Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Everything that is done in the western law courts is rational. “We want to find a
logical and rational way of determining guilt” thus the judge sitting there is
deciding cases in a systematic and a rational way – decided cases and law
He did not attribute any evolutionary sequence to his ideas. Rather he postulated
the different types of rationality and irrationality that characterized different legal
systems. And he defines irrationality or legal irrationality as failure to be guided by
legal rules. He in turn, divides this into formal irrationality for instance in
situations where decisions are guided by means beyond ordinary reasoning for
instance, trial by ordeal or trial by oracle – these are not rational yaws………he also
identified substantive…..irrationality where the decision maker reacts solely to the
individual case before him, he takes the decision based on the case before him
and not because of a chain of cases. This is exemplified by the Moslem Qapi, in
the market place – resolving disputes on the hoof – the case is judge as it is seen
by rationality but this rationality does not form within the framework of a broad
rationality.
A legal system shows substantive rationality when it based on principles derived
from an ideological system backed by procedural restraints as well as a certain
…..of uniformity that results from basic adherence – adherence to basic judicial
precedents. It only attains formal logical rationality when it rules are cast through
the use of abstract concepts and templates proceeding from legal thought in a
complete system. He says that such rationalism is the product of rationalism of
western culture. There are many aspects of the sociological school. What I have
done is to unfold first principles of the sociological school.
- If there are any questions
5. Emergence of Charles Darwin – the weak will have to die and the strong
survive.
6.