Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PR: It is 1959. Only 14 years ago the world had been ravaged by war, bombs
were falling, cities were being blown to pieces. Paris was occupied by NAZI
SOLDIERS, who took over the streets and the cafes, the theaters and the
brothels. You couldn’t get a baguette from the boulangerie or a beret from the
boutique. It was chaos, it was madness. BUT the war had been won in 1945, and
things didn’t really change, why, WHY?
It was absurd… Or that's how writers of the time saw things… but how could they
be right about it?
ME: In my book about theater of the absurd I explain that the writers of the time
wanted to bring their audiences face to face with the harsh facts of the human
situation as they saw it. “In all its mystery and absurdity”...”But there are no easy
solutions to the mysteries of existence, because ultimately man is alone in a
meaningless world. And that is why the theatre of the absurd does not provoke
tears of despair but the laughter of liberation.
1
PR: Now, imagine a rhinoceros has just run through a Paris street and everyone
accepts it and goes on with their conversations two at a time. Seems absurd
doesn't it? Well if you think that’s absurd, let’s listen to one of the conversations.
PR: That conversation went on for a very long time, in the middle of another
conversation between two other characters. Each conversation weaving in and
out between each other. It sounds absurd, It is absurd, but it’s also funny
because it reflects the breakdown of the world at the time. Theatre historian
Walter Wykes believed that the absurdist writers were concerned with the search
for meaning in that world. But, that search was also meaningless and they
showed this through the disintegration of plot, character and language in
absurdist drama. Just like this scene! But like this scene it was also funny.
2
PR: Ionesco’s play was about a rhinoceros running through the streets of Paris -
and a man turning into a rhinoceros. It couldn’t happen. But then no one thought
that the world could be turned upside down and inside out by a megalomaniac.
The whole point of Ionesco’s play is that no one seems surprised anymore about
absurd happenings. They just accepted them.
For instance when a rhinoceros runs by, what do they do …?
PR: They worry about a cat! They exclaim over and over again about the poor
frightened cat - but the rhinoceros they just accept and then talk over each other
repetitively. That’s another feature of absurd theatre. Repetition ….. And pauses
…. Repetition and pauses ….. Repetition and …. You get the idea.
3
Rhinoceros Act. 1. Pg. 67
Daisy: No, there aren't aren’t any fires, the firemen have been called out for
other rhinoceroses
Berenger: For other rhinoceroses?
Dudard and Botard: Other rhinoceroses?
Daisy: Yes, other rhinoceroses. They’ve been reported all over the town. This
morning there were seven, now there are seventeen.
Botard: What did I tell you?
Daisy: As many as thirty-two have been reported. They’re not official yet, but
they’re bound to be confirmed soon.
PR: You see, life was absurd then. Not like today… Just a minute did I hear the
word megalomaniac? And Facism? And War? Those absurdist writers weren’t as
silly as they seemed to be.Here we are in Paris today in 2023, where people are
throwing stones and firebombs in the streets, because their leader has changed
the retirement dates. Where a boy was shot by the police because he didn’t stop
for them. It’s hard to believe isn’t it? Oh! It really seems a bit absurd…
Well catch me next week when we’ll dive into the theatre of Augusto Boal, but…
in… the meantime (see what I did there?)... Break a Leg!