Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8
Dynamics II: Motion in a Plane
Background Information
Chapters 8 is a continuation of single-particle dynamics, first to two-dimensional problems in which
the x- and y-motions are independent and then to circular motion. Many of the student difficulties
with force and motion that seem to have been resolved in Chapters 5–6 resurface when students
consider motion in a plane. The fact that these issues reappear in each new context shows how
difficult it is for students to adopt a Newtonian thought pattern. On the other hand, two-dimensional
motion provides an opportunity to spiral back to many earlier topics for additional practice.
Many student ideas about a “force of motion” take on new life in two-dimensional
situations. Clement (1982) posed the following problem to engineering students in a calculus-based
physics course:
A rocket is moving sideways in deep space, with its engine off, from A to B. It is not near any
stars or planets or other outside forces. Its engine is fired at point B and left on for 2 s while the
rocket travels from point B to some point C. Draw in the shape of the path from B to C. Then
show the path from point C, after the engine is turned off.
This figure shows the most common response. An incorrect linear
trajectory between B and C was drawn by 89% of students. This is
perhaps not too surprising because few students would have any reason
to recognize that this situation gives a parabolic (or even curved)
trajectory. More interesting is that 62% of students predicted that the
rocket would return to its original direction after the engine is shut off
at C. Interviews with students found many giving explanations such as
“Whatever was making it go to the right before will take over again after point C.” This reflects a
continuing belief in a “force of motion” toward the right.
Circular motion requires a shift in thinking from the emphasis until now on linear motion
and motion that can be decomposed into independent linear motions along two axes. Not
8-1
surprisingly, this evokes new difficulties for students. Arons (1990) cites
an experiment in which a marble is rolled around the inside of an
incomplete circular hoop lying flat on a table. Students are asked to predict
the marble’s trajectory after passing point B. Some predict it will continue
with perfect circular motion, reentering the hoop at A. Others predict a
circular tendency that “runs down,” so the marble curves to the left but
gradually straightens out. Either way, students seem to be thinking that the
marble is subject to a “force of motion” that has a memory of previous
motions. Few predict the correct linear trajectory from B.
The “Physics Education Research” chapter cited the Van Heuvelen (1991a) study in which
students at the end of instruction were asked about the forces on a ball swinging in a vertical circle
on the end of a string. At the lowest point, 60% identified a “force of motion” tangent to the circle.
Further, if you look only at their vertical forces, 64% showed the tension force and the gravitational
force as being of equal magnitude while only 36% recognized that the tension force would need to
be larger than the gravitational force.
Although students may have learned the term centripetal force in high school, few have any
sense of what it means. This is demonstrated by rolling a heavy ball (such as a bowling ball) across
the floor and asking students to create a circular motion about a specified point by tapping on the
ball with a rubber mallet. Most attempt to apply tangential forces, rather than centripetal forces—
another example of thinking that force needs to be in the direction of motion.
In fact, merely the term “centripetal force” causes difficulty for some students. They
consider it to be a new kind of force, like the gravitational force or the normal force, and they will
dutifully add a force vector labeled “centripetal force” to their free-body diagrams.
Pedagogical Approach
The primary focus of this chapter is to understand that circular motion is due to a center-directed
force. This is a non-intuitive idea, one that students need to see in a variety of contexts.
There have been many suggestions in recent years, especially in The American Journal of
Physics, that textbooks and instructors not use the term “centripetal force.” As noted above, many
students believe that this refers to a new and additional kind of force acting on the object. We don’t
label a tension force causing linear acceleration “the linear force,” so why should the same force get
a special name if it happens to cause circular motion? The term seems to hinder rather than help
many students. Consequently, this text uses the term centripetal acceleration as the acceleration of
an object moving in a circle, but it does not use the term centripetal force.
Because circular motion analysis requires looking at forces both in the plane of motion (the
xy-plane) and perpendicular to the plane of motion, the text introduces a new “rtz-coordinate
system.” The origin is placed on the particle (for free-body diagram purposes) and the r-axis is
chosen to point toward the center of the circle. This choice makes the radial component of
Part I Summary
Chapter 8 is followed by the first of seven part summaries. Each summary consists of a “knowledge
structure” plus a short diversion relevant to the part just completed. Because this is the first
summary, you may want to call students’ attention to the knowledge structure.
Each knowledge structure summarizes the essential information of the preceding chapters in
an expert-like hierarchical arrangement. Students should note that, thus far, there are only three
physical principles: Newton’s laws. We’ve considered three general types of motion, each of which
uses the second law in a slightly different way. Each form of motion then branches into more
specialized kinematic results. At an even finer scale, not shown here, is information about specific
types of forces. Suggest that students photocopy this page and keep it in front of them as they study
for the exam on Part I. They can look up specific details as needed, but this table describes the basic
approach they should apply to any problem in dynamics.