Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
Pile Dynamics, Inc.'s PDI Webinar Series: QA/QC Remote Testing Continue Project Timelines begins on Oct 4th 2021 More
Create a free account and view content that fits your specific interests in geotechnical engineering Learn
Register
More
Related Software
KeyLAB
Contents [hide]
1. Laboratory Procedure
1.1. Sampling Related
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.News
Allow cookies
1.2. Apparatus
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
1.3. Testing Procedure
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 1/7
9/23/21, 11:10 AM Unconfined Compression Test | Geoengineer.org
1.4. Results
1.5. Calculations HOME NEWS EVENTS PUBLICATIONS EDUCATION JOBS SOFTWARE GALLERY
2. Rock characterization and typical range of UCS based on rock types
3. References
4. Media
5. Selected Topics
Investigation on recent
The Unconfined Compression Test is a laboratory test used to derive the Unconfirmed Champlain Towers
Compressive Strength (UCS) of a rock specimen. Unconfirmed Compressive Strength South failure in Miami
(UCS) stands for the maximum axial compressive stress that a specimen can bear under zero
confining stress. Due to the fact that stress is applied along the longitudinal axis, the Unconfined
Compression Test is also known as Uniaxial Compression Test. UCS is a parameter widely used in
geotechnical design, but may not represent the strength in-situ. On a large scale, the rockmass
properties are highly affected by other factors including discontinuities, faults and weathering.
During the test, apart from the axial load, axial and lateral deformation are commonly measured to
derive the sample’s elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio.
Laboratory Procedure
The samples’ length to diameter ratio (L/D) must be between 2.0 and 2.5, according to ASTM
(American Society for Testing and Materials) and 2.5-3.0 according to ISRM (International Society for
Rock Mechanics). The cylindrical surfaces are prepared in order to be flat and smooth. In particular,
the sample’s ends must be leveled within a 0.02 millimeters tolerance and they should not depart
from perpendicularity by more than 0.06 degrees.
The purpose of the procedure is to preserve the in-situ properties of the sample until the test is
conducted. Therefore, moisture recorded in the field should also be preserved until testing.
Platens: The axial stress applied by the loading device is transferred to the specimen by two steel
platens that are made with a minimum Rockwell Hardness of 58. Their diameter must be at least
equal to the sample’s diameter. The length to diameter ratio must also be at least 0.5.
Strain measurement devices: The axial and lateral deformations are measured by various devices NASA launches new
(e.g. Linear Variable Differential Transformers (LVDTs), Compressometers, Electrical Resistance rover mission to
Strain Gages). planet Mars: Soil and
rock samples will be
Testing Procedure retrieved and sent
back to Earth
The two plates shall be carefully cleaned before the specimen is placed in the testing chamber. The
load should be continuously applied at a rate of 0.5 MPa/s to 1.0 MPa/s (in case of a stress-
controlled load device) and failure must occur in approximately 10 minutes. Stress and deformation
data can be recorded through an electronic system that has the appropriate accuracy specifications.
The maximum load is recorded in Newtons within a 1% accuracy.
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.
Results Allow cookies
Massive landslide
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
sweeps away houses
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 2/7
9/23/21, 11:10 AM Unconfined Compression Test | Geoengineer.org
A typical stress-strain diagram deriving from a Uniaxial Compression Test of an undisturbed in Norway
HOME
specimen of basalt is presented NEWS
in Figure 1. The EVENTS PUBLICATIONS
UCS is the peak EDUCATION
value of the diagram and is equalJOBS SOFTWARE GALLERY
to 44.7 MPa. Photos of the specimen before and after the test are presented in Figure 2. During the
failure process, cracks propagated from the bottom to the top of the specimen, shearing off a large
piece of the sample.
Engineering new
materials to replace
diamonds for drilling
Figure 1: Stress-strain curve of the Unconfined Compression Test for a specimen of Basalt.
Industry Events
Rocscience Online
Course: 2D & 3D Slope
Stability Analysis
(October 26-27)
Figure 2: Photographs of the specimen before and after the testing procedure.
A recorded testing process of another basalt specimen is presented in the video below.
Rocscience Online
Calculations Course: 2D & 3D Slope
Stability Analysis
(November 2-3)
The axial strain is calculated as:
εa = Δl / L0
Where εa: Axial strain, Δl: Change in measured axial length and L0: The initial length of the sample.
σ = P / A0
Where σ: Compressive Stress, P: Load and A0: The initial cross-section area of the specimen.
Therefore, the Unconfined Compressive Strength is calculated for the maximum load applied: PDI Discussions: PDA
Practices Q&A
σUCS = Pmax / A0
The modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) E which represents the ratio between axial stress and
axial strain can be derived via several methods. Usually, it is calculated at stress-strain level of about
50% of the maximum load.
According to ASTM, the preferable sample L/D ratio is 2.0. Therefore, a correction formula is applied
HOME
for larger ratios (smaller rations NEWS EVENTS
are unacceptable). PUBLICATIONS
In particular, EDUCATION
the Uniaxial Compressive StrengthJOBS SOFTWARE GALLERY
is re-calculated as:
Based on their Uniaxial Compressive Strength, rocks can be characterized from very weak to very
strong as following:
Strength Strength
Typical rock types
classification range (MPa)
The range of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength for a large amount of typical rock types is presented
in Table 2.
Granite 100-250
Diorite 150-300
Diabase 100-350
Gabbro 150-300
Basalt 100-300
Gneiss 50-200
Marble 100-250
Slate 100-200
Quartzite 150-300
Sandstone 20-170
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.
Allow cookies
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 4/7
9/23/21, 11:10 AM Unconfined Compression Test | Geoengineer.org
Limestone 30-250
Dolomite 30-250
Table 2: Typical values of Uniaxial Compressive Strength for a various number of rocks (from
Attewell & Farmer 1976).
References
ASTM D7012-14e1, (2014). Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of
Intact Rock Core Specimens under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures, ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, PA.
Attewell, P.B. and Farmer, I.W. (1976). Principles of engineering geology. Chapman and Hall,
London.
ISRM, (1979). Suggested Methods for Determining the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and
Deformability of Rock Materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences &
Geomechanics Abstracts. 16, 2.
Equipment Providers
Looking for Inclinometer Equipment? Fill in the form and we will contact them for you.
Name Email
Affiliated Company
Select Country
Address
Equipment Category
Standard To Be Used
Select a standard
Message
Submit
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.
Allow cookies
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 5/7
9/23/21, 11:10 AM Unconfined Compression Test | Geoengineer.org
Selected Topics
Laboratory Testing
Atterberg Limits
Geotechnical Engineering Lab Manual, by Prof. William A. Kitch (Angelo State University)
Centrifuge Testing
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.
Allow cookies
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 6/7
9/23/21, 11:10 AM Unconfined Compression Test | Geoengineer.org
Numerical
Numerical Modelling: On the
Modelling: The Importance of an
What is Hardening Soil
Geotechnical Appropriate Soil
Model Model
Engineering? Aug, 09, 2021
Jun, 25, 2020 Jul, 22, 2021
Slope Stability:
Liquefaction and Critical Failure
Slope Stability:
Earthquake Surface & Design
Example Analysis
Modelling in PLAXIS Factor of Safety
Jul, 12, 2021
Jun, 30, 2021
Jun, 18, 2021
Slope Stability Analysis
The following was Critical Failure Surface
In this chapter of...
prepared by Dr. Ronald As discussed in the
B.J. Bri... prev...
© 2002-2021 Elxis S.A. Powered by ARGO-E LLC. All rights About Us • Disclaimer • Privacy Policy • Cookies Policy • Copyrights & Permissions
reserved.
Geoengineer.org uses third party cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it.
Allow cookies
To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them visit our Cookies page.
https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/unconfined-compression-test 7/7