Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Latin
View all posts by Spencer McDaniel November 22, 2019
You often hear people talk about the “practical benefits” of learning
Latin, such as being able to understand legal, medical, and scientific
terminology, expanding your vocabulary, and gaining a better
understanding of English grammar. These certainly are real benefits
to learning Latin, but, to be honest, at least on their own, they aren’t
really very good reasons to learn the whole language, for reasons I
will explain in a moment.
There are plenty of apologists for Latin out there who often try to
justify learning Latin by listing these supposed “practical benefits” to
learning Latin that apply to most people. The problem is that, if these
benefits are the only reasons you are studying Latin, and you have no
real interest in the Latin language or in reading Latin literature, then
learning a whole new language may not really be worth it. There are,
however, still very good reasons for learning Latin; they just don’t
necessarily apply to everyone.
In case you are unfamiliar with the usual arguments for why you
should learn Latin, here is a video clip from 1951 that lays most of the
major reasons out quite nicely. It has the added benefit of being
unbelievably cheesy, which means you can laugh (or cringe) at the
cheesiness as you watch along:
Let’s examine some of the reasons given in the video that are still
given today for why everyone should learn Latin, in the order they are
given by the students in the video. I am only going to address the
reasons given by the students, since teacher mostly talks about the
history of Latin and, as far as I could tell, does not actually give a
clear explanation of why students should study it.
Bad Reason #1: Many legal, medical, and scientific terms are
derived from Latin and you need to know Latin to understand
them.
It is certainly true that many legal, medical, and scientific terms are
indeed derived from Latin. It is also certainly true that knowing Latin
will help you understand those terms. The thing is, though, Latin is
an extremely complicated language and it is often difficult for
English-speakers to learn. There is not much point in learning the
whole language from start to finish just to understand legal, medical,
and scientific terms when you can just learn the actual terms
:
themselves.
For instance, to understand the term habeas corpus, you just need to
know that it means “You must have the body” and that it refers to the
legal principle that a person cannot be detained in prison unless the
authority detaining them has a legal justification. You do not
necessarily need to know that habeas is the second-person singular
present active subjunctive form of the second-conjugation verb
habeo, meaning “to have,” functioning as a jussive in this sentence,
or that corpus is the singular accusative form of the neuter third-
declension noun corpus, meaning “body.” All that information about
the grammar is extraneous as far as the meaning of the phrase in a
legal context is concerned.
This reason is often closely tied to reason #2. It is certainly true that
:
learning Latin can help students learn to speak better English,
because learning Latin helps you learn to think about grammar,
inflection, and syntax in ways you do not normally think about when
you are speaking your own native tongue.
The problem here is that Latin grammar does not correspond exactly
to English grammar. In fact, many of the most absurd and annoying
grammar rules in English are ones that were imposed on English by
Latinists for no good reason during the Early Modern Period (lasted
c. 1500 – c. 1750) just because those rules existed in Latin. For
instance, the stupid rule about not splitting infinitives, the stupid rule
about not ending sentences with prepositions, and the stupid rule
about not using “they” as singular were all made up by Latinists to
make English grammar more like Latin.
Indeed, not only does Latin grammar not always line up with English
grammar, but the whole style of writing that is most commonly used
by Latin prose authors has fallen almost completely out of fashion in
contemporary English. There was once a time when it was
fashionable for English writers to write in heavily Latinate prose, but
nowadays people expect the authors they read to sound more like
Ernest Hemingway (lived 1899 – 1961) than Edward Gibbon (lived
1737 – 1794).
In other words, Latin can help you understand English better, but
English is its own language with its own rules and there is not always
a direct correspondence between English and Latin. If you do not
really care about the Latin language and you just want to improve
your English, you are probably better off just studying English
grammar, rather than studying Latin grammar and then trying to
apply it to English. It is just more efficient.
Bad Reason #4: By learning Latin, you can learn more about the
:
government of the Roman Republic and the founding principles
of our government.
First of all, there is actually no reason why you need to learn Latin in
order to learn about ancient Roman government. There are books
about Roman government in English and all the major Roman texts
dealing with how the Roman government worked have been
translated. Obviously, no translation is ever perfect and a translation
can never do justice to the original, but, if all you are interested in are
the basic ideas about how Roman government worked, those details
are pretty clear in English and there is not much reason to learn a
whole new language.
The Founding Fathers drew on all kinds of models when they were
designing our government. They certainly drew some inspiration
from the Roman Republic, but they were actually most deeply
influenced by the English government and by the ideas of the
European Enlightenment. They may have also been influenced to
some extent by the democratic government of ancient Athens, the
government of ancient Sparta, and possibly even the government of
the Iroquois.
:
ABOVE: Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United
States, painted in 1940 by Howard Chandler Christy, depicting how
he imagined the signing of the Constitution of the United States
might have looked.
Bad Reason #5: Learning Latin makes it easier to learn the other
Romance languages later on.
It is certainly true that learning Latin will make it much easier to learn
any of the Romance languages, like Italian, French, Spanish,
Portuguese, Romanian, or any of the others. The problem is, though,
if you learn Latin first and then learn, say, Italian, you are actually
putting in way more effort than you would have put in if you had just
started with Italian. Latin is a whole language of its own and it does
not make sense to learn one language just to make it easier to learn
another language.
If you are only learning Latin because you want to learn one of the
Romance languages, and you have no interest in learning Latin for its
:
own sake, then, quite frankly, if would probably be better for you to
just start with the Romance language you want to learn and forget
about trying to learn Latin first. Maybe if you are planning on learning
all the most common Romance languages, then it might be easier to
learn Latin first, but, if you just want to learn one or two, there is
really no point in learning Latin simply as a means of preparation for
the language or languages you really want to learn.
Now that I have debunked some of the most common bad reasons
for learning Latin, I want talk about the good reasons for why some
people should learn Latin. There are actually quite a few very good
:
reasons why some people should learn Latin, but they are, ironically,
not talked about as much as the bad reasons because they do not
apply to everyone and they are, for the most part, not viewed as
“practical.”
The truth is, I do not think that everyone should learn Latin. There is
simply no need for everyone to know Latin and, for people who do
not enjoy Latin, who have no interest in Latin literature, and who are
not interested in ancient Roman or medieval history, learning Latin
would simply be a waste of time. We do need some people who
know Latin, though, even if it is only to keep the ability to read the
language alive.
Good Reason #1: You want to read texts that were originally
written in Latin in the original language.
Obviously, all the most famous Latin texts have already been
:
translated into English, but no translation is ever perfect and no
translation can never fully capture the spirit of the original. This is
especially the case when it comes to poetry. If you translate a poem
literally from one language to another, the poetry is lost, so
translators have to fiddle around quite a bit with their translations to
make them poetic. As a result of this, when you read a translation of
a Latin poem, you are really reading the translator’s words, not the
original author’s.
If you are really serious about studying Latin literature and you want
to read works of Latin literature in the original language, that is a very
good reason to learn Latin. In fact, it is the reason why I am learning
Latin.
Good Reason #3: You are a Roman Catholic and either you want
to become a priest or you are simply interested in learning Latin
because it is the traditional language of the Roman Catholic
Church.
Good Reason #4: You have a lot of time on your hands and you
want to learn Latin for fun.
There are all kinds of wonderful and amusing things written in Latin:
the love poems of Catullus, the mythic tales of Ovid, the adventure-
filled novels of Apuleius and Petronius, the erotic poems of Sulpicia,
the obscene epigrams of Martial, and, from the modern period, the
bizarre speculations of Athanasius Kircher. There is so much more to
Latin than just Cicero.
:
ABOVE: Portrait of the eccentric German scholar Athanasius Kircher
from his book Mundus Subterraneus (1664)
:
Other ancient languages aside from Latin
You will notice that the ancient Greeks did not even get a name-
check in that 1950s video I showed at the beginning of this article.
This is rather strange, especially considering the fact that, as I
discuss in much greater detail in this other post I have written, there
are about twice as many surviving ancient literary texts written in
Ancient Greek as there are in Latin, since the ancient Greeks began
writing literature about five hundred years before the Romans did
and continued writing literature in their language through the end of
antiquity and up to the present day.
It you have ever seen a complete set of all the works in the Loeb
Classical Library, which contains nearly every major surviving work of
classical literature written in Greek or Latin, you have probably
noticed that the works written in Greek, which have green covers,
make up nearly two thirds of the collection; whereas the works in
Latin, which have red covers, make up only about a third of the
collection.
It is true that there are many works of Latin literature that are not
included in the Loeb Classical Library because they were written
after the end of antiquity and the Loeb Classical Library only includes
works written in ancient times. Nevertheless, the exact same thing
can also be said of Greek; we have all kind of fascinating surviving
:
works that were written in Greek during the Byzantine Period.
Conclusion
If all you are looking for is to improve your English vocabulary and
learn to understand jargon, though, it may be more efficient for you
to study Greek and Latin roots first, rather than trying to go all-in and
fully learn the language. Then, if studying the roots gets you
interested in actually learning to read Latin, then you should take
Latin.