Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 (Invited)
9:00 AM – 9:30 AM
Abstract — Recent progress in soft-decision based FECs for FEC BER of 10-13 and bit rate in Gb/s. The three sets of data
100 Gb/s class optical communications is reviewed. High points represent the different FEC schemes: 1st generation FEC
speed 2-bit soft-decision LSI made with SiGe BiCMOS
using linear block codes represented by RS(255,239); 2nd gen.
technology is introduced. The implementation of soft-
decision based 100 Gb/s FEC is discussed. concatenated codes; and 3rd gen. FEC based on soft decision
and iterative decoding. A clear trend can be seen in that an
I. INTRODUCTION improvement of 1.4 times has been achieved every year. This
Very high-speed optical transport systems, e.g. 100 Gb/s, need improvement has been achieved not by FEC algorithm
increasingly powerful but practical forward error correction improvements, but by LSI technology evolution. The red open
(FEC) to enhance the transmission range. Several types of triangle at the top shows the research target for 100 Gb/s FEC.
powerful FEC for use at 10 to 40 Gb/s have seen intensive In order to keep the 100 Gb/s BER the same as that of a
development. For example, the dual orthogonally interleaved standard RS(255,239) FEC-based 40 Gb/s system with a Q-
BCH coding of ITU-T G.975.1 shows a 6.9 dB Q limit at 10 limit of 11.2 dB, at least 4 dB (=10log10(100/40)) greater
Gb/s with 25% redundancy. A Block Turbo code (BTC) LSI coding gain (NCG > 9.8dB at post-FEC BER of 10-13) is
has been reported with a Q limit of 6.3 dB at 10 Gb/s [1]. OTN necessary. In order to realize such high coding gain, soft
compatible enhanced FEC LSI has been developed with a Q decision would be necessary.
limit of 9.1 dB at 43 Gb/s [2]. However, no FEC LSI applicable 104
Shannon limit
to the 100 Gb/s region and showing comparable performance (Soft decision, 25% redundancy) 100Gb/s (target)
Net coding gain – Bit rate product (Gb/s)
(defined in terms of a post-FEC BER of 10-13)
[0 10]
[1 00]
[1 10]
[0 00]
[0 01]
[0 11]
[1 01]
were intensively studied for optical fiber communications by FEC 6-bit ADC
Encoder
Djordjevic et al. [7]. We proposed a new LDPC algorithm, i.e. /decoder 6-bit ADC Opt.
the cyclic approximated δ-minimum algorithm, in order to Soft Hyb.
6-bit ADC
reduce the circuit complexity of the decoder to enable 100 Gb/s
throughput [8]. The proposed algorithm can reduce the circuit 6-bit ADC
size to approximately 1/5 compared to the well known shuffled
125G x 4 = 500G
belief propagation algorithm. The undesired error floor, which
Fig. 5: Typical block diagram of a 100 Gb/s class line card
often occurs with LDPC codes, needs to be eliminated for 100
Gb/s systems, for which we propose the concatenation of
VI. CONCLUSION
LDPC and RS codes [9]. An LDPC code is used as the inner
We have reviewed soft-decision decoding based forward
code, with RS as the outer code.
error correction in optical communications. A newly
developed 2-bit soft decision LSI operating at 32
Gsample/s was introduced. A novel FEC scheme and
OTU4V framing structure based on low-density parity-
check (LDPC) codes were presented. The
implementation of soft-decision FEC for DSP based 100
Gb/s line card was discussed.
This work was in part supported by a project of the National Institute
of Information and Communications Technology, as part of a program
of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan.
Fig. 4: A part of FPGA board for emulating 125 Gb/s FEC
REFERENCES
An OTU4V frame structure for 100GbE transport has been [1] T. Mizuochi, J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electron. vol. 12, no. 4,
proposed for the concatenated LDPC(9216,7936) + pp.544-553, (2006).
RS(992,956) codes with soft decision decoding, taking the [2] Y. Kisaka, et al., OFC/NFOEC2007, OThL1, Anaheim, CA.
restrictions of the OTN framing rules into account [10]. Fig. 4 [3] W. Cheng, et al., ISSCC 2004, pp. 262 - 263, San Francisco.
shows the high speed FPGA board to emulate the proposed [4] P. Schvan, et al., ISSCC 2006, pp. 2340 - 2349, San Francisco.
FEC performance based on the OTU4V framing. The [5] P. Schvan, et al., ISSCC 2008, pp. 544 - 634, San Francisco.
encoder/decoder for the LDPC code is located at the front-end [6] T. Kobayashi, et al., OFC/NFOEC2009, OWeE2, San Diego, CA.
as an inner coder. The RS encoder/decoder wraps the LDPC [7] I. B. Djordjevic, et al., ECOC2008, P.4.04, Brussels, Belgium.
code in an outer code. The three stages of interleaving and de- [8] Y. Miyata, et al., OFC/NFOEC2007, OWE5, Anaheim, CA.
interleaving are located between the OTU4V framer/deframer, [9] Y. Miyata, et al., OFC/NFOEC2008, OTuE4, San Diego, CA.
the RS encoder/decoder, and the LDPC encoder/decoder, [10] Y. Miyata, et al., OFC/NFOEC2009, NThB2, San Diego, CA.