Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Human Flourishing
https://youtu.be/Br1sGrA7XTU
I hope you enjoy watching the life of Martin Heidegger (MH). Here is the summary of the short episode of
Martin's life;
1. He was a German philosopher who is fun of thinking about 'being', technology and etc.
2. He rejected the idea of positivist thinkers and critical to technological domination in the modern world.
3. Heidegger was critical to the essence and modern technology and
4. He reconstructed the meaning of technology that reflected in his essay entitled " The Question Concerning
Technology".
The first definition treated technology as an instrument to achieve a purpose or end. For example,
student A bought a laptop and smartphone to be used for online learning since students were not allowed to
attend a face to face learning. Laptops and smartphones are instruments for the student to achieve his/her
purpose which is to participate in online learning.
The second definition pointed out that technology is part of our daily activities of the human person
which is to invent technology such as gadgets for online learning, protective equipment to fight COVID-19,
agricultural machines to produce foods and etc.
The two definitions of technology are interconnected with each other in such a way that the outcomes
of human activities are meant to serve their purpose. However, this definition of technology became
problematic when technology does not serve its purpose (essence). For example, imagine that COVID-19 will
die naturally. You might think that those PPEs and gadgets for learning are meaningless because the purpose
is not being served. The revival of face-to-face learning will make a gadget for online learning less significant in
the traditional classroom.
Heidegger claimed that ancient and modern technology are revealing. However, modern technology is
revealing not in the sense of bringing forth but rather challenging nature. Modern technology challenges nature
through extracting, transforming, storing, and distributing it. Challenging forth reduced nature as standing
'reserve' or something to be disposed of by the people. For example, people exploited the natural resources
without minding the negative effects on the ecology, the modernization of extracting gold, coal, and petroleum
from the ground compromised the bodies of water, using of synthetic dyes and artificial flavoring jeopardize
human health, and the use of chemicals in the agriculture poses threat to food safety and health
security.
Modern Technology as Enframing
According to Martin Heidegger, modern technology is enframing. The term 'enframing' derives from the
word 'frame' which means putting something into a box. This metaphorical term of Heidegger connotes that
modern technology put nature into a box through scientific knowledge. Enframing, according to Heidegger, is
akin to two ways of looking at the world; calculative thinking and meditative thinking. Humans put an order to
nature and control it through calculative thinking.
Heidegger at this point is critical to the dangers of modern technology by pointing out its defects as
enframing nature, challenging forth, treat nature as a standing reserve. In this case, modern technology
deviated from the essential notion of technology and revealing or poiesis. Heidegger sees this as a danger to
humanity.
Recognizing the dangers of technology requires critical and reflective thinking on its use. For example,
social media has indeed connected people in the most efficient and convenient way but it is prone to abuse
such as the invasion of privacy, online disinhibition, and proliferation of fake news.
The real threat of technology comes from its essence, not its activities or products. The correct response
to the danger of technology is not simply dismissing technology altogether. Heidegger explained that people
are delivered over to technology in the worst possible way when they regard it as something neutral
(Heidegger, 1997).
Aristotle, who lived from 384 - 322 BC, is probably the most important ancient Greek philosopher and
scientist. He was a student of Plato and founded a school named Lyceum. In his own school, Aristotle's
students compiled their lecture notes and came up with a book entitled Nichomachean Ethics. This
Nichomachean Ethics, dedicated to his son Nichomachus, became a foundation of Aristotle's ethics composed
of ten books.
What is a good life?
The term 'good life is one of the concerns of Greek thinkers like Aristotle. In the Nichomachean Ethics,
Aristotle says that every action aims at some good. Some goods are classified as instrumental or intrinsic. The
instrumental good is a means to achieve something else while intrinsic good is good in itself or ultimate good
(Eudaimonia or human flourishing/happiness). At this point, Aristotle is suggesting that if we want to live a good
life then we must develop intellectual and moral virtues.
Eudaimonia
Eudaimonia is a Greek word that means human flourishing or happiness. Eudaimonia as ultimate good is
the final end of our action. However, Aristotle categorized well into different aspects; instrumental good and
intrinsic good. Instrumental good aims at something else while intrinsic good is the final end or good in itself.
For example, enrolling in this course is good because you will learn something and get a grade at the end of
the day. Why do you want a grade? because I want to get a college degree. Why do you want to get a degree?
to secure a job. As you push the question, you will end up in the final end which is the eudaimonia. So studying
in college is instrumental good if it helps you to achieve happiness. On the other hand, studying in college is
intrinsic good if you are happy with what you are doing right now. Sometimes, there are people who wrongly
assumed bodily pleasure or wealth, fame, and honor as eudaimonia. This assumption is wrong because
eudaimonia is exclusive only to a human being who exercises the faculty of reason.
Human Person
The table above reflects Aristotle's concept of the human soul and its hierarchy of functions and activities. The
soul was divided into three; rational, sensitive, and nutritive. The rational part of the soul is the ability of a
human person to think either based on theoretical or practical knowledge. Aristotle formulated the principle of
'man as a rational animal' to achieve eudaimonia/happiness. Achieving eudaimonia/happiness is possible only
when a human person learns to identify and choose the mean of their action between excess and deficiency.
By doing this, we can moderate our actions to achieve the ultimate good or virtuous action. For example,
integrating advanced technology into human activities aided workers to produce outputs faster and easier.
Almost everything is run by machines. But, too much dependent on machines has negative effects on human
well-being. However, those societies that never upgrade their technology were left behind in the fast-changing
industrial revolution and considered backward societies. Between the two extremes of actions, a rational
animal who aims to reach eudaimonia should choose the mean of action of the advanced technocratic society
and backward society. Aristotle's method can be applied to the action of generosity, courage, anger and etc. to
make them virtuous.
Arete
Arete is one of the significant concepts of Aristotle in achieving a good life/Eudaimonia or happiness. Arete
is a Greek term that means 'excellence of any kind in terms of intellectual and moral virtues. Intellectual virtue
is achieved through education and experience. On the other hand, moral virtue is developed through the
constant practice of an action that promotes good life. For instance, courage became a virtue when it is
properly displayed at the right time, right manner, and right place in the face of danger. A person who does not
properly assess the danger and reserve any fear may develop the vice of foolhardiness or rashness. However,
a person may develop the vice of cowardice if he/she becomes fearful and incapable of acting on the problem
in the face of danger.
Science, Technology, and Good Life
The rapid development of science and technology is manifested through the current trend in integrating
machines into human affairs. The automation of communication, transportation, food production, education,
modernization of medicine, etc. must be geared towards a good life. Guided by the concept of a good life,
policymakers, state leaders, and technocrats can work hand-in-hand to make our world a better place to live in.
A world is in a state of balance between excess and deficiency.
Summary:
To wrap up the discussion, the good life as a final end of human actions is an indispensable ethical theory
that advocates happiness along with the development of science and technology. Connecting good life,
science and technology requires us to set our goal which is to achieve eudaimonia. Achieving eudaimonia is
possible through the constant practice of moral virtues guided by the rational part of the soul.
Science, Technology
and Society
GEC007
ILO: Identify different conceptions of human flourishing
Despite the efforts to close out the gap between the rich and poor
countries, the gap just keeps on widening. (BBC Headline report in
2015).
Although there is no standard measure of inequality, the report claimed that most indicators suggest that
the widening of the growth gap slowed during the financial crisis in 2007 but is now growing again. The
increasing inequality appears paradoxical having in mind the efforts that had been poured onto the
development programs designed to assist poor countries to rise from absence to slow progress.
With this backdrop and in the context of unprecedented scientific and technological advancement and
economic development, a human must ask themselves whether they are indeed flourishing, individually or
collectively. If development efforts to close out the gap between the rich and the poor countries have failed, is it
possible to confront the challenges of development through a nonconformist framework?
Jason Hickel, an anthropologist at the London School of Economics, criticized the failure of the growth and
development efforts of the UN to eradicate poverty several decades ago. He conceptualized a nonconformist
perspective toward growth and development.
Here is the outline of Jason Hickel's article on 'Forget developing poor countries, it's time to de-develop rich
countries. Hickel's article will be discussed in detail in assignment 3.1.
Assumptions:
1. UN's new sustainable development goals (SDGs) assumed that growth based on the traditional economic
model is an effective strategy to eradicate poverty.
2. Gross Domestic Products (GDP) is a measure of human development.
3. Questions;
1. How much do we really need to live long and enjoy a happy life?
1. According to Peter Edward, instead of pushing poor countries to catch up with rich ones, we should
be thinking of ways to get rich countries to catch down to more appropriate levels of
development.
2. Genuine Progress is anchored on quality instead of quantity
2. What is a good life or good living?
1. Latin Americans organized themselves and envision the indigenous concept of Buen Vivir, or good
living.
2. Robert and Edward Skidelsky conceptualized the good life through the possibility of interventions
like banning advertising that promotes consumerism and shortens the working hour, and basic
income.
Summary:
This topic shows you a radical model of equalizing the poor and rich countries through eradicating
poverty as a perennial problem. Jason Hickel's criticized the existing UN model popularly known as new
sustainable development goals (SDGs) and he provided us with a nontraditional framework for solving the
problem of poverty.
4.1 When Technology and Humanity Cross
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ystdF6jN7hc
H - human beings'
U - unequivocal
M - means
A - and privilege that
N - need to be
R- respected
I - in order to
G - gain success for humanity
T - today and tomorrow in relation to
S- Science and Technology
What are human rights?
Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our nationality, place of residence, sex,
national or ethnic origin, color, religion, language, and the like.
Human rights in the face of technological and scientific advancement are critical factors in
one's journey toward a good life. Protecting the well-being and protecting the dignity of the human
person must be at the core of continued scientific and technological progress and development. Such
is the focus of the human rights-based approach to science, technology, and society by S. Romi
Mukherjee.
1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights -This document affirms everyone's right to participate in and benefit
from scientific advances, and be protected from scientific misuse. The right to the benefits of science
comes under the domain of 'culture,' so it is usually examined from a cultural rights perspective.
2. UNESCO Recommendation of the Status of Scientific Researchers- This document that all advances in
scientific and technological knowledge should solely be geared toward the welfare of the global citizens,
and calls upon member states to develop necessary protocol policies to monitor and secure this
objective. Countries are asked to show that science and technology are integrated into policies that aim to
ensure a more humane and just society.
3. UNESCO Declaration on the Use of Scientific Knowledge- This document states, "Today, more than ever,
science and its applications are indispensable for development. All levels of government and the private
sector should provide enhanced support for building up adequate and evenly distributed scientific and
technological capacity through appropriate education and research programs as an indispensable
foundation for economic, social, cultural, and environmentally sound development. This is particularly
urgent for developing countries." This declaration encompasses issues such as pollution-free production,
efficient resources use, biodiversity protection, and brain drains.
A human rights- approach to science, technology, and development sets the parameters for the
appraisal of how science, technology, and development promote human well-being.
Thus, the discussion on human rights in the face of the changing scientific and technological
contexts must not serve as merely a decorative moral dimension of scientific and technological
policies but rather the very heart of sustainable futures.
Human rights should be integrated into the journey toward the ultimate good. They should
guide humans not only to flourish as individual members of society but also to assist each other in
flourishing collectively as a society. Human rights are rights to sustainability, as Mukherjee put it.
They may function as the "golden mean," particularly by protecting the weak, poor, and vulnerable
from deficiencies and excesses of science and technology. By imposing upon science and technology
the moral and ethical duty to protect and uphold human rights, there can be a more effective and
sustainable approach to bridging the gap between poor and rich countries on both tangible and
intangible aspects. Ultimately, all these will lead humans to flourish together through science and
technology.
Summary
In summary, the good life entails living in a just and progressive society whose citizens have
the freedom to flourish. The human person has the autonomy to make choices that may enable the
flourishing of his/her self and society. To be able to attain such a good life, one must need to
exercise, and to protect his or her rights for human dignity is the ultimate core of man's existence.
Thus, the United Nations proclaimed UDHR as a global standard to ensure that the rights of a person
are recognized and appreciated by individuals regardless of race, gender, religion, and education.
Also, whatever endeavors one undertakes, whether scientific or not, one must be aware that human
rights must be respected.
Summary
In conclusion, contemporary times have seen a wide range of technological breakthroughs in
all shapes and sizes. It might be at your house, office, or business. It makes life simpler, but if not
utilized appropriately, it may also make life impossible.
In short, technology has its own set of advantages, benefits, and drawbacks. Science and
technology, as William Nelson Joy (2000) points out in his essay "Why the Future Does Not Need
Us," may be the ultimate manifestation of human rationality. People may use science and technology
to either shape or destroy the planet.
Module 4 Summary
In this module, we had discussed the following:
In summary, we know that the world is undergoing many changes at a fast pace brought about
by inventions in science and technology. Although we could not discount the benefits that we reap
from these inventions, it is very important that alongside these technological advancements, scientists
need to show concern for humanity by safeguarding their very existence which is of utmost
importance than the pleasure, comfort, and financial gain that we can get from these inventions.
. There is nothing wrong with desiring for technological advancement, for as long as a thorough
study should be done before embarking on any scientific exploits. We could not resort to a senseless
approach in pursuing any form of the scientific invention that would be detrimental to the welfare of
the human race.
In this regard, there should be a concerted effort among the stakeholders like the scientific
community, government, businessmen to engage in a discussion to determine the safeguards of
humans against the potential dangers of these inventions.
Science, Technology
and Society
GEC007
ILO: Discuss the importance of human rights in the face of changing social conditions and technological
development
Technological Advancements
Television Sets, Mobile Phones, Computers,
and Humanity
People all over the world use these
technologies every day to accomplish different
purpose;
Television was a product of different
experiments by various people;
Paul Gottlieb Nipkow’s invention was called
the "electric telescope" that had 18 lines of
resolution;
Alan Archibald Campbell-Swinton and Boris
Rosing their experiment gave rise to two types
of television systems, namely, mechanical and
electronic television.
ILO: Identify the different technological advancements in society.
Technological Advancements
Television Sets, Mobile Phones, Computers, and
Humanity
On April 3, 1973, Martin Cooper, a senior
engineer at Motorola, made the world’s first mobile
phone call;
In 1983, Motorola made their first commercial mobile
phone available to the public., It was known as the
Motorola DynaTAC 8000X.
Charles Babbage who designed the Analytical Engine
which was used as the basic framework of the
computers even until the present time;
The first design of computer was so big that it could
occupy whole floors of buildings;
The first true portable computer was released in April
1981. It was called the Osborne 1;
The evolution of laptops continued until the present
time where various designs and models are already
available.
ILO: Identify the different technological advancements in society.
Technological Advancements
Roles Played by These Technological
Advancements
Television is mainly used as a platform for
advertisements and information
dissemination;
Television also is a good platform for different
propagandas and advocacies.
Mobile phones are primarily used for
communication;
People use their mobile phones to surf the
Internet and to take pictures more than to text
or to call people;
ILO: Identify the different technological advancements in society.
Technological Advancements
Roles Played by These Technological
Advancements
Other applications include music player,
calendar, radio, television, and photo editor,
among others.
Personal computers and laptops can be used
to surf the Internet and communicate;
the availability of a mouse or a touchpad made
these two technological devices easier to
maneuver than mobile phones
ILO: Identify the different technological advancements in society.