DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY State of Maryland Case No. 50004004524 Robert Bozgoz, Defendant AFFIDAVIT OF CHRISTOPHER KING 1. |, Christopher King, under oath and penalty of law, state the following: lam an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Representative for Robert Bozgoz, the Defendant in this case; 2. 1am a former Assistant States Attorney for the State of Ohio, an Independent Journalist and Videographer. | am also a Whistleblower, particularly regarding mortgages and the Courts. | first met Margaret Bozgoz in December 2016 when she came to Tacoma, WA for a Probate Court Hearing; 3. On April 2, 2019, | first became involved in the Civil Rights case of Margaret and Robert Bozgoz when Margaret contacted me after Voncelle James's Director, Angela Kendrix directed VA Security to detain Margaret Bozgoz when she was delivering Robert's, resignation to the Veterans Benefit Administration Headquarters in Washington, DC on that date. | have been tracking this case ever since with regards to the District Court of DC Civil Rights Case, the Peace Orders Voncelle James procured against Margaret and Robert Bozgoz and the criminal charges against them including this case against Robert;4. | have been involved as a litigator and participant in Court cases involving Peace Orders and have never lost; 5. | am aware that there was no basis in law or fact for the initial Peace Order in the first place as VA manager Voncelle James materially misrepresented the facts of the Bozgoz attempted Service of a Federal Summons/Complaint on or about June 6, 2019; 6. Toit, | have read documents that falsely claim that Lieutenant Colonel Margaret ‘Sue Bozgoz was present during the attempted Ser "@, and that she was traveling in a van that was likely loaded with weapons; 7. Before legally placing the Attempted Service on YouTube in several videos | carefully reviewed the footage and noted that their process server Lance did not enter the property of Voncelle James and yet a man | believe to be Voncelle James’ husband got in his face and used threatening language towards him such as “You [are] on my block now... That's itl” and "You're stalking my wife.” To which Lance the process server properly stated the Law: “I'm not stalking anybody. This here is a Legal Summons.”Perjury and Treason Help VA and Staff Crush Whistleblowers in Court Final itp: Lance respectfully asked him “Sir could you please Summons. Legal Summons; 9. As such, the Protective Order was not in any ways viable because lawful attempts of Service of Process simply do not give rise to any criminal sanction10 However when Margaret Bozgoz attempted to inform the Montgomery County Circuit Court via a Motion to Dismiss and Subject Matter Jurisdiction challenge under Justice Debra L. Dwyer that no liability may lie for a lawful attempted Service of Process she initially refused to allow the attached legal summary to be used by Bozgoz to dismiss the case (Exhibit A); 11. After Judge Dwyer allowed Margaret Bozgoz to make the argument that Court somehow produced audio recordings that did not include a reference to the argument whatsoever and Justice Dwyer was wrong to ignore such argument in my opinion and under the Law because the Protective Order must not be a byproduct of demonstrable lies or fraud upon the Court, see Petersen v. Maryland, Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 816279001 -- https://mdcourts.gow/sites/default/fles/unreported-opinions/2726s16 pat, 12. Petersen holds that the offense of violating a Protective Order involves three elements; (1) the issuance and service of a Protective Order upon the respondent; (2) the viability of that Protective Order at the time of the charged conduct; and (3) the actions that violate the provisions of the order; 13. Throughout my association with the Bozgoz Family, they have been quite fastidious about NOT unlawfully contacting Voncelle James in spite of the unlawful Peace Order. Robert allegedly made but one mistake in responding to my email inquiry as to why Mr. Bozgoz' Workers’ Compensation Hearing was being delayed. The details of the event are as follows: 14, On July 26, 2019, Robert was extremely stressed over his Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA) Appeal Hearing that was scheduled for that morning,15. Robert and | were exchanging text messages in an attempt to alleviate his stress. Robert and his wife, Margaret Sue Bozgoz had arrived at the Frances Perkins, Department of Labor Headquarters (DOL HQ) in Washington, DC minutes before 10:00 AM that day. Robert had misplaced his hearing letter and was frustrated by the pace of being vetted by the DOL HQ security. He was thinking his hearing was scheduled for 10:00 AM and each passing minute caused his anxiety to become elevated. 16, Finally, several minutes after 10:00 AM, DOL HQ security and the FECA Hearings Examiner determined that Robert's hearing was scheduled for 11:00 AM that day and he was given a security badge and requested to wait in the lobby adjacent to the security desk. 17. _ Robert then texted me informing me that he was now somewhat relieved that he was not late for his hearing and had now been given a visitor's badge. 18. Robert a few minutes later texted me again, stating that the FECA Hearings Examiner had come down to greet them and to explain that the VA had informed her they were sending a representative to the hearing. 19. Robert then texted me what his other ADA Advocate, which is his wife, Margaret Sue Bozgoz, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Retired then informed the FECA Hearings Examiner that if Voncelle James was coming to the hearing that she would move to exclude her because of the Peace Order she was granted by the Montgomery County District Court in case number 0602SP007732019 required that Robert stay away from her. 20. At approximately 10:40 AM, Robert texted me a third time stating the FECA Hearings Examiner returned again stated that she would like to take them up for the hearing but she had to wait at least until the originally scheduled time for the hearing before she could begin. a21. Approximately every 5-10 minutes, after 11:30 AM, Robert texted me counting down more time indicating he was becoming extremely anxious about the start time of the hearing. After receiving a number of these texts, | sent an email out which included Robert as a cc addressee. The email, in pertinent part, states as follows: “Am | to understand that Mr. Bozgoz's Workers Comp hearing is late and that the VA refused to allow it to be recorded? For shame for shame. So much for transparency. | wonder what's in the VA's trick bag for today? c (Exhibit B) To which Robert replied, The DOL said it could not (accept Service on Voncelle James). We don't know the the VA's position because we haven't seen anyone. Should we open with a Motion to Waive the hearing in lieu of DOL granting my claim?” (Exhibit B); 22. _ Robert then continued to text me every few minutes until they were brought upstairs for the hearing at approximately 12:20 PM; 23. _ | received an email from Robert on August 9, 2019, because he had received a summons informing him about a possible violation of the Peace Order 2-3 days before. Upon receipt of the copy of the summons and application for statement of charges, | knew what had happened, the email which he intended only for me to see had been inadvertently sent to everyone listed on the email;24, — We spoke later that day and we discussed that he should file a Motion and Affidavit explaining what had happened leading up to these charges on July 26, 2019. He sent me a copy of the Motion to Quash Summons he completed on or about August 23, 2019 outlining that his email had been inadvertently sent to all addressees on my email and that he had only intended the reply for my eyes only; 25. Inany case, after reading Robert's email reply, it is abundantly clear that Robert was only addressing my latest email in the thread regarding the Workers’ Comp Hearing and that he did not realize Voncelle James was included in the underlying message addressees because he was suffering an exacerbation of his PTSD at a late Worker's Comp Hearing and was using his mobile phone as opposed to a full computer screen; 26. Significantly, his email is devoid of any comment regarding Voncelle James and his ‘comments are complimentary to the VA and not negative about the VA in any manner, 27. Furthermore, Robert's reply was a confidential communication between him and | as his Americans with Disabilities Act Representative and should be afforded limited, if any, evidentiary value. 28. I would like to have participated in the hearing telephonically and | am quite incredulous that the Court allegedly has no provision to allow me to call in, have the testimony and observations aired in Open Court and recorded; 29. | am incredulous because Maryland has laws regarding telephonic participation and should be allowed at any time requested by an ADA Advocate and because I have run Courtroom video in six (6) states and hundreds of hearings since 1998 and have never seen a Court that did not have provisions for telephonic participation30. The Court appears to be in violation of MD §3-513 Testimony Taken by Telephone: (6) whether transmission of the witness's testimony will be from a wired handset, a wireless handset connected to the landline, or a speaker phone (e) Good Cause. A court may find that there is good cause to allow the testimony of a witness to be taken by telephone if (1) the witness is otherwise unavailable to appear because of age, infirmity, or iliness; (2) personal appearance of the witness cannot be secured by subpoena or other reasonable means; (3) a personal appearance would be an undue hardship to the witness; or (4) there are any other circumstances that constitute good cause for allowing the testimony of the witness to be taken by telephone, section applies to the witness's unavailability to appear personally in unavailability to testify. Committee note: Thi court, not to the witnes: 31. Near the last, but definitely not least, | reviewed the Court of Appeals Decision in Coburn v. Coburn, 342 Md. 244 (1996), and note that Mr. Bozgoz's conduct is not what the Statute was designed to address: Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women in this country. According to some estimates, there are approximately four million incidents of domestic violence against women annually. The problem of domestic abuse, however, remained largely ignored by our society until the last two decades, when national efforts toward legal and social reform began to surface... The purpose of the domestic abuse statute is to protect and aid victims of domestic abuse by providing an immediate and effective remedy. The statute provides for a wide variety and scope of available remedies designed to separate the parties and avoid future abuse. Thus, the primary goals of the statute are preventive, protective and remedial, not punitive. The legislature did not design the statute as punishment for past conduct; it was instead intended to prevent further harm to the vi (Emphasis in Original).31. To my review, and to the review of any rational person Mr. Bozgoz simply did not engage in any threatening or domestic violence or any violence whatsoever rendering the underlying violation as not being viable per para 12 supra, moreover the alleged violation of such order — responding to an email sent me, his ADA Advocate who inquired about a late Worker's Compensation Hearing - does not give rise to a violation either, particularly because Mr. Bozgoz did not even address Voncelle James nor did he speak harshly of the VA; therefore this is no more a violation that incidentally passing her in traffic across a busy intersection. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. Dated this > Christopher King, JD day of November, 2019. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this _'8" day of November, 2019 Shecetioe in the State of Washington. tinny, mente Ursast Noa Notary Public for WashingtonAPPENDIX A STATE V, BOZGOZ PRIMER ~ PROCESS SERVING IS NOT A CRIME Under Harassment any action under §3-803 is an absolute impossibility ab initio because even if Defendant engaged in an “alarming course of conduct” he was indeed participating in a valid attempt to effectuate Legal Service of Process on both occasions. ‘The Statute reads in the conjunc §3-803. (a) A person may not follow another in or about a public place or maliciously engage in a course of conduct that alarms or seriously annoys the other: (1) with the intent to harass, alarm, or annoy the other; (2) after receiving a reasonable warning or request to stop by or on behalf of the other; and (3) without a legal purpose. (emphasis added) This means that even if Defendant intended to harass or to alarm or to annoy, etc. unless there was some overt act of violence threatened the Defendant must have been present without a legal purpose. Issuing a Surnmons and Complaint, or driving a car to assist someone in issuing a Sumons and Complaint constitutes a legal purpose the last time | checked. Thus, even if Voncelie James or her husband had told Defendant or his son Lance to stop, such edict would have been of absolutely no Legal Moment whatsoever because of the valid legal purpose, again, service of a Summons and Complaint against Voncelle James. ‘An erroneous prior Court Order forbade Defendant from publishing the proof about his assertions, however on further review it was perfectly legal for a third party journalist to post the video because there is no prohibition of running it on a public street so you're goddamn right | published it, and it exonerates Defendant and implicates Voncelle James and her ghetto husband for issuing threats to the process server i.e. “You on MY block now... You on MY block now.... That’s IT!” LINK TO VIDEO Turning to Stalking we find more of the same. § 3-802. Stalking. (a) "Stalking" defined.- in this section, "stalking" means a malicious course of conduct that includes approaching or pursuing another where the person intends to place or knows or reasonably should have known the conduct would place another in reasonable fear etc. etc. however:APPENDIX A STATE V. BOZGOZ PRIMER - PROCESS SERVING IS NOT A CRIME (b) Prohibited.- The provisions of this section do not apply to conduct that is: (2) performed to ensure compliance with a court order; (2) performed to carry out a specific lawful commercial purpose; or {3) authorized, required, or protected by local, State, or federal law. OK so the last time | checked, effecting Legal Service of Process is at once something that is performed to carry out a specific lawful commercial purpose and is clearly authorized by, and protected by local, State and Federal law. So how could Zuberri Williams have ever allowed this case to go through? Sheer incompetence, bribery or other undue influence is the only answer ‘As such, Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Section 3-1503 does not apply in this case on a de novo review because there was no possible way that Defendant was in violation of any of the enumerated sections contemplated by §3-1503. 816.599.0039 § 3-802, Stalking. (a) "Stalking" defined.- In this section, "stalking" means a malicious course of conduct that includes approaching or pursuing another where the person intends to place or knows or reasonably should have known the conduct would place another in reasonable fear etc. etc. however: (b) Prohibited.- The provisions of this section do not apply to conduct that is: (2) performed to ensure compliance with a court order; (2) performed to carry out a specific lawful commercial purpose; or (3) authorized, required, or protected by local, State, or federal law. OK so the last time | checked, effecting Legal Service of Process is at once something that is performed to carry out a specific lawful commercial purpose and is clearly authorized by, and protected by local, State and Federal law. So how could Zuberri Williams have ever allowed this case to go through? Sheer incompetence, bribery or other undue influence is the only answer.Gmail - Today's Feature Presentation: The backstory on VA Whist. hitps//mail google. com/mailw/0%ik~3aSb8272b32view=piésear.. APPENDIX M1 Gmail [ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz 10f7 Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whistleblowers Robert Bozgoz Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:45 AM To: Christopher King , ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz Ce: Marti Oakley , Whitegalacticwizard , maryetta beck , Jeff Blochowicz-2012 civ email , abuckley 106@gmail.com, Eileen Eddieman , Michael Reid “michaelereidS@grnail.com>, Ms Wandra J , Jay DeNofrio <, James Sizer , donna hairston “dhairston82@gmail. com>, matthew.kahn@usdoj.gov, christopher. wunsch@va.goy, Ishane@militarytmes.com, dslack@usatoday com, Ashley Meyer , VBAVACO Brown Kevin kevin. brown7@va.g0v>, Scoon Lois , margarita devin@va gov, "VBAVACO Lawrence Paul R" , robert wilkie@va.gov, "VBAVACO Davis Theresa E.” , \VBAVACO James Voncelle , VBAVACO Clark Wille , VBAVACO Kendrix Angela , Danny Evans , Jeanette Grifin , "L. Marie Anderson” , VBAVACO Frueh Mike , "VBAVACO Burke Ronald S." ‘The DOL said it could not. We don't know VA's position because we haven't seen anyone. ‘Should we open with @ Motion to waive the hearing in lieu of DOL granting my claim? Get Outlook for iOS (On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:43 AM -0400, "Christopher King” wrote: ‘Am | to understand that Mr. Bozgoz's Workers Comp hearing is late and thal the VA refused to allow it to be recorded? For shame for shame. So much for transparency. I wonder what's in the VA's trick bag today? c Sent from my iPhone On Jui 25, 2019, at 6:05 AM, Christopher King wrote: Great Morning to All There will be a feature presentation later, shot in 4K. This is just the warm up. ‘Well folks we have a white male — a former JAG Attorney mind you — being discriminated against by a black female at the VA The real color however is the color of money. Take a look. As you do, you will see that yesterday's Congressional Hearings are all lipstick on a pig. They use the Whistleblower 11/15/2019, 12:08 PM.Gmail 20f7 “Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whist. bttps:/imail.google.com/mailw0?ik=3aSb8272b38view=ptdesear.. Office of Accountability to weed out the whistleblowers, and put the screws to them. And Judge Jackson is clearly financially tied to Big Pharma and JP Morgan doing Big Time oniracting with the VA. | know this stuff because many of the people you see featured in the stories | describe are speaking with me in more depth than covered by Major Press. It's just so... crappy People risk their lives for our Country. People go to work for the VA often as Veterans. Then they get the shaft from the VA. I hate law. I's so.... ILLEGAL. http:/ichristopher-king.blogspot.com/2019/07 /kingcast-says-perjury-and-treason-help.html https:/imww. youtube com/watch?v=4NGVENSSh3E Buchanon Report live yesterday. http://www. blogtalkradio. com/ouchananinvestigations/201 |9/07/24/whistleblowers-robert-and- sue-bozgozre-the-rico-lawsuit-they-fled-against-va-e ?foclid= IwAR3162pnoSkY6gM4urVpheHIkYhiqX 1RPLyOIYtMY_QWKKT7-BIZBI35Pn3Q USA Today hnttps://www.usatoday. com/story/news/politics/2019/07/23/va-whistleblower-office-head- testifies-implementing-improvements/1808233001/?foclid= IWAROSTLSKUKOA1ELYivkSTqDJn3YfDdrC6X72VbZ7KQgB400Gmyl880VeKpQ. NPR last year https: /Awww.npr.org/2018/06/21/601127245/for-va-whistleblowers-a-culture-of-fear-and- retaliation Connecting Vets https://connectingvets radio. com/articles/va-defends-against-whistieblower-allegations- congress-hearing?foclid=IwARODQué Viel ol jOtphspe4JgOBWVZC3OpSHnL. Ly8ZeFrCBOq|35ffhSXM_ aa Military Times last year https:/www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/06/25/whistleblowers-testify- that-fear-retribution-are-still-widespread-at-val Christopher King, J.D. 617.543.8085 p 206.299.9333 f (On July 24, 2019 at 8:07 AM, Christopher King wrote: Great Morning Counselor, Just as | advised the Bozgoz's to allow your extension | respectfully suggest you accept Service on the 11/15/2019, 12:08 PMmail - Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whist.. 30f7 https:/imail google.com/mail/w/0ik~3aSb8272b34view=ptéssear... remaining Defendants: Voncell James should have been criminally charged in her escapades to prevent SoP, Christopher Wunsch is not much better sending his dog out and now their own Process Server conveniently takes & powder. [i have plenty to say to him man to man but for now | am saying to you to exercise some client control ‘and tell your cient you are accepting Service on behalf ofthe remaining Defendants and get on with the litigation, Best regards, c Sent from my iPhone (On Jul 24, 209, at 6:44 AM, ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz wrote: Hello Marti, lam ccing other Whistleblowers above. We look forward to talking to you. | updated the slides (see 256 slides below) as we were in a rush to get an affidavit and put them in the mail [sent to Courts Yesterday. Iwill make minor corrections later. Our goal is to send out a lesson’s learned to help ‘others who might not have the funds to fight the ADMIN Trickery GAME. We just had fake criminal charges against us dropped on Friday (Please see Chris’ video : https:/iwww.youtube.com/watch?v=h4s_uDFOVY4 and | | https:/Avwww.youtube.comiwatch?v=_fhXguTVagw&t=5s ). As you can see: | have documented fraud waste, abuse, privacy, 1973/ADA violations at VA HQ in DC for over 2 years.| taped everything as it pertains to VA corruption coming from the 1%... They use scapegoats. Ihave over 15 videos | would send you the link, | have a fake gag order that suggest that | temped to remove the media. We we were on the Buchanan show last night: http:/Awww.thebuchananreport.com/?fbclid=IWAR 1r27HbXGzYHFtwiTPpUWqPBvrp fQ_Lofk8XID_9FwN3AxuCgiAm7NIGHA Look forward to talking to you next week as our case is big and VA knows it. Here is the news report they sent out 2 hours after we shared our slides to the US Attorney. | am sending what we sent them and the slides. See attached 8 ‘On Wed, Jui 24, 2019 at 6:18 AM Marti Oakley wrote: Good morning! Please excuse my delay in responding to you. | went through your slide show and reviewed all that you sent to me. | would very much like to have you on the show. This would have to be in August after the Summit. | would also like to speak with you prior to that to go over your information in preparation for the show. thank you for contacting me. 11/15/2019, 12:08 PMGmail - Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whist. pttps//mail.google.com/mail/wl0?ik=3aSb8272b3&-view=ptérsear... 40f7 Marti Oakley From: ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 6:07 PM To: tsrad1 @outlook.com ; Whitegalacticwizard ; Robert Bozgoz ; ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz cadaadvocatesuebozgoz@gmail.com>; adaAdvocateSueBozgoz@pm.me Subject: Fwd: Update and SHARE - Hello Marti Oakley, Rob and Sue Bozgoz here. We are Whistle blowers we are currently in the middle ofa big fraud, waste and abuse case with VA ‘and its investors, Please see below and attached. ‘ne are interested in exposing the corruption before something happens to us, our family and or we got e gag order as our case involves fraud, waste, abuse, privacy act violations, contracts, 1973 fehab violations anc etc (See attached) Forwarded message ~ From ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz Date: Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:36 AM Subject: Re: Update end SHARE - To: Kahn, Matthew (USADC) , Christopher King cuingeasi@55@icloud com>, , Robert Bozgoz Ce: maryetia beck , , Jeff Blochowicz-2012 civ email , Brown, Kevin, VBAVACO , Klein, Anne M wine City, MN - Contractor , Kenctix, Angela, VBAVACO angela Kendrix@va.gov>, Whitegalactiowizard , Ms Wandra J , Leary, Gail M - Tampa, FL , Eileen Eddiemen , Evans, Danny (Cerdin) , Michael Reia , Anderson, Deborah, VBAVACO , ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz , Michael Volpe , donna hairston , Haynes, Fred (USADC) , Wunsch, Christopher, VBAVACO , Nicky Fulgium , AdaAdvocateSueBozgoz , , Lamont Saxon , Scoon, Lois, (ORM) , Agee, Karen Y,, VBAVACO , Brit, Jada L. (ORM) , Davis, Theresa E. \BAVAGO , Burke, Ronald S., VBAVACO , Clark, Wile, VBAVACO , Lehua Kalani , Frueh, Mike, VBAVACO , Willams, Denise, VBAVACO , Derrick Flood , Devlin, Margarita, VBAVACO Margarita Deviin@va gov>, Lawrence, Paul R., VBAVACO , Richardson, Gary, (ORM) , Russel Honore’ Matt, For the record: This is a whistle blower legal message designed to share and expose corruption with, ‘the public as we dont have anything to hide. We also went to update you as we dont want you to be 11/15/2019, 12:08 PM5of7 «Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whist. hitps://mail.google.com/maiwOTik=3a5b827203&view=pi&sear.. ‘caught off guard. ur process server, Harry told us yesterday “not” te contact him unt after 24/48 hours. As you (and Va. Genoral Counsel know) our suspense to deliver the remaining summons to each individual (in their own individual capacity) is due in 48 hours. ‘This means our process server won't make the suspense to serve the VA Defendants. ’As you and your Harvard Attomeys know, we submitted a motion to the cour to order the Marshal to Aare tne remaining summons when VA General Counsel (James Byrnes)VA Policy and Security Director (Darryl Blackwell) VA Leadership (Wikie, Frueh, Devin, Clarke, Burke, and ete) and your Office (Mir Haynes) coordinated with the MD state courts via Voncelle James to bring false charges, Ggainat us (eee 14 June motion and hear VJ motion under oath on 6 & 13 June), Records show they Started conspiring on 4 June with Haynes email to Rober), | mention the above because We need to come up with a plan B ref: issuing the remaining summons. Because we are transparent and have nothing to hide to you or the publi, Our plan B is to ask the ‘courts today for Reasonable Accommodations. We will ask the court (under the 1880 ADA Act - Tie I) to allow VA General Counsel (Mr. Jame, Byrnes team) fo deliver the summons to each defendant in their own individual capacity. Under Tite 2 Section 126, man-made rules, regulations, and policies can be changed so Service-Disabled Veterans can receive equal opportunities and access into the courts fairly. As the records, hearings under oath, recording, and tapes show as of date nothing has been fait. ‘We will also ask under Title Il of the 1890 ADA Act that we are allowed to send the remaining claims ‘out today via email and or certified mail. Again this will be done under Title Il. BLUF: We need to know in advance if you, the US Attorney's Office for the United States plan to deny our RA request too "or" will you" as a US Army Officer will work with us as Robert, and | are Service-Disabled Veterans who can connect with you as Army Officers with high morals and ethics. Robert knows Ethies and knows whet you have been taught because he wrote Ethics Law for the FORSCOM/Amy (You). Therefore we kindly request a response. {Also for the record: VA's District RA Manager, SFC (*) Chris Wunsch refused proper service with Harry last week. VA's District RA Manager SFC (Retired) Chris Wunsch lied and told Harry that he did not know that anyone was suing him. This is not a fact because | reminded Mr. Wunsch myself in Sune 2018, that we would be suing him in his own individual capactty for violating Roberts ADA/1973 Rehabiltation Act afier they forced him to return to work against his board-certified doctor's order ‘and forced him to come back to work under protest. They also denied him RA FMLA ieave (see slides) { also sent Chris Wunsch the RA federal laws, VA slides and took the VA RA test for Chris Wunsch {95 he violated my husband's civil nights as | wanted to teach Chris because VA wasn't teaching him, ‘Angela, Ms. Delvin, and Voncelle the ADA rules. \Voncelle mentioned under oath on 6 June to Judge Williams that the General Counsel (Mr. Byme) has an ADA certification program for all ADA reps, perhaps VA leaders need to attend this program ‘oF get someone from UDC to design it. Aliso, can you ask Haynes, Blackwell and General Counsel (Mr. Bynes) to remind Chris Wunsch that he, Voncelle and Angela are the main perpetrators (scapegoats) in this lawsuit as they tell us regularly that they do nothing without management's and General Counsel guidance? Besides, Brown and Candace have informed us via (text and emailed) that VA leadership has meetings about cour case) ither way, we (and the public) knows Chris receives emails as this case has been an open book for 2 years now. He was also briefed on § June by General Counsel, Haynes, and Blackwell (see 11/15/2019, 12:08 PM.Gmail - Today's Feature Presentati 60f7 12 back story on VA Whist. hups:l/mail.google.com/mailiw/07i attached emailislides) that everyone was informed (see email and slides) ‘Aiso, will you kindly ask VA General Counsel to direct Chris Wunsch to acknowledge service of the process like they told Angela Kendrix to accept service of process on 6 June (for 31 May?) FY: Angela Kenctix sent an email on 6 June to me at approx 3:00 pm after she (VA Leaders and the world) saw Voncelle James and her husband assault my process server (son) and his driver (Robert) performing duty. Also for the record, Robert drove Lance to serve VA Leadeon 6 June because Lance's fiancé sister, D, Stephanie Espinosa died on 2 June 2019 and Lance needed to return to San Francisco fast for the funeralmemorial, Had VA (Haynes and Blackwell and Gen Counsel) kept their promise, they might not have played their trick on us until "after" the funeral which we could not attend because of the false criminal charges see: htips:/wurw. google. com/amp/siwaw.mercurynews.com/2019/06/02/woman-who died-taking-selie-at- ‘eagle-falls-identified-by-police/amp! However, | was able to make Stephanie a video in her honor htips:/im youtube, com/watch ?feature=youtu be&v=yvR_EIXXWAS would show you Robert's younger's brother’s memorial, but | have a fake gag order and void order to keep VA's fraud waste and abuse close hold. We lost Rober's younger on 2 Feb 2019 after his stroke: https:/www.legacy.com/obituaries/neraldandnews! obituary. aspx?n=cari-server-bozgaz8pid=191480844 am telling you in advance should we miss another funeral or should VA and its associates harm ‘any of my family members, | 2m holding everyone [any you] associated with this conspiracy accountable as we took an cath to protect never to harm. ‘Angela, VA leaders, VA employees (am CCing them above), VA Policy and Securty Director Darryl Blackwell and VA General Counsel (James Byrnes) also knew on 6 June at approx 0900 that Voncelle James filed (1) false police report against Robert (2) perjured herself on the peace order by stating "I" was there at her house with weapons and (3) filed false criminal charges). Angola contacted me “after talking to General Counselas per the evidence | sent you. ‘Angela also knew that Vencelle was commiting these felonies because on 6 June 2019, when Judge ‘Wiliams asked Voncalle James, "Are attomey's working on this case?” Voncelle James responded by stating, "Yes, my boss, Angela and the VA Attomeys are working together to dismiss this case because we have immunity." Vencelle James also said, "We expect this case to be thrown out on 24 June’ \Vonceil also mentioned on 13 June under oath at the fake hearing that: (1) She violated the ADA law on 12 Jan 2018, (2) that VA Attorney's, (3) Your Office (Haynes) and (4) Judge Jackson are talking land are working together against our case with merit and as it pertains to proper service. ‘After hesring Voncelle James testimony, the public might guess that Voncelle James maybe a risk for VA General Counsels strategic operations ref: VA retaliation (On 6 June Angela accepted service under the guidance of General Counsel for her 31 May ‘summons (see slides or ask Angela) By Ange'a's and General Counsel's action ref: time Angela acospted service of process on 6 June [at epproximately 3:00 pm], we (and the public) believe VA and General Counsel are throwing Voncell James under the bus. Otherwise, Voncelle would not have committed perjury on 13 June. Voncelle ‘James lied not knowing that we had the 8 June video of Voncelie stating she [and va] had a pre- planned the protective order. She said this at 0700. She filed and committed perjury at 7:13 am, and ‘11:17 am (see the police report and peace order. Aithough Vencelle James (1) denied my family and | of our civil rights that we would have died for, (2) slanderes our names and (3) brought false criminal charges against us we would be remiss informing you (US States Aitomey’s Office) to kindly tell (1) General Counsel, (2) VA Leadership, and (3) Angela Kendrix that they (as leaders) have an obligation to protect Voncelle James. Ournew service processor, Harry informed us last week after Chris Wunsch dodged service that (1) rhe meets with VA General Counsel at least once a month ref: Service of process work. Therefore, (2) 11/15/2019, 12:08 PM.Gmail - Today's Feature Presentation: The back story on VA Whist. hnips:/mail.google.com/mail/w/0?ik~3a508272b3view=ptdsear.. 70f7 we know General Counsel talks to Hany, Having said that, please let us know if the VA has paid him off so we can pre-planned forward. Lasty, and forthe record, notice that Mr. Haynes and VA's FOIA Reps Guyn Smith's ema are cut Cramer ‘bid Mr. Haynes really retire? Also, can you find out why VA Gwyn Smith would send us (°) oor rA response without a case number on 28 Jun 2019 (2) Why Chris Wunsch's perured himset on TO FOIA document (see his affidavit ref: RA). And (3) please also find out why Gwyn deleted Nee in ne ene rete too Ike Haynes? We were wondering if this (FOIA response on 20 June 2018) ert be another game that nas anyning to do with your and Harvard graduate response back to us due 07 29 July Be a ee ay sighted too many times to count and cannot recognize the truth with the VA ands associates, Seen et ris “another” game that has something to do with why the VA violated the 1973 eee talon Act from 11 Jan 2018 to date? Please see attached slides ~ page 104 as we predict in Fea you wil attempt to throw out our case by stating 2016 accommadation never happened {Just leading in the foxhole before you do it. ‘Looking forward to hearing from you andior any of the defendants. vit s Be: Also, can you or VA General Counsel remind the defendants that we will sue them in their own individual capacity as RICO won't work otherwise. ‘On Sun, Jul 21, 2049 at 11:48 PM ADA ADVOCATE Sue Bozgoz wrote: Update on slides as we have several interviews this week. fe want to stay transparent as this case is of public interest. Nobody has anything to hide, I have always wanted our case to be used as an example on "what not to do". Please share our story and encourage others to watch the following: https:/Awww. youiube.com/watch?v=ftBeTIDY ‘Also please see slide 104, Just in case you want to hide the fact Rob did not have R/A. SEE VA'S AFFIDAVIT. | | || |. 11/15/2019, 12:08 PMFrom: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts. gov Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:47 PM To: ECFMail DCD Subject: Activity in Case 1:19-cv-00239-AB) BOZGOZ et al v, JAMES et al Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. "NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court District of Columbia Notice of Electronic Filing ‘The following transaction was entered on 11/21/2019 at 1:46 PM EDT and filed on 11/21/2019 Case Name: BOZGOZ et al v. JAMES et al Case Number: 1:19-cv-00239-AB) Filer: Document Number: No document attached Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER. It is ORDERED that defendants’ motion for leave to join the motion to dismiss [55] is GRANTED. And it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendants must reply to plaintiffs' opposition to the motion to dismiss [60] by December 9, 2019. At that point, the record will be complete, the motion will be fully briefed and under advisement, and the parties must await further order of the Court before filing any surreplies or supplemental submissions. The Court will issue further instructions if and when more pleadings are appropriate. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 11/21/2019. (Icabj2) 41:19-cv-00239-ABJ Notice has been electronically mailed to: Alan Burch alan.burch@usdoj.gov 1:19-cv-00238-ABJ Notice will be delivered by other means to:: ANNE KLEIN 21100 Aubrecht Shores Drive Pine City, MN 55063-4822 MARGARET BOZGOZ 3553 Burr Courta DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts gov Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:44 PM ECFMail DCD Activity in Case 1:19-cv-00239-AB) BOZGOZ et al v. JAMES et al Order on Motion for Extension of Time to This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ‘***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. USS. District Court District of Columbia Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 11/21/2019 at 1:43 PM EDT and filed on 11/21/2019 Case Name’ BOZGOZ et al v. JAMES et al Case Number: 1:19-cv-00239-A8) Filer: Document Number: No document attached Docket Text: MINTUE ORDER granting plaintiff's motion for extension of time [59]. Plaintiffs must either file an answer or a responsive pleading to defendant Anne Klein's counterclaims by December 10, 2019. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b), 8(c), 12(b). The allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint should not be repeated. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 11/21/2019. (Icabj2) 1:19-cv-00239-ABJ Notice has been electronically mailed to: ‘Alan Burch alan.burch@usdoj.gov '9-cv-00239-ABI Notice will be delivered by other means to:: ANNE KLEIN 21100 Aubrecht Shores Drive Pine City, MN 55063-4822 MARGARET BOZGOZ 3553 Burr Court Unit A Fort Meade, MD 20755