Meenal Roopchand's lawyer sends a letter in response to a previous email regarding Meenal's husband refusing to move out of her home. The letter states that 1) it is unacceptable for Meenal's husband to stay after breaking her trust and disrespecting their marriage through affairs. 2) It is shameful that he feels wronged about Meenal inheriting property alone given his unfaithfulness. 3) It is intolerable for Meenal to continue living with him after his 10-year affair and misuse of family business money. The letter calls for a settlement meeting at Meenal's home on October 29th to discuss an amicable separation.
Meenal Roopchand's lawyer sends a letter in response to a previous email regarding Meenal's husband refusing to move out of her home. The letter states that 1) it is unacceptable for Meenal's husband to stay after breaking her trust and disrespecting their marriage through affairs. 2) It is shameful that he feels wronged about Meenal inheriting property alone given his unfaithfulness. 3) It is intolerable for Meenal to continue living with him after his 10-year affair and misuse of family business money. The letter calls for a settlement meeting at Meenal's home on October 29th to discuss an amicable separation.
Meenal Roopchand's lawyer sends a letter in response to a previous email regarding Meenal's husband refusing to move out of her home. The letter states that 1) it is unacceptable for Meenal's husband to stay after breaking her trust and disrespecting their marriage through affairs. 2) It is shameful that he feels wronged about Meenal inheriting property alone given his unfaithfulness. 3) It is intolerable for Meenal to continue living with him after his 10-year affair and misuse of family business money. The letter calls for a settlement meeting at Meenal's home on October 29th to discuss an amicable separation.
In response to the email dated 27.10.2020 and on behalf and under
instructions of my client, Meenal Roopchand, I as state as under: 1. My client instructs me to state that it is unfathomable that your client has the gall to say that he will not move out of her self-owned residence after having repeatedly breached her trust, ridiculed and disrespected marital vows; 2. My client instructs me to state that it is an enormous shame that your client instead of feeling remorseful and responsible for her emotional devastation due to his repeated philandering and sexually pervert character, is feeling aggrieved that she may enjoy her inheritance all by herself (which is evident from para 18 of your response dated 20.10.2020); 3. My client instructs me to state that it is unbearable and intolerable for her to continue living with your client under the same roof who has maintained a paramour for over last 10 years and clandestinely servicing her fancy lifestyle at the cost of family business money; 4. My client instructs me to state that there is no justifiable reason why she should continue suffering emotionally, physically and financially in her own house due to your client’s adulterous character. However as a last ditch effort for an amicable separation, my client calls upon your client with/without his legal representative for a without prejudice settlement conference at her residence, Planet Godrej , Tower 4, Flat 201, 2nd floor, 30, Keshavrao Khadye Marg, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400011 on 29.10.2020 at 6.00 p.m. (Kindly note the said arrangement for the meeting is purely to save commute time of respective legal representatives); 5. As reiterated in the email trail below the said meeting would be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of my client. We await a confirmation from your end.
Regards Advocate Parul Vedak Advocate for Meenal Roopchand