Ex1: The graph below shows the amount of time taken to produce a vehicle by four US-based car manufacturers in

the years 1998 and 2002.

The given chart illustrates the production time for a vehicle from 4 different car manufacturers from America
during the period of years from 1998 to 2002.
The first glance reveals that except for the Ford, the others exhibited upward movement. Also noteworthy is
the fact that Ford initially registered the pinnacle but fell to the bottom in the last year of the period.
With regards to REF and Ford, when the survey was taken in 1998, the time entailed in the production of Ford
reigned supreme with 37 days in 1998, overwhelmingly 12 days longer than that of REF, making it the slowest
producer that time while the opposite was true for Ford; however, the reverse occurred since the early of 2000. To
illustrate, the former approximately halved, while the latter underwent a gradual increase to 28 days, which
subsequently led the procession of Cars from REF to be significantly longer than Ford, by a noticeable difference of 5
days.
In reference to the remaining companies, while the length of General Motors' production was steadily
shortened by 5 days, Daimler witnessed significant slippage but made a moderate recovery in space from 1999 to
2001. Therefore, while the former car brand took a slightly longer time to manufacture in 1998, such disparity
remarkedly exceeded 5 days in the last year of the period.
Overall, all aforementioned brands experienced significant changes, either increasing or decreasing. Therefore, it
can be inferred from the statistics that while Forf showed signs of regression, other brands made significant advances
in production in terms of time, especially REF.

Ex 2:
The given graph illustrates the amount of money civilians from 7 nations invested in intercontinental tourism in space
from 2011 and 2012.
The first glance reveals that apart from China, Germany and America, spending on international tourism in the UK,
Russian Federation, France and Canada modestly remained under the threshold of 60 million dollars.
With regard to China, Germany and the US, Chinese tended to spend appreciably more money on international
tourism, roughly from 70 million dollars to 100 million dollars; however, the remainders showed middling changes.
To illuminate, although German spending witnessed a subtle decrease, it remained moderately higher than America in
both 2011 and 2012, which, on the contrary, slightly increased to 80 dollars.
In reference to other nations, the French invested 60 million dollars in international tourism, overwhelmingly doubling
Canadians and that figure approximately remained unchanged from 2011 to 2012. In addition, despite inferiority in the
extent of increase, the investment of the UK was considerably more noticeable than the Russian Federation, by a
difference of 10 million dollars and 5 million dollars respectively.
Overall, except for China and the Russian Federation which showed a rise in investment in tourism after a year, other
countries underwent a stable trend. Additionally, it can be inferred from the statistics that Canadians attached little
attention to this kind of tourism compared with Chinese, who markedly showed a growing liking.