THEORY OF POWER

Khairunnas Ahmad

The ability of an individual or group to influence, control, or shape the actions, beliefs, and behaviors of others. Power can take many forms, including physical
force, economic resources, social status, knowledge, and cultural values.

Power is not just about domination or control, but it also involves the ability to empower others and promote positive change.

For example, a leader who uses their power to create opportunities for marginalized communities or advocate for social justice can be seen as using their power in
a positive way.

It is important to note that power is not always distributed equally in society and can be concentrated in the hands of certain individuals or groups. This can lead
to power imbalances and inequality, which can have negative consequences for those who are marginalized or oppressed.

power is a complex and multifaceted concept that is essential for understanding how societies function and how social change can be achieved. It is important to
recognize both the potential for positive and negative uses of power and to work towards creating a more equitable and just distribution of power in society.

THBT government officials who abuse their power should face more severe penalties

Possible idea

Deterrence: By increasing the penalties for abuse of power, we send a strong message that this behavior will not be tolerated. This can deter officials from engaging
in such behavior in the first place, and help to prevent abuses of power in the future.

Accountability: Government officials are entrusted with a great deal of power, and it is important that they be held accountable when they abuse that power. By
imposing more severe penalties, we ensure that officials are held to a higher standard of behavior and that they are not above the law.

Restitution: In cases where government officials have abused their power to harm others, it is important that they be held accountable for the harm they have caused.
More severe penalties can help to ensure that victims receive the restitution they deserve and that justice is served.

Against the motion:

Disproportionality: More severe penalties may not be justified in cases where the abuse of power is relatively minor or where the penalty would be disproportionate
to the harm caused. It is important to consider the specific circumstances of each case before imposing penalties.

Due process: Imposing more severe penalties may infringe on the due process rights of government officials. It is important to ensure that officials are given a fair
hearing and that the penalties imposed are based on clear and transparent criteria.

Deterrence effectiveness: It is not clear that more severe penalties would actually be more effective in deterring abuses of power. Officials may still engage in such
behavior if they believe they can avoid detection or if they are confident in their ability to evade punishment.

These are just a few potential arguments on either side of the motion, and there are many other factors that could be considered in making a persuasive case.
Ultimately, the strength of the argument will depend on the evidence and reasoning used to support it.