Professional Documents
Culture Documents
therapy in China
2 Cell and gene therapy in China
Cell and gene therapy in China 3
Since 2010, we have seen a number Roche. Innovent will use Roche’s to the upward-trending clinical
of advanced therapy medicinal technologies for both discovery and trial activities, capital is being
product (ATMP) approvals and development, giving Roche an option invested and collaborations are
product launches. These ATMPs, to eventually license each product being formed between multinational
in particular cell and gene therapy for ex-China development and companies and their Chinese
(CGT), helped to bring new hope for commercialization. counterparts in the CGT space. For
patients and their families who were instance, Merck KGaA collaborates
And progress is moving forward
suffering from indications — such as with GenScript to develop and
even during the global COVID-19
cancer and rare diseases — where establish a globally recognized CGT
pandemic. JW Therapeutics — a joint
there is a high unmet medical need. manufacturing service in China.
venture established by WuXi AppTec
In the following pages, we focus on
China is making excellent progress and Juno Therapeutics — completed a
sharing the current key market and
in CGT development and the clinical US$100m Series B round of financing
regulatory dynamics.
trial activities in China for CGT have in June 2020. JW Therapeutics’ lead
grown significantly in the past few product, a CAR-T therapy, started In China, the number of CGT clinical
years. After having produced a Phase II trials in China. trials, found in clinicltrial.gov, have
chimeric antigen receptor T cells grown significantly, as shown in
The current regulatory requirement
(CAR-T) therapy with 94% response Figure 1, and most of the trials
in China is less stringent than
rate in myeloma patients in 2017 are CAR-T. Within the active trials
in the US, requiring permission
and setting up a 50-50 collaboration for CAR-T, approximately 75% of
only from the internal hospital
with Janssen, Legend Biotech, a those are in hematological cancer
ethics committees. This presents
China-based, biotech company treatments. With the success of CAR-T
a double-edged sword since it
successfully completed its US IPO in hematological or “blood tumors,”
is less cumbersome to navigate
in early 2020. the technology is now shifting to
complex regulatory processes and
solid tumors. The remaining 25% are
Other local companies have also get ATMPs into clinical trials, but
spread among various malignant
taken the path of collaborating it may also lead to questionable
tumor treatments, such as cancer of
with large global biopharma firms, products being introduced into the
the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver,
including Suzhou Innovent Bio, which pipeline if there is not appropriate
lungs and breast.
formed an R&D collaboration with hospital-level oversight. In addition
Figure 1. CGT clinical trials commenced in China (2014–19), as found on the FDA clinical trials website (www.clinicaltrials.gov)
98
+61%
78
71
62
24
Many of the clinical trials in China Johnson & Johnson’s collaborator, RMAT designation by the U.S. Food
are initiated by the ~100 biopharma initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial in and Drug Administration (FDA)
and biotech companies, with a few 2019 for its LCAR-B38M in China for relapsed/refractory multiple
leading the pack. Table 1 below shows and globally. Similarly, in 2019, myeloma (rrMM) for its CT053.
some of the top CGT companies in Hrain Biotechnology commenced Besides CAR-T, China is also quite
China along with their corresponding Phase 1 clinical trials in China for its dynamic in the development of gene
targets and current trial status. three CAR-T products, and CARsgen therapy; notability, CureGenetics
Most recently, Fosun Kite has filed Therapeutics received clearance for based out of Suzhou is developing
for new drug application (NDA) of conducting Phase 1 clinical trials in a range of treatment products,
its leading product, FKC876, an China and in the US, respectively, and it has entered global strategic
anti-CD19 CAR-T, to the National for hepatocellular carcinoma (target: collaborations with Thermo Fisher
Medical Products Administration Glypican-3 (GPC3)) and multiple Scientific in 2017.
(NMPA). Nanjing Legend Bio, a myeloma (CT053; target: BCMA).
subsidiary of GenScript Biotech and In addition, CARsgen was granted
MM BCMA Ph1
Chongqing Precision
7 Biotech Co., Ltd.
Chongqing 2016 ALL CD19 Ph1 15,000
There are also quite a few hospitals in Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical to these top four, there are dozens of
China sponsoring CAR-T clinical trials, Institute, Beijing Boren Hospital, other hospitals in China sponsoring
including four hospitals in China that Chinese PLA General Hospital CAR-T trials.
have double-digit trials sponsored, (in Beijing) and Southwest Hospital
as indicated on clinicaltrial.gov: (in Chengdu, Sichuan). In addition
Cell and gene therapy in China 5
• In the initial stage, physicians may only adopt the approved therapy for last
line treatment, considering its efficacy data limitation and high cost
• But it has the potential to be promoted in the mid to long-term when its efficacy
has been proved through real world evidence
Last line of treatment option
in the near term 1st line 2nd–3rd line End line
Relapse/ Achieve
refractory CR/PR
treatment. Figure 2 shows how CAR-T China, it is expected that the patient infused back into the patient. There
therapies are positioned with respect is to pay fully out-of-pocket or are preparation steps required, e.g.,
to current treatment options for potentially via commercial insurance chemotherapy and resting, before
hematological cancers. CAR-T is used in the foreseeable future. Value-based CAR-T cells can be infused; as such,
as the last line of treatment after pricing is one of the topics being the CAR-T cell infusion step takes
patients have failed chemotherapy discussed; however, it is not expected about one week. Once the treatment
and targeted therapies, or as a to be implemented in the near future. is complete, patients are closely
complementary treatment with monitored initially at once per
Typical CAR-T treatment in China
Allo-HSCT, either before or after month intervals, and then gradually
takes approximately one month,
Allo-HSCT to improve clinical outcomes. extended to semi-annually as the
with post-treatment monitoring
conditions stabilized.
Recent product launches (Yescarta counted separately. Figure 3 shows
and Kymriah) in the US and EU have the typical CAR-T treatment in The general perception from the
shown that CAR-T cell therapies are China by key steps. Patient eligibility medical community EY interviewed in
commanding premium pricing; due to screening takes about one to two China toward CAR-T therapeutics is
health economic reasons most payers weeks with specific criteria set. quite positive. The overall confidence
are shifting to value-based payment The CAR-T cell creation and cell level toward CAR-T therapies from
strategies to adapt to the high cost production step takes another one physicians who have clinical trial
of ATMP and curative therapies. In to two weeks before CAR-T cells are experience related to CAR-T trials is
CAR-T creat
Patient eligibility Cell collection
and product
Pre screening
Tests
Conditioning
therapy
• Patient undergoes
conditioning
• Bloodtest, PET-CT
chemotherapy
Bone marrow puncture, etc.
during this period
*Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score describes a patient’s level of functioning in terms of their ability to care
for themselves, daily activity and physical ability.
Note: 1) CRS: cytokine release syndrome
Sources: Expert interviews; literature research; EY-Parthenon analysis
Cell and gene therapy in China 7
high; high treatment response rates by the sponsoring companies are Chinese associations and government
have been observed from those CAR-T needed. It is also important to take stakeholders on the IP environment
trials. In addition, the treatment the CRS factor into consideration for in China and expectations/trends
response results of locally developed patient eligibility and CAR-T infusion going forward. What we found is
CAR-T therapies are regarded to be preparation. Furthermore, as with all that the Chinese Government is
in line with global clinical trial results ATMPs, therapeutic heterogeneity making significant effort in the
although there is no conclusion of is observed between companies and past few decades, as shown in
better response results due to the specific types of cells are observed, Figure 3, in strengthening the
lack of head-to-head comparison due to variations in process and China IP environment, and that
clinical trials. end product. effort is aligned with the Chinese
Government’s overall national
Besides the positive perceptions, Acknowledging that intellectual
strategy to foster innovation in
there are also concerns with property (IP) is crucial for CGT
China. The latest is a Notification
post-CAR-T infusion cytokine development, and to understand
released by the China National
release syndrome (CRS) handling the importance of IP, we have
Intellectual Property Administration
capability in China. CRS grading and conducted various interviews and
in March 2020 that calls for revision
handling require the experiences discussions with multinational
of Patent Law to enhance the
of the physicians and the nurses in and Chinese biopharmaceutical
protection of IPs and increase the
charge, where training is provided and biotech companies, law firms,
enforcement of penalizing patent
tion
CAR-T infusion Monitoring
tion
Close monitoring
Figure 3. China regulation and policy guidelines relating to drug intellectual property
• The first Patent Law was passed by the 6th National People's Congress (NPC)
Mar 1984
• However, application did NOT extend for drugs and substances obtained using chemical methods
• The US and China signed a Intellectual Property Rights Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU)
Jan 1992 • This MOU allowed the patent application for all chemical invention, including drugs and agro-chemical substances,
and the coverage included product and process
• To reconcile the disparity between the Patent Law and MOU, the 7th NPC revised (the first revision) the Patent Law
Sep 1992 to allow patent applications for drugs and substances obtained using chemical methods
• The revised Patent Law also stipulate the condition (for public common interests) for compulsory licensing of patent
• Post joining WTO and abiding to Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs),
the 9th NPC revised (the second revision) again the Patent Law, which modified the condition of compulsory licensing
Aug 2000
of patent along with other articles
• This version made the Patent Law more aligned to the international (e.g., US and EU) standards
• The release of Drug Administration Law (Pilot) stipulated the disclosure of the patent situation for the drug being
Oct 2002 submitted for regulatory approval with NMPA(National Medical Products Administration), this is the first time
such request and linkage of patent with drug approval application
• The 11th NPC revised the Patent Law (the third revision) added the articles on patent infringement from the
Dec 2008 regulatory perspectives
• This version also added new condition for compulsory licensing of patent: for public health reasons
• China State Council released the "Regarding the strengthening of review and approval reform for facilitating
innovation for drug and medical devices (Opinion)1
May 2017 • The Opinion suggested the establishment of patent linkage system, patent term restoration, and clinical trial
data protection
• This Opinion, however, is for guidance and no formal establishment regarding patent linkage system
• China National Intellectual Property Administration released a policy notification on pushing the revision of the
Patent Law to enhance the protection of drug IPs, establishment of publicly releasing data of counterfeit drugs
and severely penalize counterfeit drugs and biologics, and expanding of collaborations with overseas countries
Mar 2020
among others
• The notification also calls for more stringent on enforcement of IP infringement, including establishment of
National IP data center, increasing of penalty, among others
infringement along with other Anticipating the future growth local players, as shown in Table 2, to
specific milestones to be achieved of CGT, big pharmaceutical capture the CGT growth prospects
in the coming couple years. This is companies have started to form in China, in particular in CAR-T
a positive for those multinational collaborations and engage in M&A therapeutics.
pharmaceutical companies looking with biotechs. Similarly, multinational
Going forward, more collaborations
to enter the Chinese CGT market but pharmaceutical companies have
between multinational pharmas and
may have some concerns with the IP established their presence in China
Chinese local players are expected,
environment in China. CGT via collaborations with Chinese
10 Cell and gene therapy in China
• Fosun Kite’s business scope registered as “biotechnology and medical technology in the areas of technology development,
technology transfer, technical consulting, technical services (except psychological consulting, development and application of
human stem cells & gene diagnosis or treatment technology)”
Sources: Literature research; EY-Parthenon analysis
especially when the CAR-T products of their CAR-T in China and globally, there is also favorable government
of the leading Chinese biotechs in which benefits all parties and those policy support, increasing capital
Table 1 have entered late clinical seeking medical care. flux and more talents returning
trial stages. These biotechs offer not from the US and EU. While some
We also expect China to continue
only clinical-stage CAR-T products of these biotechs would eventually
seeing more research and clinical
but also potential access to a large grow to become a fully integrated
development activities in CGT,
and growing Chinese market. Most biopharmaceutical company, the
expanding from the current CAR-T
of these companies are founded by majority can benefit from teaming
dominant space to more diversified
scientists and could benefit from the with multinational pharmaceutical
modalities. There has been a general
commercial capability of multinational companies.
attitude shift toward innovation in
pharmaceutical companies and their
the China bio and pharma space, and
global presence for commercialization
Contacts Contributors
Pamela Spence Adlai Goldberg
EY Global Health Science and EY Global Digital, Social and
Wellness Market Leader Commercial Innovation Life
pspence2@uk.ey.com Sciences Leader
+44 20 7951 3523 adlai.goldberg@ey.com
+1 415 894 8082
Peter Behner
EY Global HS&W Strategy and Cypress Luo
Transactions Leader EY Senior Manager
peter.behner@parthenon.ey.com cypress.luo@cn.ey.com
+49 30 25 4711 2467 +86 21 2228 8798
BMC Agency
GA 1017805
ED None
In line with EY’s commitment to minimize its impact on the environment, this
document has been printed on paper with a high recycled content.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended
to be relied upon as accounting, tax, legal or other professional advice. Please refer to your
advisors for specific advice.
ey.com