Name

Employee ID

Designation:

Review Period From:

Review Period Till :

INSTRUCTIONS: The Performance Measurement form has 3 sections. Section 1: Performance against on the Job Skills / Key Result Areas (KRAs). KRAs are organization wide defined; and based on role performed. Section 2: Performance against Personal Effectiveness. Section 3: Developmental Needs / Training Objectives. Must be time frame driven. Check the rating that best reflects the Appraisees performance in each competency. Examples are required to support ratings 5, 4 and 1

Definition of Ratings: 5 4 3 2 1 Performance is consistently at a level significantly greater than required. Performance significantly exceeds most of the job requirements. Performance consistently meets all of the job requirements. Performance meets a part of the requirements and indicates need for improvement. Performance does not meet minimum job requirements.

Page 1 of 7

Section 1 Key Result Area (On the Job Assessment) Name Department : : DOJ :

Designation: Role :

Last Appraisal Date:

(FACULTY) S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Ratings: 5 4 3 2 1

KRAs Understanding of and Commitment to Organisational goals Effectiveness of Teaching (based on student feedback) Communication skills Ability to integrate with other domains Promptness in providing feedback to students Research Productivity Service Orientation Customer Focus (Internal & External)

Appraisee

Appraiser

Reviewer Comments / Remarks

Performance Performance Performance Performance Performance

is consistently at a level significantly greater than required. significantly exceeds most of the job requirements. consistently meets all of the job requirements. meets a part of the requirements and indicates the need for improvement. does not meet minimum job requirements.

Page 2 of 7

Section 1 Key Result Area (On the Job Assessment) Name Department : : DOJ :

Designation: :

Last Appraisal Date:June-1/2008 to 31-May 2009 Role

(Non-Teaching Staff) S.No. 1 2 3 4 KRAs Understanding of and Commitment to Organisational goals On-the Job Performance (Compare with previous year) Peer Group Interpersonal Relations Students Communication Skills Promptness in providing relevant information to key Stakeholders Students Parents Management Academic Depts Appraisee Appraiser Reviewer Comments / Remarks

6
Ratings: 5 4 3 2 1

Customer focus Internal & External

Performance Performance Performance Performance Performance

is consistently at a level significantly greater than required. significantly exceeds most of the job requirements. consistently meets all of the job requirements. meets a part of the requirements and indicates the need for improvement. does not meet minimum job requirements.

Page 3 of 7

SECTION 2
Check Rating & Provide Examples to Support Rating PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS SelfAssessment Grade (1-5) Managers Assessment Grade (1-5) Managers Remarks (Mandatory for Ratings above 3 or if the appraisees Ratings differ significantly from the appraisers)

1) Job Knowledge & Skills: Understands the technical aspects of the job, including relevant technology / domain / function. Demonstrates the ability to use technical / functional skills to support institutional objectives. 2) Customer Focus (Internal & External): Anticipates, understands and responds to customers need in a timely and professional manner. 3) Teamwork & Interpersonal Skills: Cooperates with co-workers. Open to others ideas and suggestions. Volunteers to support / help colleagues during emergency situations. 4) Quality & Productivity: Understands and applies institutions processes, policies, procedures required for the job. Completes transactions, tasks, and assigned projects accurately and within specified deadlines. Identifies opportunities to improve processes and tasks and increase efficiencies. 5) Problem Solving & Analytical Skills: Analyzes facts/data thoroughly to reach sound conclusions. Proposes actionable and measurable solutions to problems. 6) Communication Skills: Expresses ideas and thoughts clearly. Verbal and written communication is clear, concise and well organized.

Page 4 of 7

Good listener. Check Rating & Provide Examples to Support Rating PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS SelfAssessment Grade (1-5) Managers Assessment Grade (1-5) Managers Remarks (Mandatory for Ratings above 3 or if the appraisees Ratings differ significantly from the appraisers)

7) Professionalism & Work Ethic: Demonstrates an understanding of and commitment to the institutions values. Treats co-workers and customers with dignity and respect. Assumes responsibility for actions. Displays integrity through actions. Adheres to the Policies of the Institution. Highly Dependable 8) Flexibility Adapts to changing environment quickly. Mobility (travel without inhibitions, to various locations even at short notice) Volunteers to take on new assignments and roles. 9) Initiative: Acquire new skills Actively participative and drives Organizational events. Attend training programs without absenteeism. Institutions News Letter. Quality Initiatives. Employee Referral. Company Club, Get-to-gether & Membership of committees.

10) Discipline: Punctuality Etiquette (Dressing, language etc.,)

Page 5 of 7

SECTION 3
DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS

1. Specify few developmental plans and mention their benefits/importance of implementation for the organization, individual as well as group. 2. Ask the employees to rate the plans according to their importance and which has to be completed first. 3. Also ask them to specify the probable time they feel is the right to complete the defined target.

Page 6 of 7

OVERALL SUMMARY:

For Academic Resources (Faculty) 60% Weightage on Section 1 40% Weightage on Section 2

For Non-Teaching staff 50% Weightage on Section 1 50% Weightage on Section 2

Please Check () the rating that best summarizes the employees overall performance for this review period.

Ratings Definitions: 5 4 3 2 1 Performance is consistently at a level significantly greater than required. Performance significantly exceeds most of the job requirements. Performance consistently meets all of the job requirements. Performance is below standard and indicates the need for immediate improvement. Performance does not meet minimum job requirements.

SIGNATURES: By signing below the employee acknowledges having received and discussed this performance review with his or her manager. Apraisee Signature : Apraiser Signature : Date: Date: Date:

Reviewer Signature :

Page 7 of 7