Professional Documents
Culture Documents
مقالة علمية
مقالة علمية
ISSN 2410-5198
Vol 24, No4, 2016, pp 82-98
*،1
علّام محمد موسى حمدان.د
هيكل الملكية في الشركات المدرجة في
2
عادل محمد يسلم السريع.د
3
محمد سالمة عناسوه.د
بورصة البحرين ودوره في تخفيض
تكاليف الوكالة
*
:الملخص
:كلمات مفتاحية
Abstract
This paper aims to shed lights on the role of ownership structure in Bahrain listed firms, and its role in reducing agency
costs. The ownership structure is divided into four basic components mainly, concentrated ownership, board members'
ownership, institutional ownership, and foreign ownership. The data were collected based on longitudinal data which
consist of (31) firms for time series extends to (13) years (2002-2014). By using the firm fixed- effect approach. The
findings of this paper reveal that the components of the ownership structure could lead to a negative role in the
Agency's costs of Bahraini listed firms, with the exception of the board members' ownership, which lead to a positive
role but not totally effective in reducing agency costs.
Keywords:
Chernenko, et al.,
(2012)
Pound, (1988)
(Boardman et al.,
1994)
(Jensen, 1986)
(Concentration ownership)
(Managerial ownership)
(Institutional ownership) ( (Assets utilization ratio)
(Foreign ownership) Singh & Davidson, 2003; Florackis & Ozkan, 2008;
Jensen and McKnight Weir, 2009; Henry, 2010)
Meckling, (1976)
Jarque-Bera
(Gujarati, 2003)
Jarque
-Bera
(0.000)
(0.000)
(0.000)
(0.000)
(0.000)
(0.000)
12,344,4 2,128,95
39.4 16.952 3.822 4,008 775,144
88 5
(0.000)
(0.474)
(Median)
(Mean)
(p-value)
Z-test t-test
2.299*** -3.917*** 2 21
(0.000) (0.000) 5 35
2.458*** 5.689*** 0 51
(0.000) (0.000) 8 23
3.245*** -6.909*** 2 16
(0.000) (0.000) 5 40
3.149*** -7.182*** 7 15
(0.000) (0.000) 8 40
β0
β1..8
(i) ConcOwnit
(t)
MangOwnit
(t) (i)
InstitOwnit
(t) (i)
(i) ForeOwnit
(t)
(i) Leverageit
(t)
(t) (i) Sizeit
εit
Unit Root
Agency Costs it 0 1ConcOwnit 2 MangOwnit
3 InstitOwn it 4 ForeOwnit
(Stationarity)
5 Leverageit 6 Sizeit 7 Age it
8 Industryit it .............. (1)
(Covariance)
(non-stationary) PP ADF
(p-value) Fisher Chi-square
PP ADF PP ADF
Agency
238.149*** 135.603*** 94.853*** 150.914*** Costs
(0.000) (0.000) (0.005) (0.000)
23.770*** 7.1125*** 5.216*** 5.129*** ConcOwn
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
(firm
fixed-effect approach FE)
(random-effect approach RE)
(Gujarati, 2003)
(VIF)
(VIF)
(Hausman
Test)
(R2)
(EF) (FE)
(FE)
(2)
(General Linear
(Frith et al., 2008)
Model GLM)
VIF
t-Statistic β
(0.000)
0.583 R
0.340 R2
26.917*** F-Statistic
0.000 p-value (F)
13.119 Hausman Test (Chi2)
0.037 p-value (Chi2)
2.241 Durbin-Watson stat