Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preparation
By: Bahal, Rebecca, Alen, Amira, Wadana, Melvin, Sidney
Streetcar Socratic Seminar Goals:
● To make in-depth inferences about character, conflict, and theme
Directions: Using your books, answer the following discussion prompts in your groups. You will be
required to submit written answers for the questions labeled REQUIRED along with your choice of two
additional prompts. These will be collected at the end of the Socratic Seminar on Friday.
B) Blanche: “Whoever you are--I have always depended upon the kindness of strangers” (178). Connect
back to Scene Three: “There’s so much—so much confusion in the world…Thank you for being so kind! I
need kindness now”(69).
C) Does Williams want us to root for Blanche? What attitude does he want us to have
towards her by play’s end? Why or why not? Justify response with quotes
- I would not say that Williams wanted us to root for Blanche but rather feel sorrowful for
her. Blanche from the start was a liar and kept many secrets in order to fulfill her desires
and needs. In a way, she was a narcissist. The character of Blanche was detached from
reality, making her inconsiderate multiple times, therefore I do not believe Williams wanted
us to root for Blanche. By putting Blanche through traumatic incidents, such as a lover’s
suicide and rape, Williams portrays Blanche as a victim which makes the audience feel
sorry for Blanche, especially considering that Blanche was once energetic and lived a
beautiful life until everything slowly fell apart.
2. Stanley’s End: Stanley’s last lines are, “Stella? Now, honey. Now, love. Now, now, love.”
According to the stage directions, he “kneels beside her and his fingers find the opening of her
blouse.”
Given Stanley’s view of the world and himself, to what extent is Stanley living in
illusion and reality by the end of the play?
-By the end of the play, Stanley lives an illusion in which he believes he is superior to
everyone else as he is able to read people, manipulate them and force them into doing things
they would not like to. However, Stanley is not as detached from reality as Blanche. Stanley
goes on about not caring about people, he knows what he is doing, and he does not live in the
past but rather in the present. That is the most significant difference between Blanche and
Stanley. Blanche lived in the past and was detached from reality whereas Stanley lived in
the present and was attached to reality. Stanley wants to move on in life and Blanche wants
to go back.
Why does he approach Stella “a bit uncertainly”?
-Stella at the moment is very vulnerable and in an emotional state due to her sister’s
departure. Stanley is an inconsiderate character therefore it may be that Stanley is afraid
that he might worsen his situation of Stella if he tries to comfort her. If not this, then it may
be because of guilt. Stanley is the reason why Blanche is even more mentally ill than she was
when she arrived but most importantly, Stanley is the reason why Blanche is leaving.
Is his kneeling beside Stella a position of power or weakness or both?
-Kneeling is a stance that can imply that someone is giving in or it may be a posture of
respect. However, in this case, Stanley is kneeling beside Stella who is fighting grief in order
to assert his support. Therefore, the body language of Stanley may impose weakness but the
purpose counters the weakness. Furthermore, Stanley seduces Stella in this scene which is
clearly a dominant act, an act of power.
B) Does Williams want us to root for Stanley? What attitude does he want us to have
towards him by play’s end? Why? Justify response with quotes.
-Yes. William wants us to think that Stanley always wanted to protect Stella and their son,
and his bad attitude towards Blanche was to protect his family from Blanche. “In the book
it’s clearly evident that everyone was against Blanche. All this trouble for Blanche was first
created by Stanley, who tried to find out about Belle Rive and Blanche’s past. As he found
out, everything about Blanche, Blanche’s house fell apart.
C) Synthesize.
What larger thematic message does Williams make through Stanley’s end?
- The thematic message created by Williams through Stanley’s end is “reality triumphs
fantasy, but fantasy is just as important.” Stanleys ending is uncertain, he spent the whole
play isolating and leaving Blanche with nothing. He was utterly consumed by this, leading
us to question if he will ever be satisfied again? His ending is similar to Blanches, she is
consumed by his fantasy and throughout the play he was consumed by his fantasy to be
against Blanche. By sending Blanche to the institute, does he end his fanatsy or will he
create another one?
What is uncertain or paradoxical about his end?
-The uncertainty is will he be ever satisfied again. During the summer of Blanche's arrival,
he set an aim for himself to figuratively kill her. By digging into her past, seperating her
and Mitch, raping her and seperating her from her sister, he wanted to isolate her and
control the situation. There was so much hatred for Blanche from Stanley, this motivated
him to beat her and leave her with nothing. He was so intensively consumed by this, leading
us to question if he will be ever satisfied again? Will it leave him unsatisfied and bored with
his life or will he enjoy not having to work on something?
Why does this ambiguity or paradox matter to the meaning of the work?
-The whole play was about his consumption of isolating and leaving Blanche with nothing,
this ambiguity leads us to will his life ever be the same. This will matter to the meaning of
the work on how Stanley will develop if there would ever be a second book written. Will the
meaning of the book be affected?
3. Play’s End: Examine the closing line of the play: “This game is seven-card stud” (179).
These are essentially Williams’s last words. He gives them to Steve. What does the
ending line of the play— and the poker metaphor—mean in light of the whole play?
(Google “seven-card stud rules” online.)
-In a seven-card stud game, only four out of seven cards are shown to the other players. This
is similar to the play in that only certain aspects of Stanley and the Kowalski family are
revealed. This might be a result of Stanley's tendency to control situations and withhold
details about his personal life. Alternatively, the privacy in such neighborhoods. In the play,
the majority of the characters were kept in the dark about his cruelty. The ability to bluff is a
key component of the poker game, and the ending demonstrates that Stanley was more
skilled at it than Blanche. The play as a whole is punked upon by the poker analogy,
indicating that it was an especially wild game.
Why does Williams end with these lines uttered by Steve, a character we’ve barely seen
in the play? What is the tone?
- Williams ended the play with an insignificant line from a minor character. This portraying
to the readers that their life goes on as normal. No matter how significant and dramatic
Blanche's stay was, it was mere in these characters' lives. The tone of the line is sympathetic,
as Blanche's ending could have been different.
Part II. Questions about the Meaning of the Work as a Whole: Answer required two
4. REQUIRED: Let’s go back to the beginning. Williams opens his play with an epithet—lines from
Hart Crane’s poem “The Broken Tower.”
And so it was I entered the broken world
To trace the visionary company of love, its voice
An instant in the wind (I know not whither hurled)
But not for long to hold each desperate choice.
5. REQUIRED: Why is this play entitled A Streetcar Named Desire? Find all the references
to the streetcar and desire in the play. Then synthesize this with Blanche’s
proclamation in scene 9 that “the opposite [of death] is desire.” How does Blanche’s
statement support or refute the title of this play? What does Williams want to convey to
his audience about desire, death, and streetcars?
-The play is entitled A Streetcar Named Desire because the start of the play is when Blanche
arrives in a streetcar named desire and because it is the main semantic message of the play
which states that desire leads to death or downfall. An example of desire leading to death is
the story of Allan, the young boy who killed himself because he desired to be free and choose
to love who he wanted to. Later on, Blanche’s proclamation in scene 9 that “the opposite [of
death] is desire” relates to how Stella’s desire for Stanley and wanting to please him led to
Blanche’s and Stella’s relationship being “Killed” and also how Stanley’s desire for Blanche
led to Blanche’s departure which marked her end.