You are on page 1of 1

1.

What is history
- History is the study of change over time, and it covers all aspects of human society. Political,
social, economic, scientific, technological, medical, cultural, intellectual, religious and
military developments are all part of history (Valdosta.edu)
- the branch of knowledge dealing with past events. a continuous, systematic narrative of past
events as relating to a particular people, country, period, person, etc., usually written as a
chronological account; chronicle: a history of France;a medical history of the patient.
2. What Is the Difference Between a Primary and Secondary source
- The difference between primary and secondary sources constitutes a fundamental aspect of
historical research. Primary sources encompass original materials such as personal
correspondence, photographs, official documents, and firsthand accounts, all originating from
the time under investigation or shortly thereafter. These artifacts provide direct evidence and
unique insights into historical events. On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretative
works generated by individuals who did not directly experience the events in question. These
sources involve the analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of primary sources, resulting in scholarly
articles, textbooks, documentaries, and historical narratives.

3. How can you say whether or not a certain history is authentic?


-The authenticity of a given historical narrative requires a thoroughly process to investigative
analysis. First is the provenance of the sources must be scrutinized. Primary sources carry more
weight due to their immediacy and connection to the events; however, biases and motivations of
creators must be considered. Second is the credibility and qualifications of the sources' creators
warrant examination, as these attributes significantly impact the reliability of the accounts. The
presence of corroborating sources serves as a substantial indicator of authenticity, establishing a
consensus of perspectives. Contextual analysis plays a pivotal role; understanding the historical
backdrop and societal milieu in which the sources were produced provides insights into potential
influences and perspectives. Consciousness of bias is crucial, given that historical actors often
depict events through subjective lenses.

Also, aligning the historical narrative with established facts from reliable sources reinforces
authenticity. Any inconsistencies or anachronisms that emerge demand rigorous investigation.
Seeking expert opinions from historians proficient in the era under study can offer valuable
insights into the veracity of the narrative. Archival records and official documents provide
unfiltered glimpses into the past and serve as critical benchmarks for authentication. It is vital to
approach historical research with a critical mindset, acknowledging that biases, omissions, and
misinterpretations can obscure the fidelity of accounts.

You might also like