Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Partnership Law
(Continuation…)
Interest In Partnership
A partner’s interest in the partnership is his share of the profits and surplus.
b. In case of fraud in management, avail himself of the usual remedies provided by law, such as
dissolution [Art. 1831, NCC];
c. In case of dissolution:
2. Require an accounting from the date only of the last account agreed to by all the partners. [Art.
1813, NCC].
Rationale:
It would effectively allow a third party to participate in the affairs of the partnership and would basically
have a stranger become a partner without the consent of all other partners.
Note: The list presupposes delivery. Without delivery, the loss is borne by the partner.
• The corresponding interest, from the time the expenses are made;
• The obligations the partner may have contracted in good faith in the interest of the partnership
business; and
The provision is meant to grant to every partner the right to demand from the partnership
reimbursement of advances made on behalf of the partnership business. [Villanueva]
Article 1796 is not applicable when there is no other money than that contributed as capital is
involved. [de Leon; Martinez v. Ong Pong Co, G.R. No. 5236 (1910)]
Partners shall render on demand true and full information of all things affecting the partnership to:
• Any partner;
• The legal representative of any partner under legal disability [Art. 1806, NCC].
Even without demand, honesty demands the giving of vital information, the refraining from all kinds
of concealment. [Paras]
By “information”, it is meant that which can be used for partnership purposes, it is in the sense of
a property which the partnership has a valuable right. [de Leon]
(b) Hold as trustee for it any profits derived by him without the consent of the other partners:
• From any transaction connected with the formation, conduct, or liquidation of the partnership;
or
• From any use by him of its property. [Art. 1807, NCC].
• General Rule: The partner cannot use or apply exclusively to his own benefit partnership assets
or results of the knowledge or information gained by him as a partner to the detriment of the
partnership. [de Leon]
• Exception: If the taking by the partner is with the consent of all other partners. [Lim Tanhuv.
Ramolete, G.R. L-40098 (1975)] The duty to account continues until the partnership relation is
terminated. [de Leon]
• This obligation exists even when he issued a receipt for his share only [Art. 1793, NCC].
Rationale: In this case, the debt becomes a bad debt. It would be unfair for the partner who
already collected not to share in the loss of the other partners.
Credit collected after dissolution: The collecting partner need not bring the same to the partnership
capital. Art. 1793 presupposes that there exists partnership capital. Upon dissolution of the partnership
and the return to each principal of what he contributed, the community of interest between them
disappears altogether. [de Leon]
General rule: An industrial partner cannot engage in business for himself. Should he do so, the capitalist
partners, as well as industrial partners may either: Exclude him from the firm; or Avail themselves of
the benefit which he may have obtained with a right to damages. [de Leon]
Exception: He may engage in business for himself when the partnership expressly permits him to do so.
[Art. 1789, NCC]
Remedy of the other partners The other partners have the remedy of either excluding the erring partner
from the firm or of availing themselves of the benefits which he may have obtained.
An action for specific performance to compel the partner to perform the promised work is not available
as a remedy because this will amount to involuntary servitude.
Reasons:
• To prevent the industrial partner from exploiting his services for his own personal benefit
without the permission of the firm.
• To prevent conflict of interest and to ensure compliance by said partner with his prestation.
General Rule: For a capitalist partner, the prohibition on engaging in another business extends only to
any operation which is of the same or similar kind of business in which the partnership is engaged
A partner occupies a fiduciary position with respect to his co-partners imposing duties of utmost good
faith and he may not carry on any other business in rivalry with the business of the partnership, whether
in his own name or for the account of another at the expense of the partnership. [de Leon]
The distribution of profits and losses shall be in accordance with the following rules:
2. If only the share in profits has been stipulated, the share in the losses shall be in the
same proportion.
• The share in the profits of the capitalist partners shall be in proportion to their
contributions.
• The losses shall be borne by the capitalist partners, also in proportion to the contributions.
• The share of the industrial partners in the profits is that share as may be just and equitable. If
he also contributed capital, he will receive a share of the profits in proportion to his
contribution; and
• The industrial partner, who did not contribute capital, is not liable for losses. [Art. 1797, NCC]
• General rule : A stipulation excluding one or more partners from any share in the profits or
losses is void. [Art. 1799, NCC]
• Exception: A stipulation exempting an industrial partner from losses is valid, since, if the
partnership fails to realize profits, he can no longer withdraw his work or labor. [de Leon]
• But this does not exempt the industrial partner from liability insofar as third persons are
concerned. He may however, recover what he has given to third persons from the other
partners, for he is exempted by law from losses.
Note: Those who, not being members of the partnership, include their names in the firm name, shall be
subject to the liability of a partner. [Art. 1815, NCC]
The partnership name shall contain the word “Company” or “Co.”, except for professional partnerships.
[SEC Memo Circ No. 14-00]
Exceptions:
They cannot use a name which is “identical or deceptively or confusingly similar one already protected
by the Commission or a sole proprietorship registered with the Department of Trade and Industry. [SEC
Memo Circ No. 14-00]
• The use of names of a deceased partner in law firms is “permissible provided that the firm
indicates in all its communications that said partner is deceased”. [Rule 3.02, Code of
Professional Responsibility]
Upon exhaustion of its assets, all partners are liable pro rata with all their property. Any partner may
enter into a separate obligation to perform a partnership contract [Art. 1816, NCC].
General rule: The partners are liable subsidiarily. It only arises upon exhaustion of partnership assets.
[Cia. Maritima v. Muñoz, G.R. No. L-24796 (1907)]
Exceptions:
• A third person who transacted with the partnership can hold the partners solidarily (rather
than subsidiarily) liable for the whole obligation if the case falls under Articles 1822 or 1823.
[Muñasque v. CA, G.R. L-39780 (1985)] The provisions refer to wrongful acts or omission and
misapplication of money or property by a partner in the ordinary course of business.
A person admitted as a partner into an existing partnership is liable for all the obligations of the
partnership arising before his admission, except that his liability shall be satisfied only out of
partnership property, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary. [Art. 1826, NCC] In other words, he
is not personally liable.
Pro Rata
The partners are liable pro rata. This liability is not increased even when a partner: Has left the country
and the payment of his share of the liability cannot be enforced; [CoPitco v. Yulo, G.R. No. L-3146 (1907)]
or His liability is condoned by the creditor. [Island Sales v. United Pioneers, G.R. No. L-22493 (1975)]
Basis for Pro-rating Pro rata must be understood to mean equally or jointly and not its literal meaning.
After all partnership assets have been exhausted, pro-rating is based on the number of partners and
not on the amount of their contributions to the common fund, subject to adjustment among the
partners. [de Leon]
• An industrial partner, who is not liable for losses, is not exempt from this liability (for
partnership debts). However, he can recover the amount he has paid from the capitalist
partners, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary. [Cia. Maritima v. Muñoz, G.R. No. L24796
(1907)]
• Stipulation against Individual Liability Any stipulation against pro rata liability is: Void against
third persons; but Valid among the partners. [Art.1817, NCC]
• A stipulation which excludes one or more partners from any share in the profits or loses is void.
[Art. 1799, NCC]
• Reconciling Art. 1816 and Art. 1797 The exemption of the industrial partner to pay losses relates
exclusively to the settlement of the partnership affairs among the partners themselves, and has
nothing to do with the liabilities of the parties to third persons. Art. 1816 refers to “liabilities”
while
• Art. 1797 speaks of “losses”. There is therefore no conflict between the two articles. [Nachura]
General rule: The partnership is liable for any act of a partner which is apparently for the carrying on
of the usual business of the partnership binds the latter, including the execution of any instrument in
the partnership name.
(b) The person with whom he deals has knowledge of such fact [par. 1, Art. 1818, NCC].
• General rule: Acts of a partner which is not apparently for carrying on of the usual business does
not bind the partnership.
• Exception: The partnership is bound if the other partners authorized him to do the act. [par. 2,
Art. 1818, NCC]
3. Acts of Strict Dominion
General Rule: One or some of the partners have no authority to do the following acts of strict
dominion:
• Assign the partnership property in trust for creditors or on the assignee’s promise to pay the
debts of the partnership;
• Do any other act which makes it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the partnership;
• Confess a judgment;
• Exceptions: They may do so if: 1. Authorized by all the partners; or 2. The other partners have
abandoned the business. [par. 3, Art. 1818, NCC]
Any act of a partner in contravention of a restriction on authority does not bind the partnership to
persons having knowledge of the restriction. [par. 4, Art. 1818, NCC].
The partnership is not liable to third persons having actual or presumptive knowledge of the
restrictions, whether or not the acts are for apparently carrying on in the usual business of the
partnership. [de Leon]
Any partner may convey the real property in the name of the partnership. The partnership can
recover it, except when:
• The act of the partner binds the partnership, when he has authority to carry out the usual
business of the partnership, under par. 1, Art. 1818, NCC; or
• If not so authorized, the property has been conveyed by the grantee, or a person claiming under
him, to a holder for value and without knowledge that the partner exceeded his authority. [par.
1, Art. 1819, NCC]
A partner authorized to carry out the usual business may convey, in his own name, the equitable
interest of the partnership. [par. 2, Art. 1819, NCC]
• Title to Real Property is in the Name of One or More But Not All the Partners
• Title to Real Property is in the Name of One or More or All the Partners, or in a Third Person in
Trust for the Partnership
Where the title is in the name of one or more but not all the partners, and the record does not
disclose the right of the partnership:
2) The partnership may recover it when the partners conveying title have no authority to carry on
the usual business of the partnership, unless the purchaser or his assignee is:
• Without knowledge that the act exceeded authority. [par. 4, Art. 1819, NCC]
• Where the title is in the name of one or more or all the partners, or in a third person in trust
for the partnership, a partner authorized to carry on the usual business may convey equitable
title in the partnership name or in his own name. [par. 4, Art. 1819, NCC] Where the title is in
the names of all the partners, a conveyance executed by all of them passes all the rights to the
property. [par. 5, Art. 1819, NCC]
An admission or representation by any partner may be used as evidence against the partnership
when:
b. Such affairs are within the scope of his authority. [Art. 1820, NCC]
b. Knowledge of any other partner who reasonably could and should have communicated it to the
acting partner. [Art. 1821, NCC]
• Not in such ordinary course of business, but with the authority of his co-partners. [Art. 1822,
NCC]
The partnership is liable for losses suffered by a third person whose money or property was:
a. Received by a partner –
• Misapplied it;
LIABILITY OF THE OTHER PARTNERS UNDER ARTS. 1822 AND 1823, NCC
All partners are solidarily liable with the partnership for its liabilities under Arts. 1822 and 1823.
[Art. 1824, NCC]
This is without prejudice to the guilty partner being liable to the other partners. However, as far as
third persons are concerned, the partnership is answerable. [de Leon]
The rule of respondeat superior (also called the rule of vicarious liability) applies to the law of
partnership in the same manner as other rules governing the agency relationship. [de Leon]
It is not only the partners who are liable in solidum; it is also the partnership. [Art 1824, NCC]
The injured party may proceed against the partnership or any partner. [Paras]
The reason for the law’s imposition of wider liability on the partnership with respect to torts and
breach of trust is based on public policy. [de Leon]
A non-acting partner in a partnership engaged in a lawful business is not criminally liable for the
criminal acts of another partner but he is criminally liable if the partnership is involved in an
unlawful enterprise with his knowledge or consent.
Partnership Liability
Does Not Extend to criminal liability where the wrongdoing is regarded as individual in character,
i.e. embezzlement.
Extends to criminal liability where the crime is statutory, especially where it involves fine or
imprisonment. [de Leon]
*those acts that are prohibited for the protection and/or betterment of society
• A person admitted as a partner is liable for obligations incurred subsequent to his admission as
the other partners are liable. This is because he is already part of the partnership.
• As per Article 1826, the partner is liable for obligations incurred before his admission, but will
be satisfied only out of the partnership property, unless otherwise stipulated that he fully
assumes such obligations.
Rationale
• The new partner partakes of the benefits of the partnership property and an already established
business.
• He has every means of obtaining full knowledge of the debts of the partnership and remedies
that amply protect his interest. [de Leon]
• Knowledge of the partner acting in the particular matter acquired while a partner;
• Knowledge of the partner acting in the particular matter then present to his mind; or
• Knowledge of any other partner who reasonably could and should have communicated it to the
acting partner.
These do not apply in case of fraud on the partnership committed by or with the consent of the
partner. [Art. 1821, NCC]
With respect to partnership assets the partnership creditors are entitled to priority of payment.
However, the private creditors of each partner may ask the attachment and public sale of the share
of the latter in the partnership assets as provided in Art. 1814, NCC. [Art. 1827, NCC]
Property Preference:
• Partner’s Individual Property – Partner’s individual creditors are preferred. [de Leon]
• Partner’s Individual Creditor – Ask for attachment and public sale of the share of the partner in
the partnership assets. [de Leon].
General rule: Partnership creditors are preferred over the personal creditors of the partners as
regards partnership property.
Exception: On due application by any judgment creditor of a partner, a competent court may:
• Charge the interest of the partner for the satisfaction of the judgment debt;
• Appoint a receiver of the share of the profits and of any other money due or to fall due to the
partner; and
• Make all other orders, directions, accounts and inquiries, which the debtor partner might have
made, or which the circumstances may require. [par. 1, Art. 1814, NCC]
a. Concepts
• Dissolution – the change in the relation of the partners caused by any partner ceasing to be
associated in the carrying on of the business. It is different from the winding-up of the business.
[Art. 1828, NCC]
• It does not terminate the partnership, which continues until the winding up of
partnership affairs is completed. [Art. 1829, NCC]
• Note: The dissolution of a partnership must not be understood in the absolute and strict sense
so that at the termination of the object for which it was created, the partnership is extinguished.
[Testate Estate of Mota v. Serra, G.R. No. L22825 (1925)]
• Partnership Still Exists. The partnership, although dissolved, continues to exist until its
termination, at which time the winding up of its affairs should have been completed and the
net partnership assets are partitioned and distributed to the partners. [Emnace v. CA, G.R. No.
126334 (2001)]
• Winding up – the actual process of settling the partnership business or affairs after dissolution.
It involves collection and distribution of partnership assets, payment of debts, and
determination of the value of the interest of the partners in the partnership.
• Termination – the point in time when all partnership affairs are completely wound up and finally
settled. It signifies the end of the partnership life. [de Leon]
c. Causes of Dissolution
1. By the expulsion of any partner from the business bona fide in accordance with such
a power conferred by the agreement between the partners. [Art. 1830(1), NCC]
If, after the expiration of the definite term or particular undertaking, the partners continue the
partnership without making a new agreement, the firm becomes a partnership at will. [Art.
1785, NCC]
Any one of the partners may, at his sole pleasure, dictate the dissolution of the
partnership at will. He must, however, act in good faith, not that the attendance of bad faith
can prevent the dissolution of the partnership, but that it can result in a liability for damages.
[Ortega v. CA, G.R. No. 109248 (1995)]
• By the insolvency of any partner or of the partnership; Note: The insolvency of the partner or
of the partnership must be adjudged by the court. [de Leon]
• By the civil interdiction of any partner;
• Civil interdiction deprives the offender during the time of his sentence of the right to
manage his property and dispose such property by any act or any conveyance inter vivos. [Art.
34, RPC]
Ratio: One who is without capacity to manage his own property should not be allowed
to manage partnership property. [de Leon]
v. Other Causes
a. When a new partner is admitted into an existing partnership;
b. When any partner retires;
c. When the other partners assign their rights to the sole remaining partner;
d. When all the partners assign their rights in the partnership property to third persons.
[Art. 1840, NCC]
c. Effects of Dissolution
i. On Authority of the Partners
In general, upon dissolution, the authority of the partners to represent the partnership is
confined only to acts necessary to:
1. Wind up partnership affairs; or
2. Complete transactions begun but not then finished. [par. 1, Art. 1832, NCC]
With Respect to Partners. The authority of partners to act for the partnership is terminated,
with respect to partners:
1. When the dissolution is not by the act, insolvency or death of a partner; or
2. When the dissolution is by such act, insolvency or death, when the partner acting for the
partnership has knowledge or notice of the cause. [Art. 1832 and 1833, NCC]
In other cases, each partner is still liable for his share in the liability created by the partner
acting for the partnership. [Art. 1833, NCC]
With Respect to Third Persons
With respect to persons not partners:
1. After dissolution, a partner can bind the partnership by any act appropriate for –
a. Winding up partnership affairs; or
b. Completing transactions unfinished at dissolution.
2. He can also bind it by any transaction which would bind the partnership as if dissolution had
not taken place, provided the other party to the transaction –
a. Had extended credit to the partnership prior to dissolution and had no knowledge or
notice thereof; or
b. Had not so extended credit but had known of the partnership prior to dissolution, and
having no knowledge or notice of dissolution, the fact had not been advertised in a
newspaper of general circulation in the place (or in each place if more than one) at
which the partnership business was regularly carried on. [par. 1, Art. 1834, NCC]
Any act of a partner after dissolution in no case binds the partnership in the following cases:
1. Where the partnership is dissolved because it is unlawful to carry on the business, unless
the act is appropriate for winding up partnership affairs;
2. Where the partner has become insolvent; or
3. Where the partner has no authority to wind up partnership affairs, except by a transaction
with one who –
a. Had extended credit to the partnership prior to dissolution and had no knowledge
or notice of his want of authority; or
b. Had not extended credit to the partnership prior to dissolution and, having no
knowledge or notice of his want of authority, the fact of his want of authority has not been
advertised. [Art. 1834, NCC]
Art. 1834, NCC does not affect the liability under Art. 1825, NCC of any person who, after
dissolution, represents himself or consents to another representing him as a partner in a partnership
engaged in carrying on business. [Art. 1834, NCC]
General rule:
A contract:
1. Entered into by a partner acting for the partnership;
2. After dissolution by – a. act, b. death, or c. insolvency of a partner, Binds the other partners.
Exceptions:
1. The dissolution being by act of any partner, the partner acting for the partnership had
knowledge of the dissolution; or
2. The dissolution being by death or insolvency of a partner, the partner acting for the
partnership had knowledge or notice of the death or insolvency. [Art. 1833, NCC]
General rule: Dissolution does not of itself discharge the existing liability of any partner.
Exception: A partner may be relieved when there is an agreement to that effect between:
1. Himself;
2. The partnership creditor; and
3. The person or partnership continuing the business.
Such agreement may be inferred from the course of dealing between: 1. The creditor having
knowledge of the dissolution; and 2. The person or partnership continuing the business.
In case of dissolution by death, the individual property of a deceased partner is liable for obligations
of the partnership incurred while he was a partner, after payment of his separate debts. [Art.1835,
NCC]
d. Winding Up Partners
The following partners have the right to wind up the partnership affairs:
1. Those designated in an agreement;
2. Those who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership; or
3. The legal representative of the last surviving partner, who was not insolvent.
Any partner or his legal representative or assignee may obtain winding up by the court, upon cause
shown [Art. 1836, NCC].
The partner who caused the dissolution wrongfully has the following rights:
• 1. If the business is not continued, all the rights par. 1, Art. 1837, NCC, subject to liability for
damages;
• 2. If the business is continued, the right, as against his co-partners and all claiming through
them, to:
• a. Ascertainment, without considering the value of the goodwill of the business, and
payment to him in cash the value of his partnership interest, less any damage, or have
the payment secured by a bond approved by the court; and
• b. Be released from all existing liabilities of the partnership. [Art. 1837(3), NCC] The
goodwill of a business may be defined to be the advantage which it has from its
establishment or from the patronage of its customers, over and above the mere value
of its property and capital.
The goodwill (which includes the firm name) is part of the partnership assets and may be subject of
sale. [de Leon]
b. Retirement or death of any partner, and his rights to partnership property are
assigned to [1] two or more of the partners, or [2] one or more of the partners and
one or more third persons;
c. Retirement of all but one partner, and their rights to partnership property are
assigned to the remaining partner,who continues the business, either alone or
with others;
d. Wrongful dissolution by any partner, and the remaining partners continue the
business, either alone or with others; or
e. Expulsion of a partner, and the remaining partners continue the business, either
alone or with others.
2. When the cause of dissolution is the retirement or death of any partner, and business is
continued with the consent of the retired partner or the representative of the deceased
partner, without assignment of their rights to partnership property.
3. When the cause of dissolution is the assignment by all the partners or their representatives
of their rights in partnership property to one or more third persons who promise to pay the
debts and who continue the business of the partnership. [par. 1, Art. 1840, NCC]
ii. Liability of A New Partner
• The liability to the creditors of the dissolved partnership of a new partner in the partnership
continuing the business shall be satisfied out of the partnership property alone. However, he
may, through agreement, assume individual liability. [par. 2, Art. 1840, NCC]
iii. Priority of Creditors of Dissolved Partnership
• Creditors of the dissolved partnership have prior right to any claim of the retired partner or
the representative of the deceased partner against the person or partnership continuing the
business. [par. 3, Art. 1840, NCC]
• This is without prejudice to the right of creditors to set aside any assignment on the ground of
fraud. [par. 4, Art. 1840, NCC]
• Ratio: Business will be hampered if outside creditors are not given superior right. It will be
risky for them to deal with partnerships. Moreover, if partners enjoy priority right, in the
natural order of things, they will prefer their own interests to that of the outside creditors.
Such state will make it easy to defraud non-partner creditors. [Pineda]
a. May have the value of his interest at the date of dissolution ascertained; and
1. An amount equal to the value of his interest in the dissolved partnership with
interest; or
2. At his option or at the option of his legal representative, in lieu of interest, the
profits attributable to the use of his right in the property of the dissolved partnership.
[Art. 1841, NCC]
v. Right to an account
In the absence of any agreement to the contrary, the right to an account of his interest shall
accrue to any partner, or his legal representative at the date of dissolution, as against:
• a. The winding up partners;
• b. The surviving partners; or
• c. The person or partnership continuing the business [Art. 1842, NCC].
4. Limited Partnership
a. Definition
1) A partnership;
2) Formed by two or more persons;
3) Having as members:
i. One or more general partners; and
ii. One or more limited partners.
iii. The limited partners as such shall not be bound by the obligations of the
partnership [Art. 1843, NCC], except to the extent of their capital
contributions.
b. Characteristics
1) A limited partnership is formed by compliance with the statutory requirements. [Art. 1844,
NCC]
2) The business is controlled or managed by one or more general partners, who are personally
liable to creditors. [Arts. 1848 and 1850, NCC]
3) One or more limited partners contribute to the capital and share in the profits but do not
manage the business and are not personally liable for partnership obligations beyond their
capital contributions. [Arts. 1845, 1848 and 1856, NCC]
4) Obligations or debts are paid out of the partnership assets and the individual property of the
general partners. [Art. 1843, NCC]
5) The limited partners may have their contributions back subject to conditions prescribed by
law. [Arts. 1844 and 1957, NCC]
1. For general partners, to secure capital from others while retaining control and supervision
for the business;
2. For limited partners, to have a share in the profits without risk of personal liability.
e. Formation
General Requirements
1. Sign and swear to a certificate stating the items in Art. 1844, NCC; and
2. File for record the certificate in the SEC. [Art. 1844, NCC] A limited partnership is formed if there is
substantial compliance in good faith with the requirements. [Art. 1844, NCC]
1. In relation to third persons, the partnership is general, unless they recognized that the firm is a
limited partnership; and
2. As between the partners, the partnership remains limited, since they are bound by their
agreement. [de Leon]
Purpose of Filing
1. To give actual or constructive notice to potential creditors or persons dealing with the
partnership; and
2. To acquaint them with its essential features, including the limited liability of limited partners. [de
Leon]
Firm Name
General rule: The surname of a limited partner shall not appear in the partnership name.
Exceptions:
2. Prior to the time when the limited partner became such, the business had been carried on under
a name in which his surname appeared.
A limited partner whose surname appears in a partnership name contrary to this prohibition is liable
as a general partner to partnership creditors who extend credit without actual knowledge that he is
not a general partner. [Art. 1846, NCC]
If the certificate contains a false statement, one who suffers loss by reliance thereon may hold liable
any party to the certificate who knew the statement to be false:
2. Subsequently, but within a sufficient time before the statement was relied upon to enable
him to cancel or amend the certificate, or to file a petition for its cancellation or amendment [Art.
1847, NCC].
Requisites:
b. Subsequently, but having sufficient time to cancel or amend it, or file a petition for its
cancellation or amendment, and he failed to do so;
2. The person seeking to enforce liability has relied upon the false statement in transacting business
with the partnership; and 3. The person suffered loss as a result of reliance upon such false
statement.
1. A general; and
2. A limited partner, in the same partnership at the same time. This fact must be stated in the
certificate.
Such person shall have:
Except that, in respect to his contribution as a limited partner, he shall have the rights against the
other members which he would have had if he were not also a general partner. [Art. 1853, NCC]
f. Management
General Rule: Only general partners have the right to manage the partnership.
A general partner shall have the rights and powers and be subject to all restrictions and
liabilities of a partner in a partnership without limited partners. Thus, he has general authority over
the business.
Thus, if a limited partner takes part in the control of the business, he becomes liable as a general
partner. [Art. 1848, NCC]
However, written consent or ratification by all limited partners is necessary to authorize the
general partners to:
b. Do any act which would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the partnership;
d. Possess partnership property, or assign their rights in specific property, for other than a
partnership purpose;
f. Admit a person as a limited partner, unless the right to do so is given in the certificate;
2. Death;
3. Retirement;
4. Insanity;
5. Civil interdiction; or
6. Insolvency of a general partner, unless the right so to do is given in the certificate [Art. 1850,
NCC]
The contributions of a limited partner may be cash or other property, but not services. [Art.
1845, NCC] A limited partner is liable for partnership obligations when he contributes services
instead of only money or property to the partnership. [de Leon] A limited partner is liable to the
partnership:
1. For the difference between his actual contribution and that stated in the certificate as having
been made; and
2. For any unpaid contribution which he agreed in the certificate to make in the future, at the time
and on the conditions stated in the certificate. [par. 1, Art. 1858, NCC]
1. Specific property stated in the certificate as contributed by him, but which was not contributed or
which has been wrongfully returned; and
2. Money or other property wrongfully paid or conveyed to him on account of his contribution. [par.
2, Art. 1858, NCC]
These liabilities can be waived or compromised only by the consent of all members. Such waiver or
compromise, however, shall not affect the right to enforce said liabilities of a creditor:
2. Whose claim arose, after the filing or before a cancellation or amendment of the certificate,
to enforce such liabilities. [par. 3, Art. 1858, NCC]
Even after a limited partner has rightfully received the return in whole or in part of his capital
contribution, he is still liable to the partnership for any sum, not in excess of such return with
interest, necessary to discharge its liabilities to all creditors:
2. Whose claims arose before such return. [par. 4, Art. 1858, CC]
A person:
3. Whose name appears in the certificate as a general partner, or who is not designated as a
limited partner, is not personally liable as a general partner by reason of his exercise of the rights of
a limited partner, provided:
a. On ascertaining the mistake, he promptly renounces his interest in the profits of the business
or other compensation by way of income [Art. 1852, NCC];
b. He does not participate in the management of the business [Art. 1848, NCC]; and c. His
surname does not appear in the partnership name. [Art. 1846, NCC]
General rule: A limited partner is not liable as a general partner. His liability is limited to the extent
of his contributions. [Art. 1843, NCC]
Exceptions: The limited partner is liable as a general partner when:
1. His surname appears in the partnership name, with certain exceptions. [par. 2, Art. 1846, NCC]
3. The certificate contains a false statement of which he knows and which was relied upon, resulting
in loss. [Art. 1847, CC]
In cases (1) and (2), the limited partner is entitled to reimbursement by the general partner/s.
Ratio: The general partner/s may not have been aware of such false statement.
On due application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any separate creditor of a limited partner,
the court may:
1. Charge his interest with payment of the unsatisfied amount of such claim;
3. Make all other orders, directions and inquiries which the circumstances of the case may require.
The interest so charged may be redeemed with the separate property of any general partner, but
may not be redeemed with partnership property. [Art. 1862, NCC]
Note: In a general partnership, the interest may be redeemed with partnership property with the
consent of all the partners whose interests are not charged. [Art. 1814, NCC]
In General A limited partner shall have the same rights as a general partner to:
1. Require that the partnership books be kept at the principal place of business of the partnership;
3. To demand true and full information of all things affecting the partnership;
4. To demand a formal account of partnership affairs whenever circumstances render it just and
reasonable;
7. To receive the return of his contribution provided the partnership assets are in excess of all its
liabilities. [Art. 1851, NCC]
3. Receive a pro rata share of the partnership assets with general creditors if he is not also a general
partner. [par. 1, Art. 1854, NCC]
Limitations: A limited partner, with respect to his transactions with the partnership, cannot:
2. Receive any payment, conveyance, or release from liability if it will prejudice the right of third
persons. [par.1, Art. 1854, NCC]
Violation of the prohibition is considered a fraud on the creditors of the partnership. [par. 2, Art.
1854, NCC]
A limited partner may receive from the partnership the share of the profits or the compensation
by way of income stipulated for in the certificate.
This right is subject to the condition that partnership assets will still be in excess of partnership
liabilities after such payment. [Art. 1856, NCC] The partnership liabilities being referred to exclude
the liabilities to the limited and general partners.
1. All the liabilities of the partnership, except liabilities to general partners and to limited partners
on account of their contributions, have been paid or there remains property of the partnership
sufficient to pay them;
2. The consent of all members is had, unless the return may be demanded as a matter of right; and
3. The certificate is cancelled or so amended as to set forth the withdrawal or reduction. [par. 1, Art.
1857, NCC]
Note: Once withdrawal has been approved by the SEC and registered, the partnership may no longer
recover the limited partner’s contributions.
The return of his contributions may be demanded, as a matter of right [i.e., even when not all the
other partners consent]:
2. Upon the arrival of the date specified in the certificate for the return; or
3. After the expiration of a 6-month notice in writing given by him to the other partners, if no time is
fixed in the certificate for:
General rule: A limited partner, irrespective of the nature of his contribution has only the right to
demand and receive cash in return for his contribution.
Exceptions: He may receive his contribution in a form other than cash when:
2. All the members of the partnership consent. [par. 3, Art. 1857, NCC]
Settlement of Accounts
Order of Payment
In settling accounts after dissolution, the liabilities of the partnership shall be entitled to payment in the
following order:
1. Those to creditors, including limited partners except those on account of their contributions, in the
order of priority as provided by law;
2. Those to limited partners in respect to their share of the profits and other compensation by way of
income in their contributions;
3. Those to limited partners in respect to the capital of their contributions;
4. Those to general partners other than for capital and profits;
5. Those to general partners in respect to profits;
6. Those to general partners in respect to capital. [par. 1, Art. 1863, NCC]
Note: In settling accounts of a general partnership, those owing to partners in respect to capital enjoy
preference over those in respect to profits.