information we obtained will be used as guidelines ton ginning plants.
in planning extensive scientific investigations into the Samples were taken from each of the 24 test lots
mechanism of creating neps in cotton or for reducing according to a time schedule during ginning. Samples
were obtained for determining seed cotton moisture
the potential for nep formation in later mill processes.
and foreign matter contents at the wagon and feeder
apron, lint moisture levels during ginning and lint
Methodology cleaning, nonlint content and classer’s grade and staple
length at the press, and fiber testing.
The experiments were conducted in the U.S. Cotton Moisture contents were determined by oven drying
the samples by ASTM Standard Method D 2495 [1].
Ginning Laboratory’s gin plant in Stoneville, using
commercial equipment. The seed cotton drying and Seed cotton foreign matter contents were ascertained
cleaning sequence consisted of a 24 shelf tower drier, by the fractionation procedure 181 and lint foreign
6 cylinder cleaner; stick, leaf, and hull machine; 24 matter contents by Shirley Analyser tests, ASTM Stan-
shelf tower drier; 6 cylinder cleaner; and extractor dard Method D 2812 [2].
feeder. The ginning system included an 88 saw (30.5- Fiber test samples were taken at seven locations in
cm-diameter) gin stand followed by a flow-through air the ginning sequence for nep count analyses. This in-
lint cleaner and three stages of saw cylinder lint volved roller ginning seed cotton at the wagon and
cleaning. feeder apron for lint sampling, and collecting ginned
Seed cotton used in the experiments was grown and lint after the gin stand and flow-through air lint cleaner,
and each of the three stages of saw cylinder lint clean-
spindle harvested by the Delta Branch, Mississippi
Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station in ing. The neps were counted per 645 CM2 of web. The
Stoneville and by a private grower. Harvesting was web was prepared by using accessory equipment with
performed September 17-October 4, 1982, and the the fiber blender [ 1 O]. Fiber tests on samples collected
cotton ginned September 23-October 16, 1982. immediately before the bale press included micronaire
Twenty-four ’/3 bale lots of spindle harvested cotton readings and causticaire fiber maturity. The U.S. Agri-
were processed from two cotton varieties. The cotton
cultural Marketing Service classed the samples at
varieties were Delta Branch Experiment Station 56 Greenwood, Mississippi, and made fiber tests at Clem-
South Carolina.
(DES 56) and Stoneville 825 and are shown in the tables son,
as cottons A and B, respectively. Each variety was pro-
The experimental design involved two cotton har-
cessed in three replications. Each replication of each vestings/varieties, three replications, two fiber moisture
variety was ginned from a unit of 1’/3 bales of similar levels, two cotton process rates, and seven machinery
cotton, with a’/3 bale lot receiving one of four different locations. The nep data for the experiments were an-
treatments. About 218 kg of seed cotton was used in alyzed statistically by analysis of variance. The sources
each test lot. of error and the distribution of degrees of freedom are
The treatments involved two cotton moisture levels shown in Table I. Significant nep count differences at
and two seed cotton processing rates. The experimental the 5% level were determined between the seven sam-
plan called for cottons at fiber moisture levels of 3 and pling locations by Duncan’s new multiple range test [9].

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015
758

TABLE I. Analysis of variance for nep data from cottons A and B.’

Moisture, process rate, and moisture X.rate were tested using the AOV mean square for replication X moisture X rate as an error term.

Results The actual ginning rate obtained in the study aver-


Initial seed cotton moisture contents averaged 11.4 aged 1.8 and 4.1 bales/hour for the two planned process
and 8.8% for cottons A and B. Initial seed cotton foreign rates (Table II). This corresponds to 4.4 and 10.1 kg
matter contents averaged 6.4 and 7.7%. of lint per gin stand saw per hour.
After seed cotton drying and cleaning, moisture The classer’s composite grade designations were strict
contents of the seed cotton averaged 7.4% for the low middling plus (SLM+) and middling white (M)
heavily dried treatments compared to 8.6% for the after lint cleaning for the test cottons. The grades av-
moderately dried treatments. Seed cotton foreign mat- eraged one-half grade higher on the treatment where
ter level had been reduced to about 1.9%. the lint moisture content at ginning averaged 3.0% and
Lint samples taken after ginning but before lint the process rate was 1.8 bales/hour, compared to grades
cleaning showed that the average lint moisture content where the moisture content averaged 5.0% and the
for the low moisture level treatment actually ranged processing rate was 4.1 bales/hour. Foreign matter
from 2.8 to 3.4% (Table II). Corresponding moisture content in the lint trended lower as the moisture con-
contents for the high moisture level treatment ranged tent decreased or as the process rate was lowered. The
from 4.5 to 5.6%. For all test lots, the low and high staple length of the ginned lint averaged 27.4 mm in
moisture levels averaged 3.0 and 5.0%, respectively. the experiments and appeared to decrease slightly as
The planned 7% moisture content was not obtained the average lint moisture content decreased.
because of the low initial seed cotton moisture level Caustaire maturity index for cotton A averaged 74%,
and the low ambient relative humidity prevailing dur- the causticaire fineness averaged 4.6 ~g/25.4 mm, and
ing ginning. the micronaire readings averaged 4.1 units (Table III).

--- -
TABLE li. Lint moisture content and ginning rate for four lint moisture and process rate treatments, cottons A and B’


Each data point is the average of three replications.

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015
759
i

TABLE IV. Summary of nep count data for moisture content,


Corresponding readings for cotton B averaged 78%,
process rate, and location treatments, cottons A and B.’
5.0 lAg/25.4 mm, and 4.6 units.
During gin processing, cotton A produced fiber con-
taining a higher level of neps than that sampled from
cotton B (Table III). When processed with the higher
moisture level and process rate treatment, fiber from
cotton A contained 43 neps per 645 CM2 (100 of in.2)
web after three stages of saw cylinder lint cleaning,
compared to 34 neps/645 CM2 for cotton B.
Changing the average lint moisture content at gin-
ning from 3 to 5% or increasing the seed cotton process
rate from 1.8 to 4.1 bales/hour did not significantly
change, at the 5% level, the average number of neps
counted in the web (Tables I and IV). There were also
no significant changes in the nep counts attributed to
interaction between moisture content and process rate,
and this was true for cottons A and B.
For the four moisture and process rate treatments,
b
the average number of neps in the web increased from I
Data are the averages of three replications. Means in the
column followed by different letters are significantly diffenent at the
about 6 at the wagon to 42 neps/645 CM2 as cotton A C
Locations are at the wagon, feeder apron, and after
5% level.
passed through the ginning sequence to the baling press the gin stand, flow-through air lint cleaner, and each of three saw
(Table IV). Cotton B showed a 5 to 32 neps/645 CM2 cylinder lint cleaners.

TABLE III. Fiber maturity data and neps per 645 cm&dquo; for lint sampled at seven locations in the ginning system,
four lint moisture and process rate treatments, cottons A and B.’

a
Each data point is the average of three replications. Locations are at the wagon, feeder apron, and after the gin stand, Bow-through air
lint cleaner, and each of three saw cylinder lint cleaners.

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015
760

increase during its passage from wagon to baling press. It is not always possible to determine the number
The increases attributed to drying and seed cotton of neps present in the original material, because the
cleaning, the gin stand, and each stage of saw cylinder preparation of specimens required in most test methods
lint cleaning were all significant at the 5% level for both inevitably increases the number of neps. Useful com-
cottons. These increases ranged from 5 to 8 neps/645 parisons on the neppiness are possible, however, pro-
cm2 on cotton A and from 3 to 7 neps/645 CM2 on vided the specimens are all prepared in the same way
cotton B. The increases produced by the gin stand and and under the same conditions.
each saw cylinder lint cleaner unit were about as great Nep content in the cottons used in the experiments
as the increases produced by the entire seed cotton was not significantly affected by changing the fiber

drying and cleaning system. The air jet lint cleaner did moisture content at ginning from 3 to 5% or reducing
not significantly affect the nepping of the cotton. No the normal ginning rate from 4.1 to 1.8 bales/hour
significant interactions in the nep count data were (underfeeding), but was highly affected by the amount
measured between moisture level, process rate, and lo- of gin machinery used. The gin stand and saw cylinder
cation treatment combinations. lint cleaners were the major contributors to the for-
In a standard gin plant, the formation of neps can mation of neps. Using three saw cylinder lint cleaners
be minimized by using only the number of lint cleaners in the ginning sequence instead of one lint cleaner in-
necessary to achieve the desired grade. Under the con- creased the neps/645 CM2 of web from 24 to 37, a 54%
ditions of the experiments, eliminating the three stages increase.
of saw cylinder lint cleaning would reduce the neps/ Results from the experiments indicate that maturity
645 CM2 from 37 to 17, a 54% reduction (Figure 1). and micronaire of the cotton need to be studied further
Using one saw cylinder lint cleaner instead of three to determine their relation to neppiness. After three
cleaners would reduce neps by 35%, but reductions in stages of saw cylinder lint cleaning, 42 neps/645 CM2
the numbers of lint cleaners would also likely reduce were measured on the cotton having a causticaire ma-

lint grade [7J. . ’ .


turity index of 74% and a micronaire reading of 4.1I
units, compared to 32 neps/645 CM2 on the cotton
having a causticaire maturity index of 78% and a mi-
cronaire reading of 4.6 units.
Promising approaches to reducing neps caused at
the gin, indicated by this and previous research, are to
encourage the harvesting of clean cotton and use min-
imum cleaning at the gin, to gin with only one stage
of saw cylinder lint cleaning, and to develop less ag-
gressive but effective cleaning devices. The last two ap-
proaches would probably result in higher trash contents
and lower ginning rates. Thus, there is a tradeoff be-
tween cleanliness and neps.

Literature Cited

1. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard


FIGURE 1. Neps in ginned lint measured at seven locations in the
gin process, cottons A and B combined. Seed cotton at the wagon Test Method for Moisture in Cotton by Oven-drying, D
( I ) and feeder apron (2) locations was roller ginned, while saw ginned 2495, in "Annual Book of ASTM Standards," part 33,
lint was sampled after the gin stand (3), flow-through air lint cleaner 1979, pp. 536-542.
(4), and each of three saw cylinder lint cleaners (5, 6, 7). 2. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard
Test Method for Non-lint Content of Cotton, D 2812,
in "Annual Book of ASTM Standards," Part 33, 1979,
.

Discussion and Conclusions pp. 632-639.


3. Chapman, W. E., Jr., and Stedronsky, V. L., Ginning
Neps in cotton fiber considerable concern to
cause
Acala Cottons in the Southwest, U.S. Dept. Agr. Prod.
persons interested in yarn and fabric quality. Experi- Res. Rep. 27, 20 pp, 1959.
ments indicate that solving the problem of excessive 4. Griffin, A. C., Jr., and Mangialardi, G. J., Automatic
neps in cotton will require cooperation between breed- Control of Seed Cotton Drying at Cotton Gins, A Review
ers, growers, ginners, and spinners. of Research, U.S. Dept. Agr. ARS 42-57, 14 pp, 1961.

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015
761

5. Griffin, A. C., and McCaskill, O. L., Gin-Stand Research and Moisture Analytical Tests Used in Cotton Ginning
at Stoneville, Miss.: 1956-66, U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. Research, U.S. Dept. Agr. Handb. 422, pp. 1-4, 1972.
1407, 24 pp., 1969. 9. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H., "Principles and Pro-
6. Leonard, C. G., Fundamental Mechanism of Nep For- cedures of Statistics," McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
mation in Cotton, Annual Reports, Southwestern Cotton 481 pp., 1960.
10. United States Department of Agriculture, Cotton Testing
Ginning Research Laboratory, U.S. Dept. Agr., 1966-69.
7. Mangialardi, G. J., Jr., Multiple Lint-Cotton Cleaning: Service: Tests Available, Equipment and Techniques, and
Its Effect on Bale Value, Fiber Quality, and Waste Com- Basis for Interpreting Results, Agr. Market. Serv., Cotton
position, U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1456, 69 pp., 1972. Div., Agr. Handb. 594, pp. 13-19, 1970.
8. Shepherd, J. V., Standard Procedures for Foreign Matter Manuscript received March 7, 1985: accepted July 23. l985.

Finishing Cotton-Wool Blends


ROBERT J. HARPER, JR., AND PARVEZ MEHTA
1
Southern Regional Research Center,
2 New Orleans, Louisiana 70179, U.S.A.

ABSTRACT
This paper covers application of crosslinking agents and polymers to cotton-
the
wool blends. In particular, the influence of a catalyst on performance levels attained
was investigated. Likewise, the role of polymers in improving dimensional stability
and wet wrinkle recovery was elucidated.

The recent interest in natural blend fabrics has led crosslinking agents on woven fabrics [8] and knitted
to questions as to how best to finish cotton-wool blends. fabrics [9]. The latter study also included a sodium
Although the finishing of cotton and wool fabrics has bisulfite pretreatment and the preshrinking of the fabric
been extensively reported in the literature, the finishing prior to resin treatment. This report is designed to bring
of a blend of these two fibers has received only mod- forth certain unappreciated aspects in the finishing of
erate attention. Thus, O’Connell et al. [ 10, 11] studied cotton-wool blends.
the application of dimethyloldihydroxy-ethyleneurea
(DMDHEU) to cotton-wool blend fabrics after stabi- Materials and Methods
lizing the wool fibers against felting shrinkage using the The fabrics used were a desized, scoured, and
Wurlan process.3 Mehta [8] applied the wet fixation of bleached 244 g/M2 (7.2 oz/sq yd) 60% conon-40% wool
resins to cotton-wool fabrics in which the wool com-
3/2 twill weave fabric and a 45% cotton-55% wool yarn
ponent was either untreated or treated for shrinkage. dyed plain weave suiting fabric weighing 193 g/m~ (5.7
Mehta also used a polyacrylate in conjunction with
oz/sq yd).
The crosslinking agent was commercially prepared,

Current address: Manager Apparel Services, Wool Bureau, unbuffered DMDHEU. The catalysts (zinc nitrate
Woodbury, New York. hexahydrate, magnesium chloride heuahydrate, and
2 One of the facilities of the Mid South Area, Agricultural Research
Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. organic acids) were reagent grade materials. The poly-
3
Names of companies or commercial products are given solely mers included a polyacrylate with a T. of 253 K
for the purpose of providing specific information; their mention does
not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department
(-20°C), an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer with a
of Agriculture over others not mentioned. Tg of 273 K (O*C), an aqueous polyethylene emulsion,

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 6, 2015

You might also like