You are on page 1of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29956 of 2020


Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2019 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura
======================================================
MD. ZUBAIR @ MD. ZUBAIR ALAM Resident of Village-Babhangama,
P.S.-Bihariganj, District-Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s


Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma
For the Informant : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nityanand, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER

3 08-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for

the informant and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bihariganj P.S. Case No.

258 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section

366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on 09.06.2019 the

informant got information that his daughter namely, Sabana

Khatoon aged about 21 years is missing and ornaments and

clothes and cash of Rs. 82,000/- are also missing. On

01.07.2019, one call of unknown person came on mobile of

informant’s son who informed that Sabana has died. It is further

alleged that after hatching up criminal conspiracy the accused

persons including this petitioner committed murder of his

daughter.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29956 of 2020(3) dt.08-01-2021
2/2

It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely

implicated into this case. In fact, this petitioner married with

deceased and were living in Delhi. After two months of

pregnancy the deceased became sick and during treatment died

in Delhi. Petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2019 having no

criminal antecedent.

Counsel for the informant however, vehemently

opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner took

away the deceased and later on died on 01.07.2019 in Delhi.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of

allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-

named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

vinita/-
U T

You might also like