Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ورقة بحثية 3
ورقة بحثية 3
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition held in Jakarta, Indonesia, 22–24 October 2013.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been
reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to
reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Implementation of such techniques can significantly Production flow rate per well from specific productivity
reduce the prediction error of water production flow rates index could be calculated using given pressure gradient
for new wells and increase the operational reliability of and net pay value.
production forecasts.
The obtained productivities can be used for operational
In this paper a method of productivity index and the initial forecast of initial production rates of new wells. It’s
water influx estimation is proposed. This technique takes needed to be clarified according to the hydrodynamic
into account effective porosity, relative permeabilities, as modeling. Nevertheless, this information does not reflect
well as well logging data. the actual content of flows.
Productivity Index Evaluation from Well Logging Prediction of Reservoir Performance in the Inter-
Data Well Space
There are two most common ways to forecast production The initial water cut of oil wells is controlled with relative
rates: theoretical and statistical. For the implementation of permeability functions for oil and water. M.Masket is first
the first way the information about the parameters of the to establish a fact later confirmed by the number of
formation (the effective and relative permeabilities, researchers: relative permeabilities are functions of water
reservoir thickness, drainage radius), well (skin factor or saturation [2-4].
reduced range radius, the quality factor of penetration,
etc.) and the properties of the saturating fluid (volume The most of attempts to model relative permeability is
ratios, viscosity) is needed. Based on the expected flow based on the Purcell equation [4], which includes
rate Q, the productivity index Kprod and specific capillary pressure and relative permeability, wherein the
productivity index are calculated. pore space is modeled by a set of capillaries with certain
radius. N.T.Burdine proposed relative permeability
Statistical method for predicting is realized by models taking into account saturation changes as
constructing the correlations obtained by using the well functions of the capillary pressures and free fluids [2].
test results (Q, Kprod
tuning according to well logging data. Authors of [6] developed relative permeability models,
operating with phase permeabilities for oil and water, as
Hereafter the technique of specific productivity index well as current and effective residual oil saturation (the
calculating is proposed. It’s based on statistical proportion of oil in the volume of effective porosity). The
correlation between the value of effective porosity and control parameters of these models have a close
specific productivity, separated for each production target. correlation with the reservoir characteristics, which
The assumption of the stated dependences presence is allows the calculation of relative permeability functions
based on the tightness of the correlations between the according to log data.
effective porosity and permeability [6].
ef) and
A close correlation between specific productivities and dyn) porosity is stated for the studied field set
effective porosity averaged on reservoir thickness for according to the processing of the core data. The resulting
Cretaceous reservoirs BU10 and BU14 from one oilfield of regression is as follows: = 1+ 2 ef+ 3 dyn.
Western Siberia is shown on Fig. 1a and 1b. This
dependence is described with the equation: The effective permeability of oil and water is determined
with the value of absolute permeability, which is
ef , (1)
predicted from well log data. Current oil saturation is
are empirical constants for each individual calculated in two ways to improve the results accuracy in
production target. thin beds and heterogeneous productive reservoirs. It is
evaluated with resistivity logging (Archie equation and
Studied reservoirs are represented with quartz-feldspathic adaptive well log interpretation) and capillary pressure
sandstones with intergranular structure of the capacitive model of transition zone (CPM) [6]. The calculation
SPE 165771 3
results with resistivity log are consistent with the CPM. Reference
Relative permeability functions (rel. perm. map for oil is 1. Brooks, R.H., Corey, A.T. Properties of porous media
shown on Fig. 2a), predicted on each depth step of well affecting fluid flow // Journal of the Irrigation and
logs are transformed to the water share in flow with
Buckley-Leverett equation [6]. 2. Burdine, N.T. Relative Permeability Calculations
To predict the productivity and the initial water cut it is 71, 1953.
performed geological modeling of the studied deposit. A 3. Kjosavik, A., Ringen, J.K. and Skjaeveland, S.M.
three-dimensional distribution of the effective porosity, Relative Permeability Correlation for Mixed-Wet
saturation and relative permeability are conducted with Reservoirs // Paper SPE 59314 presented at the 2000
described approach. Reservoir performance is predicted SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium held
from these maps. Map with productivity index is shown in Tulsa, OK, 2000.
on Fig. 2b. 4. Purcell, W.R. Capillary Pressures-Their Measurement
Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability //
Way to test the three-dimensional distribution of the Trans. AIME, 186, 39, 1949.
productivity index is comparison of this parameter with 5. Kozhevnikov, D.A., Kovalenko, K.V. and
the results of well testing and production logging (MDT Deshenenkov, I.S. Informational Advantages and
data). The comparisons carried out on 20 wells from Accuracy Characteristics of the Adaptive Well Log
different parts of the deposit, which did not participate in Data Interpretation // Paper SPE-148676 presented at
generation of the correlation on Fig. 1 and 3D modeling the 2011 SPE Arctic and Extreme Environments
of the petrophysical characteristics. Ten monitoring wells Conference in Moscow, Russia, 2011.
include MDT data, the remaining have results interval 6. Kozhevnikov, D.A., Kovalenko, K.V. and
standardized well tests. In almost all cases, the data from Deshenenkov, I.S. Relative Permeabilities Evaluation
the control wells are close to the prediction of both the oil with Well Log Derived Effective Porosity // Paper
(Fig. 3a) and the water (Fig. 3b). EarthDoc-16371 presented at the 75th EAGE
Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE
Maps of the productivity index and initial water cut EUROPEC, London, UK, 2013.
resulting from geological modeling are used in the well
placement process (Fig. 2b) to reduce water production
and increase oil production rates (5 producers are already
drilled: 200-300 m3/day of oil with low water cut 5-15%;
recommendations for drilling include 25 new wells).
Figures
a. b.
Fig. 1. Comparisons of specific productivity and effective porosity for 50 wells from studied formations
BU10 (a) and BU14 (b) (equation (1))
a. b.
Fig. 2. Maps of a. oil relative permeability and b. specific reservoir productivity for BU10 formation.
SPE 165771 5
a. b.
Fig. 3. A comparison of the actual and predicted specific productivity for oil (a) and water cut (b) of the BU10 formation.