Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Bec 2660
1 Bec 2660
Basic Surgery
Christina Strand Thomsen DipECVS DVM
Veterinary surgeon
AniCura Dyresykehuset Bergen Nord
Vetzup
Overview
Part 1
• Surgical site infection (SSI)
• Classification
• Risk factors
• Aseptic preparation
• Patient
• Surgeon
Part 2
• Basic surgical techniques
1
10/10/17
2
10/10/17
Classification
(U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Criteria for Defining Surgical Site Infection)
• Purulent discharge
• Positive culture
• At least one of the following
• Pain or tenderness
• Redness or heat
Classification
INCISIONAL SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS (2)
3
10/10/17
Classification
ORGAN/SPACE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
• Any part of the body that is manipulated during the procedure (except
skin, fascia, or muscle layers)
• Within 30 days if no implants utilized
• Within 1 year if implants utilized
• Clean
• Clean-contaminated
• Contaminated
• Dirty
4
10/10/17
10
5
10/10/17
11
12
6
10/10/17
13
Rats
BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF INAPPARENT WOUND INFECTION IN RATS
14
7
10/10/17
Risk factors
15
Risk factors
DEGREE OF BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION
16
8
10/10/17
Risk factors
CLIPPING OF THE SURGICAL SITE
• Can produce cuts into which bacteria can colonize over time
• Clipping of the skin anytime other than immediately preoperatively
should be avoided whenever possible
• Even just the morning of surgery
17
Risk factors
DURATION OF SURGERY
• The risk of surgical site infection approximately doubles for every hour of
surgery
18
9
10/10/17
Risk factors
NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE OPERATING ROOM
• For each additional person in the surgical suite, the risk of SSI can
increase by as much as 30%
• Greater amount of airborne contamination
19
Risk factors
OTHER POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS
20
10
10/10/17
Aseptic preparation
21
Antiseptics
ALCOHOL
22
11
10/10/17
Antiseptics
IODOPHORS
23
Antiseptics
CHLORHEXIDINE
• Bactericidal
• Sporicidial at higher temperatures
• Activity reduced in organic material, but better than povidine-iodine
• Surgical scrub formulations are 2-4%
• Wound treatment are 0.05% or less
• Disinfectant 0.5-2%
24
12
10/10/17
PRIMARY GOAL
• Removal of transient organisms and reduction in the number or
resident flora
25
26
13
10/10/17
27
• Spray
• Will make the area wet, but have a very little
cleaning effect
• Concentric movements
• Circle movements - penetrating into cracks and
fissures?
28
14
10/10/17
• What we do
• Rough scrub (chlorhexidine)
• Diluted povidine-iodine around the eyes
• Chloraprep (2% chlorhexidne gluconate + 70% isopropyl alcohol)
29
• Human hospitals
• Proven to be better than povidine-iodine
• Easy to use
• Single-use
30
15
10/10/17
• Barrier that prevents microbial spread from the patient into the surgical
field or onto surgical personnel
• Should be
• Resistant to penetration by bacteria
• Resistant to penetration by fluids (blood, flush water)
• Should not tear with normal use
• Secured in such a way as to remain effectively in position during the
surgery
• Not easily flammable
31
32
16
10/10/17
33
• Many protocols
• The ideal protocol
• Quick and efficient
• None irritating
• Economical
• With residual effect
34
17
10/10/17
35
• Alcohol-based formulations
• Scrub brush have minimal effect and possibly a negative effect
36
18
10/10/17
• Sterilium®
• best peer-reviewed hand-disinfectant
– quality since 1965
• possesses an excellent immediate
effect
• provides very good residual effect
• excellent skin tolerability even with
long-term use
37
38
19
10/10/17
• Initial study
• Hibiscrub (H), Povidine-iodine (P), Sterilium® (S)
• Sampling prior to hand wash, immediately after and after 3 hours
• H and S significantly better than P immediately after
• S signifacntly better than H and P after 3 hours
39
• Clinical study
• Sterilium vs Hibiscrub
• Prior to hand wash, immediately after hand wash and after surgery
• Routine and acute surgeries (small animals and equine)
• Similar results pre and post hand wash
• Sterilium® significantly better than hibiscrub after surgery
40
20
10/10/17
• Conclusion
• The alcoholic-based rub used in this study performed better than
disinfecting soaps and was suitable for veterinary surgical hand
disinfection. Alcoholic-based rubs are cheaper, can be applied more
rapidly, have greater skin tolerance and cause less environmental
impact
41
42
21
10/10/17
43
• Worn to decrease the spread of bacteria and other particles from the
surgeon´s skin and clothes to the environment
• Reusable
• Single use
• Reduces SSI
• More economical
44
22
10/10/17
• Perforations
• Single glove
• 12.7-31%
• Double glove
• Outermost
• 11.5-44%
• Innermost
• 3.8-13%
45
46
23
10/10/17
Summary
ASEPTIC PREPARATION OF THE ANIMAL + ASEPTIC
PREPARATION OF THE SURGEON/STAFF
47
24