Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Vernacular Architecture Forum is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture.
http://www.jstor.org
hanced by theirpresencewithintheirinstitutional
space (fig.3.3). The lodge room and the members
of the organizationfunctionedwithina dialectical
relationship.The room had only the significance
-rat " assignedto itby theMasonic membership;yet,by
being presentwithinthis space, which theyhad
set aside as different,
theindividualmembers'per-
i ' sonal worthwas elevated.13The roomwas shaped
and decoratedby themembersof the lodge, but it
simultaneously transformed themen thatinhabited
it.The grandeurof thesemen'ssurroundings trans-
.. portedthemfromtheirown particularlocationsin
time and space and allowed them to occupy a
.a
grander,timelessrole.Withinthisspace, theywere
no longermerelynineteenth-century residentsof
Massachusetts,but had become partof the chain
of Masonic officers,a chain which both theirlit-
eratureand ritualportrayedas being eternal.
"Bur
. ...
?. . ??~u~~ Certain characteristicsof the Masonic lodge
roomrarelyvaried.As a rule,the roomwas above
Fig.3.1.Charlestown, MasonicHall,1876.
Massachusetts, streetlevel, was longer than it was wide, had a
(PhotographbyWilliamD. Moore.) high ceiling,symmetrically placed doors on one
end, and an altar in its These featuresare
center.14
While much could be writtenabout theway in evidentin the interiorof the lodge room of Mont-
which Masonrywas expressed on the exteriorof gomeryLodge in Milford,Massachusetts,photo-
these structures,thisessay will concentrateon the graphed in 1897, in a floor plan of the second
lodge roomswithinthebuildings,forthesespaces floor of the Worcester,Massachusetts,Masonic
were of centralimportanceto theMasoniccharac-
terof the buildings."In 1886, at the dedicationof
the Masonic temple in Waterbury,Connecticut,
J.W. Richardscalled thelodge room"a soul within
a tabernacleof clay."He said thatitwas here that
"Masonic thoughtand activityare born; here that
lifecourses which gives meaningto all the exter-
nals."12The lodge room was where Masonic ritu-
als were enacted. It was where the abstractidea
of a fraternity of men took concrete form,and
where a lodge defineditself.
For these reasons, when Masons had institu-
tional portraitsmade the photographswere often
taken withinthe lodge room. In posing fortheir Fig. 3.2. Quincy,MassachusettsMasonicTemple, 1926,
theidentitiesof theofficers
1898 portrait, ofMount J.WilliamBeal, Sons, Architects.
(Photographby
Carmel Lodge of Lynn,Massachusetts,were en- WilliamD. Moore.)
Fig.3.3. Officers
ofMountCarmel
Lodge,Lynn, 1898.
Massachusetts,
(From One Hundred Years,Mount
CarmelLodgeofLynn,
Massachusetts
Mass.:Historical
[Lynn, Committee
oftheLodge,19051,
opp. 14.
of
Courtesy the ofthe
Library
GrandLodge,A.F.&A.M., of
voI'C
Boston.)
Massachusetts,
3-
u
- .;-v
Fig.3.4.MontgomeryLodgeRoom,
Milford, 1897.
Massachusetts,
(FromClarenceA. Sumner,
-z"-:
CentennialHistoryofMontgomery
Lodge,A.F.&A.M.,Milford,
Massachusetts,U.S.A.
[Boston:The Lodge,18991,
n.p.
CourtesyoftheLibraryofthe
GrandLodge,A.F.&A.M., of
Boston.)
Massachusetts,
Temple, designed by George C. Halcottand built who v top hat,throughthe altar,and ends
in 1914, and in a diagramfromDuncan's Masonic with t_ warden, sittingwith his back to
.__-or
Ritual and Monitor,a guide to the Masonic ritual the viewer. The secondaryaxis is perpendicular
fromthe second half of the nineteenthcentury. to the primaryone, and runsfromthe juniorwar-
From the latterdiagram,space withinthe lodge den on the rightthroughthe altarto the farwall
room can be understoodas being orderedaround splittingthe room in the other direction.In the
a pair of axes. The primaryaxis runs down the Milfordlodge room, this axis terminateswith a
centerof the lengthof the room. Startingat the largeemblematicpaintingon thefarwall (fig.3.4).
letterG on thewall-a symboldenotingbothGod In Halcott'sfloorplan, the presence of the axes is
and geometry-theaxis runsthroughthe master, indicatedby the elevated platformsmeantforthe
Fig.3.5.SecondFloorPlan,
M
MasonicTemple,Worcester,
r - -7--JA1 co
At
00o C-)
ExAM Halcott,
1914,GeorgeC.
Massachusetts,
Architect.
(FromMasonic
L
R D
Doo L)IV Massachusetts
TempleWorcester
CI . QoI'
Mass.:Worcester
[Worcester,
0 TYLER and Educational
MasonicCharity
of
xRoom
I RI- n.d.],n.p.Courtesy
Association,
r-
~~0' LODGEE
fc.TC.
JaWTI](
5ToRF- 6Ap EPI cC A.F.&A.M.,
the ofthe Grand ARCHIV'E~S
14,1
Zia, PPOPIF)MIC
Boston.)
ofMassachusetts,
Lobe
4? Ts
C HALCOTT NE
GrORFGE
ACsCMITecr
THrE M L
IC TEMPLE
A~55 M5'ASO
Wo,CE5T--P SECO /4DFLOOR PLAN woRce.l, MAs
Fig.3.6."LodgeofEntered FellowCrafts,
Apprentices,
orMaster Masons."(FromMalcolmC. Duncan,
Duncan'sMasonicRitualand Monitor [NewYork:
-? f
/? ~ '?
(I2Iil
ll?
Dick& Fitzgerald,
1866],8.)
'\
I
1I VNl
.
t1 ]
5i;I:
officers'chairson threesides of the lodge rooms
"%ii / ~ 17 (fig. 3.5). Everything in the lodge room is orga-
R
i
nized around these two axes. A person's or an
Fig.3.8.Egyptian
Hall,Philadelphia
MasonicTemple,Philadelphia,
Interior
Pennsylvania. designby
GeorgeHerzog,1889.(Courtesy of
theMasonicLibrary& Museumof
Philadelphia.)
Pennsylvania,
44!
.. .......
could not be expected to know the plot or dia- master'schairis separatedfromthe main area of
logue of a dramatheyhad neverwitnessed,were the lodge room by a line representinga curtain
assigned a guide and spokesmanwho responded and is clearlylabeled "Stage."
forthemwhen theywere rituallychallenged. An understanding of the lodge room as theater
OtherMasonic rituals,like those of the Scottish is furtheradvanced when it is realized that the
Rite of Freemasonry,were not participatedin by ritualsoftenwere performed by membersin elabo-
the initiates,but were performedby membersof rate costumes and makeup. In performingthe
the organizationfortheiredification.In these in- fellowcraftritualof the second degree in 1928,for
stances,justas the characteristicsof theatricalpro- example,PacificLodge No. 233 of New York City
ductionand ritualenactmentwere mergedin the utilizeda team of thirty-one membersin fullcos-
actions of the participants,the formalqualitiesof tume,representing a wide range of characters.27
the lodge room and the theaterwere synthesized. Atthe heightof the blossomingof the golden age
In the 1910s,Kenwood Lodge No. 303 of Milwau- of fraternalism between 1870 and 1930, scores of
kee, Wisconsin,builta new temple,designed by companiesprovidedcostumesand props forthese
the architectsLeenhoutsand Guthrie,thatempha- productions.Amongthelargest ofthesefirmswere the
sized the connectionbetweenlodge roomand the- Pettibone BrothersManufacturingCompany of
The floorplan of the lodge roommetall the
ater.26 Cincinnati,Ohio, the Ward-StilsonCompany of
requirements of theMasonic ritual(fig.3.9). There Anderson,Indiana,theHenderson-Ames Company
is an altar at the center of the room. Members' of Kalamazoo, Michigan,and M. C. Lilley& Com-
seating is located around the perimeterof the pany of Columbus,Ohio.28
room,the doors are symmetrically arrangedat one The firstthreedegreesofMasonryin thisperiod,
end, and the chairs
officers' are in theirritually called the Blue Lodge degrees, culminatedwith
prescribedpositions. This particularroom,though, raisingan initiateto the statusof MasterMason,
is worth noting because the space behind the and comprised the most commonly performed
,F 7
Masonic rituals.In these degrees, the masterof Fig.3.9.FloorPlanof
the lodge played the role of King Solomon. More KenwoodLodge,Mil-
7..'-
accurately,the masterof the lodge did not play waukee,Wisconsin,
King Solomon; he metaphoricallybecame King ri.
Leenhouts & Guthrie,
Solomon, and the lodge room became Solomon's ca. 1915.(FromG.L.S.,
temple.In manycases, the masterwould don an "Freemasons as Build-
elaborate robe and crown to signal thistransfor- ers:II TheTempleof
L;
mation. KenwoodLodge,Mil-
Writingin 1886, ArthurW. Clarkof Michigan, waukee,Wis.,"The
discussed the rationale for using costumes. He Builder1 [101[Oct.
wrote: i-. of
1915]:238.Courtesy
theChancellor
Robert
Al
TheWorshipful Masteris no longer simply theMas- R.Livingston
Masonic
terofa Lodge.Thelofty teachings of the Order lift Library& Museum,
-Z
!t
himto theawfulseatofSolomon,KingofIsrael. NewYork.)
TheSeniorWardenis no longer there;itisHiram,
KingofTyre,thefriend and bosomcompanion
ofKingSolomon,themighty builder.
Whatshouldbe theirdressand insignia? Imag-
ine theheaven-chosen Kinghearing theconfes-
sionsoftheblackest criminals inhiskingdom while
seatedupon thestoolofa cameldriver without FortNewton also recognizedthe theatricalquali-
hiskinglyrobes,sceptreor hisattendants!! ties of Masonrybut refusedto admitthattheater
Theverythought provokes ... Therepre-
ridicule. was all thattherewas.30 He wrote,"IfMasonryis
sentation shouldbe,as nearly as practicable,
a true onlya dramaticclub,whose performances prelude
imitation oftheoriginalevent, anda faithfulrepro- a banquet and a smoker,let us admitit, and not
ductionofthecostumesand insignia, as wellas keep up the hoax of having a noble history,a
ofthelanguageanddemeanor oftheoriginal char- profound philosophy, and a beautiful symbol-
acters.. . . A wantofpropercareand conformity ism."31Newtonmade thissuggestionin an article
in regardto clothing and ceremony detracts in- entitled"TakingMasonrySeriously,"and he cer-
calculably from the and
solemnity impressiveness tainlymeantit to conveyirony.This noted mystic
oftheworkin everydegree,in everyplace,and did not believe that Masonry's philosophy and
at everytime,and no eloquenceoftheritualist symbolismwere a sham. Instead,he believed that
can supplythelackor entirely atoneforthein- therewas somethingbeyond thetheatricalaspects
congruity.29 Newtonand Clarkwere notalone
of theinstitution.
in thisbelief.The materialevidence survivingfrom
Clark's rhetoricalstyleand word choice indicate Freemasonry'sheyday makes it clear that enor-
thathe perceivedmore to the Masonic ritualthan mous amounts of time, effort,and financialre-
theatricals.He refersto "loftyteachings"and the sourceswere expended in outfitting these rooms.
"solemnityand impressivenessof thework."Clark Althoughrecognizingthe lodge room as a the-
was not alone in seeing beyond the play acting. ater sheds some lighton its use, it does not ad-
Writingin 1916,the internationallyacclaimedUni- equatelyexplain the importanceof hierarchyand
versalistpreacherand MasonicphilosopherJoseph incorporationas manifestedin the room's spatial
configuration.To furtherunderstandthe room's furniture, issued two catalogs in the 1880s, one
formalqualities,we mustshiftmetaphorsand view labeled ChurchFurnitureand the other labeled
the room not as a theater,but ratheras a spiritual LodgeFurniture.Both catalogsincludeda number
space, as a domain thatmen inhabitedin an at- of identicalengravingswith identicalprices. The
temptto deal withforceslargerthanthemselves. onlydeviationbetweenthese images is thatin the
Justas Masonic writtenrecordsjustifythe un- ecclesiasticalcatalog the chairswere labeled pul-
derstandingof ritualas theater,Masonic writers pit chairs,while in the fraternal catalog theywere
also supportan interpretation of the lodge room called lodge chairs(fig.3.10).37
as a religiousrealm.AlthoughFreemasonry'ssta- In identifyingthelodge roomas a place ofwor-
tus as a religiousorganizationwas hotlydebated ship, as a sacred space, we come one step closer
duringthe period under examination,the lodge to fullyunderstanding itssignificanceas a cultural
room was repeatedlyidentifiedand treatedas a form.Anthropologists, like CliffordGeertz, and
sacred space by the order'smembers.32 A Mason sociologists,such as Emile Durkheim and Peter
fromKansas wrote in 1890, "Freemasonryis not Berger,have shown thatreligionis a culturalcon-
only a brotherhoodbut a church.. . . It is an es- struction, thatit is a productof social forces.38A
sentialpartof our ceremonialto joyfully recognize fullercomprehensionof theforcesdetermining the
our relationshipto God, our dependence upon lodge room's formand directingthe design of its
Him,and to expressour sense of need. A Masonic furnishings maybe reachedby comparingthe val-
templeis a religioustemple.The veryword'temple' ues expressedby thesesanctuariesto the religious
impliesworship."33 and social changes takingplace in Americansoci-
Similarly,wheneverdiscussionofbehaviorwithin etyat the time.
thelodge roomoccurred,thefirst pointofreference
was churchetiquette.For example, the editorof
TheMasonic Chroniclestatedin 1887, "We never
could see thepropriety ofsmokingin LodgeRooms
any more than in a church,"34and again in 1894
commented,"To pursue the habit[ofchewingto-
bacco] in a lodge-roomis scarcelyless reprehen-
sible thanin a lady's parloror in a cushionedand
carpeted church.""35 The New England Craftsman
in 1907 noted, "Lodge meetingsshould be con-
ductedwithas muchdignityas a churchservice."36
This linkbetween lodge roomsand churchesis
further substantiatedby the factthatat the end of
the nineteenthcenturyboth formsof ritualspace
were furnishedwiththe same furniture. The func- No. 4 LODGE CHAIRS.
tional tie between the chair of the Masonic wor- .r.
.i..
Notes
whosefinancial
I wouldliketo extendmythanksto theLuceFoundation, in part,madethisessay
assistance,
possible. I would also like to thankRichardCandee, MarkC. Carnes,EdwardS. Cooke, Jr.,KeithMorgan,and
RobertBlairSt. George fortheircommentson earlierdraftsof thisessay.
1. The best currentwork on the early roots of Freemasonryis David Stevenson,The Originsof Freemasonry:
Scotland'sCentury,1590-1710 (Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press,1988). For the importanceof Freema-
sonryin the UnitedStatesin the period underdiscussion,see LynnDumenil,Freemasonryand AmericanCul-
ture,1880-1930 (Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniversity Press, 1984). My thoughtsthroughoutthis essay have