Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Methods
Ten normal adult subjects were studied. BIG activity was recorded from adductor
pollicis, abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti quinti, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior,
soleus, masseter, and orbicularis oculí muscles, using concentric needle electrodes or
clip electrodes [CoPØ and Dwgs, 1964] and was photographed on moving paper or
with a Polaroid camera. Silent periods were evoked by electrical stimulation delivered
through DISH 13 Κ62 surface electrodes to the ulnar, median, superficial radial, medial
popliteal, posterior tibial, sural or facial nerves, or the skin overlying the motor point of
masseter or, through ring electrodes, to the digital nerves of the fingers. Stimuli were
square waves 0.1-1.0 msec in duration and of nominal amplitude 10-50 V led from a DISH
Multistim or from a Grass S88 stimulator through a special SIU 5 isolation unit capable of
300 V output. SP were recorded during an evenly sustained isometric background contraction
except in the case of orbicularis oculí where the tension produced is difficult to measure.
Background (0.5-1.0 kg) and twitch tension were recorded primarily from adductor pollicis
with the subject seated, the forearm supported and the hand fixed in a specially designed
splint. The proximal phalanx of the thumb was connected to a steel bar on which two
ceramic strain gauges (Ether 3A-1A 350Ρ) were cemented. These made up two arms of a
Wheatstone bridge circuit connected to a DC amplifier. Isotonic twitch contraction was
recorded by interposing a spring between the thumb and strain gauge. All experiments were
performed in a warm room (24-26 °C).
Results
Ji kg
illmsec
Fig. 1. The effect of alterations in stimulus strength upon the SP in adductor pollicis.
A, B Isometric twitches. A Submaximal electric stimulus to the ulnar nerve. B Supramaxímal
stimulus. C, D Isotonic twitches (see methods). C Submaximal stimulus. D Supramaxímal
stimulus.
ιιιιιilι
+
SP studies in man have usually been restricted to muscles in the hand or,
less often, the arm. Because muscles vary in anatomical configuration, size,
speed of contraction and concentration of muscle spindles, clues to the nature
of the SP may be obtained by studying it in a wide array of muscles. For ex-
ample, when stimulating the facial nerve (fig. 3 B) and recording the volun-
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
Studies of the Normal Human Silent Period 593
r
~
tarily contracting orbicularis oculí (fig. 3 D), only a very brief and relative
electrical silence, lasting perhaps 30 msec, is seen (fig. 3 C). This is quite dif-
ferent from the SP in abductor digiti minimi (fig. 3A) or masseter [see SHA-
HANM and YOUNG, this volume, and STRUFPLER, STRUPPLER and AnAis, 1963]
under the same circumstances.
Supramaximal stimuli delivered to a mixed nerve, as in MERTON'S
studies [1951] or those reported here, have potential effects other than those
usually considered. In addition to producing impulses in motor fibers and in
at least the larger diameter muscle afferents (In and IB), such stimuli also
activate larger cutaneous fibers running in the mixed nerve. Fortunately, one
can stimulate such fibers in isolation in sensory nerves such as the superficial
radial at the wrist or digital nerves in the fingers, and such stimuli also pro-
duce a SP in the background voluntary contraction (fig. 4, 5). This cutaneously
evoked EMG silence is present from roughly 50-100 msec, after the stimulus
in the upper extremity and from 80-140 msec, after the stimulus in the leg.
There is also slight variation from muscle to muscle and nerve to nerve. This
SP is produced in muscles proximal (fig. 4A, C) as well as distal (fig. 4 Β) to the
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
SHAHAM/ŸOUNG 594
inri~ n++'Ι~Ι~•'ΙΙΙ~~~ιι~ιυ,γq!ι ,
.ι ~ ' ΥΙιιλ..,. .ιια~~~υi ι.Ι,.ι ,
~ι ~, ιΙ ΙhyWt
Ιω1&Ιiii ιιllΙ
■rιiiiiiι■
aii••ia•ii
iii•iaiiii
ιi
il/ii ιi
■
ιΙιiιιιιιi
ιrιιιιιιιιιιι
Fig.5. A cutaneously evoked SP is seen with the same timing in each of a pair o;
antagonistic muscles. Simultaneous superimposed EMG recordings from solens on the
upper line of each par and from tibialis anterior on the bottom line. Ιn A and B voluntary
activity is present in soleus, and in C and D the activity is in tibialis anterior. In A and C the
stimulation is applied to the posterior tibial nerve at the medial malleolus, whereas in B and
D the sural nerve is stimulated at the lateral malleolus. The stimulus artifacts, as at arrows
in A, are clearly visible. Calibrations are 20 msec and 500 µV for one large division on the
graticule.
Discussion
antidromic impulses somewhere in the motor axon between the cell body and
the site of stimulation if that motoneurone was active within plus or minus the
conduction time from cell body to stimulus site (of the order of 12 msec in the
case of stimulation at wrist), or (b) antidromic firing of the motoneurone if it
had not been active within plus or minus 12 msec of the stimulus. In addition,
the antidromic motor impulses which either collide central to the origin of the
recurrent axon collateral or invade the motoneurone would invade the col-
lateral to activate Renshaw-like cells, if such exist in man. Allowing for con-
duction centrally in motor fibers, for conduction peripherally again to the
muscle and assuming for the moment that the anterior horn cell will continue
to fire at rates of roughly 25/sec, it can be shown that electrical silence will
persist in the EMG from the arrival of the direct M response, some 3-4 msec
after a stimulus at the wrist, for the next 45-65 msec even if one ignores pos-
sible Renshaw effects. The `antidromic inhibition' described by RENSHAW
[1941] in the cat could not have an effect on the human EMG peripherally for
at least 30 msec after the stimulus ; this time allows for conduction centrally,
the onset of segmental inhibitory effects and the conduction peripherally of
impulses which arose just before the recurrent collateral inhibition began.
Therefore, the silence seen between the M and F responses (the latter occur-
ring some 30 msec after the stimulus) is explicable purely on the basis of
effects on conduction in motor axons and cannot be due to any changes in
CNS activity. If antidromic firing is avoided by using a stimulus below thre-
shold for motor fibers to produce a synchronous H-reflex, no Ell silence is
seen during the first 30 msec after the stimulus (fig. 2).
The effect of the ascending volley produced in sensory fibers by the stimu-
lation is more difficult to comprehend. The usual percutaneous stimulus
would be expected to activate Ia and In fibers from primary endings on the
spindle and Golgi tendon organs respectively, as well as large fibers from
joint receptors, cutaneous and subcutaneous structures, and so forth. Again,
allowing for conduction times, this volley of impulses could not produce an
EMG effect in less than 30 msec after the stimulus, which is the latency of the
H-reflex, taken to be the result of a volley in In fibers. This synchronous firing
of much of the motoneurone pool would also be expected to produce, via the
recurrent collateral pathway, considerable local Renshaw inhibition that would
tend to produce Ell silence for some time after the arrival of the H-reflex in
the muscle. Recent studies in the cat [RYALL, PIERCEY, PILOSA and GOLDFARB,
1972] have shown greater Renshaw cell activation following antidromic as
opposed to orthodromic monosynaptic activation of the motoneurone pool.
The effect of a volley in IB, joint or cutaneous fibers is less clear. Ιn the latter
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
SκØ/ΥουκG 596
instance, at least, the SP produced (fig. 4 and 5) appears about 50 msec after
the stimulus at the wrist and persists for another 50 msec or so. In summary,
though the ascending volley in motor and sensory fibers may produce EMG
silence by Renshaw or other mechanism from 30-75 msec (see below) after
the stimulus, the first 30 msec of the SP is produced by peripheral antidromic
effects and tends, therefore, to be less noticeable or absent when the stimula-
tion of motor fibers is minimized or the conduction distance in them is shorter.
The next segment of the SP (from 30 to 50 or 60 msec after the stimulus)
occurs too soon to be explicable on the basis of cutaneous effects (50-100 msec)
or of effects produced by the volley descending from the site of stimulation to
the muscle. In the mechanical trace (fig. 1) the twitch begins 12-15 msec after
the stimulation or 9-12 msec after the arrival of the M response. Α certain
degree of extrafusal muscle contraction must occur before the spindles are
unloaded or the Golgi tendon organs begin to discharge. Though Iλ and IB
fibers are fast conducting, at least 30 msec must elapse in the case of human
hand muscles between any peripheral action and the appearance in the BIG
of increased or decreased activity related thereto. The effects of the descending
volley on the SP cannot be expected before 50-60 msec elapse after the stimu-
lus and the second segment of the SP must, therefore, be due to factors other
than the modification of proprioceptíve or cutaneous input produced by the
stimulus. The persistence in humans of only the first 50 msec of the SP in de-
afferented muscles [Sηληλντ and YouriG, unpublished] supports this hypo-
thesis and suggests that the initial volley in IB, joint and other fibers plays re-
latively little role in at least the first half of the SP. The factors responsible for
the silence between 30 and 50 or 60 msec must include antidromic collision
and motoneurone firing which could produce relative silence, as noted above,
up to 45 or 65 msec. One must also not forget possible effects of an antidromic
volley in Ia fibers into the spindles themselves [IλrrnΕws, 1964]. In addition,
a Renshaw effect, if present in humans, would be expected no earlier than
30 msec and would persist for at least the next 30 msec or so. Interestingly, if
weaker stimuli are used, few motor axons are stimulated, less Renshaw effect
would be expected, and under these conditions, a brief return of voluntary
action potentials can be seen (fig. 1) at 50 to 60 or more msec. The second
segment of the SP is probably due to a combination of some of the same peri-
pheral antidromic effects described in discussions of the first segment as well as
hypothetical Renshaw effects which may also spill over into the next segment.
The third segment of the SP also has a multifactoríal basis. In upper ex-
tremity muscles, at least, the role of the cutaneous afferents merit serious
consideration because, in isolation (fig. 4 and 5), they produce a SP between
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
Studies of the Normal Human Silent Period 597
50 and 100 msec after the stimulus. That interval comprises the latter half of
the usual SP (the third segment in our terminology), and since we know that
a single volley in radial nerve can produce it, we are forced to assume that a
volley in all the large cutaneous fibers in the ulnar or median nerve at the wrist
can also. HOFFMANN and associates described an SP in masseter following
cutaneous stimulation of the oral mucosa [HOFFMANN and TbNNIES, 1948]
and in gastrocnemius and soleus following an electrical stimulus to the skin
of the foot [HOFFMANN, SCHENCκ and TÖNMES, 1948] ; SCHEΝcκ and KOEHLER
[1949] soon found that the latter stimulus could also produce an SP in both
gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior. HAGBARTH [1960], using trains of noxious
stimuli, found excitation in one group of leg muscles (usually flexors but at
other times extensors, depending on the site of stimulation) and inhibition in
the antagonist group. These silent periods, though clearly of cutaneous origin,
were considered to be examples of reciprocal inhibition though at times no
actual reflex was seen in the muscles antagonistic to those where the SP was
seen. KUGELBERG, EKLUND and GRIMBY [1960], using the same techniques as
HAGBARTH, reported much the same findings, including the observation that
the SP began slightly before the associated reflex contraction. In addition to
reciprocal inhibition, KUGELBERG et al. used the term `ambivalent inhibition'
to describe the simultaneous SP in antagonistic muscles.
In 1961, LIBERSON reported that cutaneous stimulation could produce
an SP in many muscles — he cautioned against ignoring this factor — but sub-
sequent authors in their discussions of the physiology of the SP [HERMAN,
1969; HUFSCH/c r, 1966; MATTHEws, 1964] were apparently not aware of
the importance of cutaneous factors. HUG~ON [1967] and DELWAIDE, SCHWAS
and YOUNG [1971] also described a cutaneously produced SP. Once again,
physiological studies in man have demonstrated a new entity, the cutaneous
SP, the basic neurophysiology of which remains to be worked out. The timing
of the cutaneous SP (minimal latency in bulbar muscles with progressively
longer latencies when recording from proximal arm, hand and leg) supports
the contention that so-called `long loop reflexes' [EccLES, 1966; ΤΑΒοιuκονΑ
and SAx, 1969] may be involved, and other preliminary evidence suggests that
the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere is necessary for its presence. Because it
comes between 80 and 140 msec after stimulus in triceps surge, whereas the
usual SP is up to 100 or 120 msec long, less contamination of the latter with
cutaneous factors results, though an overlap is still present. Our impressions
are that stimuli supramaximal for motor fibers are required to produce a clear-
cut cutaneous SP and that lesser stimuli may tend to produce less cutaneous
effects as compared to proprioceptive. Studies with quantitative evaluations
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
$ΗØ/YOUNG 598
sion resulted in a feeble tendon organ response [HouK and HUNNEMAN, 1967]
which might then fail (as in fig. 1 C) to produce the last 15-25 msec of the
SP. HERMAN [1969] reported no difference in the length of the SP in triceps
surge under isometric or isotonic conditions. He also found the SP duration
to persist for 175 to more than 200 msec, and we cannot account for this
discrepancy.
To account for the last half of the SP, at least the following factors must
be considered : poorly understood cutaneous input, particularly with electrical
stimuli supramaximal for motor fibers, muscle spindle unloading and Golgi
tendon organ activation. The first, though of little interest to neurophysio-
logísts, is clearly demonstrable in man, whereas the latter two have been ex-
tensively investigated in animal laboratories but remain terra incognita clini-
cally. The time relationships between stimuli and EMG response may be
difficult to visualize because of the delay around the loop from changes in
firing of muscle receptors, spinal modification of resultant input, increase or
decrease of motoneurone activity to eventual EMG changes. Figure 6 sche-
matically portrays hypothetical roles played by the spindle pause (A'—B') and
Golgi tendon organ activation (A'—P') in relation to the resulting EMG re-
sponses (A—B and B—P, respectively).
Clearly, multiple factors are involved in the SP, and it would be useful to
simplify them if possible. By the use of phasic reflex contractions (tendon jerk
193.51.85.197 - 10/27/2017 9:37:32 AM
Université René Descartes Paris 5
Downloaded by:
Studies of the Normal Human Silent Period 601
studies under poorly defined conditions and reports from animal experiments
carried out under artificially simplified conditions, we must resist. We should
concern ourselves with gathering data of a type which will remain useful as
our understanding evolves.
Summary
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant from Mrs. W. B. Lτ.ovn. We wish to thank Mr.
FREDERICK E. Balm, Medical Research Council, for his help in building the myograph.