The Falling Man” is a well-known photograph taken by Richard Drew during the 9/11 terrorist attacks in

2001. The photograph captures a man falling or jumping from one of the World Trade Center towers.
The photograph has been a subject of controversy and debate, with some arguing that it is too graphic
and disturbing to be shown publicly.

In his article “The Falling Man,” Tom Jun offers an interesting and controversial argument about the
identity of the man in the photograph. Jun suggests that the man was not just any victim but possibly a
window washer or maintenance worker who was trapped inside the building and made the decision to
jump rather than be burned alive. Jun suggests that the man’s identity may have been deliberately
obscured by the media to avoid highlighting the failures of building management in ensuring the safety
of workers during emergencies.

Jun’s argument is compelling because it sheds light on an important issue related to workplace safety
and the responsibilities of building management. By suggesting that the man in the photograph may
have been a worker rather than just a random victim, Jun highlights the systemic issues that led to the
tragedy and calls for greater accountability on the part of building owners and managers.

However, Jun’s argument is also controversial because it challenges the popular perception of the 9/11
attacks as an act of terrorism targeting innocent civilians. By suggesting that the man in the photograph
may have been a worker, Jun raises questions about the extent to which workers were prepared and
trained to deal with emergencies in a building as vulnerable as the World Trade Center.

Overall, Jun’s argument is an interesting and thought-provoking take on the identity of the Falling Man
in the photograph. It highlights important issues related to workplace safety and the responsibilities of
building owners and managers in ensuring the safety of workers during emergencies.