You are on page 1of 7

Acta Pædiatrica ISSN 0803-5253

REGULAR ARTICLE

Body composition in late preterm infants in the first 10 days of life and at
full term
Elisabeth Olhager (elisabeth.olhager@skane.se), Caroline T€ornqvist
€ping, Sweden
Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Linkoping University, Linko

Keywords ABSTRACT
Air displacement plethysmography, Body Aim: To investigate changes in body weight, fat-free mass, fat mass and percentage of
composition, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, Preterm
infants body fat during early life and at full-term postconceptional age (PCA) in preterm infants
born after 32 gestational weeks and before 37.
Correspondence
E Olhager, Department of Neonatology, Skane Methods: Twenty-nine late preterm infants underwent growth and body composition
University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. assessment by air displacement plethysmography (ADP) at the age of 4 days and at full-
Tel: +46 46 178286 |
term PCA. In 25 of these infants, body composition was assessed three times between
Email: elisabeth.olhager@skane.se
days four and nine of life. The preterm infants were compared with 29 full-term infants,
Received
matched for gestational age, sex and body weight.
29 September 2013; revised 1 February 2014;
accepted 10 March 2014. Results: There was a significant increase in birth weight and fat-free mass between days
DOI:10.1111/apa.12632
four and nine of life. Preterm infants had significantly more body fat 382  180 g vs
287  160 g than full-term infants at full-term PCA. Preterm infants showed poor linear
growth between birth and full-term PCA.
Conclusion: Weight gain after the initial postnatal weight loss consists of gain in fat-free
mass. At full-term PCA, preterm infants were stunted. When compared with full-term new
born infants matched for body weight and gestational age, preterm infants had more body
fat and a higher percentage of body fat.

INTRODUCTION fact, almost 25% of infants admitted to neonatal units,


Preterm infants often experience early postnatal growth making them by far the largest patient group (10). Although
failure, which is already evident at full-term postconcep- these late preterm infants are relatively healthy compared
tional age (PCA) and may be associated with a negative with infants born before 32 completed gestational weeks,
long-term neurological outcome (1). Aggressive nutritional they have higher mortality and morbidity than full-term
management has been proposed to minimize later devel- newborn infants (10).
opmental delays, the goal being to achieve a postnatal The period around birth is very important, as the first
weight gain approximately equal to foetal growth rates (2). days of postnatal life are a time of enormous change (11).
However, rapid weight gain in early infancy has been Several studies have highlighted the high-fat content in
associated with increased risks of obesity and metabolic preterm infants at full-term PCA, but little attention has
syndrome later in life (3). Furthermore, it has been shown been paid to their body composition development during
that children who are born prematurely have an isolated the first postnatal days (12). One study reported data on the
reduction in insulin sensitivity, which may be a risk factor body composition of preterm and full-term infants within
for type 2 diabetes mellitus (4). In recent years, there has 48 h of birth, stating that the proportion of body fat in late
been increasing focus on the quality of growth in preterm
infants (5,6). Studies comparing the body composition of
preterm infants at full-term PCA with that of full-term
newborns show preterm infants are not only shorter and Key notes
lighter, but they also have more body fat and less fat-free  Conflicting data exist regarding early and late changes
mass (7). This is alarming, because this pattern of growth in body composition in late preterm infants.
may correlate with impaired cognitive outcome (1,5).  We found that weight gain after the initial postnatal
Most studies of the body composition of preterm infants weight loss consisted of gain in fat-free mass and
have been carried out in infants born before 32 gestational preterm infants (n = 29) had a higher percentage of
weeks (1,6,7). A study of late preterm Italian infants born body fat than full-term infants (n = 29).
after gestational week 32, but before 37 completed gesta-  This pattern of growth and body composition develop-
tional weeks, found rapid catch-up growth in fat mass ment may be associated with increased risks of obesity
between birth and one-month old (8,9). In Sweden, this and the metabolic syndrome in later life.
group of infants represents 3–4% of all newborns and, in

©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743 737
Body composition in late preterm infants €rnqvist
Olhager and To

preterm infants, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiom- University Hospital. Gestational age was based on the date
etry (DEXA), was as high as 13–14% (13). of the last menstrual period and ultrasound in gestational
In 2004, equipment based on the air displacement week 11–12. Postconceptional age was calculated using
plethysmography (ADP) technique became available, chronological age plus gestational age. Forty-one of these
enabling accurate, quick and noninvasive assessment of infants met the following criteria: birth weight over 1500
body composition in infants weighing between one and grams, singletons, weight and length appropriate for gesta-
eight kilograms (9,14,15). This technique has subsequently tional age according to Swedish growth reference values
been used to measure the body composition of full-term and (16), no need for respiratory support (ventilator, continued
preterm infants. It is well accepted by parents, healthcare airway pressure or extra oxygen), no need for parenteral
staff and infants and is therefore well suited for clinical nutrition and no sepsis or malformation. Parents were
studies. We used the ADP technique in a group of late asked for permission for their child to participate in the
preterm infants to study changes in body composition study, and permission was granted for 30 infants (29 infants
during the early postnatal period. Our first aim was to had valid results). These infants were all fed according to
describe changes in body weight, fat mass and fat-free mass current practice at the neonatal unit, which includes special
in such infants during the first 10 days of life. Our second efforts to initiate and maintain maternal lactation. As most
aim was to compare their body composition at full-term preterm infants are unable to suck effectively, breast milk
PCA with corresponding values for full-term new born was initially fed through a nasogastric tube. If the mother
infants matched for PCA, sex and weight. was unable to provide breast milk, the infants were fed
formula (Pepti Junior, Mead Johnsson). On day four of life,
nine infants received formula, 13 received formula plus
MATERIALS AND METHODS their mother’s breast milk, and seven only received their
Study design mother’s breast milk. At full-term PCA, two infants were fed
Body weight, fat-free mass and fat mass were assessed in 29 formula, four were fed formula plus breast milk, and 23 only
preterm infants (Group One). The infants were examined received breast milk. Feeding regimes were not recorded
on day four  one of life, on two additional occasions between discharge from the unit and the day of assessment.
during the first 10 days of life and at full-term PCA. Four
infants were not assessed on the following two occasions. Full-term infants
Values obtained at full-term PCA were compared with Twenty-nine healthy full-term newborn infants were
those for 29 full-term newborn infants (Group Two). For recruited from the maternity ward at Linko € ping University
this comparison, infants were matched for sex, body weight Hospital. Fourteen had participated in a previous study
(100 g) and PCA (3 days). Infants in Group Two were (17). The infants were fed according to the guidelines of the
examined on day six  two of life. Figure 1 shows the maternity unit, where all mothers are encouraged to
infants who participated in the study. breastfeed. At the time of investigation, two infants were
formula fed, two received formula plus breast milk and 25
Preterm infants were completely breastfed.
Between February 2008 and June 2009, 166 preterm
infants, born after at least 32 gestational weeks, were Anthropometry at birth
€ ping
admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Linko In the delivery room, all infants were weighed without
clothing on an electronic baby scale (Tanita Corporation,
Tokyo, Japan) and their length measured by means of a
measuring board. Head circumference was measured with a
Group 1
plastic measuring band.
n = 29 preterm infants,
investigated on day four
of life Body composition
Body composition was assessed using an ADP system (Pea
Pod, Cosmed USA Inc., Concord, CA, USA) using software
Four preterm infants were version 3.0.1. The physical design, validation and measure-
not eligable for
investigations on ment procedure have been described in detail elsewhere
day 6 and 9 of life. (15,16). The system measures body volume and body weight
and calculates body density. Body composition is then
calculated by means of a two-compartment model, assum-
Group 1 ing a fat mass density of 0.9007 g/mL and using fat-free
n = 29 preterm infants Group 2 mass density values based on data published by Fomon
investigated att full-term n = 29 full-term infants et al. (18). The validity of Fomon et al.0 s estimates of fat-free
post conceptional age
mass density in full-term newborns has recently been
confirmed (19). Values for preterm infants are based on
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the infants who participated in the study. back-extrapolation using existing reference values for foe-
tuses of different gestational ages (20,21). A recent study has

738 ©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743
€rnqvist
Olhager and To Body composition in late preterm infants

reported good agreement between ADP and the isotope


Table 1 Gestational age, body length, head circumference and body weight at birth
dilution technique in the when assessment of body compo-
in late premature and full-term infants
sition in preterm infants (9).
Premature infants* Full-term infants†
The method of measurement was as follows: first, a
n = 29 (14 male) n = 29 (14 male)
measuring board was used to assess the infant’s length. The
infant0 s head was placed against the top of the measuring Gestational 35.0 (1.0) 38.7 (1.2)
board and held in that position by one of the parents. The age (weeks)
examiner (CT) straightened the infant’s legs and recorded Range (33.1–36.7) (37.0–40.7)
the measurement. The infant’s body weight was then Length (cm) 46.0 (1.8) 49.2 (2.1)
recorded using an electronic scale, which is part of the Range (43–49) (46–54)
Head 31.3 (0.5) 36.2 (2.0)
Pea Pod. Subsequently, the infant was placed without
circumference (cm)
clothing in a chamber, which maintains a temperature of
Range (28–33) (35–39)
around 30°C, for about 2 min to measure body volume. Weight (g) 2443 (395) 3185 (453)
While the body volume was measured a tight cap was used Range (1685–3310) (2600–4310)
to keep the infant’s hair flat. All preterm infants except two Weight z-score‡ 0.26  0.72¶ 0.83  0.34¶
were calm during the first measurement. Two infants cried Length z-score§ 0.1  0.89¶ 0.69  0.58¶
and moved around at the start of the examination, but
Data are presented as mean (SD) and range.
subsequently settled. One of these infants did not have a
*Group One.
valid result and was excluded. During the second examina- †
Group Two.
tion, nine infants initially cried but subsequently settled. ‡
Weight-for-age z-score.
Two infants did not settle and cried throughout the §
Length-for-age z-score.
examination. Of the full-term infants, three cried and ¶
(22).
moved around during measurement. All infants were
examined by the same person (CT).

Ethical considerations infants were not examined on days six and nine. Between
The Regional Human Research Ethics Committee in birth and the first examination, the infants lost 4.4  2.5%
Linko€ ping approved the study. Both parents of all infants of their body weight. At the third examination, they had
gave informed oral consent. regained their birth weight. Between the first and third
examinations, there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in
Statistics body weight, from 2323  363 to 2392  354 grams, and
Data were analysed using the statistical software SPSS for in fat-free mass, from 2176  297 to 2237  275 grams.
Windows, version 18.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). Values are The average increase in body weight was 69  57 grams,
expressed as means (SD). Repeated ANOVA, post hoc and the average increase in fat-free mass was 62  53
Tukey’s test and multiple regressions were used to identify grams. During this period, the average change in body
significant differences between groups. Means were also fat was 0.1  1.2% and the average increase in body
compared using paired and unpaired t-tests. Significance fat 7.0  6.3 grams. This increase in fat mass was not
was accepted when p < 0.05. significant.

Body composition development of late premature infants


RESULTS until full-term PCA
Description of infants at birth Table 3 shows the body weight, length, fat mass, fat-free
The body weight, length and gestational age at birth of the mass, fat mass index and fat-free mass index of late preterm
late premature and full-term infants are presented in Table 1. infants at the first measurement and at full-term PCA. The
The gestational age at birth of the preterm infants (n = 29) examinations were performed when the infants were on
was 34.9  1.0 weeks and their birth weight 2443  395 average four- and 25-day old. Between the two examina-
grams. The weight-for-age z-score was 0.26  0.72 and the tions, there were significant increases in body weight, length
length-for-age z-score was 0.1  0.90 (22). and head circumference. Fat mass increased from
The full-term infants (n = 29) were born in gestational 153  113 to 348  181 grams, and fat mass as a percent-
week 38.7  1.2, and their birth weight was 3185  453 age of body weight increased from 6.2  4.0 to 12.3  4.9.
grams. Their weight-for-age and length-for-age z-scores Fat-free mass increased from 2182  292 to 2631  309
were 0.83  0.34 and 0.69  0.58, respectively. grams. Fat mass accretion between the first and last
examinations was 4.2  2.4 g/kg/day. The fat-free mass
Body composition of late premature infants during the index was 10.3  1.1 kg/m2 at the first examination,
first 10 days of life increasing significantly to 11.4  1.0 kg/m2 at full-term
The body weights, fat mass and fat-free mass of the late PCA. The corresponding figures for fat mass index were
preterm infants are shown in Table 2. The infants were 0.7  0.5–1.7  0.7 kg/m2, with this increase also signifi-
examined, on average, at four-, six- and nine-day old. Four cant (p < 0.05).

©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743 739
Body composition in late preterm infants €rnqvist
Olhager and To

Table 2 Body weight, fat mass and fat-free mass in 29 late preterm infants (four infants did not participate in examinations 2 and 3) assessed three times in the first 10 days of life
Examination Age (days) Body weight (g) Fat mass (%) Fat mass (g) Fat-free mass (g)
† †
1 4 (1) 2323 (363)* 4.9 (3.8) 150 (110) 2176 (297)*
2 6 (1) 2348 (356)* 4.4 (3.8)† 135 (110)† 2216 (293)*
3 9 (2) 2392 (354)* 4.9 (3.3)† 159 (111)† 2237 (275)*

*Significant (p < 0.05) difference between measurements 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 3.



No significant difference between measurements 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 3.
Data are presented as means (SD).

Table 3 Body weight, length, fat mass, fat-free mass, fat mass index and fat-free mass index in 29 late preterm infants (Group One) at first measurement and at full-term PCA
First measurement Full-term PCA p-Value* 95% CI

PCA (weeks) 35.0 (1.0) 38.7 (1.1) <0.0001 (3–4)


Age (days) 4 (1) 25 (9) <0.0001 (18–25)
Weight (g) 2333 (366) 3012 (415) <0.0001 (541–817)
Length (cm) 46 (1.9) 47 (1.9) <0.007 (1.1–2.7)
Fat mass (%) 6.2 (4.0) 12.3 (4.9) <0.0001 (4.3–8.1)
Fat mass (g) 153 (113) 384 (181) <0.0001 (166–297)
Fat-free mass (g) 2182 (292) 2631 (309) <0.0001 (361–536)
Fat mass index kg/m2 0.7 (0.5) 1.7 (0.7) <0.0001 (0.7–1.2)
Fat-free mass index kg/m2 10.3 (1.1) 11.4 (1.0) <0.05 (0.8–1.6)

PCA = postconceptional age.


Data are presented as means (SD).
*For comparison between first measurements and full-term PCA.

The z-scores for weight and length at full-term PCA were DISCUSSION
0.62  0.75 and 0.78  0.91, respectively. These values In our study of late preterm infants, we found that the
were significantly lower than the corresponding values at increase in body weight between days four and nine of life
birth, when the weight-for-age z-score was 0.26  0.72, was mainly due to an increase in fat-free mass. Between the
and the length-for-age z-score was 0.1  0.9. There was a fourth day of life and full-term PCA, these infants increased
significant difference between the z-score at PCA and the their fat mass from 153 to 384 grams, equivalent to a fat
z-scores at birth. accretion of 4.2 g/kg/day. The corresponding figure for the
reference foetus is 2–3 g/kg/day during gestational weeks
Body composition of late premature infants compared 33–36 (20). During this period, the weight-for-age and
with full-term infants at similar PCA length-for-age z-scores of the late preterm infants
Table 4 shows the PCA and postnatal age at measurement decreased. Furthermore, at full-term PCA, these infants
together with body weight, length, fat mass, fat-free mass, had significantly less fat-free mass than full-term newborn
fat-free mass index and fat mass index for late preterm infants matched for weight, sex and age.
infants (Group One) and full-term (Group Two) infants Using ADP, this study assessed body composition
measured at comparable PCA. By design, the two groups changes in late preterm infants during the first 10 postnatal
had similar body weights, but the preterm infants were days. A previous study assessed body composition in late
significantly shorter, on average by 2 cm. They also had preterm infants on day five but did not include further
significantly less fat-free mass than the full-term infants, measurements during the first 10 days (8). However, mean
2631  309 versus 2794  329 grams. Furthermore, the body fat as a percentage of body weight was 5.7% in that
preterm infants had significantly more body fat (grams and study, agreeing with our results. Furthermore, body fat as a
percentage) than the full-term infants: 382  180 versus percentage of body weight of our preterm infants on day
287  160 grams, and 12.3  4.9 versus 8.1  4.3%. four of life was consistent with reference data from the
Although the average body weight of the two groups was study of Ziegler et al.(20) who showed that body fat in
very similar, preterm infants had 25.3% more body fat. They foetuses of corresponding gestational ages varies between
also had a significantly lower fat-free mass index (p < 0.05) 6.3 and 8.7%. The higher percentage of body fat in late
but a significantly (p < 0.003) higher fat mass index than preterm infants reported by Lapillone et al. can be
the full-term infants. In both groups, the majority of infants explained by the use of DEXA – a technique that has been
were breastfed. shown to overestimate fat mass in small infants (13,23).

740 ©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743
€rnqvist
Olhager and To Body composition in late preterm infants

Table 4 Body weight, body length, postconceptional age and postnatal age at measurement, fat mass, fat-free mass, percentage of body fat, fat mass index and fat-free mass index
in 29 preterm infants at full-term postconceptional age (Group One) and 29 full-term infants (Group Two)
Preterm infants Full-term infants p-Value* 95% Confidence interval

Postconceptional age (weeks) 38.7 (1.1) 39.6 (1.2) <0.05 (0.5–1.2)


Postnatal age (days) 25 (9) 6 (2) <0.0001
Body weight (g) 3012 (415) 3000 (452) ns
Body length (cm) 47 (2) 49 (2) <0.05 (0.23–2.2)
Fat-free mass (g) 2631 (309) 2794 (329) <0.0001 (71–196)
Fat mass (g) 384 (180) 287 (160) <0.0001 (76–205)
Body fat (%) 12.3 (4.9) 8.1 (4.3) <0.0001 (2.6–5.8)
Fat-free mass index (kg/m2) 11.4 (1.0) 12.1 (1.2) <0.02 (0.2–1.0)
Fat mass index (kg/m2) 1.7 (0.7) 1.2 (0.6) <0.000 (0.4–1.0)

Data are presented as means (SD).


*For comparison between groups.

ADP, by contrast, has been shown to be a valid method (9). at birth but, as Figure 2 shows, they were shorter than both
Thus, we believe that our results are likely more accurate small full-term and normal-sized full-term infants at full-
than those reported by Lapillone et al. At full-term PCA, term PCA, suggesting that their gain in length was restricted
our preterm infants had weighed less, were shorter and had during the first 3 or 4 weeks of extra uterine life. Further-
a lower percentage of body fat than preterm infants assessed more, their proportion of fat-free mass at full-term PCA was
by ADP at full-term PCA (5,8). The infants in the study by less than that of small full-term infants and, of course, of
Ramel et al. contained 18.7  0.8% body fat at full-term normal-sized full-term infants, indicating that the growth of
PCA and the corresponding figure in the study by Roggero this body component, too, was restricted during this period.
et al. was 16.1  4.6%, which are higher values than for our However, preterm and normal-sized full-term infants had
preterm group at full-term PCA (5,8). The reasons for the similar amounts of fat, both in grams and as a percentage.
difference could be that Ramel et al.0 s study included varied This comparison thus emphasizes that the problem for a
samples of preterm infants who were older, between 40 and premature newborn is to gain sufficient fat-free mass and
42 weeks gestational age, when assessed by ADP at full- length. Consequently, future efforts in this area should
term PCA. The differences in the percentage of body fat may attempt to specifically improve these aspects of growth.
reflect variations in international and inter-hospital nutri- An obvious way of improving the growth in fat-free mass
tional regimes. This also means that further studies of and length of premature infants is to manipulate their
changes in body composition in late preterm infants under nutritional intake. Our late preterm infants did not follow a
different nutritional regimes are necessary. In our study, 23 prescribed nutritional schedule and the policy of our unit is
of the preterm infants and 25 of the full-term infants were that all infants should be breastfed at discharge, as breast
breastfed at full-term PCA. The results in this study were not milk is regarded as the optimal food for all preterm infants.
adjusted for feeding regimes. Detailed feeding regimes However, it has been shown that protein-fortified feeds can
between discharge and assessments were not recorded in increase gains in fat-free mass (25). It remains unclear
the preterm group. We believe that confirmation studies whether this can completely correct the kind of diminished
using larger samples sizes and, if possible, randomization to fat-free mass at full-term PCA found in our late preterm
different feeding regimes is required. Furthermore, the full- infants. Further studies of late preterm infants are therefore
term infants were assessed during the first week of life and necessary to examine the effect of such protein supplements
details of feeding were not recorded. Details of feeding were on growth in length and fat-free mass.
not recorded, and thus, it would not be correct to draw any Growth patterns in early life predict subsequent disease
conclusion on how body composition was affected by risks, such as type 2 diabetes and decreased insulin
different feeding regimes. At the time of assessment, most of sensitivity. Intrauterine growth restriction is a risk factor
the infants had not reached their full capacity of feeding. for such diseases, but rapid postnatal weight gain is also
Normal postnatal development in full-term infants independently associated with an increased risk of devel-
involves a rapid increase in total body fat after birth, and oping metabolic syndrome (3,4). These aspects of the
data reported by others tend to suggest that this is also the relationship between early growth and later disease risk
case for infants born prematurely (6,7,12). In Figure 2, we have been discussed by Wells, who introduced the concepts
present a compilation of data with additional information of metabolic load and metabolic capacity (3). A high body
on this issue. The figure presents the results of the present fat content may represent a metabolic load and metabolic
study for our small full-term and preterm infants in relation capacity. Metabolic capacity is defined as organ develop-
to body composition data for 209 normal-sized full-term ment that occurs early in life and metabolic load as the
healthy Swedish infants studied at an average age of 1 week subsequent growth. Disease risk is predicted to be greatest
(24). The preterm infants were of average weight and length when there is large disparity between metabolic capacity

©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743 741
Body composition in late preterm infants €rnqvist
Olhager and To

Body weight (g) Length (cm) Body fat (%)

3500

12
50
Body fat
Fat free mass

3000

10
40
2500

8
30
2000

6
1500

20

4
1000

10

2
500
0

TN TS P TN TS P TN TS P

Figure 2 Figure 2 shows the body weight (g), fat mass (g), length (cm) and body fat (%) of 209 average-size, full-term Swedish infants at an average of 1 week of age
(term normal = TN) (24), plus the small full-term infants (term small = TS, group III) and late preterm infants of the present study (preterm = PT, group II).

and metabolic load. A high body fat content may represent preterm infants have adapted to extra uterine life (11).
a metabolic load, while a low content of fat-free mass may Calculation of the percentage of body fat is based on
be detrimental in terms of metabolic capacity. A low fat-free measurements of body density, assuming a constant density
mass index in relation to body length squared has been of fat mass and fat-free mass. However, in fat-free mass the
found to be an independent risk factor for premature death amount of water, the so-called hydration factor, is an
in adults (26). At full-term PCA, our late premature infants important determiner of fat-free mass density. The hydra-
had a lower fat-free mass index and a higher fat mass index tion factor is known for full-term newborns but not for
ratio than full-term infants. We do not know if these preterm infants (19). Thus, to increase the validity of ADP
observations are of any significance for future health, but it for preterm infants, studies on the degree of hydration
is without doubt warranted to consider such infants‘ body factor would be recommended.
composition characteristics suboptimal. Several maternal factors, such as smoking, parity, pre-
The infants in our study were younger (4 days 1), when eclampsia, maternal body mass index, diabetes and level of
examined by ADP, than those in the validity study by education, have been shown to affect the outcome of a
Roggero et al. (9). Another study reported invalid results mother’s offspring (29). Placental dysfunction is strongly
when small full-term infants are measured soon after birth associated with preterm birth and growth restriction, and
(27). This could indicate that measurement accuracy soon high maternal body mass index and diabetes are associated
after birth and later differs for small infants. It has, however, with increased growth (30). In our study, maternal factors
been shown that the ADP is robust to minor changes in fat- were not recorded and the presented data were not adjusted
free mass hydration in full-term infants (28). In preterm for maternal factors. As preterm birth is often caused by
infants, adaptation to extra uterine life takes longer com- maternal factors, there is reason to believe that the intrauter-
pared with full-term infants (11). ADP values are affected by ine growth of the preterm infants in our study was affected.
lung volume and fluctuation in hydration. Therefore, our The rapid postnatal growth in fat mass could be an effect of
preterm infants were assessed on day four, when most late intrauterine growth restriction caused by maternal factors.

742 ©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743
€rnqvist
Olhager and To Body composition in late preterm infants

In conclusion, we showed that in late preterm infants the 10. Altman M, Vanpee M, Cnattingius S, Norman M. Neonatal
weight gained after the initial postnatal weight loss mainly morbidity in moderately preterm infants: A Swedish national
consisted of a gain in fat-free mass. At full-term PCA, population-based study. J Pediatrics 2011; 152: 239–44.
11. Micheli J-L, Pfister R, Junod S, Laubscher B, Tolsa J-F, Schutz
however, growth in length and fat-free mass was restricted in
Y. Water, energy and early postnatal growth in preterm infants.
these infants. Accretion of body fat, on the other hand, was Acta Paediatr Suppl 1994; 405: 35–42.
comparable with that of healthy newborn infants of average 12. Griffin IJ, Cooke RJ. Development of whole body adiposity in
size. Furthermore, in relation to their length, preterm infants preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88: S19–24.
were fatter. This pattern of growth and body composition is 13. Lapillone A, Braillon P, Claris O, Chatelain PG, Delmas PD,
a concern, as it may be associated with increased risks of Salle BL. Body composition in appropriate and in small for
gestational age infants. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86: 196–200.
obesity and metabolic syndrome later in life.
14. Urlando A, Dempster P, Aitkens S. A new air displacement
plethysmograph for the measurements of body composition in
infants. Pediatr Res 2003; 53: 486–92.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 15. Ma GS, Yao M, Liu Y, Lin A, Zou H, Urlando A, et al. Validation
We wish express our thanks to the infants who participated of a new pediatric air displacement plethysmograph for assessing
in this study and the staff at the Neonatal Intensive Care body composition in infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 653–60.
16. Niklasson A, Albertsson-Wikland K. Continuous growth
Unit in Linko € ping. We also wish to thank Mats Fredriksson
reference from 24th week of gestation to 24 months by gender.
for statistical advice. We are further grateful to Professor BMC Pediatr 2008; 8: 8, doi:10.1186/1471-2431-8-8.
Elisabet Forsum, Britt Eriksson and Pontus Henriksson for 17. Eriksson B, Lo € f M, Forsum E. Body composition in full-term
generously allowing us to use their material. healthy infantsmeasured with air displacement plethysmography
at 1 and 12 weeks of age. Acta Pediatr 2010; 99: 563–8.
18. Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler E, Nelson SE. Body composition
of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr
COMPETING INTERESTS
1982; 35: 1169–75.
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest. 19. Eriksson B, Lo € f M, Eriksson O, Hannestad U, Forsum E. Fat-free
mass hydration in newborns: assessment and implications for
body composition studies. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100: 680–6.
ROLE OF FUNDING SOURCE 20. Ziegler E, O0 Donnell A, Nelson S, Fomon S. Body composition

The project was funded by Ostergo€ tland County Council of the reference fetus. Growth 1976, 40; 329–41.
and the Samariten Foundation. 21. Dickerson J. Contribution of major soft tissue to total amounts
of body constituents during growth: In Morgan JB, Dickerson
JW, editors. Nutrition in early life. 1 ed. West Sussex, England:
References John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2002:11.
22. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to
1. Franz AR, Pohlandt F, Bode H, Mihatch W, Sanders S, Kron M, revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC
et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal and post discharge growth Pediatr 2013; 13: 59. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-59.
and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely 23. Brunton J, Bayley H, Atkinson S. Validation and application of
preterm infants after intensive nutritional support. Pediatrics dual-energy x-ray absorotiometry to measure bone mass and body
2009; 123: e101–9. composition in small infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 839–45.
2. Yeung MY. Postnatal growth, neurodevelopment and altered 24. Henriksson P, Lof M, Forsum E. Body composition of healthy
adiposity after preterm birth: from clinical nutrition Swedish infants in response to body composition of their
perspective. Acta Pediatr 2006; 95: 909–17. parents. Submitted for publication, 2013.
3. Wells J. The thrifty phenotype: an adaptation in growth or 25. Roggero P, Gianni ML, Amaot O. Influence of protein and
metabolism? Am J Hum Biol 2011; 23: 65–75. energy intakes on body composition of formula-fed preterm
4. Hofman P, Regan F, Jackson W, Jefferies C, Knight D, Robinson infants after term. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr 2008; 47: 375–8.
E, et al. Premature birth and later insulin resistance. N Engl J 26. Bigaard J, Frederiksen K, Tionneland A, Thomsen BL, Overvad
Med 2004; 351: 2179–86. K, Heitman BL, et al. Body fat and fat-free mass all cause
5. Ramel S, Gray H, Ode K, Younge N, Georgieff M, Demerath E. mortality. Obes Res 2004; 12: 1042–9.
Body composition changes in preterm infants following 27. Andersen G, Girma T, Wells J, Kaestel P, Leventi M, Hother
hospital discharge: comparison with term infants. J Pediatr AL, et al. Body composition from birth to 6 mo of age in
Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53: 333–8. Ethiopian infants: reference data obtained by air-displacement
6. Cooke R, Griffin I. Altered body composition in preterm infants plethysmography. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 98: 885–94.
at hospital discharge. Acta Pediatr 2009; 98: 1269–73. 28. Ellis K, Yao M, Shypailo R, Urlando A, Wong W, Heird W.
7. Roggero P, Gianni ML, Piemonteses P, Orsi A, Amato O, Body-composition assessment in infancy: air-displacement
Taroni F, et al. Body composition in newborn infants: 5-year plethysmography compared with a reference 4-compartement
experience in an Italian neonatal intensive care unit. Early model. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 90–5.
Hum Dev 2012; 88: S13–7. 29. Ness E, Zhang J, Bass D, Klebanoff M. Interactions between
8. Gianni M, Roggero P, Liotto N, Amato O, Piemontese P, smoking and weight in pregnancies complicated by
Morniroli D, et al. Postnatal catch-up after late preterm birth. preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age birth. Am J
Pediatric Res 2012; 72: 637–40. Epidemiol 2008; 168: 427–33.
9. Roggero P, Gianni ML, Amato O, Piemontese P, Morniroli D, 30. Ouyang F, Parker M, Cerda S, Pearson C, Fu L, Gillman MW,
Wong W, et al. Evaluation of air-displacement et al. Placental weight mediates the effects of prenatal factors
plethysomgraphy for body composition assessment in preterm on fetal growth: the extent differs by preterm status. Obesity
infants. Pediatric Res 2012; 72: 316–20. 2013; 21: 609–20.

©2014 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014 103, pp. 737–743 743

You might also like