Rejection of Proposal for Impact Assessment Project

1. Inadequate Understanding of Project Objectives: During the discussion, it became evident

that your agency's understanding of the project's objectives was not aligned with our
requirements. The lack of clarity on key aspects of the study's purpose and expected outcomes
raised concerns about the effectiveness of your proposed approach.

2. Insufficient Methodological Rigor: Your proposal presented limited details on the data
collection methods and tools you intended to utilize for the impact assessment study. The
methodology lacked a comprehensive approach, raising doubts about the accuracy and reliability
of the results.

3. Inadequate Team Composition: We observed that the proposed team lacked the necessary
expertise and experience required for conducting a robust impact assessment in the healthcare
sector. The qualifications of the team members did not sufficiently demonstrate their proficiency
in social science research and data collection methodologies.

4. Lack of Quality Assurance Measures: Your proposal did not adequately outline the strategies
and measures for ensuring data quality throughout the project. Quality assurance is a critical
aspect of any assessment, and the absence of a comprehensive plan raised concerns about the
reliability of the findings.

5. Budgetary Concerns: The financial proposal presented by your agency appeared to be

unbalanced, with significant discrepancies in cost allocation for various project components. The
lack of detailed breakdown and justification for expenses further impacted our confidence in the
financial viability of the project.