Script

[INTRODUCTION]
In 1989, a seismic shift rocked the cosmetics industry, as L'Oréal, a global beauty giant, found
itself embroiled in a controversy that would forever change the way cosmetics are tested for
safety. The heart of this dispute was the Draize eye test, a method used to gauge the potential eye
irritation caused by cosmetics and chemicals, by applying them to the eyes of rabbits. But as the
year unfolded, animal rights activists, notably People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
(PETA), began to vociferously question the ethics of subjecting animals, particularly rabbits, to
such trials.
[THE CONTROVERSY]
The Draize eye test, involving the administration of test substances to rabbits' eyes, raised not
just eyebrows but profound ethical concerns. It resulted in discomfort, pain, and, at times,
permanent eye damage for these helpless animals. This troubling reality galvanized animal rights
activists into action. Their rallying cry was clear: the use of animals in these experiments had to
stop.
[THE PROTESTS]
The streets and media outlets became the battleground for this ethical standoff. Animal rights
activists took to the streets, their protests echoing with cries for change. These fervent
demonstrations garnered increasing attention from the public, drawing the spotlight towards the
ethical dilemma at hand.
[THE RESPONSE]
Under the relentless pressure from both the public and animal rights groups, L'Oréal took a
stance that would reverberate throughout the industry. They made a momentous announcement:
the gradual phase-out of the Draize eye test. L'Oréal also pledged to pursue alternative testing
methods that did not involve animal suffering. This bold move marked a significant turning point
in the cosmetics industry and served as a beacon of hope for animal rights activists worldwide.
[THE LEGACY]
The reverberations of the L'Oréal case extended far beyond its immediate impact. It awakened
global consciousness about the ethical dimensions of animal testing in cosmetics, sparking a
movement to reduce and ultimately eliminate such practices. Governments worldwide followed

Script 1
 suit by introducing regulations and guidelines that encouraged the adoption of cruelty-free
testing methods.
[THE EVOLUTION]
In the years since the L'Oréal case, progress has been made towards more humane testing
methods. Innovative approaches, such as in vitro testing and computer modeling, have emerged
to replace traditional animal testing. These cutting-edge techniques aim not only to enhance the
accuracy of safety assessments but also to minimize the suffering of animals used in testing.
[CONCLUSION]
The L'Oréal case of 1989 stands as a testament to the power of public opinion and the ethical
imperative in product safety testing. It reminds us that progress can be achieved, even in
entrenched practices, when ethical considerations and the welfare of living beings are given
priority. The legacy of this case endures as a beacon of hope for a world where compassion and
scientific advancement can coexist harmoniously.

Script 2