Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Published on 21 March 2018. Downloaded by China University of Geosciences - Wuhan Campus on 12/18/2022 3:53:09 PM.
Benzo[ghi]perylene and coronene were used as ratiometric fluorescent probes to monitor microenvironment
changes and monomer-micelle transition for the first time. The perturbations in vibronic bands in the
emission spectra of probes displayed microenvironment sensing behavior in various solvents and surfactants.
The monomer–micelle transitions of anionic, cationic and neutral surfactants were monitored by changes in
the ratios of vibronic band intensities. Clear CMC values were obtained, which is an advantage over the
conventional probes such as pyrene with clear CMC values sometimes difficult to obtain due to less steep
changes of S-shaped plots. They revealed a redshift in emission which offers a good substitute
in situations where the fluorescence of pyrene and the background fluorescence of the assay mixture
Received 13th February 2018, interfere with each other. BzP exhibited reverse behavior in the perturbations of vibronic band intensities
Accepted 17th March 2018 in anionic SDS and SLS relative to cationic and non-ionic surfactants, which was not observed when
DOI: 10.1039/c8nj00739j pyrene was used. In addition, the vibronic band ratios of BzP are thermally more stable than those of
pyrene, which is advantageous since strict assay temperature control may not be necessary. These
rsc.li/njc probes are thus helpful for various applications in the areas of sensing and interface science.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018 New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 | 6949
View Article Online
Paper NJC
6950 | New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018
View Article Online
NJC Paper
states. In the excited state lifetime of the probe, the more stable
dipole moment of the probe is reoriented by the influence of the
solvent molecules. The fluorescence emission of the molecular
probe varies with the formation of the solute–solvent pair.8
The redshifts in the fluorescence emissions displayed by both
probes relative to pyrene (Fig. S3, ESI†) are advantageous for some
analytical applications where the background fluorescence of the
assay matrix interferes with pyrene.
Fig. 4 The behavior of vibronic peak intensity of benzo[ghi]perylene above and below CMC of surfactants (SDS, CTAB, and Triton X-100) showing
systematic changes in relative peak intensities (BzP = 2 mM, lext = 365 nm, slit width = 3 nm, fluorescence intensities were normalized relative to peak III).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018 New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 | 6951
View Article Online
Paper NJC
Published on 21 March 2018. Downloaded by China University of Geosciences - Wuhan Campus on 12/18/2022 3:53:09 PM.
Fig. 5 Monitoring of micelle formation in aqueous solutions of SDS, CTAB and Triton X-100 by changes in III/IV of BzP as a function of surfactant
concentration. Error bars were estimated from three measurements.
Table 2 The critical micelle concentration (CMC) values determined by Multiples ratios of vibronic band intensities of coronene
vibronic band ratios of fluorescent probes displayed detectable changes in behavior at CMC of surfactants.
CMC (mM SD) The plots of I/II, and II/III gave the clear values of CMC from the
Vibronic inflection point of two lines with a different slope (Fig. 6 and
Probe ratio SDS CTAB TX-100
Fig. S6, ESI†). The ratio of I/II gradually increased with increase
BzP I/II 7.9 0.003 0.91 0.003 0.31 0.005 in the concentration of surfactants below CMC and remained
II/III 8.1 0.04 0.92 0.04 0.31 0.03
III/IV 7.8 0.04 0.91 0.02 0.29 0.02 constant above CMC. The ratio of II/III decreased with the
increase in the concentration of surfactants. However, it
Coronene I/II 7.9 0.02 0.84 0.02 0.29 0.03 remained constant with negligible changes above CMC. Hence,
II/III 7.7 0.02 0.88 0.01 0.29 0.03
I/IV — 0.88 0.01 0.31 0.03 these ratios gave clear values of CMC. I/IV and I/VI can be used
I/VI — 0.89 0.04 0.31 0.02 for the CMC determination of surfactants of low CMC values.
The values of CMC of surfactants obtained by coronene are in
Literature6,32–35 7.8–8.1 0.87–0.92 0.28–0.31
good agreement with the literature as illustrated in Table 2.6,24
The plots of conventional dye pyrene are sigmoid shaped
points of lines of mean values gave clear CMC values. The values of with less steep changes near CMC. They may give uncertain
the CMC obtained were in good agreement with the literature values CMC values.42 The ratios of vibronic band intensities of pyrene are
as depicted in Table 2 and Table S3 (ESI†). also thermally less stable.37 Hence, the new probes with thermally
The reverse behavior in the perturbation of vibronic bands stable vibronic band ratios and clear CMC values obtained from
in monomer fluorescence of anionic SDS seems to be a complex inflection points could be more helpful to monitor micelle for-
phenomenon of interactions between the less symmetric BzP mation. There are more peak ratios available with the new
with the microenvironment. It is reported that the molecular probes to locate the CMC value as compared to other dyes.6,34
symmetry and the interactions of molecular probes with the The shape of plots obtained from vibronic ratios of BzP and
microenvironment play a critical role to determine the extent to Cron resembled with the plots reported by monitoring various
which mixed allowed and forbidden transitions should occur.36 properties of environments such as surface tension, conductiv-
The intensity ratios were affected by the specific interactions of ity, detergency and interfacial tension.8,9 The response of II/III
molecular probes with the solvent cage.39 Furthermore, the of coronene as a function of surfactant concentration resem-
dielectric constant, polarity, micro-viscosity of anionic SDS bles the shape of the plot obtained from interfacial tension.10,42
apparently differ greatly from the cationic and neutral media.40 The response of various peak ratios of BzP resembles the
plots obtained by monitoring osmotic pressure and conductivity
of the microenvironment.41 These results indicate the various
Microenvironment sensing of coronene at phase transition in
factors of the microenvironment that influence monomer
micelle formation process
fluorescence of the probes. These findings will help to under-
Coronene also exhibits concentration-dependent changes in stand the process of micellization and identify the factors
relative intensities of monomer fluorescence. It shows turn-on affecting the microenvironment.
monomer fluorescence in dilute aqueous solutions of surfactants.
The intensities of monomer fluorescence enhanced with the increase
in surfactant concentration. And the formation of micelles at a Experimental
higher concentration of surfactants leads to a higher intensity of
monomer fluorescence. Besides the gradual increase in monomer Materials and chemicals
fluorescence, microenvironment-dependent relative perturbations Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium lauryl sulfonate (SLS),
in peak intensities were observed as can be seen in Fig. S5 (ESI†). hexadecyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), didecyldimethyl-
The peak intensities of I and II showed significant attenuations in ammonium bromide (DDAB), Triton X-100, coronene, benzo[ghi]-
peak heights with the change in surfactant concentration. perylene and pyrene were purchased from commercial suppliers.
6952 | New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018
View Article Online
NJC Paper
Published on 21 March 2018. Downloaded by China University of Geosciences - Wuhan Campus on 12/18/2022 3:53:09 PM.
Fig. 6 Critical micelle concentration of SDS, CTAB and Triton X-100 determined by various ratios of coronene vibronic bands as a function of surfactant
concentration. Error bars were estimated from three measurements.
Coronene and benzo[ghi]perylene were re-crystallized once from The probes offer precise and clear CMC values of surfactants
ethanol before use. Purity was assessed by 1H NMR spectra from the inflection point of lines, which are consistent with the
obtained at 500 MHz using a BRUKER NMR spectrometer in literature values.6,32–35 The redshift in emission made them
CDCl3. Chemical shifts were recorded relative to TMS as an good alternatives to pyrene for studies where the interference of
internal standard. Ethanol, DMSO, acetonitrile, chloroform, background fluorescence with pyrene could not be easily
n-hexane, hexanol, methanol and all other solvents used were avoided. BzP displayed the reverse behavior in perturbations
of analytical grade. Corrected fluorescence spectra were collected of vibronic bands in anionic surfactants SDS and SLS as
using a Fuoromax-4 spectro-fluorometer. compared to aqueous solutions of cationic (CTAB, DDAB) and
neutral surfactants (Triton X-100). Thermal stability of vibronic
Methods band ratios of BzP is an additional advantage over pyrene.37 It
The stock solutions of surfactants were prepared in water is envisioned that BzP and Cron could find a wide range of
purified by a Milli-Q water purification system. Serial dilutions of applications in areas of colloids, microemulsions, polymers,
each surfactant were prepared in a desired range of concentrations. biosurfactants, and membrane structures.31,41
The methanol solutions of benzo[ghi]perylene and coronene were
prepared in the range of 0.2–0.3 mM. 5 mL of probe solutions was
added to 500 mL of corresponding diluted solutions of the surfac- Conflicts of interest
tants. The final aqueous solutions of surfactants contained 2 to 3 mM There are no conflicts to declare.
probe concentration. Diluted solutions were mixed and sonicated for
30 minutes. Corrected fluorescence emission spectra of each
solution were recorded on a Fuoromax-4 spectrofluorometer. Acknowledgements
Coronene and benzo[ghi]perylene solutions were excited at
wavelengths of 305 and 365 nm respectively with a slit width This work was supported by the CAS-TWAS President’s PhD
of 3 nm. Fellowship Program (2015CTF031), the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (21561162004, 51761145102),
and the Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development
Conclusions Project (International Collaboration Program, 20160414040GH).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018 New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 | 6953
View Article Online
Paper NJC
2 L. Linlin, F. Chongchong, X. Jie, W. Fengyang, Y. Haijun, 22 K. C. Hyun, K. Eunjoo, J. W. Sang, L. G. Se, L. J. Sung and
X. Zhiai and Z. Wen, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2017, 92, 101–108. L. W. Seung, Macromol. Res., 2015, 23(2), 196–204.
3 F. Lei, X. Lu, D. Shuli and H. Jingcheng, Soft Matter, 2016, 23 M. Arshad, L. Melanie, L. Flavia, H. W. Christian and
12, 7495–7504. B. S. Andreas, Carbohydr. Polym., 2017, 167, 250–258.
Published on 21 March 2018. Downloaded by China University of Geosciences - Wuhan Campus on 12/18/2022 3:53:09 PM.
4 M. Almgren, F. Grieser and J. K. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 24 H. H. J. Joris, S. Peter, O. Gunter, H. Geoff, E. V. Charles,
1979, 101, 279–291. K. Mattias and H. L. M. Joop, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 2016,
5 L. Piñeiro, N. Mercedes and A. Wajih, Adv. Colloid Interface 35(9), 2173–2181.
Sci., 2015, 215, 1–12. 25 F. Elisabet, R. Clara, R. Marti and B. Elisabeth, Anal. Chim.
6 K. Kalyanasundaram and J. K. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Acta, 2005, 548, 95–100.
1977, 99, 2039–2044. 26 H. Dan and C. C. Keng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136,
7 H. W. Liu, K. Li, X. X. Hu, L. Zhu, Q. Rong, Y. Liu, 15114–15117.
X. B. Zhang, J. Hasserodt, F. L. Qu and W. Tan, Angew. 27 O. E. Daniel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2017, 1859, 639–649.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56(39), 11788–11792. 28 O. E. Daniel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2011, 1814(5), 562–591.
8 L. Shi, D. Lundberg, D. G. Musaev and F. M. Menger, Angew. 29 A. K. Kell, O. L. Cristiano, L. L. Kim, P. M. Flemming,
Chem., 2007, 119, 5993–5995. C. H. Thomas, W. Peter, P. S. Jan and O. Daniel, J. Mol.
9 C. Ignac, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2002, 97, 91–149. Biotechnol., 2009, 391(1), 207–226.
10 W. Al-Soufi, L. Piñeiro and M. Novo, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 30 Y. Tauran, B. Arnaud, P. Patrick, C. Cumbo, K. Beomjoon,
2012, 379, 102–110. P. Florent, C. W. Anthony and M. Imed, Chem. Commun.,
11 L. Day, J. K. Raynes, A. Lies, L. H. Liu and R. P. W. Williams, 2012, 48, 9483–9485.
Food Hydrocolloids, 2017, 69, 150–163. 31 Y. Jun, Y. Mei and D. Yixiang, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114,
12 G. V. Jensen, R. Lund, J. Gummel, T. Narayanan and 6130–6178.
J. S. Pedersen, Angew. Chem., 2014, 126, 11708–11712. 32 C. Prem, P. Somasundaran and T. J. Nicholas, J. Colloid
13 W. Guan, W. Zhou, C. Lu and B. Z. Tang, Angew. Chem., Int. Interface Sci., 1987, 117(1), 31–46.
Ed., 2015, 54, 15160–15164. 33 K. P. Ananthapadmanabhan, E. D. Goddard, N. J. Turro and
14 G. V. Jensen, R. Lund, J. Gummel, M. Monkenbusch, P. L. Kuo, Langmuir, 1985, 1, 352–355.
T. Narayanan and J. S. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 34 R. C. Dorrance and T. F. Hunter, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
135, 7214–7222. Trans. 1, 1972, 68, 1312–1321.
15 P. Yin, P. Wu, Z. Xiao, D. Li, E. Bitterlich, J. Zhang, P. Cheng, 35 W. G. Margaret and J. T. Nicholas, Photochem. Photobiol.,
D. V. Vezenov, T. Liu and Y. Wei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1975, 22, 273–276.
2011, 50, 2521–2525. 36 A. T. Sheryl, E. A. Willaim, W. S. Kenenth and C. F. John,
16 C. N. Maiti, M. M. G. Krishan, P. J. Britto and N. Periasamy, Appl. Spectrosc., 1989, 43(1), 162–164.
J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101(46), 11051–11060. 37 R. Waris, E. A. Willaim and K. W. Street, Analyst, 1988, 113,
17 F. Monzer, M. A. Sami and S. Mukhles, J. Dispersion Sci. 1465–1467.
Technol., 2010, 31(11), 1561–1567. 38 N. Nijegorodov, R. Mabbs and W. S. Downey, Spectrochim.
18 M. Shannigrahi and S. Bagchi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, Acta, Part A, 2001, 57, 2673–2685.
108(46), 17703–17708. 39 M. M. Steven and B. M. Linda, Anal. Chem., 1991, 63,
19 S. T. Laura, S. H. E. Verkempinck, L. Sun, A. M. Van Loey, 2082–2086.
T. Grauwet and M. E. Hendrickx, Food Chem., 2017, 229, 40 H. Chikako, I. Miwa, T. Rie and E. Kazutoyo, Langmuir,
653–662. 2002, 18, 1999–2003.
20 P. B. Bhim, S. Ragini and K. Anil, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2017, 41 C. Arunima, H. Sourav and C. Amitabha, Biochem. Biophys.
94, 115–123. Res. Commun., 2009, 390, 728–732.
21 E. Soussan, S. Cassel, M. Blanzat and I. Rico-Lattes, Angew. 42 J. Aguiar, P. Carpena, J. A. M. Bolı́var and C. C. Ruiz,
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 274–288. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2003, 258, 116–122.
6954 | New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6949--6954 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018