Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stephan Hawking is asking the question: “Is time travel possible?”. He is tabling
about how the universe can be explored, wondering if portals to the past can be found or,
the other way around, finding a way to go to the future quicker - whilst taking advantage of
Considered scientific heresy, Stephan Hawking hid the fact that this was a topic
that he was obsessed with. In this documentary, he is talking about how we need to see
dimensions - width, height, length. The 4th dimension is the length in time. Time is
compared to the rocks and solar system that last longer than human lives. Traveling in
time is traveling through the 4th dimension. Traveling in a straight line with a car is one
dimension, adding curves adds a second, going up or down hills adds a third.
fiction. Physicists have been thinking about time tunnels from a different perspective,
wondering if the tunnels could be built within the actual law of nature, which they think is
The holes are all around us, occurring in nooks and crannies between time.
Nothing is flat or solid, as we find holes and wrinkles in it - same being applied to time.
Showing that in the 3 dimensions is easy, but in the 4th dimension, we need to get to the
quantum foam to see wormholes - tiny shortcuts between space and time, which form and
reform. The tunnels are however too small for humans to pass through.
of times, making it big enough for a human or spaceship to enter it. Given enough power, a
gigantic one could be done in space, if possible - as stated, one end near the Earth and
another end to another distant planet, leading a ship to come out still near the Earth, but in
the past.
Hawking, deciding to throw a party expecting future time travelers. The coordinates - exact
time and space were shared, hoping that the time travel will be possible in the future -
however no one showed up, the experiment failing. Why did it not work? The problem
might be paradoxes as causes happen before effects and never the other way around -
Something would always happen where the paradox is not possible. The
wormhole in the paradox can’t exist because of the feedback, the phenomenon of sound
being amplified. This theory applies to the wormhole as well, but radiation would replace
sound - expanding leads to radiation, leading to the destruction of the wormhole. That was
the real reason for no one being present at the party - wormholes are not able to go to the
The idea of travel to the future was proposed by Albert Einstein years ago, as
there are zones where time speeds up and where time slows down as well - in space. The
gospel positioning system - GPS - 31 satellites orbiting around the planet, making satellite
navigation possible. Time runs faster there than it does on Earth - the satellites have a
clock that is very accurate, but they do each gain a 3rd of a billionth of a second every day,
needing to be changed back, else all gps’s on the planet will go off by 6 miles. The time in
space runs faster than the one on earth than in space because of the mass of the earth -
the heavier the object, the more it drags on time. Being closer to a heavy object makes
Being next to a black hole which is a natural time machine might be possible, but
very hard to do, as a spaceship needs to be on the correct pathway, into the orbit of the
black hole. It is, however, impractical, very dangerous. Another way to travel in time is
using a train that goes around the Earth, close to the speed of light. The train offers a one-
way ticket to the future, circling the planet 7 times a second. Time in the train would be
slowed down so that the speed of the train could be just under the speed of light, as the
laws of physics forbid it. The speed of light is named the cosmic speed limit - nothing can
What are the economically related factors that come in place when talking about the
Let's start off with the economical factor, based on the already explained time travel
train theory explained in the documentary (Stephan Hawking - “Into the Universe - Time
Travel”) - the idea that if a train could travel around the world at a speed close to the speed
source(“Going to the moon”), a 10 day trip to the moon costs about 55 million US dollars.
The price for a ticket on the time travel train might be double, even triple that amount,
offering just a one-way ticket to an unknown future. According to another site (Millsap
Adam : “Biden’s High-Speed Rail to Nowhere”), it would cost 500 million US dollars PER
mile to build just the railway. The train itself might get closer to the price of an actual
Competition”), the cost of new rockets can reach 2 billion US dollars. All of these costs
added up would lead to incredible build-up, as going around the entire earth with a railway
would be way too expensive, probably driving countries participating unto debt.
Furthermore, the railway would need to be protected by different laws as well as physically
protected and made sure to be structurally sound, else the train right go off the rails and
The only noticeable advantage here would be that it would provide people with a job
as the train conductor, but also as early testers of the experiment, also as technicians and
physicists that take care of the train and railway possibilities. The existence of the time
travel train would also provide passive income, as it would likely gain more interest as time
passes.
This next segment is a theory me and one of my classmates Gonzalo have figured
out, so I am unable to back it up with evidence. I think it’s quite interesting, as it makes a
lot of sense in the long-run. Time travel might be possible, but it is not effective or useful.
Sure, the idea of time travel is interesting, but the only reason it might be useful is for
Think of it this way - an American and a flooded South-America. The person travelling to
the future has the knowledge of how America looked like in the past, but that doesn't alter
the future in any way because the rest of America have already made decisions that lead
to that natural disaster. We know that time travel to the past is not possible because of the
paradoxes that would be formed, so the person couldn't possibly inform the government of
the natural disaster occurring in order for it to not happen - the person would need to live in
an alternate universe for that to be possible, else from one minute to another the whole
future, as that person knows it, would be changed. It's impossible. That idea purely does
In the article created on the website of the American Museum of Natural History
( “Einstein: Time is Relative”), we can see the relativity of time - a concept and law present
in physics. In basic words, time passing can only be determined by a frame of reference,
which is very true in this case. We report for example 100 years outside the train. They
would feel like 100 years, but inside the train it would feel like a week. An easier example
is that a sleeping person goes 8 hours to the near future faster than one that is awake that
whole 8 hours, just because sleep is taken as a reference. Both of the 100 year cases
would come to the same point, it would literally be just a matter of transportation to the
point.
This means that time travel really doesn't bring any sort of good, helpful addition to
the table as it wouldn't affect the events that will happen other than historical or
In conclusion, I believe that time travel might be possible to a certain extent, but the
costs and actual benefits of it are overpowered my the reality of the existent laws that have
SOURCES:
Hawking, Stephan. “Into the Universe - Time Travel .” Dailymotion, Dailymotion, 21 June
2018, https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6mei0y.
ticket moon-journey/amp.
Millsap, Adam. “Biden's High-Speed Rail to Nowhere.” Google, Google, 15 Apr. 2021,
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/adammillsap/2021/04/15/
bidens-high-speed-rail-to-nowhere/amp/.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Space_launch_market_competition#:~:text=By%20early%202016%2C%20the%20
US,billion%20for%20the%20main%20engine%22.