The panel voted to include recommendations to consider comprehensive genomic profiling via a validated assay or plasma ctDNA assay in the workup for persistent or recurrent cervical cancer based on data showing this could help identify biomarkers and improve access to clinical trials. However, the panel did not support other proposed changes to recommend comprehensive genomic profiling assays instead of tumor mutational burden testing or to add new recommendations related to comprehensive genomic profiling.
The panel voted to include recommendations to consider comprehensive genomic profiling via a validated assay or plasma ctDNA assay in the workup for persistent or recurrent cervical cancer based on data showing this could help identify biomarkers and improve access to clinical trials. However, the panel did not support other proposed changes to recommend comprehensive genomic profiling assays instead of tumor mutational burden testing or to add new recommendations related to comprehensive genomic profiling.
The panel voted to include recommendations to consider comprehensive genomic profiling via a validated assay or plasma ctDNA assay in the workup for persistent or recurrent cervical cancer based on data showing this could help identify biomarkers and improve access to clinical trials. However, the panel did not support other proposed changes to recommend comprehensive genomic profiling assays instead of tumor mutational burden testing or to add new recommendations related to comprehensive genomic profiling.
and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT CERV-10 and CERV-A Based on the review of data and discussion, the panel 29 0 0 3 External Request consensus was to include the following bullets under Workup Submission from Foundation Medicine, Inc for persistent or recurrent disease (CERV-10): (05/14/21) requesting to • Consider comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via a 1. Recommend comprehensive genomic validated and/or FDA-approved assay profiling via a validated and/or FDA-approved • If tissue biopsy of metastatic site is not feasible or tissue assay in the workup of persistent or recurrent not available, consider CGP via a validated plasma ctDNA disease (page CERV-10) and Principles of assay Pathology section (CERV-A) for patients with “recurrent, progressive, or metastatic disease” in order to improve patient access to timely and accurate diagnosis of NCCN- recommended biomarkers (NTRK fusions, MMR alterations, Microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB)). 2. Allow for CGP via a validated plasma ctDNA assay as part of the workup for recurrent disease as a potential alternative to surgical exploration to determine options for clinical trial enrollment (CERV-10) and when tissue biopsy of the metastatic site is not feasible in metastatic disease in Principles of Pathology section (CERV-A). CERV-12 Based on a review of the data and discussion, the panel 0 29 0 3 External Request consensus was not to make changes to the current Submission from Illumina, Inc (05/13/21) request recommendations. to amend footnote ff to “Consider tumor mutational burden (TMB) testing as determined by a validated and/or FDA-approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay.” CERV-A 1 of 3 Based on a review of the data and discussion, the panel 0 29 0 3 External Request consensus was not to make changes to the current Submission from Illumina, Inc (05/13/21) request recommendations. to Amend the last bullet point to “Consider TMB testing through a validated and/or FDA approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay.” NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer V.1.2022 –Annual on 06/11/21
and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT CERV-A 1 of 3 Based on a review of the data and discussion, the panel 0 29 0 3 External Request consensus was not to make changes to the current Submission from Illumina, Inc (05/13/21) request recommendations. to add a new bullet point to the end under Pathologic assessment: Comprehensive genomic profiling with a validated and/or FDA- approved assay is informative for predicting rare pantumor targeted therapy opportunities. CERV-F 1 of 3 Based on the review of the data in the noted reference, the 29 0 0 3 Internal Request panel consensus was to include nivolumab for PD-L1–positive Consider adding nivolumab for PD-L1 positive tumors as a second-line or subsequent therapy option for tumors recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. The panel consensus supported a category 2A, preferred regimen recommendation. • Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vaginal, or Vulvar Carcinoma: Results From the Phase I/II CheckMate 358 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2825-2834. CERV-F 1 of 3 • Based on a review of the data and discussion, the panel 29 0 0 3 External Request consensus supported making the following change: Submission from Illumina, Inc (05/13/21) request Footnote h: For the treatment of patients with to amend footnote h to “For the treatment of unresectable or metastatic tumor mutational burden-high patients with unresectable or metastatic (TMB-H) [≥10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] tumors, as tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) [≥10 determined by an a validated and/or FDA-approved test, mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] tumors, as that have progressed following prior treatment and who determined by have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. a validated and/or FDA-approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test, • Based on a review of the data and discussion, the panel 0 29 0 3 that have progressed consensus was not to make changes to include following prior treatment and who have no comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to the current satisfactory alternative treatment options.” recommendations on this page.