Monterrazas de Cebu Case Study

June 30, 2023
Dir. MA. VICTORIA V. ABRERA

Regional Director
EMB-DENR Region VII
Banilad, Mandaue City
Attn.: EIA Review Committee
Ma’am;
Respectfully submitting herewith, our EIS-EPRMP Amendment documents relative

to Monterrazas De Cebu Project of Genvi Development Corporation located at
Brgys. Guadalupe and Sapangdaku, Cebu City.
Related hereto, we would like to request the second review meeting on our ECC
Application on the said project.
Immediate action on this matter is highly appreciated.
Very truly yours,

Genvi Development Corp.
Represented by:
MS. SARA BARBADILLO

Pre-Documentation Manager
----------------------FIGURE’S---------------------------
Figure 1: Site Location Map---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 6
Figure 2: Component List------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 16
Figure 3: Description of Gross Floor Area----------------------------------------------------- page 17
Figure 4: Vicinity Map------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 22
Figure 5: Zoning Certificate ---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 23-24
Figure 6: Locational Clearance------------------------------------------------------------------ page 25
Figure 7: Land Classification Status------------------------------------------------------------- page 26
Figure 8: Spot Map of the nearest Distance---------------------------------------------------page 27
Figure 9: Topographic Map----------------------------------------------------------------------- page 30
Figure 10: Geologic Map-------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 32
Figure 11: Geohazard Map------------------------------------------------------------------------page 33
Figure 12: Soil Series Map------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 39
Figure 13: Certification for Inventory Trees from CENRO DENR7------------------------page 44
Figure 14: Certification from BP Waterworks------------------------------------------------- page 56
Figure 15: Photos with Geographical Coordinates during their sampling-------------- page 59-60
Figure 16: Water Analysis Result from Tech- NoLab----------------------------------------- page 64-70
Figure 17: Climate Map----------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 74
Figure 18: Certification for Tree Planting Activity--------------------------------------------- page 78
Figure 19: Air Sampling with Google Map------------------------------------------------------ page 92-93
Figure 20: Termination Agreement-------------------------------------------------------------- page 97-106
Figure 20: Location of MRF------------------------------------------------------------------------ page 136
Figure 21: Waste Categorization Scheme------------------------------------------------------ page 137

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Brief Description
2. Brief Summary of Project EIA Process
3. Brief Description of the existing project
4. Summary on the EIA Findings on the Key Significant
5. Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Plan
6. Basic Project Information
7. Description of the Projects EIA Process
7.1 Terms of Reference of the EIA Study
7.2 EIA Team
7.3 EIA Study Schedule
7.4 EIA Study Area
7.5 EIA Methodology
7.6 Public Participation
8. Project Description
8.1 Basic Project Background and Information
Environmental Issues
1.0 The Land
1.1 Land Use and Classification
1.1.1 Impact in terms of compatibility with existing land use------------------21-26
1.1.2 Impact on compatibility with classification as an
Environmental Critical Area (ECA) --------------------------------------------27
1.1.3 Impact in existing land tenure issues-----------------------------------------28
1.1.4 Impairment of visual aesthetics------------------------------------------------28
1.1.5 Devaluation of land value as a result
Of improper solid waste management and other related impacts------28-29
1.2 Geology/Geomorphology
1.2.1 Change in Surface landform/topography/terrain/slope-----------------29-30
1.2.2 Change in sub-surface geology/underground conditions---------------31-33
1.2.3 Inducement of subsidence------------------------------------------------------34-35
1.3 Pedology
1.3.1 Soil Erosion--------------------------------------------------------------------------35-39
1.3.2 Change in soil quality-------------------------------------------------------------40
1.4 Terrestrial Biology
1.4.1 Vegetation removal and loss of habitat--------------------------------------41
1.4.2 Threat to existence of important local species-----------------------------42
1.4.3 Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution-------------------------42-43
1.4.4 Hindrance to wildlife access-----------------------------------------------------45
2.0 The Water
2.1 Hydrology/Hydrogeology
2.1.1 Change in drainage morphology------------------------------------------------46-56
2.1.2 Change in stream, lake water depth------------------------------------------------------57
2.1.3 Depletion of water resources/competition in water use--------------------------58-60
2.2 Oceanography-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------61
2.3 Water Quality
2.3.1 Degradation of groundwater quality------------------------------------------------------62
2.3.2 Degradation of surface water quality-----------------------------------------------------63
2.4 Freshwater Ecology
2.4.1 Threat to abundance existence and/or loss of species of ----------------------------71
important local and habitat------------------------------------------------------------------72
2.4.2 Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of Species------------------------73
2.4.3 Threat to existence and/or loss of important local species and Habitat-----------73
3.0 The Air
3.1 Meteorology/Climatology
3.1.1 Change in the local climate---------------------------------------------------------------74-77
3.1.2 Contribution to global greenhouse gas-----------------------------------------------------78
3.2 Air Quality (Noise)
3.2.1 Degradation of air quality-----------------------------------------------------------------79-92
3.2.2 Increase in Ambient Noise level----------------------------------------------------------94-95
4.0 The People
4.1.1 Displacement of settler-NA
4.1.2 Displacement/disturbance of properties---------------------------------------------------96
4.1.3 Change/ conflict in Land Ownership---------------------------------------------------96-106
4.1.4 Change/conflict right of way----------------------------------------------------------------107
4.1.5 Impact on Public Access----------------------------------------------------------------------107
Demography----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------108-118
In-migration-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------119
Cultural/lifestyle Change-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------119
Impacts on Physical cultural resources-------------------------------------------------------------------------121
Threat to delivery of basic services------------------------------------------------------------------------121-124
Threat to Public Health---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------125-126
Generation Local Benefits from the project-------------------------------------------------------------------127
Traffic Congestion---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------128-136
WACS-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------137
1st Review Meeting Other Concerns---------------------------------------------------------------------138-149
EMP--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------150-155
IMP---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------156-159
--------------Annexes----------------
Annex A----------------------------Site Development Plan

Annex B----------------------------EGGAR
Annex C----------------------------Flora and Fauna Inventory
Annex D----------------------------Drainage System flow
Annex E----------------------------Detentions Pond Location
Annex E1----------------------------Detention Pond Sizing
Annex F---------------------------The Air Sampling
Proof of Authority
PEMAPS
Copy for ECC Approved
1.) Brief Project Description:
GENVI Development Corporation (GENVI) was originally incorporated as GENVI Agro-

Industrial Development Corporation in Cebu City, Philippines in 1974. GENVI is currently
managed by 8990 Holdings, Inc. GENVI’s first major venture into real estate development
began in 2006 with the development of the corporation’s flagship property in Brgys.
Guadalupe and Sapangdaku, Cebu City in partnership with Landco Pacific Corporation.
Monterrazas de Cebu is a master-planned, high–end mixed use development of the 200+
hectares of GENVI. It is envisioned to be an integrated community with residential,
commercial and institutional clusters. The Monterrazas de Cebu development initially
covers approximately 140 hectares of land in Barangays Guadalupe and Sapangdaku.
It has been noted that the approved ECC was issued on May 30, 2007 under the name of
Landco Pacific Corporation which is the developer at the time. We build the most
captivating sustainable communities in the most coveted address in Cebu sustainability the
heart of all that we do, we commit to protect and enhance the environmental balance of
this last piece of paradise in Cebu. We promise to bequeath our Legacy of Sustainability to
the next generations. GENVI quality our seal of excellence we may not be the biggest but
we are the best. Always, we are a notch higher that the rest. We are all stakeholders and
we deliver what we promise to our partners, customers, shareholders and our
communities.
2.) Brief Summary of Projects EIA Process:
A draft scoping report is compiled as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment

(EIA) process for the proposed Monterrazas De Cebu which are located at Brgys.
Guadalupe and Sapangdaku, Cebu City. Relevant impacts, both in social and environmental
aspects, are carefully identified with the provision of adequate and appropriate mitigating
measures to ensure the preservation of the environment and its community around. The
scoping report presents the impacts, its degree of significance to the study, the possible
1
occurrence of the impact during the project implementation and the corresponding
activities to abate or control these impacts.
A public consultation was conducted prior to the commencement of the study. The
consultation was attended by company representatives and residents directly affected by
the proposed project. Relevant issues particularly on the impacts of the project to the
environment and community were raised and discussed during the said public hearing.
(Please see attached photo taken during the Public Scoping/Public Hearing with reports
and minutes).
2
3
3.) Brief description of the existing project vis-à-vis the proposed expansion or changes:
The proposed Monterrazas de Cebu covers a total land area of 1, 522, 219.62 square
meters is located in Brgys. Guadalupe and Sapangdaku Cebu City. Please be informed
that the area covered by their ECC issued by EMB is still undeveloped until now,
however, there are area to be increased particularly the gross floor area of the building
and other components of the said project.
Please see attached “Annex A” copy of the Site Development Plan for further
information and records.
4.) Summary on the EIA Findings on the Key Significant Impacts of the Project corresponding
EMP highlights:
During the initial studies revealed before the project was implemented the physical
and socio-economic impact of the project will not affect nearby barangays. The study
will cover the environmental impacts only during the operation stage.
5.) Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Plan on the most significant impacts and key
measures:
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) considers only the mitigation of negative of

the impacts during the construction stage because most of the negative impacts are
observed during this stage.
Monterrazas De Cebu corporate social responsibility to the host community prompted

them to establish Social Development Program which certainly improved the quality of
lives of the local residents near the project site.
1) Temporary/Regular Employment- The Proponent hired skilled and

unskilled but qualified local residents for employment during
construction and operations.
2) Potable Water Supply Reservoir - The Proponent, in coordination with
the Local Government Unit, constructed an epoxy coated steel water
4
tank Potable Water Supply Reservoir which is the source of safe local
water supply of the community.
3) Public Road leading to the project site – The Proponent is closed

coordination with the City for the proper maintenance and
rehabilitation of the public road leading to the project. In fact, an on-
going planning for the improvement of the said road specifically the
Gervacio Quijada St. that connects to V. Rama Avenue.
4) Public Street Lights – The Proponent maintained the street lights along
the public road and within the project vicinity.
6) Basic Project Information:
Project Name MONTERRAZAS DE CEBU SUBDIVISION
Project Location BRGYS. GUADALUPE AND SAPANGDAKU, CEBU CITY
Total Land Area 1,400,552.62 square meters (140 HECTARES) as per

Approved ECC issued on May 30, 2007
Total Gross Floor Area Existing: 1,400,552.62 square meters
Proposed: 107,558.00 square meters
Geographical Coordinates 10.32645; 123.87225
Project Proponent’s Name GENVI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Company Address 8990 Building, Negros Rd, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu
Contact Person Ms. Sara Barbadillo
Designation Documentation Officer
Mobile Number 09985826402
Email Address mt.ssestoso@gmail.com
5
7) Description of the Project EIA Process:
7.1 Terms of Reference of the EIA Study

Terms of Reference were discussed during the lecture course of ENS 295 and
were inferred from the requirements of the applicable legislation. In this
regard, the EIS Team aims to satisfy the applicable environmental
requirements in terms of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRRS) for
the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System to tender for an
Environmental Clearance Certificate from the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources through Environmental Management Bureau Region 7
(DENR – EMB7).
6
Pursuant to Part 1, Section 1 of the DENR Administrative Order No. 2003- 30 the
Monterrazas De Cebu is required to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) study for the construction of a facility, which aims to:
• Identify all positive and negative environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project;
• Investigate any positive and negative socio-economic impacts associated with the proposed
project;
• Suggest the most suitable mitigation measures so as to reduce the nature and extent of any
negative impacts on the environment associated with the proposed project;
• Maximize the potential benefits associated with the proposed project;
• Investigate the current and pending legal framework to which the proposed project needs
to comply to, and
• Identify and consult with all relevant interested and affected parties and Stakeholders so as
to incorporate their concerns and suggestions into the planning and execution of the
proposed project.
For the purpose of this report, the following definitions shall be applied:
a. Environment - Surrounding air, water (both ground and surface), land, flora, fauna, humans and
their interrelations.
b. Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)- document issued by the DENR/EMB after a positive
review of an ECC application, certifying that based on the representations of the proponent, the
proposed project or undertaking will not cause significant negative: environmental impact. The ECC
also certifies that the proponent has complied with all the requirements of the EIS System and has
committed to implement its approved Environmental Management Plan. The ECC contains specific
measures and conditions that the project proponent has to undertake before and during the
operation of a project, and in some cases, during the project's abandonment phase to mitigate
identified environmental impacts.
7
c. Environmentally Critical Area (ECA) - area delineated as environmentally sensitive such that
significant environmental impacts are expected if certain types of proposed projects or programs
are located, developed or, implemented in it.
d. Environmentally Critical Project (ECP) - project or program that has high potential for significant
negative environmental impact.
e. Environmental Guarantee Fund (EGF) - fund to be set up by a project proponent which shall be
readily accessible and disbursable for the immediate clean-up or rehabilitation of areas affected by
damages in the environment and the resulting deterioration of environmental quality as a direct
consequence of a project's construction, operation or abandonment. It shall likewise be used to
compensate parties and communities affected by the negative impacts of the project, and to fund
community-based environment related projects including, but not limited to, information and
education and emergency preparedness programs.
f. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) - process that involves evaluating and predicting the likely
impacts of a project (including cumulative impacts) on the environment during construction,
commissioning, operation and abandonment. It also includes designing appropriate preventive,
mitigating and enhancement measures addressing these consequences to protect the environment
and the community's welfare. The process is undertaken by, among others, the project proponent
and/or EIA Consultant, EMB, a Review Committee, affected communities and other stakeholders.
g. Environmental Impact Assessment Consultant - a professional or group of professionals

commissioned by the proponent to prepare the EIS/IEE and other related documents. In some
cases, the person or group referred to may be the proponent's technical staff.
h. Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee (EIARC) - a body of independent technical

experts and professionals of known probity from various fields organized by the EMB to evaluate
the EIS and other related documents and to make appropriate recommendations regarding the
issuance or non-issuance of an ECC.
8
i. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - document, prepared and submitted by the project
proponent and/or EIA Consultant that serves as an application for an ECC. It is a comprehensive
study of the significant impacts of a project on the environment. It includes an Environmental
Management Plan/Program that the proponent will fund and implement to protect the
environment.
j. Environmental Management Plan/Program (EMP) - section in the EIS that details the prevention,
mitigation, compensation, contingency and monitoring measures to enhance positive impacts and
minimize negative impacts and risks of a proposed project or undertaking. For operating projects,
the EMP can also be derived from an EMS.
k. Environmental Management Systems (EMS) - refers to the EMB PEPP EMS as provided for under
DAO 2003-14, which is a part of the overall management system of a project or organization that
includes environmental policy, organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities,
practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing
and maintaining an improved overall environmental performance.
l. Environmental Monitoring Fund (EMF) -fund that a proponent shall set up after an ECC is issued
for its project or undertaking, to be used to support the activities of the multi-partite monitoring
team. It shall be immediately accessible and easily disbursable.
m. Environmental Performance - capability of proponents to mitigate environmental impacts of
projects or programs.
n. Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) - assessment, through the use of universally accepted and
scientific methods, of risks associated with a project. It focuses on determining the probability of
occurrence of accidents and their magnitude (e.g. failure, of containment or exposure to hazardous
materials or situations.)
9
o. Multipartite Monitoring Team (MMT) - community-based multi-sectoral team organized for the
purpose of monitoring the proponent's compliance with ECC conditions, EMP and applicable laws,
rules and regulations.
p. Project or Undertaking - any activity, regardless of scale or magnitude, which may have significant
impact on the environment.
q. Proponent - any natural or juridical person intending to implement a project or undertaking.
r. Public Participation - open, transparent, gender-sensitive, and community-based process aimed at

ensuring the social acceptability of a project or undertaking, involving the broadest range of
stakeholders, commencing at the earliest possible stage, of project design and development and
continuing until post-assessment monitoring.
s. Procedural Review - phase in the ECC application review process to check for the completeness the
required documents, conducted by EIAM Division at the EMB Central Office or Regional Office.
t. Process Industry - an industry whose project operation stage involves chemical, mechanical or
other processes.
u. Scoping - the stage in the EIS System where information and project impact assessment
requirements are established to provide the proponent and the stakeholders the scope of work
and terms of reference for the EIS.
v. Social Acceptability - acceptability of a project by affected communities based on timely and

informed participation in the EIA process particularly with regard to environmental impacts that
are of concern to them.
w. Stakeholders - entities who may be directly and significantly affected by the project or undertaking.
10
x. Substantive Review - the phase in the EIA process whereby the document submitted is subjected
to technical evaluation by the EIARC.
y. Technology - all the knowledge, products, processes, tools, methods and systems employed in the
creation of goods or providing services.
7.2 EIA Team Preparer

The following field experts conducted/participated in this study:
• Mr. Edgar Alan Pagapulaan (Team Leader-EIA Preparer/Consultant)

• Ms. Sara Barbadillo (Pre-Documentation Manager- GENVI)
• Engr. Oswaldo Trani Jr. (Project Manager – GENVI)
• Engr. Ranel Pelpinosas (Branch Manager – GENVI)
7.3 EIA Study Schedule
The EMB Region VII personnel will conduct the EIA Technical Scoping as soon as the EIS
documents are evaluated and processed. An EIS document is prepared as basis for the
issuance of the Environmental Compliance Certificate for the proposed project. The EIA team
responsible for the EIA Study should be able to complete the EIS document and provide the
necessary supporting documents on _________.
The activities for the EIS study are strategically scheduled in order to acquire necessary data
based on different meteorological and social conditions. All the data collected will be
processed and presented in the EIS document.
It is estimated that the EIA Study, the completion of the EIS document and the application
for ECC will conclude on __________________.
11
7.4 EIA Study Area
In the EIS study, the direct impacts of the project to the immediate surrounding
environment and facilities have been considered and mitigating measures are identified to
reduce or avoid such impacts. The impacts and its corresponding mitigating measures are
reflected in the scoping checklist.
7.5 EIA Methodology

The scope of this study was guided by the requirements of DENR Administrative Order No.
2003-30 in consistency with their effort in the implementation of the Philippine
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System established under Presidential Decree (PD)
No 1586. Key legislation applicable to the proposed Poultry project is discussed below:
• Principle 17 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development
‘Environmental impact assessment, as a national instrument, shall be undertaken for

proposed activities that are likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment
and are subject to a decision of a competent national authority.'
• Philippine Environmental Policy (1977) known asPD 1151 where, “sponsors of all
government and private projects affecting the quality of the environment are required to
prepare an assessment of the project’s environmental impacts”.
• Philippine Environment Code (1977) known as PD 1152 where, “all land use
management agencies are required to incorporate EIA as a tool for sitting and locating
development projects”.
• Philippine EIS System (1978) known as PD 1586 where,
12
• “all centralized the EIS System under the National Environmental Protection
Council (NEPC),
• “authorized the President and the NEPC to proclaim projects and activities
subject to the EIS System,
• “defined ECAs and ECPs”
• DAO 21 Amending IRR-PD 1586 (1992) This law stated that it:
• decentralized certain EIA functions to DENR regional offices
• defined the need for public hearings
• established the concept of multi-sectoral monitoring team and
Environmental Guarantee Fund
• DAO 30 Amending IRR-PD 1586 (1992) where,
▪ LGUs are assigned the functions of issuing ECCs and adjudicating cases
involving environmental complaints against small projects and businesses
• DAO 37 Amending IRR-PD 1586 (1996) stated that:

▪ initial scoping requirement for ECPs prior to the submission of the EIS
▪ accreditation of EIS/IEE preparers
▪ joint accountability of proponent and preparers
▪ public participation and social acceptability
▪ information, consultation, hearings, alternative dispute or conflict
resolution and documentation reports
▪ compliance Monitoring
▪ EMF, EGF and MMT
▪ demarcated roles of other government agencies
▪ administration of sanctions
▪ adherence to the EIS Procedural Manual
13
• EO 42 Rationalization of the EIS System (2002)
This law “gave authority to RDs of EMB (in addition to the Secretary) to grant or
deny issuance of ECCs”.
• DAO 03-30 IRR for EIS System (2003)

This makes the PEISS more responsive to the demands and needs of the project
proponents and the various stake holders. It also,
▪ clarify the coverage of the PEISS and update it to take into consideration industrial
and technological innovations and trends,
▪ simplify procedures for processing ECC applications,
▪ standardize requirements to ensure focus on critical environment parameters,
▪ assure that critical environmental concerns are addressed during project
development and implementation.
7.6 Public Participation
A Public consultation is conducted as part of the EIA Study for the proposed project.
Consultations are most of the time attended by company representatives,
community residents and local government. The purpose of a public consultation
is to present the project to the affected parties, in order to solicit concerns from
the community and local government in the implementation. The project will then
be evaluated by the concerned parties and if deemed environmentally and socially
feasible, then the community and local government will recommend the
implementation of the project.
14
8 Project Description and Location
8.1 Basic Project Background and information

Name of Proponent: GENVI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Name of Project: MONTERRAZAS DE CEBU SUBDIVISION
Type of Project: Subdivision
Contact Person and Designation: Ms. Sara Sestos- Pre-Documentation Officer

Location: Brgy. Guadalupe and Sapangdaku Cebu City
Total Land Area: 1,400,552.62 square meters (140 hectares)
Project Rationale
With this incoming development, the Brgys. Guadalupe and Sapangdaku and City
of Cebu as well will be benefited when the company will increase and building as
well in which generate employment for management, operation, security and
maintenance personnel provided it has a labor force that has necessary skills and
trainings. With other individual skill and resources, the firm targets its aim to
embark on, engage and undertake on the business of acquiring, developing and
selling real estate, including the construction of subdivision for housing and aided
either by private or government facilities.
Project Component List – For further information, please refer on Annex A Site Development
Plan for your reference.
15
16
17
Project Phases, Key Environmental Aspects, Wastes, Issues Built Inn Measures
The project will undertake the following project components:
1. Pre-Construction Phase: Preparation of project design for planning lay-out

of the site, preparation of necessary documents to support acquisition of
government permits and clearances. This may cover also the initial clearing
of the area where and/or additional components to be constructed within
the project site.
2. Construction Phase: Project development will entail the construction of the

proposed facilities as being mentioned the attached site development plan
will involve manual works and heavy equipment usage at the construction
site. The activities area are as follows:
a. Earth moving and leveling of the land/terracing on east-west

direction;
b. Excavation of soil/land, drainage canals, disposal, mortality and
compost pits;
c. Construction of addition components of the farm;
d. Installation of electric posts and wiring facilities for power and
lighting;
e. Installation of elevated water tank including water system
facilities,
f. Planting of fruit and forest trees within the project site.
3. Operational Phase: This phase involves all daily activities necessary for the
smooth operation of the project such as security checks, equipment
maintenance, wastewater treatment facilities operation, solid waste
18
management, environmental management, monitoring and implementation
of social development programs and institutional plan.
Project
Proponent/President
Engineer
Admin
Safety/Pollution
Department
Officer
Accounting/
Driver Cashier Sales Collection
4. Abandonment/Major Repair/Expansion Phase – This stage of the project is

undertaken when project ends or when the land development needs major
repair or expansion. The following activities are:
a. Dismantling of structures, facilities and equipment’s in case of

abandonment while for major repair/expansion, dismantling and
reinstalling of facilities and structures;
b. Segregation of re-usable and recyclable materials such as wood,
galvanize iron, steel bars, etc. from the garbage waste.
c. Clearing up operation of dismantled/repaired/expansion of
project site and septic tanks when project is to be abandoned.
8.4 Manpower Requirements
19
No. of employees to be hired by the project
100 more or less
During the construction phase:
200 Carpenters/Laborers/Electrician/Plumber more or less

During the operational phase:
5 Security Guard; Manager/5Technician/5 Engineer
8.5 Project Development
The Proposed project has 5 years duration in construction.
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Documentation
Pre-Construction Stage
Construction Stage
Operational Stage
20
ANALYSIS OF KEY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1 THE LAND
1.1 Land Use and Classification-
1.1.1 Impact in terms of compatibility with existing land use
Cebu is a province situated in the Visayan region of the central Philippines. The province is
composed of the mainland Cebu Island and its surrounding 167 islands and islets.
The Monterrazas De Cebu is located at Guadalupe, Cebu City is within the Residential as
per Zoning Ordinance of the Cebu City. Please see attached below the Certification from
City Planning and Development Office together with Location Clearance and Land
Classification status from CENRO Office likewise the vicinity map of the project site for your
information.
Guadalupe is situated at approximately 10.3232, 123.8838, in the island of Cebu. Elevation
at these coordinates is estimated at 45.4 meters or 148.9 feet above mean sea level.
Guadalupe shares a common border with the following adjacent barangay(s): Sapangdaku,
Buhisan, Sambag 1 Poblacion, Capitol Site Poblacion, Calamba, Labangon, Tsa, Kalunasan
and Lahug Poblacion. The nearest water body in the project site is Guadalupe River as per
DENR MC No. 2000-10 List of Classified Water Bodies in 1999. Guadalupe River: Region 7
Upstream of Sandayong Bridge is Class B and Downstream of Sandayong Bridge is Class C.
Per Land Classification Status issued by CENRO DENR7 dated 2/3/2022 where the project
site is located under the Lot Number 25-P is classified as Alienable and Disposable in the
name of GENVI Development Corp.
21
Figure 8: Vicinity Map of Monterrazas De Cebu Subdivision
22
23
24
25
26
1.1.2 Impact on compatibility with classification as an Environmentally Critical Areas
This project does not encroach any protected areas under NIPAS-ACT, or areas
declared as such under-Republic Act No. 7586. Based on Google Earth that the
nearest Central Cebu Protected Landscape (CCPL) protected area is the Buhisan
Dam which is 2.52 km away from the said project site. See attached below the spot
map for your information.
The Central Cebu Protected Landscape (CCPL) covers what used to be known as the
Central Cebu National Park, Buhisan Dam, Mananga Watershed Forest Reserve,
Kotkot-Lusuran Watershed Forest Reserve, and the Sudlon National Park. The
protected area spans 29,062 hectares (71,810 acres) of adjoining forestlands and
watersheds located in the middle of the province. It covers parts of the central
Cebu cities of Cebu City, Toledo, Talisay, and Danao, and the municipalicities
of Balamban, Minglanilla, Consolacion, Liloan and Compostela.
27
1.1.3 Impact in existing land tenure issues
Please be informed that the expansion project of Monterrazas De Cebu is not

covered by CARP, CADC, CADT, CALC, CALT with IFMA/CBFMA, within COC, within
MPSA or other tenurial instruments and identify corresponding existing tenure
issues including presence of informal settlers. This parcel land where the project is
located is covered by the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT). Copy of the said TCT are
hereto attached for your reference.
According to the CENRO-Cebu City Certification that the area where said project is
to be constructed are declared as alienable and disposable. And likewise, there are
no corresponding existing tenure issues including presence of informal settlers.
1.1.4 Impairment of visual aesthetics
There is a valley landform visually located at project site and no structures can be
found in the proposed project except those who are already existing structures
covered by the approved ECC.
During construction, improper handling and disposal of construction and domestic

wastes may result in visual pollution and will have an aesthetic impact on the
landscape. In order to reduce, if not eliminate, the environmental impacts of the
solid wastes, the construction plans, operating instructions and solid waste
management plan will be strictly implemented. DOTr will ensure that the
contractors maintain the construction site tidy and clean and that temporary
screens/walls are provided to minimize visual clatter. During the demobilization of
construction activities, construction yards will be rehabilitated to its previous
condition.
1.1.5 Devaluation of land value as a result of improper solid waste management and
other related impacts
The Monterrazas De Cebu will generate domestic wastes such as papers, cartons,
plastics, bottles, food leftovers, etc. Assuming a per capital waste generation of 0.6
kg per day, the project will generate an estimated of 0.93 ton of solid waste per
day during operation. Some hazardous wastes that will also be generated include
busted fluorescent lamps, spent batteries, used oils, etc. Improper disposal of
generated solid and hazardous wastes particularly at the stations could pose health
and sanitation hazards to the operations personnel and railway passengers and
may affect the soil quality at the area which will result to the devaluation of land
value.
28
A Solid Waste Management Plan will be implemented in accordance with RA 9003
at the stations of the project. This includes waste minimization, segregation, and
proper disposal. Properly sized bins will be provided for recyclable, biodegradable
and hazardous waste. The project management will coordinate with the host LGUs
for the regular collection of the waste and their disposal to the DENR designated
site. Bulk hazardous wastes will be stored in impermeable area and with
appropriate secondary containment. Hazardous wastes will be stored properly and
will be transported, treated and disposed of by a DENR Accredited transporter and
treater in accordance with RA 6969.
An Emergency Response Plan and a Health and Safety Management Plan will be
implemented in case of accidental spills. Regular training of employees will also be
provided in regards to keeping the workplace and surrounding environment in
good condition.
1.2 Geology/Geomorphology- Please refer also Annex B the “EGGAR” for your reference.
1.2.1 Change in Surface landform/ topography/terrain/slope
The topography of the project site is generally hilly to moderately steep. Elevation
ranges from 103.0 to 201.0 meters above sea level (masl). During the land
development, there will be some excavation activities to give way to the laying of
foundations of the buildings, construction of access roads, amenities, etc. Excess
excavated limestone materials will be placed and filled in low-lying areas within the
project.
The project area is located on the east central part of Cebu Island. It is within the
political jurisdiction of Barangay Guadalupe, Cebu City, Cebu. The project is accessible
and located beside the Monterrazas Road near the main gate of Monterrazas de Cebu.
The Project will significantly impact the general topography of the land. The project
area is possibly dry area. The portion which is steep slope, however, if there is an
excess material will be placed some areas within nearest project site. Furthermore,
we will install perimeter fenced within the boundary of project site. We will categorize
29
the portion area which is steep slope. Attached below the Topographic Map for your
reference.
Figure 9: Topographic Map of Monterrazas De Cebu Project
30
1.2.2 Change in sub-surface/underground conditions
The change in sub-surface geomorphology is the excavation a few meters

underground of the limestone bedrock to prepare for the foundation of the multi-
building project. This is temporary since the excavated area will be concreted and
fortified with steel bars when the building construction will start.
Since the natural environment undergoes physical changes for a variety of process
brought about either as a natural occurrence or manmade. Furthermore, we will
install perimeter fence within the boundary of project site. Therefore, there are no
certain circumstances that the area where the project site is located losses from
land subsidence considering that said area is not prone for erosion which sinks to
a possible lower level in any surrounding that cause inducement. This material will
be in place properly through dump truck and cover by a net in order to avoid
miscarriage and falling out the exist materials.
The island of Cebu geologically falls within the Central Physiographic Province of
the Philippines, which is composed of cordilleras, lowlands, troughs and offshore
basins. The island lies towards the central portion of the Visayan Basin and
moderately interrupted by the uplift of the Cebu geoanticline in Late Miocene to
Pliocene. The basement is mainly Cretaceous to lower Tertiary metavolcanics and
metasediments. These are intruded by diorite stocks and batholiths (BMG, 1982).
Cebu island has a NNE-SSW trending mountainous axis, about 160 km long and is
flanked by intermediate highlands heavily dissected by deep narrow valleys with
steep slopes. Narrow coastal plains skirt the hilly terrain and are principally coral
reefs mantled by alluvial sediments.
31
Figure 10: Geological Map
32
Figure 11: Geohazard Map
33
1.2.3 Inducement of subsidence, liquefaction, landslide, mud/debris flow etc.
The possibility of inducement thru subsidence in the project area is low because
the foundation of the building structures is within the limestone bedrock.
Differential settling and/or subsidence may occur in backfilled areas. This depends
upon the nature and the degree of compaction of the emplaced filling material. The
less compacted filling material is prone to surface water infiltration thus, scouring
effect may occur during heavy precipitation. Building and other man-made
structures on the surface are damaged when some portions of the heterogeneous
soil mass underlying the foundation settle more than the other parts.
Another cause of differential settlement or subsidence is when the contact

between bedrock and soil or backfilling material in a project area is irregular.
Problem happens when one footing of the foundation is erected on top of the
bedrock and the other on an uncompacted soil or back-filled area. The weight of
the building or any other constructed structure will tend to compact the soil to
some extent and the structure will settle. However, since the bedrock supports one
part of the foundation and the other by the soil, the result would be differential
settling of the structure. This may produce cracks in the floors and walls thus
weakening the structure.
Inducement of landslides or other natural hazards
The existing limestone bedrock in the project area, which has rolling to moderately
hilly topography, is assessed to be stable. The flat-to gently bedded coralline
limestone is generally massive. No evidences of current or paleo-landslides (cracks,
crumpled slopes resulting to uneven vegetation, broken or distorted walls, creep,
etc.) were observed in the area. Observations along the slope specifically in those
portions where it is steeper also revealed no signs of current sliding either. It is
34
believed that the steepness of the slope is some portion of the property is shaped
in time by the normal wear and tear of the limestone in response to the earth’s
external forces cause by weathering and erosion.
There are also no prominent major geologic structures or joints that may trigger
slide movement. The only plane of weakness mapped is the bedding of limestone,
which has a generally gentle dip of less than 15º. The friction angle of this type of
limestone is more or less 30º, thereby the possibility of sliding along the bedding
plane is very unlikely to occur.
The possibility of slope failure was assessed to possibly occur during and after the
land development of the building project. Site grading will be made in areas with
steep slopes during the development using cut and filling method. Geohazards may
include circular failure and rock fall and/or erosion on vertical limestone cut slope
along internal boundary limits and foundation differential settlement on the
flattened slope area.
The sites are primarily in areas with moderate to high susceptibility to landslides.
Trees and plants will also be planted along the buffer areas on the borders of the
project sites to improve water retention in the soil.
1.3 Pedology
1.3.1 Soil Erosion/Loss of topsoil/overburden
Soil erosion is insignificant in the project area since soil deposit is generally very
thin. Relatively, thicker soil is confined along creek embankments and in flat and
gently sloping area. Very thin to nil soil cover are found along the steep limestone
slopes where the main development of the buildings will be done.
35
Most of the areas in the Cebu City are classified as having possible erosion
potential.
Soil composition in the area is of five types, namely: Faraon Clay, Lugo Clay, Faraon
Clay Steep Phase, Mandaue Clay loam and Baguio clay loam. Predominant is faraon
clay steep phase which comprises 39.36% of the total land area.
Faraon Clay - This type of soil is usually found in areas with undulating to hilly slope.
This soil type is the weathering product of the underlying limestone of the project
site. The principal distinguishing characteristics of this type is its black heavy clay
soils with outcrops of gray, coralline and porous limestone. The surface is littered
with pebbles and cobbles of limestone. This soil remains moderately friable and
maintains its excellent good structure when dry. Those areas with this type of soil
are widely planted with coconut, corn, cassava, banana, and fruit trees.
Surficial Deposit
Soil deposit is generally very thin in the project area. Relatively, thicker soil is
confined along creek embankments and in flat and gently sloping area. Very thin to
nil soil cover along steep slopes.
Subsurface Geology/Geotechnical Study
Soil exploration and geotechnical investigation study was conducted in the project
area last January 2022 by Megatesting Center, Inc. (please see attached report
below). It includes subsurface investigation in which the consultant conducted
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) on eight (8) test holes (labeled as BH-01 to BH-08),
inside the project area (see attached borehole location map of Megatesting Center,
Inc.., 2022 and Figure 21). The boreholes were drilled to a depth up to 21.0 meters
each hole. Result of soil exploration drilling showed that static water level was not
encountered 21.0 meters below ground surface in all the eight bore holes
(Megatesting Center, Inc.., 2022). Laboratory physical tests of soil and rock samples
36
from regular depth intervals of 1.5 meter of the bore holes were collected and
submitted to physical laboratory for Grain Size Distribution, Sieve Analysis,
Atterberg Limit Test, moisture content and Soil Classification for Engineering
Purposes. All the eight (8) test bore holes encountered the underlying Carcar
Limestone Formation. Based on the sieve analysis, the dominant soil type
underlying the project per Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) classification is
the sandy clay (CL). It is found in the upper 2-4 meters from the surface. It is
described as inorganic of low to medium plasticity gravelly clays. The rest of the
core samples at depth were described uniformly as light brown coralline limestone,
fracture, moderate to hard in terms of rock strength (Megatesting Center, Inc..,
2022). The high N-values of SPT of the limestone (> 60 blows) at depth (up to 21.0
meters’ depth from surface) may indicate the absence of solutional cavities
beneath the project site.
Result of drilling showed a soil profile of very dense limestone. It is not susceptible
to liquefaction in the event of strong earthquake since soil mass have a generally
dense to very dense clayey gravel, weathered coralline limestone of moderate
strength, stiff to very hard lean clay and with the ground water table level not
encountered even at 21.0m depth from the ground surface. It is also not
susceptible to ground settlement due to the absence of thick clay.
Structural foundation design and bearing capacity for shallow footing location were
included in the geotechnical report. Rigid combined or rigid mat footings are
suitable footing systems for the proposed buildings and can be designed for
allowable soil bearing pressures as shown in attached (MegaTesting Center, Inc.,
2022 and Soil Map).
Soil Description
Soil deposit is generally thin to absent in the moderately rolling to steep slope
sections of the project area.
37
The project area and its vicinities consist of one (1) soil type which is the Faraon
Series. This is based from the soil classification made by the Bureau of Soils and
Water Management.
The Faraon Series is the residual soil and weathering product of the underlying
coralline limestone of the Pliocene to Pleistocene age Carcar Formation. Surface
soil consists of black medium granular and plastic clay with some limestone gravels
present. Maximum depth is 30 cm. Sub-soil consist of gray, moderate fine granular
and strongly plastic clay. Substratum consists of grayish to white, porous limestone.
External drainage is good to excessive while internal drainage is poor.
Based on the Soil Series Map of the Philippines, a soil map showing the distribution
of the established Philippine Soil Series, the project area belongs to the Upland
Soils, particularly the Faraon Soil Series. This map was compiled and produced by
the Soil Survey Division of the Bureau of Soil and Water Management (BSWM) of
the Department of Agriculture.
38
Soil Map
PROJECT
Soil Series Map of the Philippines showing the Project Are (BSWM,
2013)
Figure 12: Soil Series Map
39
1.3.2 Change in Soil Quality
The soil type in the project area is the Faraon Clay, which in the weathering product
of the underlying coralline limestone bedrock (BSWM, 2013). The principal
distinguishing characteristics of this type is its black heavy clay soils with outcrops
of gray, coralline and porous limestone. The surface is littered with pebbles and
cobbles of limestone. This soil remains moderately friable and maintains its
excellent good structure when dry.
Soil erosion is insignificant in the project area since soil deposit is generally very
thin. Relatively, thicker soil is confined along creek embankments and in flat and
gently sloping area. Very thin to nil soil cover are found along the steep limestone
slopes where the main development of the buildings will be done.
There will be an insignificant change in soil quality in the project area since the
topography is generally steep slopes with nil to thin soil cover. The project site
cannot support agriculture and is presently covered with thick growth vegetation
of grass and shrubs along the steep limestone slopes.
40
1.4 Terrestrial Biology- For the Full report Please refer to Annex C “Flora and Fauna Inventory”
1.4.1 Vegetation removal and loss of habitat
Sketch Map of the Project Site

Location of Sampling Plots
• The sampling plots and transect survey recorded 61 SPECIES of FLORA. The most dominant
family was Poaceae (11 species of grasses). (Please see full report for the full list of flora).
• On the other hand, the most dominant fauna was arthropods, with 10 species identified
from 10 genera, belonging to 7 families. There were also 4 families of avifauna observed
such as the Apodidae (swifts), Laniidae (shrikes), Nectariidae (sunbirds).
• A single individual of mollusc species was recorded all throughout the study area. (Please
see full report for the full list of identified fauna).
• Furthermore, based on the analysis of the biodiversity indices, it can be observed that both
the species evenness (E=0.93) and diversity (H’=3.84) falls under ‘Very High’ category. This
portrays that the species within the sampling plots are evenly distributed and there is a
wide variety of species that can be found in the site.
• Further, there is no available data on historical occurrences of pest infestations, forest /

grass fires or similar incidences.
*For the full report please refer to Annex C “Flora and Fauna Assessment”
41
1.4.2 Threat to existence of important local species
• It was found out that there are no threatened or endangered FLORA species
found in the study area based on IUCN and DAO 2017-11.
• In terms of endemicity, among the 61 identified flora species, 32% are native,
53% are non-native and 15% are invasive species.
• There are also no threatened or endangered FAUNA species found in the study
area based on IUCN and as for DAO 2019-09.
• Among the 18 fauna species found, 17% were native and 83% non-native.
Vegetation clearing is inevitable during pre-construction and construction phase.

This may affect the existence of the flora species that were found to be Philippine
endemics or have natural habitat confined only in the country. To mitigate impacts
to the existence of important local species, indigenous and native plant and tree
species naturally growing in the project site will be emphasized for conservation
and protection planning in response to the conservation status reported in this
report.
1.4.3 Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution
• The sampling plots and transect survey recorded 61 SPECIES of FLORA. The
most dominant fauna was arthropods, with 10 species. There were also 4
families of avifauna observed and a single mollusc species.
• Out of 61 flora species, weed species dominated the shrub and groundcover of
the study site. Acalypha indica, E. hirta, Fimbristylis miliacea, Chromolaena
odorata, and Mikania micrantha have reported to have traditional medicinal
potential.
42
• However, it is observed that there are no nearby communities that benefits
from these plants or hardly any future interests, considering that the terrain
may pose a hazard for people and the site is already surrounded with on-going
and accomplished developments.
There is no threat to abundance, frequency and distribution since the area are open
areas mostly are grasses and trees can be found therein.
Factors that would affect distribution and abundance are both physical
(temperature, rainfall) and biotic (predator’s competitors). These factors may limit
the survival and reproduction of a species, and hence its local density and
geographic distribution. This controls the distribution and abundance of organisms
including climate, soil, water availability, temperature, food availability, space
availability and predation.
Increased changes in greenhouse gas emissions locally compound to the serious

issues of climate change on a global stage or the global environment. Greenhouse
gases as precursors to climate change should be seen as a global concern rather
than a local issue. However, there are still no clear demarcations on where and how
global contributions from single project can be measured against the problem.
With this in mind the Project is committed to undertake tree planting activities to
help offset greenhouse gas emissions under Green Philippines Program of the
DENR. Attached below the Certification for tree planting for your reference.
43
Figure 13: Certification for Tree Planting
44
1.4.4 Hindrance to wildlife access
There are flora and fauna can be found at the project site which are not considered
as wildlife resources and likewise there are no priority or important local species
found thereon. The most numerous insects are the field ants, flies were also
abundant in the area other insects found include, butterflies, grasshoppers and
mosquitoes.
• The physical encroachment on the land gives rise to

disturbance and barrier effects that contribute to overall
habitat fragmentation.
• However, it is observed that there are other
patches of scrubland left surrounding the development
site. Therefore, highly mobile species such as the birds may
transfer to these available areas. …..................
Location of other Patches of Scrubland for Transfer of Species
The proponent’s commitment to perform avoidance, mitigation, rehabilitation and compensatory

activities for the environmental impacts caused by the project (DMO 2023-01)
45
2 THE WATER
2.1 Hydrology/Hydrogeology
2.1.1 Change in drainage morphology/inducement of flooding reduction in stream

volumetric flow
The Project has a approximate surface area of 27,175.8 sq m. The drainage system of the
project will be collected through roof drains and gardens using the Rainwater Harvesting
Tank or Rainwater Holding Tank. The collected rainwater excess which is approximately
30% - 40% will be redirected to the Catch Basin/detention pond with approximate holding
volume of 5,000 cubic meter which is more than enough to mitigate the possible flooding
to the said project site. Attached below the detention pond via google map and Hazard
Map of Province Cebu for your reference and likewise see Annex D the Detention Pond
System Layout for your reference.
46
47
Reduction in stream volumetric flow
The volume of surface run-off is Approximately 1033 liters per second at Rainfall average
intensity of 136.8 mm per hour. The Drainage system of the area are composed of Roof
drain and gardens. The run-off will be collected by 1000 m3 capacity Rainwater Harvesting
Tank or Rainwater Holding Tank as a sustainable solution for the control of heavy runoff
directly to the river and mitigating measure for flooding. By using the Rainwater harvesting
measure, the reduction in stream volume metric flow is approximately 60% to 70%
reduction of rainwater going directly to the river. For the drainage layout please refer to
Annex D” Drainage Layout” for your reference.
Inducement of Flooding
Rainwater harvesting techniques as an adaptation strategy for flood mitigation.
The capability of the rainwater harvesting technique to be used as a viable solution for flood
mitigation.
Computation as follows:
DESIGN OF DRAINS ON SURFACE AREA FOR BLDG
Approximate Area = 27,173.8 sq. m

VOLUME OF Surface Run-Off, Q
Qs = 0.278 CIA
Where:
Qs = Vol. of Surface Run-off @ Roof deck
C = Surface Run-off Coefficient
= 1.0
I = Rainfall Intensity, mm/hr. = 136.8
A = 27,173.8 m²
0.278 = Conversion Factor
Solving for Qs = 0.278(1) (136.8mm/hr.) (27,173.8 m2 /106)
48
= 1.033m3/sec.
Qs = 1033 lps
SIZE OF RAINWATER HARVESTING TANK (RAINWATER HOLDING TANK)

Approximate Area = 27,173.8 m²
Solving for Qs = 0.278(1) (136.8mm/hr.) 27,173.8 m² / 106
= 1.033 m³/sec
Qs = 1033 lps
= 1.033m³/sec. X 60 sec. x 15 mins. = 930 m³
Rain Water Tank = 1,000 m³
SIZE OF DISCHARGE PIPE (D) IN METER

Q = n-1 A R 2/3 S1/2
Where:
Q = Discharge run-off, m³/s
= 1.033m³/s
A = cross-sectional area, m
R = hydraulic Radius, m
S = Slope
= 0.005
Q = 1/n (πd2/4) (πD2/2πD+4D)2/3(S1/2)
Q = 1/n x πD2/4 x (πD2)2/3/(2πD+4D)2/3 x S1/2
1.033 = 1/0.012 x πD2/4(πD2/2πD+4D)2/3(0.005)1/2
D = 0.766 m
Therefore: use 0.80 m dia. Reinforce Concrete pipe use bigger size
Water Resource Competition
Domestic uses include drinking water supplies, private homes, commercial establishments,
public services and municipal supplies. Water uses differ greatly depending on access,
quantity, quality and socio-economic conditions.
BENEFITS OF HAVING RAINWATER COLLECTION:
49
• It’s relatively clean and is a free source of water.
• It is socially responsible as you’re not depleting any natural resource.
• It is self-sufficient and can provide for your household’s water demands.
• It’s great for both agricultural and ornamental plants as it’s not treated with
chlorine.
• It’s simple and inexpensive, yet provides great convenience.
• It provides an excellent backup source of water during emergencies.
Irrigation can help make yield-increasing innovations a more attractive investment.
The table below illustrates that domestic water use is higher as a proportion of total water use in the project
area.
DESIGN DATA:
CALCULATION OF BUILDING OCCUPANCY
UNIT AREA PER OCCUPANT

TYPE OF OCCUPANCY
(SQ. METER)
a. Hotels 18.6
b. Residences 18.6
50
c. Conference Room 1.4
d. Exhibit Rooms 1.4
e. Gym 1.4
f. Retail Bsmt 2.8
g. Retail Ground 2.8
h. Retail Upper Floor 5.6
i. Offices 9.3
j. Parking Garage 18.6
k. Drinking/Restaurant 1.4
l. Kitchens (Commercial) 18.6
m. Mechanical Room 28.0
n. School/Classroom 1.8
ESTIMATED SEWAGE FLOW RATES/WATER CONSUMPTION
LITERS PER DAY

TYPE OF OCCUPANCY
PER PERSON
a. Hotels 227.1
b. Residences 283.9
c. Conference Room 18.9
d. Exhibit Rooms 18.9
e. Gym 18.9
f. Retail Bsmt 75.7
g. Retail Ground 75.7
h. Retail Upper Floor 75.7
i. Offices 75.7
j. Parking Garage 18.9
k. Drinking/Restaurant 75.7
51
l. Kitchens (Commercial) 75.7
m. Mechanical Room 75.7
n. School/Classroom 75.7
AREA PER LITERS PER

TYPE OF AREA OCCUPANT NO. OF DAY TOTAL
OCCUPANT (SQ. PER
METER) (SQ. METER) PERSON PERSON (LITERS)
Parking Level 2,585 18.6 139 18.9 2627
Genset 67 9.3 7 18.9 136
Transformer Area 62 9.3 7 18.9 125
Pump Room 46 9.3 5 75.7 370
Parking Level 2,525 18.6 136 18.9 2565
Parking Level 3,247 18.6 175 18.9 3299
Lobby 47 18.6 3 75.7 191
Drivers Lounge 17 18.6 1 75.7 67
Pantry 3 18.6 0 75.7 13
Office 39 9.3 4 75.7 315
Lounge 18 9.3 2 75.7 149
Meeting Room 15 9.3 2 75.7 118
Storage 4 9.3 0 75.7 35
Drivers Quarter 20 9.3 2 75.7 165
Lobby 35 18.6 2 75.7 140
Lobby 35 18.6 2 75.7 140
52
Residential Units 875 18.6 47 283.9 13356
Drivers inn 36 18.6 2 283.9 546
Drivers lounge 13 18.6 1 75.7 53
Parking 1,265 18.6 68 75.7 5148
Residential Units 2,580 18.6 139 283.9 39380
Residential Units 2,580 18.6 139 283.9 39380
5TH Residential Units 2,580 18.6 139 283.9 39380
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
53
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
FLOOR
15TH Residential Units 775 18.6 42 283.9 11829
FLOOR Service Area 126 9.3 14 75.7 1026
Dirty kitchen 43 18.6 2 75.7 175
Kitchen 56 18.6 3 75.7 228
Dining 92 18.6 5 75.7 375
Living Area 85 18.6 5 75.7 346
Mud Room 9 18.6 0 75.7 38
Mancave 54 18.6 3 75.7 221
Guest Room 35 18.6 2 283.9 534
Pool Deck 35 18.6 2 75.7 142
Lounge 63 18.6 3 75.7 254
Bar 28 18.6 2 75.7 114
Alfresco 46 1.5 31 18.9 583
Sauna 17 9.3 2 75.7 136
Powder Room 10 9.3 1 75.7 81
Wine Cellar 50 9.3 5 18.9 102
16TH Residential Units 408 18.6 22 283.9 6227
FLOOR Family Area 76 18.6 4 75.7 310
54
Bedroom 184 18.6 10 283.9 2801
TOTAL ESTIMATED WATER DEMAND AND SEWAGE FLOW 506,422
ESTIMATED WATER
DEMAND = 506,422 Liters per Day
= 507 M³ per Day
SIZING OF SEPTIC
TANK = FLOW X 0.75 + 1,125
= 506,422 X 0.75 + 1,125
= 380,941 Liters per Day
= 381 M³ per Day
SIZING OF GREASE
TANK = 2,350 X 22.7 X 1.50 X 1.50
= 120,026 Liters per Day
= 120 M³ per Day
The primary water utility will be for domestic use like washing of equipment,
spraying over dusty areas, and drinking of the workers. Water source for such
activities will be sourced from local water districts (MCWD)or water suppliers (BP
Waterworks). Attached is the Certification of BP Waterworks for your reference.
55
56
2.1.2 Change in stream, lake water depth
Construction of Rainwater Tank facilities in our building in the project area is one of our
possible solutions to control the flood during heavy rainfall. Therefore, there is no impact
on the change in stream and lake water depth since they are not affected because of this
Rainwater Harvesting measure in a sustainable manner. Attached hereto the Regional
Hydrogeological Map for your reference.
57
2.1.3 Depletion of water resources/competition in water use
Pumping water out of the ground faster than it is replenished over the long-term causes
water supply problems. Groundwater depletion is primarily caused by sustained
groundwater pumping. Some of the negative effects of groundwater depletion:
• drying up of wells
• reduction of water in streams and lakes
• deterioration of water quality
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF RAINWATER HARVESTING AND WATER RECYCLED FOR

IRRIGATION SYSTEM
In case of depletion of water resources and or competition in water use the proponent will
introduce deep well drilling as part of our mitigating measures.
58
59
60
2.2 Oceanography
2.2.1 Change/disruption in water circulation pattern, littoral current and coastal erosion
and deposition
The proposed project is located approximately 6 km. far away from the ocean
which will not cause coastal potential erosion and may not be affected by the
climate change especially the sea level rise. Since, the elevation ranges from 103.0
to 201.0 meters above sea level.
2.2.2 Change in bathymetry
This Site
61
2.3 Water Quality
2.3.1 Degradation of groundwater quality
The proponent will monitor periodically the Physico-Chemical characterization of

water to check and take sample whether there is possible degradation of
groundwater quality.
To mitigate the degradation of groundwater proper disposal of all waste must be

observed and strictly implemented, For example: Properly dispose of all waste,
don’t dump chemicals down drains or on the ground, test underground fuel oil
tanks for leaks, if possible, replace them above ground, safely store all chemical and
fuels and minimize the use of chemicals always use according to directions.
Stream Water Pollution
Water Pollution occurs when harmful substance open chemical or microorganisms

contaminate a stream, river, lake or other body of water, degrading water quality
& rendering it toxic to humans of the environment.
For the rise project one of the assurance in mitigating stream water pollution is the
introduction of sewage treatment plant in which all processed waste water are
directly pumped into the storage tanks to be utilized as water supply for the
planter’s irrigation system. Consist of removing pollutants through physical,
chemical or biological process. In addition, mitigating measures the storm water
management, plastic waste reduction and water conservation.
62
2.3.2 Degradation of surface water quality
Construction works like ground excavations, leveling, stockpiling, and dewatering of

railway column holes within or near the river banks would cause observable but short-term
increase of total suspended solids of surface water, more pronounced during rainy season.
This can be addressed by scheduling the construction period on a dry season and having
erosion controls. Erosion controls which shall be implemented for the Project are the
siltation ponds.
Proper maintenance and monitoring of WTF in case of leaks and spills. However, if
there is failure of WTF and other emergency/accident scenarios for the said
facilities we will hire an accredited 3rd party hauler to siphon/haul our wastewater
from the septic tank before it goes to WTF.
The proponent will monitor periodically the Physico-Chemical characterization of

water to check and take sample whether there is possible degradation of surface
water quality.
The procedures in taking samples are based on the standard of EMB-DENR7 and its
classification of the nearest water bodies.
2.3.3 Degradation of coastal/marine water quality
There is no degradation of coastal/marine water quality since the proposed project

is approximately 6km.
63
64
65
66
2.4 Oceanography- Not Applicable
2.5 Water Quality

2.5.1 Groundwater Pollution
Groundwater elevations in Brgys. Guadalupe and Sapangdaku are generally low

except in low-lying areas. The ground water quality at the inland portion is in
general good except in the coastal zone. Water encroachment associated with over
drafting of aquifers or natural leaching from natural occurring deposits are natural
sources of groundwater pollution. Most concern over groundwater contamination
has centered on pollution associated with human activities. Human groundwater
contamination can be related to waste disposal (land disposal of solid waste,
wastewater impoundments, deep-well disposal of liquid waste, improper well
construction and maintenance).
67
68
69
70
2.4 Freshwater Ecology
2.4.1 Threat to existence and/or loss species of important local and habitat
Loss of Important species
Loss of species or Biodiversity loss refers to the decline or disappearance of

biological diversity, understood as the variety of living things that inhabit the
planet, its different levels of biological organization and their respective genetic
variability, as well as the natural patterns present in ecosystems. Biodiversity loss
is cause by five primary drivers: habitat loss, invasive species, overexploitation
(extreme hunting and fishing pressure), pollution, climate change associated with
global warming.
Basically, Species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any
two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types
can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction. However, since
mostly are grasses and natural growing trees can be found in the project site as per
inventory conducted by CENRO DENR 7 which are considered very familiar and
common organism. However, during the clearing area of the project site, if
necessary, the proponent will secure a Permit to Cut from CENRO DENR Office in
accordance with existing guidelines.
Loss of Habitat
Habitat loss refers to the reduction in the amount of space where a particular
species, or group of species can survive and reproduce. Habitat loss is a
consequence of human activities such as agriculture, urbanization, deforestation,
resource extraction, alteration of the sea-floor due to trawling (fishing), or the
release of pollutants. Habitat loss can also occur due to environmental changes
such as volcanic eruptions or tsunamis, or changes in climate or sea level, which
today are largely the result of human activities. Habitat loss can decrease
biodiversity and alters species ranges and interactions.
71
Less habitat can be found in the project site that would minimally destruct during
the clearing operation because there are only five major habitats such as; forests,
grasslands, deserts, mountains, polar regions and aquatic habitat. There is a loss of
habitat but its minimal and less significant.
2.4.2 Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of species
The project will impact the existing freshwater ecosystem. The purpose of the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as mandated by PD 1152 or the Philippine
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) System and regulated by PD 1084 (Charter
of the Public Estates Authority), is to accurately and sufficiently assess the existing
baseline conditions and recommend mitigating measures to ensure environmental
protection and the prevention of environmental degradation.
Nearby communities also direct their drainage towards the Guadalupe River. It
does not have water present during the summer months, but has flowing water
during the monsoon season.
Threat to abundance, frequency & distribution impact for this project is from less
impact to none, since the site is far from water body of river like Guadalupe river &
other river tributaries. Aside from the location, water diversion and impoundment
is minimal in which it does not affect to the important species and loss of habitat.
In addition, upon survey of the nearest body of water there are no significant
number of species evident in the area only common frogs.
72
2.5 Marine Ecology- N/A
2.5.1 Threat to existence and/or loss of important local species and habitat
There is no threat to existence and/or loss of important local species and habitat
since the proposed project is located approximately 6 km. far away from the coastal
area. Attached herewith is the proximity map for your reference.
2.5.2 Threat to abundance frequency and distribution
Again, there is no threat to abundance frequency and distribution since this

proposed project is a land development. Marine Ecology is not applicable.
73
3 THE AIR- Please refer to Annex F for the Air Sampling Report for your reference.
3.1 Meteorology/Climatology
3.1.1 Change in the local climate
The climate of Cebu belongs to Type 3 of the Modified Coronas Classification having
indistinct wet and dry seasons. This type of climate is relatively dry from November to
April and wet the rest of the year.
Data on climatological normal and projections on temperature and rainfall data, were
obtained from the Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services
Administration (PAGASA). Climatological data used for Region 7 were from the nearest
PAGASA synoptic station located Mactan International Airport, Cebu. The observed
ranges, and estimated projections by 2020 and 2050.
Meteorological data of Cebu including rainfall data were gathered from the records
of the nearest PAGASA station located in Mactan, Cebu.
74
A. Climate
During dry season (February to May) monthly rainfall is about half that of the wet season
(June to- November) monthly rainfall. It is less than 200 millimetres (mm) on a month
average as compared with many areas of the country. The region receives only mind
amount of rainfall. Generally, the average annual rainfall of Cebu as established by the USC
Water Resources Center is 1.6 meters per year on the lowland and 1.8 meters per year at
higher elevations with 25% allowable variations. The nearest rainfall monitoring device
(rain gauge) that can be utilized for projection purposes is located at Talamban, Cebu City
as taken from the Water Resource Center.
B. Rainfall
The 10-year total per month comparison of the rainfall data taken from PAGASA Mactan
from the years 2009 to 2018 showed that the rainy season in Cebu starts in late May-
June to November and slightly extending until January. Wettest months is on the month
75
of July and September. The remaining months from February to April are expected to be
dry. The annual comparison of the said rainfall data within a 10-year period (2009-2018).
High rainfall was recorded in the years 2011 and 2017 with low rainfall in the years 2009
and 2015, which relate to the El Nino phenomenon.
C. Temperature
Cloudiness and humidity values are uniformly high throughout the year according to
PAGASA. Differences between the average of the dry and wet months are also small.
D. Wind Direction
There are two (2) types of prevailing winds corresponding to the large-scale monsoon
flow that is northeasterly from November to May; Southwesterly from July to September.
For the months of June and October, wind evenly split between these directions. The
average wind speed for all months is two (2) meters per second (m/s).
76
Wind Rose Diagrams
The Wind Rose is described based on the data observed hourly every day from 1981 to
2010. From June to October, the wind from southwest was dominant due to the influence
of the southwest monsoon. On the other hand, from November to May, the wind from
north and northeast was dominant due to the influence of the northeastern monsoon.
Attached herewith the Wind Rose diagram of Cebu source by Google
77
3.1.2 Contribution in terms of greenhouse gas emissions
Increased changes in greenhouse gas emissions locally compound to the serious

issues of climate change on a global stage or the global environment. Greenhouse
gases as precursors to climate change should be seen as a global concern rather
than a local issue. However, there are still no clear demarcations on where and how
global contributions from single project can be measured against the problem.
With this in mind the Project is committed to undertake tree planting activities to
help offset greenhouse gas emissions under Green Philippines Program of the
DENR. Attached
herewith the
Certification.
78
3.2 Air Quality
3.2.1 Degradation of Air Quality
Construction activities involve earth movement and excavation. These activities

potential may generate emissions of air contaminants and greenhouse gas
emission from earth movement, heavy equipment operation and fuel combustion.
However, these are expected to be marginal and are very unlikely to cause the
ambient air quality standards to be exceeded or greenhouse gas emissions that are
considered important on the local or provincial scale.
Proper dewatering during excavation and cover for the hauling vehicle during
transport. Air cleaning equipment are introduced in the project during operation
stage to ensure an exhausted air are purified. Attached herewith the Test Result
conducted on April 21, 2022.
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
3.2.2 Increase in ambient Noise level
Sound quality is mainly characterized according to type, character, frequency,

intensity and duration of sound emissions. Since the human ear does not respond
to sound on a linear scale, ambient sound pressure levels are characterized using a
logarithmic decibel scale. Winds, waves, birds and anthropogenic activities
influence sound pressure.
The construction activities in the project site will generate noise due to the
temporary use of heavy equipment. Considering that the cluster of households in
the vicinity is more than 500m, noise generation levels as determined at the
receptors end is expected to be within the national ambient noise quality
standards.
At the completion of the project construction cars, service vehicles and equipment
will generate low level of noise. At distances greater than 50m, these noise sources
will be hardly noticeable.
On the operation stage noise will be generated and expected. Noise which is a
component of air quality since its transmission is by air is expected to be very
substantial, specifically within and around the project perimeter.
MITGATING MEASURES
Noise can be mitigated by limiting the usage of heavy equipment during daytime
considering that activities will start at 8am to 5pm only. Limiting the number of
equipment to operate at a given time should also be done.
94
Impact Analysis
The DENR Environmental Quality Standards for Noise are based on the 1978 Rules
and Regulations of the National Pollution Control Commission. The location of Genvi
Development Corporation was considered a commercial area (Class BJ with a DENR
Morning and Evening Noise Standard of 60dBA.
The results of the noise Ievel measurement show that the noise levels at both
stations were within the applicable DENR Daytime Noise Standard of 70dBA. Audible noise
during the time of measurement normally. Please see attached below the Test Result for
your reference
95
4.0 THE PEOPLE
4.1.1 Displacement of settler
For the proposed development there are no settlers can be found in the project.
4.1.2. Displacement/ disturbanceof properties
The proposed project where to be constructed is a vacant area. The rise project does
not displace any settler since the proposed location is mainly clear from tenants or
illegal settlers. And if there any a proper coordination with affected individuals and
other concerned agencies for proper disposition of the issue. Any existing use of access
is still granted as long as there are no violations of the existing conditions like no
standby, no parking of the road carriage and inducement of intolerable noise. And in
the future the access will be utilized for development, proper coordination with
barangay and agencies will be coordinated. And access will not be closed unless new
pathways are identified by both parties raised during the public hearing.
4.1.3 Change conflict in land ownership
For now, the 8990 Monterrazas Corporation is the property owner of Monterrazas
De Cebu Project, sometime in the year 2007 LANDCo Pacific Corp. started the
development in partnership with Genvi Agro-Industrial Development Corp. until it
was terminated in 2010. There is no Change of land ownership since originally the
land itself is owned by 8990 Monterrazas Corporation. Attached herewith the
Termination Agreement and Amended SEC for your record and reference.
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
4.1.4 Change/ conflict Right of way conflict
The project area is accessible from Cebu City via V. Rama Avenue in Barangay
Guadalupe, turning to the west at the junction of Gervacio Quijada Street, right
after Guadalupe Barangay Hall. The eastern and northern
boundaries of the proposed project are bounded by the
Monterrazas Road.
The main gate of Monterrazas de Cebu and its oval road are
located in the northeast section of the project site. The study
area is accessible by private vehicles, which only takes 15-20
minutes’ drive from downtown Cebu City.
The project is surrounded by existing land development

projects of Monterrazas de Cebu which include The North
Ridge, The Residences at the Northridge and the Peaks.
4.1.5 Impact on Public Access
All existing legal roads crossed by the alignment such as National Roads, City Roads, and Barangay
Roads will be maintained and not closed/blocked;
Provision of alternative access to affected access roads and crossings are being considered in the
design;
Assured that the concern is being carefully studied by the traffic engineering design team.
Any existing use of access is still granted as long as there are no violations of the existing
conditions like no standby, no parking of the road carriage and inducement of intolerable
noise. And in the future the access will be utilized for development, proper coordination
with barangay and agencies will be coordinated. And access will not be closed unless new
pathways are identified by both parties raised during the public hearing.
107
Demography Guadalupe is a barangay in Cebu City. Its population as determined by the 2020
Census was 70,039. This represented 7.26% of the total population of Cebu City. The household
population of Guadalupe in the 2015 Census was 60,848 broken down into 15,200 households or
an average of 4.00 members per household
Population by age group
According to the 2015 Census, the age group with the highest population in Guadalupe is 20 to
24, with 6,845 individuals. Conversely, the age groups with the lowest population are in the
ranges 75 to 79, and 80 and over, with 521 individuals. Combining age groups together, those
aged 14 and below, consisting of the young dependent population which include infants/babies,
children and young adolescents/teenagers, make up an aggregate of 29.54% (18,090). Those
aged 15 up to 64, roughly, the economically active population and actual or potential members of
the work force, constitute a total of 65.52% (40,121). Finally, old dependent population consisting
108
of the senior citizens, those aged 65 and over, total 4.94% (3,027) in all. The computed Age
Dependency Ratios mean that among the population of Guadalupe, there are 45 youth
dependents to every 100 of the working age population; there are 8 aged/senior citizens to every
100 of the working population; and overall, there are 53 dependents (young and old-age) to every
100 of the working population.
The median age of 25 indicates that half of the entire population of Guadalupe are aged less
than 25 and the other half are over the age of 25.
Historical population
The population of Guadalupe grew from 40,696 in 1990 to 70,039 in 2020, an increase of 29,343
people over the course of 30 years. The latest census figures in 2020 denote a positive growth
rate of 2.87%, or an increase of 8,801 people, from the previous population of 61,238 in 2015.
Physical/ Geographical Profile
Total land Area 374 hectares

Total Population 70,074
Female 35,796
Male 34,278
109
No. of Families 59,333
No. of Household 12,290
Total Voting Populations 44,690
(Regular)
Total voting populations (SK) 11,000
Number of Sitios 77
Number of Subdivision 40
(estimated)
Attached the Secondary from Brgy. Guadalupe for your reference.
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
4.2 In-migration
With the eventual construction and operation of the propose condominium project, it is expected
that a number of people who are willing to work will move-in. The loss of a person from rural
areas, impact on the level and development of rural areas. The influx of workers in urban areas
increases competition for the job, houses, school facilities. Having large population puts too much
pressure on natural resources, amenities and services.
During the construction stage an estimated 100 more or less since the implementation of this
proposed project will be done in series of phases and stages. In addition, hiring of qualified workers
from the Barangay Guadalupe and other neighboring areas will be facilitated and given more
priority in which sudden influx of construction workers are mitigated to avoid competition the job,
houses and natural resources.
Upon turnover operation of the project an estimated of 500 occupants considering full occupancy
but, on the data, gathered on all condominiums high end and mid-level development, maximum
of 60% are occupied. In addition, market from outside the Province/City of Cebu utilizes the unit
as mainly 2nd or 3rd home for vacation purposes or a unit that can be stayed during business or
family trip.
4.3 Cultural Change
Culture Change is a term used in Public Policy making that emphasizes the influences of cultural
capital on individual and community behavior. It has been sometimes called repositioning of
culture, which means the reconstruction of the cultural concept of a society. It places stress of the
social and cultural. Capital determinants of decision making and the manner in with these interact
with other factors like the availability of information.
During the implementation of the project, hiring of workers are mainly from the barangays nearest
to the project or the Province of Cebu in which it does not mainly affect any cultural change like
religion faith since our community as of this day has various religious sectors that are freely
119
operating. Also, for the construction workers are mostly Roman Catholic with compromises the
large church in the society.
During the operation target market are mainly Filipinos 75%- 85% in various regions or Filipinos
married to foreign national which are composed of 10%-15% based on the existing demographic
on sales from previous years, in which impact of cultural change us minimal or less significant. In
additional, society as of today is changing and the community are mainly open to embrace any
change to the age of technology.
The Project potentiates a lively growth of cultural changes brought about by the development. It
is foreseen that the residents of the units will be a mix of Filipino and residents of different
nationalities. Further foreseen is more economic entrepreneurship that will be generated as result
of this Project.
All cultures change through time. No culture is static. However, most cultures are basically
conservative in that they tend to resist change. Some resist more than others by enacting laws for
the preservation and protection of traditional cultural patterns while putting up barriers to alien
ideas and things. With the propose project it will create cultural change.
Livelihood and job opportunities of the residents in the area has a great impact. The talents and
skills of the existing residents may not be suitable or limited to supply to the needed manpower
of the operations. The proponent in coordination with the Barangay, Municipality and City of
Public service will implement a training and skills development program for the residents thereon.
This will ensure and enhance the employability of impact barangay residents in the proposed
project.
120
4.4 Impacts on physical cultural resources
In the project site has no cultural resources and landscape classified as cultural interest value,
provincial, national or international level.
4.5 Threat to delivery of basic services
(1) Power Consumption During construction stage, there will be demand for power for utilization
in the construction works (e.g. operation of the equipment’s, lighting etc). In addition, during the
operations stage there will be demand for power for roadside lighting.
(2) Water Usage During construction stage, there will be demand for water supply for utilization
in the construction works (e.g. concrete mixing, etc). However, during the operations stage there
will be very minimal usage of water.
121
Water Supply and Demand
To summarize, the volume of water that will come out of the project after development, even
during rain, will be less than before. We could even eliminate totally the effluent and water runoff
through recycling. The most significant effect the development project will cause is that it will
certainly help curve possible flooding in low lying areas especially during rainy season.
122
Power Supply Demand
Total Load Estimated capacity is 4,500 KVA during the operation. See attached below the
Certification from VECO for your reference.
123
Communications
• PLDT
• Globe
• Smart
• Converge
Transportation
• Habal-habal
• PUJ
• Tricycle
• Taxi
• PUV
Peace of Order
• Brgy. Tanod
• Security Guard
• PNP
Educational Facilites
• Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish Pre-School Dev't Center

• Ramon Duterte Memorial High School (Day & Night)
• Guadalupe Elementary School
• Golden Success College
• Bethany Christian School
• St. Paul Learning Center Inc. and etc.
124
4.5 Threat to public health and safety
During implementation/ Operation stage, mitigating measures are to be strictly implemented and
budget allocation are provided.
The prevailing public health policy calls upon the project proponent to ensure that buildings are
adequately provided with utilities so that they are fit for human habitation. The proposed
development has been designed by professional engineers and architects and as such will have all
amenities/utilities that are essential for safeguarding public health and safety for all people using
the facilities.
Air Pollution
Proper dewatering during excavation and cover for the hauling vehicle during transport. Air
cleaning equipment’s are introduced in this project during operation stage to ensure an exhausted
purified.
Soil Pollution
Minimal application of soil poisoning for terminates only on building footprint, proper collection
of construction plastic packing and disposal. Planting vegetation of excavated open areas and
introduction of greenery to avoid soil erosion. Reuse and recycling of things, that would ensure
the lesser waste and dumped in landfills and cubic meter in turn would reduce soil pollution.
Promote of natural manure in the fertilization of soil as it is harmless and completely organic.
Noise Pollution
During implementation stage usage of heavy equipment and machineries activities that produces
sound and noise. The scheduled is day time only from 8 am to 5pm.
Operation stage, deed of restriction with implementing guidelines will be discussed during the
signing of contract to sell.
125
Water Pollution
The best way to protect streams from pollution is to prevent it at the source. Liters can flow from
yards and streets to nearby drains and streams when it rains. Chemicals and other pollutants
negatively impact the environment and wildlife in waterways.
Here are some ways to prevent water pollution:
• Pick up liter and throw it away in a garbage bin.

• Promote the use of natural manure of fertilizer.
• Blow or sweep fertilizer back on the grass/plants if it gets into paled area. Don’t put
fertilizer on the grass right before it rains. The chemicals will wash into storm drains and
waterways.
• Wash cars or outdoor equipment where it can flow to a gravel on grassy areas instead of a
street.
• Rainwater coming from building are collected to the rainwater tank and wastewater
coming from the units are directed to the septic tanks prior flowing to the sewage
treatment facility and the product are used in watering of plants and other greeneries.
126
4.7 Generation of Local Benefits from the project
Direct and indirect economic opportunities for local residents will result from the Project
through direct labor and economic activities during the construction and operation of the Project.
And likewise contribute income to the barangay.
In the operation of the establishment, local residents who fit the required qualification for
applicants should be given priority over other applicants. This could be part of the
coordination effort between the establishment and the local residents.
• Provides opportunity/employment to local resident and nearby areas of the project.

• Provides livelihood like provision of meals and snacks during implementation stage.
• Increase in house/room rental demand
• Increase income of transport providers like tricycle and habal-habal drivers as the basic
mobility from quijada to construction site.
• Increase LGU Revenue income due to real property tax on buildings and additional zonal
valuation.
127
4.8 Traffic Congestion
Definitely, there will be an increase in the traffic volume. Aside from its being a shorter link to the
western side of Cebu, there are also developments happening on the mountain barangays that
will greatly contribute to the increase. The heavy equipment, vehicles and dump truck of the
contractor that will come in and out of the project site may block the road and create unnecessary
nuisances. Changes in the traffic situation could trigger some adjustments on the lifestyle of the
residents living along the road. The proponent has also designed a traffic model to find ways of
ensuring the access and security checks at the proposed facility do not result in buildup of traffic.
Mitigating Measures
At the project site, space should be provided for parking purposes only. Construction vehicles,
heavy equipment and construction material delivery trucks should not park or standby along the
barangay road, instead go straight to the designated parking area. Temporary traffic and warning
signs should be posted in and outside the project site. On the narrow-concreted road, vehicles and
haulers particularly those that belong to the contractor should observe road courtesy at all times.
Drivers should be given instructions and reminder on defensive driving techniques so that conflict
between the existing road users will be avoided. Traffic management on this road could also
coordinated with the barangay officials.
The residents should be given time to adopt the change in traffic situation. There could be a need
for some period of time to make change part of their daily routine. Good community relations
could make the change run smooth devoid of any conflicts that may rise. Also maximize the use of
alternative route whenever applicable to lessen traffic loads in one area.
128
Traffic Analysis
The above figure entitled Vehicle Percentage in

Intersection 1 shows the breakdown of vehicles based
on classification. In summary, the following are the
percentage
• Private Vehicle - 34.22 %

• • Motorcycle - 23.84 %
• • PUJ - 6.73 %
• • Taxi - 5.86 %
• • Truck - 3.66 %
• • Bus - 0.14 %
• • Tricycle - 0.12 %
• • Container Van - 0.02 %
Data shows that privately owned vehicles comprise an estimated 58.06 % of this Intersection. This
is the combination of a private vehicle and motorcycle count. While publicly accessible vehicles
(PUJ, tricycle, and taxi) account for an estimated 13 % of the total count for this Intersection
The above figure entitled Vehicle Percentage in

Intersection 2 shows the breakdown of vehicles
based on classification. In summary, the following
are the percentage
• • Private Vehicle - 30.8 %
• • Motorcycle - 26.25 %
• • Taxi - 4.34 %
• • PUJ - 3.5 %
• • Truck - 3.35 %
• • Tricycle - 0.3 %
• • Container Van - 0.0 %
Data shows that privately owned vehicles comprise an estimated 57.05 % of this Intersection. This is the
combination of a private vehicle and motorcycle count. At the same time, publicly accessible vehicles (PUJ,
tricycle, and taxi) account for an estimated 8 % of the total count for this Intersection.
129
Intersection 1 starts with a volume of 3471.0 for
7:00 - 7:30. Then, it logs with an average volume
of 6412.0 for 7:30 - 8:00.
Then, it logs with an average volume of 5692.0
for the period of 8:00 - 8:30. And finally,
Intersection 1 logs with an average volume of
6278.0 for the period of 8:30 - 9:00.
The highest average volume logged for this
Intersection is 6412.0 for 7:30 - 8:00.
Intersection 2 starts with a volume of 2256.0

from 7:00 - 7:30. Then, it logs with an
average volume of 1992.0 for 7:30 - 8:00.
Then, it logs with an average volume of
3013.0 for the period of 8:00 - 8:30. And
finally, Intersection 2 logs with an average
volume of 2505.0 for the period of 8:30 -
9:00.
The highest average volume logged for this
Intersection is 3013.0 for 8:00 - 8:30.
Intersection 1 starts with a volume of 5797.0 for 16:00

- 16:30. Then, it logs with an average volume of 6605.0
for 16:30 - 17:00. Then, it logs with an average volume
of 8899.0 for 17:00 - 17:30. And finally, Intersection 1
logs with an average volume of 10169.0 for 17:30 -
18:00.
The highest average volume logged for this Intersection
is 10169.0 for 17:30 - 18:00.
130
Intersection 2 starts with a volume of
3584.0 for 16:00 - 16:30. Then, it logs
with an average volume of 2310.0 for
16:30 - 17:00. Then, it logs with an
average volume of 1748.0 for 17:00 -
17:30. And finally, Intersection 2 logs with
an average volume of 975.0 for 17:30 -
18:00.
The highest average volume logged for
this Intersection is 3584.0 for 16:00 -
16:30.
Traffic Generates
The table shows the ITE Generation rates for the type of land use application (Mid-Rise Residential Land
use 221) for the development. The basis of the rates will be the number of units the residential project
will produce.
The morning peak hour rate indicates that the generation is estimated at 97.92 vehicle trips for the
morning peak hour period. Out of this generation, 25 is for the incoming vehicles while 72 is for the
outgoing vehicles.
131
The afternoon peak hour rate indicates that the generation is 119.68 vehicle trips. Out of this generation,
73 is for the incoming vehicles while 47 is for the outgoing vehicles.
Directional Breakdown of Traffic
The directional traffic analysis shows that V. Rama (Guadalupe Bound) receives most traffic from Salvador
St and M. Velez Street. While the outgoing traffic for V. Rama generally proceeds to another juncture and
is divided between M. Velez and Salvador Street.
132
Traffic Impact Analysis
This section analyses future traffic, including the generated volume after the fully operational status of
the proposed project / 100% occupancy. It also examines future traffic based on the projected growth
rate.
The above data shows that Intersection 1 has the most road lanes at either LOS D or E. The section of M.
Velez and Salvador St. are already on LOS E. It is characterized by significant delays and average Traffic
Impact Assessment.
133
travel speeds of 33 percent or less of the free-flow speed. Such operations are caused by negative
progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate
signal timing. On the other hand, the sections of V. Rama are on LOS D. It borders on a range in which small
increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreased travel speed. LOS D may be due to
adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or a combination of these factors.
Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free-flow speed.
Long-term traffic projection for intersection 1 will be a LOS E for most of the Intersection. However, traffic
generation is less than 10% of the total traffic.
Intersection 2 shows significant volumes along G. Quijada from Project Site and Jollibee bound traffic for
the morning peak hour. Contributing traffic from the project along these critical lanes is at a minimal of less
than 10%. These lanes have been identified with LOS D. However; it shows that projected generation by
the project is high at 10.55% for project site bound. However, it is still within the threshold level.
Traffic for the afternoon peak hour period shows that most of the lanes in Intersection 1 are already at
LOS E. While projected traffic from the project is only at a high of 4.52% and hence still within the minimal
level. Intersection 2 still shows the threshold level for all the lanes except for Jollibee bound traffic. While
a significant traffic contribution from the project is seen along G. Quijada St, it also shows that projected
traffic is still within LOS C and along the threshold. LOS C describes stable operations; however, the ability
to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and long
queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds about 50
percent of the free-flow rate for the street class.
Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation

After data presentation and careful analysis, the study was able to come up with the following initial
findings:
134
• Intersections 1 and 2 show that most traffic composition is private vehicles, followed by motorcycles and
PUJ.
• The traffic pattern shows a peak between 8:00 am and 9:00 am for all intersections during the morning
peak hour. It also indicates the pattern of waning traffic after the peak hour period.
The afternoon peak hour period shows a different pattern. It reflects an increasing traffic pattern from
4:00 pm and peaks at 5:30 pm to 6:00 pm for intersection 1. However, intersection 2 shows waning traffic
with higher traffic volume from 4:00 pm and lessening throughout the peak hour period.
• Additional generated traffic is shown as having minimal impact on the existing road lanes. The
additional volumes account for not more than 6%. At the same time, other lanes have negligible traffic
impact, which is less than 3% of the prevailing traffic.
• Major lanes from the project site are not significant contributors to the high traffic volumes identified.
In the case of intersection 1, wherein all lanes have been identified as having a critical traffic volume. It
does not have any significant traffic contributor showing that generated traffic from the project is less
than 10%.
Conclusion
The study was able to find that the project may have a minimal impact on the prevailing situation during
the morning and afternoon peak hour periods. However, the level of service is still projected within the
threshold level. The generated traffic most would impact G. Quijada St with traffic generation at more than
10%.
On the other hand, it is crucial to consider that it is under the "Do No" situation wherein the existing lanes
are not expanded.
Overall, the economic benefits that the project may bring and the additional residential units it produces
would weigh more than the minimal traffic that it may be attributed.
Recommendations
The following are the recommendations for the project proponents to consider.
Provision of Transport Service
As observed in the traffic study, it was found out that the immediate Intersection (which is Intersection
2) is minimally accessed by public utility transportation. Hence, future residents may look into owning a
car. The project proponents may consider providing scheduled transportation service, especially during
the identified peak hour period.
Access to Retail Services
Another important consideration is the provision of retail shops within the project vicinity. This will
minimize unnecessary road trips for the residents of the area.
135
Traffic Advisory
The project proponent may provide traffic advisory to their residents to plan and avoid the rush hour
traffic for morning and afternoon periods. It is also imperative for them to keep constant communication
with the local traffic authorities to cascade any significant advisories to the project's residents.
Solid Waste Management Measures (WACS)
Solid waste generation is significant, construction waste and waste generated by the construction
personnel contribute to domestic and construction waste. The contractor will provide the
appropriate sanitation facilities such as toilets within the Project site. These facilities comply with
the solid waste management plan.
It is good estimate that per household with an average of 4 to 5 members, the solid waste
generated amounts to 2 kg/household/day. The area of MRF of Condominium is 57 sq.m while the
residential subdivision is 504 square meters.
136
Waste Analysis and Characterization Study for MONTERRAZAS DE CEBU
Waste Percentage Volume
Food Waste 25.48% 5,102 kg

Plastic 25.70% 5,303
Metal 26.9% 5,400
Wood 1.00% 949.1
Paper 15.23% 2,207
Glass 5.69% 1,038.9
Total 100% 20,000kg
137
First Review Meeting Other Concerns
Other Concerns to be Addressed in the Document:
1. To make a revision of the boundary for the new proposed development in

the site development.
Proponents Response: Please see Annex A for your reference
138
2. “The Geotechnical Study is design for the previous structure, is this applicable for the
new design.”
Proponent’s Response:
Geotechnical investigation study was conducted in the project area last January 2022 by Mega
testing Center, Inc. It includes subsurface investigation in which the consultant conducted
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) on eight (8) test holes (labeled as BH-01 to BH-08), inside the
project area. The boreholes were drilled to a depth up to 21.0 meters each hole.
The original design of the project was for an 8-storey residential multi-building structures and
was revised by the project proponent and change to a 15-storey condominium multi-building.
The geotechnical consultants and structural engineers of the project should reevaluate and
recalculate the design parameters to conform with the new building design.
3. Do not include in the SDP the area that are not included in the ECC Application.
Proponents Response:
This is already addressed and the site development plan of Monterrazas De Cebu was already
updated.
4. Include all components in the amendment application.
Please see attached the updated components list of Monterrazas De Cebu.
139
140
141
5. “Include the social aspects (the people) in the squatter area that belongs to the property of
GENVI (baseline data)”
The Social Development Plan for Monterrazas De Cebu is manifested through Social Development
Plan.
• Brigada Eskwela
• Feeding Program
• Tree Planting
• Donation Construction Materials to Brgy. Guadalupe
6. Design of the drainage system and its schematic diagram.
Please refer to Annex C the Schematic diagram design of Monterrazas de Cebu for your reference.
7. “Include in the EIS document the flooding concerns of the stakeholders during the Public
Hearing. Make sure that the inspection is documented.”
Inspection was done on March 3, 2023 at around 11.05 am together with the concern Jean
Cabarrubias and Brgy. Guadalupe Councilor Apple Rose G. Enriquez and found out that the
concerned is not valid since the area are caused by clogged drainage/waterway due to the
volume of garbage especially plastic. As for the solution a clean up drive was scheduled on
March 18, 2023 and the regular cleaning by the residents thereon. As agreed by the
residents and the barangay. Attached are the Attendance sheet and Pictures during the
inspection for your reference.
142
143
144
145
146
Pictures below showing the cleanup drive in coordination of Brgy. Guadalupe for your reference.
“Compliance of the existing ECC”
All permits are already submitted to EMB, DENR7 with screenshot for your reference.
MONTERRAZAS DE CEBU
PERMIT COMPLIANCES
1. DISCHARGE PERMIT – currently in process
147
2. ONLINE HAZARDOUS WASTE ID – currently in process
148
3. PCO ACCREDITATION
149
Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) with Environmental Quality Performance Levels (EQPLs)1,2,3
Proponent/Name of Project: Monterrazas De Cebu Project Location: Brgy. Guadalupe, Cebu City
Impact Description Cost of
per Mitigation or
Project Activities Mitigation (if negative) Enhancement Institutional Plan Schedule Guarantees,
Parameter
Enhancement (if positive) MOA,
Contracts
A. PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Loss of vegetation and Trees/plants of ornamental P 20,000.00 Re-greening and Throughout Contract with
soil erosion values were not cut aesthetic program will development contractor
be initiated stage
Good shade trees were

introduced/planted in the
area.
Planting of erosion control

medium plants/ grasses like
Bermuda grasses and other
ornamental plants
B. CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Erosion of filling Erosion is minimized by filling P 20,000.00 Maintenance program Throughout Contract with
materials/soil areas by small section and of soil erosion control development contractor
planting it immediately with measures stage
Bermuda grasses.
150
Maintenance of plants Throughout
planted development
stage
Erosion of stock piled Stock pile is located in low
materials and lying area and regular
accumulation of dust sprinkling of water is done.
Vibration caused by Boring made on big boulders

boring/ hammering were small, therefore it doest
activities weaken the foundation of the
rocks
Provision of appropriate
Possible increased traffic traffic signs at the barangay
movement in the area road leading to the project
site/
Throughout
Installation and development
P 20,000.00 maintenance of stage
readable traffic signs
will be properly
observed Maintenance
of parking lot
Prioritize hiring of qualified

manpower in the nearby
Source of additional communities
income and new job Throughout
opportunities for the development
people stage
Small livelihood will rise like

souvenir items, etc.
151
Rise in associated project
activities
C. OPERATION PHASE
Increase in solid waste Trash boxes/collection bins P 20,000.00 Risk Management and Quarterly Agreement
generation in the form of placed in strategic places; Waste management with LGU
plastics, food and other will be regularly
product packaging monitored
Practice waste segregation;
Collection of garbage
by Municipal collection truck

once a week. Garbage is
delivered to Municipal
garbage facility.
152
Increase in water Rainwater water. Used for Continue conservation Project
demand watering plants and also used of water resources Development
for other cleaning purposes. P 20,000.00 Throughout Plan
operation stage
Upon full operation, a rain

collection tank will be Monitoring and ensure
constructed adequate supply of
water Throughout the
P 20,000.00 operation
Plant species planted in the

area are not actually foreign Conduct of Re-
Introduction of plant in the area. These plants greening programs,
species to the area actually in nearby areas and planting of ornamental Throughout the
just transplanted in the plants operation
project site.
P 20,000.00
Close coordination with the

barangay; Work for the
passing of ordinances relating
to the operation of the
project; Appoint a community Establishment of
Possible tension between coordinator. linkage between the
visitors/tourists and local proponent and the
people LGU MOA with LGU
Throughout the
Appropriate traffic signs at project
the barangay road leading to P 20,000.00
the project site;
Visitor’s vehicles should be Maintenance of traffic

parked inside the project signs
Traffic congestion
area;
Quarterly MOA with LGU
153
Construction of the project P 20,000.00
will provide Additional income
by selling foods to
construction workers.
Support small business

of the community
Source of additional
income for the people
workers are hired from

nearby communities,
including women.
One income generating

livelihood is on transportation
business.
Coordinate with the barangay

Additional job and conduct IEC (Thru the
opportunities barangay
Provide support to LGU

projects
Rise in associated
project/ income
generating activities
As the need MOA with LGU
Increase in land values/ arises
selling of lands
D. ABANDONMENT PHASE
Possible demolition, It will only have wastes that P 50,000.00 Proper Management Rehabilitation
accumulation of waste are domestic in nature. Waste Program for Disposal Plan
will be in the form of wooden of wastes
and cement debris since most
154
part of the building and its
furniture can be sold or re-
cycled. The septic tanks will
be covered/ sealed.
Composting of waste; Re-use

of empty paint cans
Accumulation of wastes Wastes Management ECC

due to rehabilitation program be
P 50,000.00 implemented properly
De-slugging of wastes and
delivered to treatment
facilities
Wastes Management
Accumulation of waste program be
due to rehabilitation of ECC
implemented properly
sanitary or waste facility P 50,000.00
155
IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN (IMP)
Project Phase/Environment Aspect Environmental Component Potential Impact Options for Prevention Responsible Cost Guarantee /
(project Activity Which Will Likely Impact the Likely to be Affected or Mitigation or Entity Financial
Environmental Component Enhancement Arrangement
I. PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE (include only applicable

modules)
A. The Land No potential N/A N/A N/A N/A
Environmental Aspect #1 impact during this
phase
B. The People No potential
Environmental Aspect #4 impact during this
phase
II. CONTRUCTION PHASE (include only applicable
modules)
A. The Land Soil erosion/ Tree planting of fruit Contact or 10,000 Part of the
landslide alteration bearing tress, provide and development
of land contour buffer zone and installing proponent budget
structures such as piles
and retaining walls.
10,000
Environmental Aspect #1 Traffic generation Put vital signs visible on Contact or
the project site in and
accordance with the proponent
traffic rules and
regulation of the city
planning
Loss of vegetation Limit land clearing as

due to land clearing much as possible
incorporate in the design
that minimum vegetation
will be affected as much
as possible.
Cleared vegetation are

allowed to decompose
Coordination with LGU for

final disposal of
construction
156
Project Phase/Environment Aspect Environmental Component Potential Options for Prevention or Responsible Cost Guarantee /
(project Activity Which Will Likely Impact the Likely to be Affected Impact Mitigation or Entity Financial
Environmental Component Enhancement Arrangemen
t
Increase in Replant trees. Ornamental 5,000
water run off plants
Provide adequate
drainage system with slit
traps
Top soil As soon as possible re- 5,000

removal vegetate the area
B. The Water Generation of Provide temporary toilet 1,000
Environmental Aspect #2 domestic facilities for the workers;
waste have the effluents Part of the
Proponent/PC development
collected by accredited 5,000.00
O budget
services providers
operating with WTF after
construction period
Possible Drainage canal shall be

flooding provided
Increase in Implement water

water usage conservation methods
and waste
water -Construction of adequate
generation 3 chambered septic tank
-Provision of adequate
wastewater treatment
facility
-Final disposal of effluents
will be collected by the
accredited septage and
sewerage service
operating with WTF
-Construction and
installation of cistern tank
157
and adequate drainage
system;
Recycle water for watering
greeneries and unpaved
roads.
C. The Air Dust Regular watering of 5,000
Environmental Aspect #3 generation due exposed cuts/grounds
to earthmoving
activities
Provides temporary fence

during the construction
Noise Schedule noise generating

generation due activities during daytime Contract
to earthmoving only noise
activities
D. The People Increase Prioritize hiring of locals
Environmental Aspect #4 employment
opportunity Supplies and materials will
be bought from local
Increase in markers
economic
activity
(include only applicable
III. OPERATION PHASE modules)
A. The Land Increase in Provide adequate garbage 5,000 LGU &
Environmental Aspect #1 solid waste receptacles with labels Proponent
generation (bio-non bio, and
recyclables) Coordinate
with LGU for the collection
and disposal of the solid
waste
Sedimentation Monitor the still traps

on the every quarter
drainage line
158
B. The Water Generation of Operation and 10,000 Part of the
domestic maintenance of septic development
wastes tanks; effluents will be budget
Environmental Aspect #2 collected sewerage
Drainage operating with WTF
outfall maintenance of drainage
system; deposited silt will
be removed and sundried
and used as filling
materials in different
areas of the site
Run-off water Operation of cistern tank

(rain water) and other water storage;
recycle water for watering
greeneries and unpaved
roads
C. The Air Emission from Use diesel fuel with low 5,000
Environmental Aspect #3 the generator sulfur content
set
Check the generator set
regularly to ensure
efficient combustion
Used oil, from the

generator set (very
minimal) will be stored in
the container and sold to
qualified local residents
D. The People Increase job Prioritized hiring to
Environmental Aspect #4 opportunities qualified local residents
Increase in Prompt payment of taxes

local revenue to the LGU
(include only applicable

IV. ABONDONMENT PHASE modules)
Environmental Aspect # 1 A. The Land

Environmental Aspect # 2 B. The Water
Environmental Aspect # 3 C. The Air
Environmental Aspect # 4 D. The people
159
160
161

Monterrazas de Cebu Case Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monterrazas de Cebu Case Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

June 30, 2023

Dir. MA. VICTORIA V. ABRERA

Attn.: EIA Review Committee

Respectfully submitting herewith, our EIS-EPRMP Amendment documents relative

Immediate action on this matter is highly appreciated.

Very truly yours,

MS. SARA BARBADILLO

Figure 1: Site Location Map---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 6

Figure 2: Component List------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 16

Figure 3: Description of Gross Floor Area----------------------------------------------------- page 17

Figure 4: Vicinity Map------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 22

Figure 5: Zoning Certificate ---------------------------------------------------------------------- page 23-24

Figure 6: Locational Clearance------------------------------------------------------------------ page 25

Figure 7: Land Classification Status------------------------------------------------------------- page 26

Figure 8: Spot Map of the nearest Distance---------------------------------------------------page 27

Figure 9: Topographic Map----------------------------------------------------------------------- page 30

Figure 10: Geologic Map-------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 32

Figure 11: Geohazard Map------------------------------------------------------------------------page 33

Figure 12: Soil Series Map------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 39

Figure 13: Certification for Inventory Trees from CENRO DENR7------------------------page 44

Figure 14: Certification from BP Waterworks------------------------------------------------- page 56

Figure 17: Climate Map----------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 74

Figure 18: Certification for Tree Planting Activity--------------------------------------------- page 78

Figure 19: Air Sampling with Google Map------------------------------------------------------ page 92-93

Figure 20: Termination Agreement-------------------------------------------------------------- page 97-106

Figure 20: Location of MRF------------------------------------------------------------------------ page 136

Figure 21: Waste Categorization Scheme------------------------------------------------------ page 137

Impacts on Physical cultural resources-------------------------------------------------------------------------121

Threat to delivery of basic services------------------------------------------------------------------------121-124

Threat to Public Health---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------125-126

Generation Local Benefits from the project-------------------------------------------------------------------127

1st Review Meeting Other Concerns---------------------------------------------------------------------138-149

Annex A----------------------------Site Development Plan

GENVI Development Corporation (GENVI) was originally incorporated as GENVI Agro-

2.) Brief Summary of Projects EIA Process:

A draft scoping report is compiled as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) considers only the mitigation of negative of

Monterrazas De Cebu corporate social responsibility to the host community prompted

1) Temporary/Regular Employment- The Proponent hired skilled and

3) Public Road leading to the project site – The Proponent is closed

Project Name MONTERRAZAS DE CEBU SUBDIVISION

Project Location BRGYS. GUADALUPE AND SAPANGDAKU, CEBU CITY

Total Land Area 1,400,552.62 square meters (140 HECTARES) as per

Total Gross Floor Area Existing: 1,400,552.62 square meters

Proposed: 107,558.00 square meters

Geographical Coordinates 10.32645; 123.87225

Project Proponent’s Name GENVI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Contact Person Ms. Sara Barbadillo

Designation Documentation Officer

Mobile Number 09985826402

Email Address mt.ssestoso@gmail.com

7.1 Terms of Reference of the EIA Study

g. Environmental Impact Assessment Consultant - a professional or group of professionals

h. Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee (EIARC) - a body of independent technical

q. Proponent - any natural or juridical person intending to implement a project or undertaking.

r. Public Participation - open, transparent, gender-sensitive, and community-based process aimed at

v. Social Acceptability - acceptability of a project by affected communities based on timely and

7.2 EIA Team Preparer

• Mr. Edgar Alan Pagapulaan (Team Leader-EIA Preparer/Consultant)

7.3 EIA Study Schedule

7.5 EIA Methodology

• Principle 17 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development

‘Environmental impact assessment, as a national instrument, shall be undertaken for

• DAO 37 Amending IRR-PD 1586 (1996) stated that: