You are on page 1of 9

This article was downloaded by: [University of Newcastle (Australia)]

On: 27 February 2014, At: 20:51


Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Archives of Environmental Health: An International


Journal
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vzeh20

Mortality for Certain Diseases in Areas with High Levels


of Arsenic in Drinking Water
a a a
Shih-Meng Tsai , Tsu-Nai Wang & Ying-Chin Ko
a
Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical College , Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Published online: 05 Apr 2010.

To cite this article: Shih-Meng Tsai , Tsu-Nai Wang & Ying-Chin Ko (1999) Mortality for Certain Diseases in Areas with
High Levels of Arsenic in Drinking Water, Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal, 54:3, 186-193, DOI:
10.1080/00039899909602258

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039899909602258

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Mortality for Certain Diseases in Areas with High Levels
of Arsenic in Drinking Water

SHIH-MENC TSAl
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

TSU-NAI W A N C
YINC-CHIN K O
Institute of Medicine
Kaohsiung Medical College
Kaohsiung, Taiwan

ABSTRACT. Blackfoot disease was prevalent in a limited area on the southwest coast of Tai-
wan, where artesian well water containing arsenic (median = 0.78 ppm arsenic) had been
used for many years. Previous studies of arsenic exposure in the blackfoot disease endemic
area have been focused on malignant tumors. We, therefore, conducted this study to ana-
lyze mortality of all death causes in blackfoot disease endemic areas and to determine other
neglected cancers or noncancer diseases related to artesian well water containing high lev-
els of arsenic. We calculated standardized mortality ratios for cancer and noncancer dis-
eases, by sex, during the period from 1971 to 1994 and compared them to the local refer-
ence group (i.e, Chiayi-Tainan County) and the national reference group (i.e., Taiwan
population). The results revealed marked standardized mortality ratio differences for the 2
reference groups. Greater mortality was found for males and females with bladder, kidney,
skin, lung, nasal-cavity, bone, liver, larynx, colon, and stomach cancers, as well as lymphoma
than in the local reference population. With respect to noncancer diseases, we found greater
mortality for males and females who had vascular disease, ischemic heart disease, diabetes
mellitus, and bronchitis than in the local reference group. Mortalities for other diseases-
including rectal cancer, cerebrovascular disease, and other diseases-were higher among
cases than the local reference group. Our results indicated that the hazardous effect of
arsenic is systemic. Diseases related to arsenic exposure included those reported previously
by other investigators, as well as diseases reported in the present study.

ARSENIC is an ubiquitous element present in various inhalation or Inhaled or ingested arsenic


compounds throughout the earth’s crust. In 1556, Agri- causes cancer in humans but not in other species.’T2
cola reported that some health effects might be related Despite these results, a recent publication from the
to arsenic exposure. This prescient conclusion was International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
made before arsenic compounds were used widely dur- listed arsenic as a “group 1” carcinogen to lung and
ing the 18th and 19th centuries.’ A carcinogenic effect skin.8 In addition to the relationship between arsenic
related to inorganic arsenic was proposed in 1879-a exposure and internal cancers, recent studies-includ-
time during which high rates of lung cancer in German ing epidemiological or animal studies-contained
miners might have been caused by inhaled arsenic.2 In reports that many other health hazards or diseases were
fact, arsenic is the first chemical for which there was related to arsenic exposure. These diseases included
evidence of a carcinogenic effect. A few epidemiologi- sinonasal ~ a n c e r ,diabetes
~ mellitus,1° ischemic heart
cal studies revealed that skin, lung, liver, and bladder ’
disease,’ childhood leukemia,I2 hyperten~ion,’~ and
cancers were associated with arsenic exposure via vascular disease.14

186 Archives of Environmental Health


In addition to epidemiological studies, many labora- According to the results of previous studies, blackfoot
tory studies have supported the concept that the health disease was prevalent in all these areas.22These four
effects of arsenic could be systemic. For example, neighboring townships are located on the southwest
arsenic could act as a clastogen, thus increasing micro- coast ofTaiwan (Fig. 1). The soil and water from shallow
nuclei in exfoliated bladder c ~ I I ’ ~or, ’ increasing
~ the wells in these areas have a high salt content. Some
frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in lym- inhabitants, therefore, have used water from artesian
phocyte~,’~,’~ and it may cause increased lipid peroxi- wells since the 1900~,~’particularly those who have
dati~n’~t~~-w hich reportedly is related to many chron- lived in ,villages along the coast. Unfortunately, the
ic diseases. To determine certain diseases that are unique geological characteristics cause the water from
associated with chronic arsenic exposure, we analyzed these wells to be very poor in quality and quantity.23
the mortality of all diseases, including cancers and non- The arsenic content of the artesian wells ranged from
cancers, for a blackfoot disease endemic community on 0.25 to 1.14 ppm (median = 0.78 ~ p m ~The ~ )soil
. in
the southwest coast of Taiwan. In this community, arte- these areas has a high arsenic content that ranges from
sian well water-characterized by high concentrations -
5.3 to 1 1.2 mg/kg (median 7.2 mg/kg).25During 1956
of arsenic, had been used since the first decade of this and thereafter, a tap-water system was gradually
century.21Although higher mortality of some cancers installed in these areas. Nevertheless, some residents
and other diseases were reported for this community in continued to use artesian well water for drinking, wash-

Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

previous ~tudies,~,’ no general health-hazard assess- ing, and agriculture. However, during the mid-19 7 0 ~ , ~ ’
ment had been done in the community. The blackfoot artesian well water was no longer used. Agricultural
disease endemic community included the townships of products and fish reportedly contain high concen-
Peimen, Hsuechia, Putai, and Ichu-all of which are trations of arsenic.25In 1959, Blackwel126estimated that
located between Chiayi and Tainan counties. We chose the daily arsenic ingested by local residents was as high
the populations of Chiayi and Tainan counties as our as 1 mg.
local reference group when we calculated the standard- Study population. It is mandatory that all births,
ized mortality ratios (SMRs) for various health hazards, deaths, marriages, divorces, and migrations into
by sex, in the blackfoot disease endemic area during the households be registered at the registration office. These
period from 1971 to 1993. The entireTaiwan population statistics are verified annually via door-to-door surveys;
served as the national reference group. therefore, the population statistics in Taiwan are very
accurate and complete. According to the Taiwan-Fukien
Materials and Method Demographic Fact Book printed by the Ministry of
Interior27most of the residents in the blackfoot disease
Study area. The areas included in this study were endemic areas engaged in farming, fishery activities,
limited to the four townships of Peimen and Hsuechia and salt production. Their education levels and socio-
in Tainan County and Putai and lchu in Chiayi County. economic status were below average, compared with

National reference
/?

\
Local reference

Study

Fig. 1. Locations of study areas, local reference group, and national reference group.

May/June1999 [Vol. 54 (No. 3)] 187


the general population of Taiwan. In addition, a survey group, and national reference group were 1 1,193 and
conducted in 1960 revealed that residents consumed 1,508,623; 113,576 and 18,046,123; and 12,290,606
insufficient amounts of fresh vegetables and animal and 227,273,814; respectively, for males. The corre-
protein.28 sponding values for females were and 8,874 and
Mortality analyses. Physicians are required to submit 1,404,759; 80,350 and 16,434,421; and 836,203 and
standardized certificates for each death to the Depart- 209,548,487 respectively (Table 1). The exact deaths
ment of Health; therefore, the vital statistics published and expected numbers for the study area, by sex and
by the National Health Department of Taiwan are very causes of death, are listed in Tables 2 and 3 for males
complete. In published official vital statistics, the under- and females, respectively.
lying cause of death was diagnosed by physicians (99O/, For males, the SMRs and 95% CISfor various causes
of cases). All cancers were also confirmed by path- of death related to the local and national reference
ological examination. All death information in our study groups are shown inTable 2. The SMRs between the two
was obtained from vital statistics and from the computer different reference groups were similar, except for can-
database of deaths, which was established by the cers of the esophagus, stomach, and rectum, and for
National Health Department in 1971. To minimize diabetes mellitus. High mortality (i.e., SMR > 3) for both
misdiagnosis and/or misclassification, we coded all the groups was found for cancers of the bladder, kidney,
underlying causes of death according to the 8th (i.e., skin, lung, and nasal cavity, and for vascular disease.
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

prior to 1980) or 9th revision of the International The disease with high-but marginal (i.e., lower limit of
Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and 95% CI is close to 1)-mortality for both groups includ-
Causes of Death. Given that the study areas were lo- ed leukemia, cerebrovascular disease, liver cirrhosis,
cated between Chiayi and Tainan counties, we chose the and nephropathy.
population of Chiayi-Tainan as the local reference group For females, the SMRs and 95% CISfor various caus-
to help adjust for geographic variations in mortality and es of death are shown in Table 3. Discrepancies in SMRs
for the potential influence of confounding factors. We between the two different reference groups was found
chose the entire Taiwan population as the national for cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, cervix, and
reference group. Person-years, by sex and age group brain, and for hypertension and nephropathy. The dis-
(i.e., 0 y, 1-4 y, 5-9 y . . ., 80-85 y, and 85+ y) of the eases for which there were high mortalities for both
referencegroups, were obtained from the Taiwan-Fukien groups (i.e., SMR > 3) included cancers of the bladder,
Demographic Fact Book published by the Republic of kidney, skin, nasal cavity, larynx, and lung. In neither
China Ministry of Interior.28The sex- and age-specific group were there diseases for which there was a ”high-
mortalitities for each disease for the reference groups but-marginal” mortality.
were calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the The SMRs of the total-death causes and all malignant
number of person-years, by sex and age group, from tumors were also significantly higher than those of local
1971 to 1994. The SMRs were the ratio of the total and national reference groups for both sexes.
observed deaths for each disease from 1971 to 1994 in
the blackfoot disease endemic areas relative to the Discussion
expected deaths, which we calculated on the basis of
age- and sex-specific mortality rates for the reference In our study, we used mortality-rather than the inci-
groups. We used the method suggested by R ~ t h m a to n~~ dence of health hazards related to arsenic exposure-
estimate the formula for the 95% confidence interval for assessment. It should be noted that mortality is a
(CI) for each SMR. This calculation involved the setting function of incidence and fatality rates. If a disease is
of limits for observed deaths, and we assumed the not completely lethal, it follows that the fatality rate
expected deaths to be constant. We assessed SMRs for will not be 100%, and the association between expo-
all diseases, except when the cause of death was clearly sure and disease will be underestimated. Only one
unrelated to arsenic exposure (e.g., accident). underlying cause of death, rather than multiple causes
of death, was cited on the death certificates; therefore,
Results the association between exposure and disease may
have been distorted, especially for mortality from dia-
The total deaths and person-years from 1971 to 1994 betes mellitus.
for the blackfoot disease endemic area, local reference Given that four townships in the blackfoot disease

Table 1.-Numbers of Deaths and Person-Years of Study Area and Local and National Reference Groups

Study area Local reference National reference


Sex No. deaths Person-years No. deaths Person-years No. deaths Person-years

Male 11,193 1,508,623 113,576 18,046,123 1,290,606 227,273,814


Female 8 874 1,404,759 80,350 16,434,421 836,203 209,548,487

188 Archives of Environmental Health


Table 2.4tandardized Mortality Ratios for Certain Diseases in Blackfoot-DiseaseEndemic Area with High Arsenic Exposure,
1971-1 994 (Males Only)

Local reference National reference


Cause ICD8,9 Obs. Exp. SMR 95% CI Exp. SMR 95%CI

Total causes 000-799 11 193 8 465.758 1.32 1.29, 1.35* 8 657.21 1.29 1.27, 1.32*
All malignant tumors 140-208 2 774 1 263.95 2.19 2.11, 2.28. I 430.87 1.94 1.87, 2.01*
Oral cavity and pharynx cancers
Oral 140-1 45 23 20.00 1.15 0.73, 1.73 24.79 0.93 0.59, 1.39
Pharyngeal, except NPC 146, 148, 149 24 17.75 1.35 0.87, 2.01 21.17 1.13 0.73, 1.69
Nasopharyngeal 147 60 50.69 1.18 0.90, 1.52 54.68 1.10 0.84, 1.41
Digestive system cancers
Esophagus 150 69 41.20 1.67 1.30, 2.12* 70.84 0.97 0.76, 1.23
Stomach 151 195 143.84 1.36 1.17, 1.46* 202.86 0.96 0.83, 1.1 1
Intestine 152 15 7.1 5 2.10 1.20, 3.54* 7.1 6 2.09 1.17, 3.46*
Colon 153 91 61.05 1.49 1.20, 1.83* 67.21 1.35 1.09, 1.66*
Rectum 154 46 31.96 1.44 1.05, 1.92* 37.12 1.24 0.91, 1.65
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

Liver 155 63 1 345.27 1.83 1.69, 1.98* 345.23 1.83 1.69, 1.98*
Gallbladder 156 13 1 1.68 1.1 1 0.59, 1.90 13.93 0.93 0.50, 1.60
Pancreas 157 30 24.57 1.22 0.82, 1.74 31.90 0.94 0.63, 1.34
Respiratory system cancers
Nasal 160 40 13.30 3.00 2.14, 4.09* 10.93 3.66 2.61, 4.98*
Laryngeal 161 30 16.81 1.78 1.20, 2.55* 17.01 1.76 1.1 9, 2.52*
Lung 162 699 225.39 3.10 2.88, 3.34. 264.68 2.64 2.45, 2.84'
Bone cancer 170 41 16.64 2.46 1.77, 3.34* 17.60 2.33 1.67, 3.16*
Skin cancer 171-172 66 13.65 4.83 3.74, 6.15' 11.05 5.97 4.62, 7.60*
Breast cancer 175 - - - - - - -
Genitourinary system cancers
Cervical 179-1 80 -
Ovary 183 - - - - - - -
Prostate 185 48 19.07 2.52 1.86, 3.34* 24.55 1.96 1.44, 2.59*
Bladder 188 312 34.99 8.92 7.96, 9.96* 29.72 10.50 9.37, 11.73*
Kidney 189 94 13.91 6.76 5.46, 8.27* 13.83 6.80 5.49, 8.32*
Brain cancer 191 19 15.03 1.26 0.76, 1.97 16.71 1.14 0.68, 1.78
Lymphatic system cancers
Lymphoma 2 00-2 08 56 34.40 1.63 1.23, 2.1 1* 39.44 1.42 1.07, 1.84*
Leukernia 204-208 67 50.07 1.34 1.04, 1.70* 50.04 1.34 1.04, 1.70*
Diabetes mellitus 250 188 139.69 1.35 1.16, 1.55* 165.37 1.14 0.98, 1.31
Hypertension 401-405 158 21 6.83 0.73 0.62, 0.85* 221.84 0.71 0.61, 0.83*
Ischemic heart disease 41 0-41 4 445 254.68 1.75 1.59, 1.92* 297.61 1.50 1.36, 1.64*
Pulmonary heart disease 41 5-41 7 33 65.39 0.50 0.35, 0.71 * 49.55 0.67 0.46, 0.94'
Heart disease 420-429 534 503.37 1.06 0.97, 1.15 455.00 1.1 7 1.08, 1.28*
Cerebrovascular disease 430-438 1286 1 123.26 1.14 1.08, 1.21* 1 184.60 1.09 1.03, 1.1 5'
Vascular disease 440-448 107 30.09 3.56 2.91, 4.30* 34.68 3.09 2.53, 3.73*
Chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease
Bronchitis 490-491 157 106.38 1.48 1.25, 1.73* 84.08 1.87 1.59, 2.1 8*
Emphysema 492 31 38.09 0.81 0.55, 1.1 5 40.76 0.76 0.52, 1.08
Asthma 493 147 166.13 0.88 0.75, 1.04 130.35 1.1 3 0.95, 1.33
Liver cirrhosis 571 428 360.05 1.18 1.08, 1.31' 332.89 1.29 1.17, 1.41*
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, 580-589 206 176.01 1.1 7 1.02, 1.34' 167.71 1.23 1.07, 1.41*
nephrosis
Congenital abnormalities 740-759 86 75.68 1.14 0.91, 1.40 123.69 0.70 0.56, 0.86'

Notes: ICD = International Classification of Diseases, Obs = observed, Exp = expected, SMR =standardized mortality ratio, CI = confidence
interval, and NPC = nasopharyngeal cancer.
*Statistically significant (p < .05).

endemic area are located between Chiayi and Tainan were more similar to those of the study group; therefore,
counties, we used the entire populations of Chiayi and use of this group could reduce confounding or bias. The
Tainan counties as the local reference group and the effect of arsenic is more outstanding if the SMRs are sig-
whole population of Taiwan as the national reference nificant for comparisons in which both groups are used.
group. The age- and sex-specific rates were more stable Conversely, if confounding or bias exist, discrepancies
for the national reference group than the local reference between the local and national reference groups might
group. The lifestyles and other related factors, except for result. In our study, there were no notable differences
arsenic exposure level of the local reference group, between the results when we used the local or national

MaylJune1999 [vol. 54 (No. 3)] 189


Table 3.-Standardized Mortality Ratios for Certain Diseases in Blackfoot-Disease Endemic Area with High Arsenic Exposure,
1971-1994 (Females Only)

Local reference National reference


Cause ICD8,9 Obs. Exp. SMR 95%CI EXP. SMR 95%CI

Total causes 000-799 8 875 6 329.72 1.40 1.37, 1.43' 6 670.85 1.33 1.30, 1.36'
All malignant tumors 140-208 2 029 843.90 2.40 2.30, 2.51* 991.33 2.05 1.96, 2.14*
Oral cavity and pharynx cancers
Oral 140-1 45 12 7.46 1.61 0.83, 2.81 8.25 1.45 0.75, 2.54
Pharyngeal, except NPC 146, 148, 149 10 4.24 2.36 1.13, 4.34* 4.52 2.21 1.06, 4.07'
Nasopharyngeal 147 29 31.13 1.37 0.92, 1.97 22.34 1.30 0.87, 1.86
Digestive system cancers
Esophagus 150 12 7.59 1.58 0.82, 2.76 14.54 0.83 0.43, 1.44
Stomach 151 111 79.46 1.40 1.15, 1.68' 109.43 1.01 0.83, 1.22
Intestine 152 8 5.81 1.38 0.59, 2.72 6.38 1.25 0.54, 2.47
Colon 153 83 58.47 1.42 1.1 3, 1.76' 69.00 1.20 0.96, 1.49
Rectum 154 33 2 1.98 1.50 1.03, 2.1 1* 31.90 1.03 0.71, 1.45
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

Liver 155 224 119.28 1.88 1.64, 2.14* 119.59 1.87 1.64, 2.14*
Gal Ibladder 156 11 12.18 0.90 0.45, 1.62 14.39 0.76 0.38, 1.37
Pancreas 157 19 19.75 0.96 0.58, 1.50 22.71 0.84 0.50, 1.31
Respiratory system cancers
Nasal 160 29 5.82 4.98 3.33, 7.1 5' 5.69 5.10 3.41, 7.32'
Laryngeal 161 13 2.73 4.76 2.53, 8.15' 3.46 3.76 2.00, 6.43'
Lung 162 471 114.02 4.1 3 3.77, 4.52* 134.42 3.50 3.19, 3.84*
Bone cancer 170 34 15.11 2.25 1.56, 3.14' 15.57 2.18 1.51, 3.05'
Skin cancer 171-172 68 1 1.96 5.68 4.41, 7.21' 9.99 6.81 5.29, 8.63'
Breast cancer 175 47 46.48 1.01 0.74, 1.34 70.17 0.67 0.49, 0.89
Genitourinary system cancers
Cervical 179-1 80 122 96.09 1.27 1.05, 1.52" 117.50 1.04 0.86, 1.24
Ovary 183 15 13.78 1.09 0.61, 1.80 19.53 0.77 0.43, 1.27
Prostate 185 - - - - - - -
Bladder 188 295 20.96 14.07 12.51, 15.78 16.71 17.65 5.70, 19.79
Kidney 189 128 14.40 8.89 7.42, 10.57* 12.20 10.49 8.75, 12.47'
Brain cancer 191 21 11.99 1.75 1.08, 2.68' 14.1 8 1.48 0.92, 2.26
Lymphatic system cancers
Lymphoma 200-208 35 20.57 1.70 1.1 8, 2.37* 24.44 1.43 1 .OO, 1.99'
Leukemia 2 04-2 08 40 37.36 1.07 0.76, 1.46 37.96 1.05 0.75, 1.43
Diabetes mellitus 250 343 221.72 1.55 1.39, 1.72' 277.78 1.23 1.11, 1.37*
Hypertension 401-405 239 198.69 1.20 1.06, 1.37' 234.97 1.02 0.89, 1.1 5
Ischemic heart disease 41 0-41 4 283 197.02 1.44 1.27, 1.61* 229.24 1.23 1.09, 1.39*
Pulmonary heart disease 41 5-41 7 27 51.1 8 0.53 0.35, 0.77* 39.00 0.69 0.46, 1.01
Heart disease 420-429 493 51 1.25 0.96 0.88, 1.05 473.21 1.04 0.95, 1.14
Cerebrovascular disease 43W38 1 352 1 089.41 1.24 1.18, 1.31' 1 153.98 1.17 1.11, 1.24*
Vascular disease 440448 68 29.51 2.30 1.78, 2.93* 3.39 2.04 1.58, 2.58*
Chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease
Bronchitis 490491 148 96.55 1.53 1.30, 1.80' 76.05 1.95 1.65, 2.29'
Emphysema 492 16 13.96 1.15 0.65, 1.86 17.71 0.90 0.52, 1.47
Asthma 493 103 123.14 0.84 0.68, 1.01 94.98 1.08 0.89, 1.32
Liver cirrhosis 571 164 157.71 1.04 0.89, 1.21 142.21 1.15 0.98, 1.34
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, 580-589 196 168.39 1.16 1.01, 1.39* 182.89 1.07 0.93, 1.23
nephrosis
Congenital abnormalities 740-759 70 59.96 1.16 0.91, 1.48 105.84 0.66 0.52, 0.84*

Notes: ICD = International Classificationof Diseases, Obs = observed, Exp = expected, SMR = standardized mortality ratio, CI = confidence
interval, and NPC = nasopharyngeal cancer.
*Statistically significant (p < .05).

reference groups, thus revealing the importance of addition, we found that adverse health effects-includ-
arsenic exposure. ing bronchitis, liver cirrhosis, nephropathy, intestinal
Generally speaking, the outcomes of our study cancer, rectal cancer, laryngeal cancer, and cerebrovas-
accorded with the results of many previous studies cular disease-might be related to chronic arsenic
(Table 41, suggesting that the relationship between exposure via drinking water, a conclusion unreported
arsenic exposure and internal cancer-including blad- heretofore.
der, kidney, lung, liver, and skin cancers-was signifi- With respect to digestive cancers, all mortality rates
cant for both sexes and for both reference groups. In for stomach, colon, rectal, and liver cancers were ele-

190 Archives of Environmental Health


Table 4.-Studies about Cancer and Noncancer Disease Related to Arsenic Exposure

Health hazard Exposure route Author and reference no. Location

Stomach cancer Inhalation Bulbulyan et a1.6 Russia


Colon cancer Inhalation Enterline et aL3 United States
Ingestion Chen et aL4 Taiwan
Ingestion Tsuda et aL5 Japan
Liver cancer Ingestion Chen et al.4 Taiwan
Nasal cancer Inhalation Battista et aL9 Italy
Inhalation Chen et al.” Taiwan
Lung cancer Inhalation Enterline et aL3 United States
Ingestion Chen et aL4 Taiwan
Ingestion Tsuda et aL5 Japan
Inhalation Bulbulyan et aL6 Russia
Bone cancer Inhalation Enterline et aL3 United States
Skin cancer Ingestion Chen et al.4 Taiwan
Uterine cancer Ingestion Tsuda et aL5 Japan
Prostate cancer Ingestion Chen et al.” Taiwan
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

Bladder cancer Ingestion Chen et aL4 Taiwan


Ingestion Tsuda et aL5 Japan
Ingestion Bates et al.’ United States
Ingestion Hopenhayn-Rich et al.36 Argentina
Kidney cancer Ingestion Chen et aL4 Taiwan
Leukemia Ingestion DurantI2 United States
Diabetes mellitus Ingestion Lai et al.1° Taiwan
Inhalation Rahman et Sweden
Ischemic heart disease Ingestion Chen et al.” Taiwan
Vascular disease Ingestion Tseng et al.37 Taiwan
Ingestion Engel et al.38 United States
Ingestion Wu et aLi4 Taiwan

Notes: The results of the present study indicate that the following diseases may be related to arsenic exposure:
intestinal cancer, rectum cancer, laryngeal cancer, lymphoma, bronchitis, nephropathy, and cerebrovascular disor-
ders.

vated for both sexes, compared with the local reference ynx-were related to occupational arsenic exposure via
group; this did not always hold true when we compared i n h a l a t i ~ n . ~All
, ~of
, ~these
~ cancers, except lung cancer,
mortality rates from digestive cancers to the national were rare in Taiwan and could have been triggered by
reference group. The lifestyles of the local reference several occupational carcinogens via inhalation. The res-
group were very similar to those of the study group; idents of the blackfoot disease endemic areas and the
therefore, the SMRs for these cancers, based on the local reference group engage in farming, fishery activi-
comparison with the local reference group, were more ties, and salt production. There are no industrial factories
appropriate for us to judge the relationship between in these areas. Exposure to arsenic via ingestion for the
cause and diseases than SMRs based on the national study group must be responsible for the extraordinarily
reference group. Perhaps high mortality rates resulted high SMRs we observed for these cancers.
from the fact that these digestive organs are in direct An important confounder for lung cancer is smoking
contact with arsenic via ingestion, and small amounts status. According to previous studies, smoking preva-
of arsenic can be excreted in feces. This result was also lence for males was slightly higher than in the general
reported in Japanby Tsuda et aL5 In Taiwan, the mortal- population of Taiwan3’; however, the prevalence for
ity rate for liver cancer associated with hepatitis B viral females did not differ. In our analyses, the SMRs for
infection is high. However, liver cancer mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were
these areas remains higher than in the local and nation- not significant, except for bronchitis in both sexes,
al reference groups. The liver is the main organ for compared with the local and national reference groups.
detoxification of arsenic, and arsenic will accumulate Although we could attribute approximately 80% of
in this organ after exposure. It is possible that the high COPD mortality to cigarette smoking, the high S M R for
liver cancer mortality is related to arsenic exposure. bronchitis could not be explained by smoking alone.
With respect to cancers of the respiratory system, mor- On the basis of this finding, we believe that the effect
tality for cancers of the nasal cavities, larynx, and lung of smoking is not significantly different among the
were elevated significantly in both sexes and for both study area, local group, and national reference groups.
reference groups. In many studies, investigators reported The high SMRs for smoking-related health effects, such
that cancers of the upper-respiratory tract-including as lung cancer, cannot be explained only by smoking.
sinonasal cancer and cancers of the larynx and phar- Perhaps lung cancer is caused by arsenic via inhala-

MaylJune 1999 Wol. 54 (No. 3)l 191


tion, as has been supported by other ~tudies,~,~ as well (i-e., blackfoot disease). Chronic arsenic exposure could
as by ingestion, as was suggested by the results of our influence the peripheral circulation and nerve function
current study. via va~odilation.~~
There are only a few studies in which the investiga- Chen et aI.l3 and Lai et al.1° used prevalence, rather
tors have referenced a relationship between arsenic than mortality, to assess and confirm the relationship
exposure and bone cancer. For example, Enterline et between chronic arsenic exposure and hypertension
aL3 found a positive relationship between exposure to and diabetes mellitus, respectively. In our study, the
arsenic in air at a copper smelter and bone cancer. Our SMRs for diabetes mellitus were significantly-but
results also revealed higher SMRs for bone cancer and marginally-higher than for the local reference group,
lymphoma in both sexes than in both reference groups. and the SMRs for hypertension were significantly lower
The mechanism is unclear, but it deserves further study. for males than females. Perhaps these differences
Kadowski3’ reported that arsenic accumulated in bone resulted from misdiagnosis and/or misclassification of
marrow in an animal Perhaps this finding cause of death.
explains the higher SMRs for these diseases we ob- In addition to arsenic, fluorescent hurnic substances
served in the current study. have been identified in the artesian well water in the
With respect to cancers of the uro-reproductive sys- blackfoot disease endemic areas. Lu et al.35 demon-
tem, the SMRs for bladder cancer, calculated on the strated that humic acid caused blackfoot disease in
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

basis of the local and national reference groups, were mice. Vascular damage was also associated with hurnic
highest in our study, especially in females. Bladder can- acid. Whether these effects resulted from arsenic alone
cer occurs more frequently in males than females. The or in combination with humic acid was unclear.
results of our study revealed that the age-adjusted mor- Although humic acid is distributed widely, no correla-
tality for females in these areas was equal to males and tions have been observed between concentration of
suggested that arsenic exposure influenced bladder humic acid and arsenic levels, blackfoot disease, or
cancer in these areas. In fact, there were greater dis- cancers.l Therefore, we cannot attribute all of these
crepancies in mortality rates for many health effects in effects to humic acid alone.
females between these areas and the local or national In conclusion, the results of our study evidenced the
reference groups than for males. Perhaps the fact that potential relationship between mortality from certain
males are exposed to more risk factors-in addition to diseases and chronic arsenic exposure. In addition to
arsenic exposure-than females explains these results. diseases reportedly associated with arsenic, we suggest
In addition to bladder cancer, kidney cancer mortality that further studies be performed to investigate relation-
was very high in the study area. Nephropathy-includ- ships between arsenic and intestinal cancer, rectal can-
ing nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis-was cer, laryngeal cancer, lymphoma, cerebrovascular dis-
also a serious problem for the study group. Given that ease, bronchitis, and nephropathy.
arsenic is excreted mainly via urine, it would be an
important etiologic factor. **********
The SMRs were not significant in cancers of the
reproductive system, with the exception of prostate can- Submitted for publication February 1, 1998; revised; accepted for
cer for males and for both reference groups. A similar publication August 10, 1998.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Ying-Chin KO, Ph.D., M.D.,
finding was reported by Chen et al.,3 who noted that Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical College, 100, Shih-Chuan
Swedish glassworkers had a slightly elevated SMR for 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
prostate cancer, compared with a national reference I

group. It would appear that arsenic exposure is not **********


related to cancers of the reproductive organs.
Recently, the relationship between many chronic
diseases and arsenic exposure has been investigated. References
Such diseases have included diabetes rnellitus, hyper- 1. Smith AH, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Bates MN, et al. Cancer risk from
tension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular dis- arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 1992; 97:
ease, and vascular disease.10*’1,13,3’,33 The validation of 259-67.
the analyses that involved mortality for chronic dis- 2. Bates MN, Smith AH, Hopenhayn-Rich C. Arsenic ingestion and
internal cancers: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135:462-76.
ease is less than that for cancer. As mentioned above, 3. Enterline PE, Day R, Marsh CM. Cancers related to exposure to
the fatality rate for chronic diseases i s less than 100%. arsenic at copper smelters. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52:
If we used mortality, rather than incidence rate, to 28-32.
assess associations between exposure and disease, 4. Chen CJ, ChuangYC, LinTM, et al. Malignant neoplasms among
their relationship-if such a causal relationship, in residents of a blackfoot disease-endemic area in Taiwan: high-
arsenic artesian well waters and cancers. Cancer Res 1985;
fact, exists-would be underestimated. Nevertheless, 45~5895-99.
our findings accord with the results of previous stud- 5. Tsuda T, Babazono A, Yamamoto E, et al. Ingested arsenic and
ies, with the exception of our findings regarding internal cancer: a historical cohort study followed for 33 years.
hypertension of males. Am J Epidemiol 1995 141:198-209.
6. Bulbulyan MA, Jurenkova NJ, Boffetta P, et al. Mortality in a
Significantly high SMRs for ischemic heart disease, cohort of Russian fertilizer workers. Scand J Work Environ Health
cerebrovascular disease, and vascular disease indicated 1996; 22~27-33.
that arsenic caused great damage to the vascular system 7. Bates MN, Smith AH, Cantor KP. Case-control study of bladder

192 Archives of Environmental Health


cancer and arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol 1995; Coll Med NatlTaiwan Univ 1961; 7:33-50.
141 :523-29. 23. Tseng WP, Chu HM, How SW, et al. Prevalence of skin cancer in
8. Tomatis L, Aitio A, Wilbourn J, et al. Human carcinogens so far an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. JNCl 1968;
identified. JapanJ Cancer Res 1989; 80:795 -807. 40~453-63.
9. Battista G, Bartoli D, laia TE, et al. Art glassware and sinonasal 24. Chen KP, Wu HY, Wu TC. Epidemiologic studies on blackfoot dis-
cancer: report of three cases. Am J Ind Med 1996; 30:31-35. ease in Taiwan. 3. Physicochemical characteristics of drinking
10. Lai MS, Hsueh YM, Chen CJ, et al. Ingested inorganic arsenic and water in endemic blackfoot disease area. Mem Coll Med Natl
prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Am j Epidemiol 1994; 139: Taiwan Univ 1962; 8:115-19.
484-92. 25. Lo MC. The arsenic content of farm products and fish in areas
1 1 . Chen CJ, Chiou HY, Chiang MH, et al. Dose-response relation- where high arsenic well water was used for agriculture and pis-
ship between ischemic heart disease mortality and long-term ciculture. Report on Blackfoot Disease Research. Taiwan, ROC:
arsenic exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996; 16: Taiwan Provincial Government, 1978; 6:28-46.
504-1 0. 26. Blackwell RQ. Estimated total arsenic ingested by residents in the
12. Durant JL, Chen J, Hemond HF, et al. Elevated incidence of child- endemic blackfoot area. J Formosan Med Assoc 1961; 60:
hood leukemia in Woburn, Massachusetts: NlEHS superfund 1 143-44.
basic research program searches for causes. Environ Health Per- 27. Ministry of Interior, Republic of China. Demographic Facts,
spect 1995; 103:93-98. 1971-1994. Taipei, ROC: Ministry of Interior.
13. Chen CJ, Hsueh YM, Lai MS, et al. Increased prevalence of hyper- 28. Chen CJ,k Wu MM, Lee SS, et al. Atherogenicity and carcino-
tension and long-term arsenic exposure. Hypertension 1995; 25: genicity of high-arsenic artesian well water: multiple risk factors
53-60. and related malignant neoplasm of blackfoot disease. Arte-
14. Wu MM, Kuo TL, Hwang YH, et al. Dose-response relation riosclerosis 1986; 8:452-60.
Downloaded by [University of Newcastle (Australia)] at 20:51 27 February 2014

between arsenic concentration in well water and mortality from 29. Rothman KJ. Stratified analysis. Modern Epidemiology. Boston,
cancers and vascular diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: Ma: Little, Brown; 1986.
1123-32. 30. Malker HSR, McLaughlin JK, Weiner JA, et al. Occupational risk
15. Warner ML, Moore LE, Smith MT, et al. Increased micronuclei in factors for nasopharyngeal cancer in Sweden. Br J Ind Med 1990;
exfoliated bladder cells of individuals who chronically ingest 47:213-14.
arsenic-contaminated water in Nevada. Cancer Epidemiol Bio- 31. Chen CJ, Wang CJ. Ecological correlation between arsenic level
mark Prev 1994; 3:583-90. in well water and age-adjusted mortality from malignant neo-
16. Moore LE, Smith AH, Hopenhayn-Rich C, et al. Micronuclei in plasms. Cancer Res 1990; 50:5470-74.
exfoliated bladder cells among individuals chronically exposed 32. Kadowski K. Studies on the arsenic contents in organ tissues of
to arsenic in drinking water. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent the normal Japanese.Osaka City Med J 1960; 9:2083-88.
1997; 6:31-36. 33. Rathman M, Axelson 0. Diabetes mellitus and arsenic exposure:
17. Hantson P, Verellen-Dumoulin C, Libouton JM, et al. Sister chro- a second look at case-control data from a Swedish copper
matid exchanges in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after smelter. occup Environ Med 1995; 25:773-74.
ingestion of high doses of arsenicals. Int Arch Occup Environ 34. Tseng CH, Chong CK, Chen CJ, et al. Abnormal peripheral
Health 1996; 68:342-44. microcirculation in seemingly normal subjects living in black-
18. Lerda D. Sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) among individuals foot-disease-hyperendemic villages in Taiwan. Int J Cicrocirc
chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Mutat Res 1994; 1995; 15:21-27.
312:lll-20. 35. Lu FJ. Blackfoot disease: arsenic or humic acid? Lancet 1990;
19. Lee TC, Ho IC. Differential cytotoxic effects of arsenic on human 336:115-16.
and animal cells. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102:101-05. 36. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Fuchs A, et al. Bladder cancer
20. Ramos 0, Carrizales L, Yanesz L, et al. Arsenic increased lipid mortality associated with arsenic drinking water in Argentina.
peroxidation in rat tissues by a mechanism independent of glu- Epidemiology 1996; 7:117-24.
tathione levels. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103(suppl 1): 37. Tseng CH, Chong CK, Chen CJ, et al. Dose-response relationship
85-88. between peripheral vascular disease and ingested inorganic
21. Tseng WP. Blackfoot disease in Taiwan: a 30-year follow-up arsenic among residents in blackfoot disease endemic villages in
study. j Vasc Dis 1989; 7:547-58. Taiwan. Atherosclerosis 1996; 120:125-33.
22. Wu HY, Chen KP, Tseng WP, et al. Epidemiologic studies on 38. Engel RR, Smith AH. Arsenic in drinking water and mortality from
blackfoot disease. 1 . Prevalence and incidence of the disease by vascular disease: an ecologic analysis in 30 counties in the Unit-
age, sex, year, occupation, and geographic distribution. Mem ed States. Arch Environ Health 1994; 49:418-27.

MayIJune1999 [vol. 54 (No. 3)] 193

You might also like