Professional Documents
Culture Documents
xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1
0.63 1.520
255.022
0.5
1.180 0.6
253.842
0.040 253.802 0.000
0.000
1.520 0.900
4.800
0.000 7.000
0.000
BOB 252.902
1.200
6693
1.200 4.800
TOF 234.991 7.000
0.000
1.800
BOF 233.191
3.400
8.000
1 DESIGN OF PIER - P1
2 BRIDGE NO. 15 Top of Bed Block L- Side 253.802
3 Top of Bed Block R- Side 253.802
SPAN
2 Proposed Formation Level 255.022
OUT- PUT
43
44
45
46 STRESS CHECK
47 Description Maximum (t/m2) Minimum (t/m2) Remark
Permissible Stress Result
48 1750.0 Sesmic , Wind &
49 At Intermediate Checking Level 573.5 -421.6 OK
50 At Top of Foundation 1028.5 -849.7 LWR /1.33 , OK
51
52 Maximum (t/m2) Minimum (t/m2)
53
Base Pressure Check 150.0 0.0
54 At Bottom of Foundation 30.2 -13.3 OK
55 Foundation Pressure Aft 42.0
56 Along Across Allowed Ratio Result
57 Eccentricity Position Ecc- m Width-m Ratio Ecc- m Length-mRatio
58 2.581 8.000 3.1 1.902 7.000 3.7 4 FAIL
59
214
215
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
216
217
218
219
220
221
222 DETAIL CALCULATION
223
224
225 1 DEAD LOAD
226 SKEW ANGLE 0.000
227 Skew factor cosecθ = 1.000
228
229
230 LOAD Distribution on Portal Pier
231
232 Nos of Pier Provided = 1
233
234 Note
235 As per ACS-48- IRS Br RULE Cl.2.16.4.3.3 -(ii) - In Case of Multiple Columns, Structure should be safe even
236 if one Column Got Damage,
237
238 Hence Nos of Column Considered for Analysis = 1 - 0 = 1
239
240 For Vertical Load
241
242 Distribution factor for Inner Pier = 1.000
243
244 Distribution Factor for Outer Pier = 1.000
245
246 Note
247 For Pier Design Min Vert Load + Max Moment will always governing the Design
248
249 Final Vert Load Dist for Pier = 1.000
250
251 For HORZ LOAD
252
253 Distribution Factor for Each Pier = 1.000
254
255 Effect of Slenderness
256 AT INT CHK LVL
257
258 Min Dimension in Plane of Bending = h = 1.200 m
259
260 As per Cl 15.6.3.1 oc IRS/CBC
261
262 min Eccentricity = 0.020 m
263
264 Effecctive Height = Le = 1.200 x 8.955 = 10.747 m (As per Table 18 CBC)
265
266 Le / h = 10.747 / 1.200 = 8.955 < 12 Hence Short Col
267
268 1 - 0.0035 * Le/ h = 1 - 0.0035 x 8.955 = 0.969
269
270 Eccentricity due to Slenderness = 0.969 / 2.000 = 0.000 m ( For LongColumn)
271
272 Total Eccentricity = 0.020 + 0.000 = 0.020 m
273
274
275 AT TOP OF FOUNDATION
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
276
277 Min Dimension in Plane of Bending = h = 1.200 m
278
279 As per Cl 15.6.3.1 oc IRS/CBC
280
281 min Eccentricity = 0.020 m
282
283 Effecctive Height = Le = 1.200 x 17.911 = 21.49 m (As per Table 18 CBC)
284
285 Le / h = 21.49 / 1.200 = 17.911 > 12 Hence Long Col
286
287 1 - 0.0035 * Le/ h = 1 - 0.0035 x 17.911 = 0.937
288
289 Eccentricity due to Slenderness = 0.937 / 2.000 = 0.469 m
290
291 Total Eccentricity = 0.020 + 0.469 = 0.489 m
292
293
294
295
296 1.1 Super Structure Dead Load
297
298 1.1.1 Superstructure Loads - Left Span ( D1 )
299
300 Total Dead Load of Super Str = 160.300 t Drg No 10271
301
302 Eccentricity in Long direction = 0.315 + 0.020 = 0.335 m From C/L of Pier
303
304 Eccentricity in Tranverse direction = 0.000 m Vert Distribution factor = 1.000
305 Nos of Track = 1
306 Reaction on Pier
307 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
308 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
309 Superstructure Loads - Left Span ( D1 ) 80.150 26.850 0.000
310
311
312 1.1.2 Superstructure Loads - Right Span ( D2 )
313
314 Total Dead Load of Super Str = 160.300 t Drg No 10271
315
316 Eccentricity in Long direction = 0.315 + 0.020 = 0.335 m From C/L of Pier
317 L :10 L :302
318 Eccentricity in Tranverse direction = 0.000 m Vert Distribution factor = 1.000
319 Nos of Track = 1
320 Reaction on Pier
321 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
322 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
323 Superstructure Loads - Right Span ( D2 ) 80.150 26.850 0.000
324
325
326
327 Reaction on Pier ( For Both Span ) - DG
328 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
329 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
330 DG = D1 + D2 160.300 0.000 0.000
331
332
333 1.2 Sub Structure Dead Load
334
335 1.2.1 Dead Wt of Pier Cap
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
336
337 1.520 7.000
338
339
340 0.90
341
342 0.900
343
344
345 0.00
346 1.200 4.800
347
348
349
2
350 X- section Area at top of cap = 1.520 x 7.000 = 10.64 m
351
2
352 X- section Area at Bottom of cap = 1.200 x 4.800 = 5.76 m
353
2
354 Avg Area for Trap Portion = ( 10.640 + 5.760 ) / 2 = 8.200 m
355
3
356 Vol of Rectangular Portion = 10.640 x 0.900 = 9.576 m
357
3
358 Vol of Trap Portion = 8.200 x 0.000 = 0m
359
3
360 H Additional Vol of raised cap = 0.760 7.000 0.000 = 0.000 m
361
3
362 Total Volume = 9.58 + 0.00 + = 9.576 m
363
364 Total Weight = 9.576 x 2.5 = 23.940 t
365
366 H Moment due to unequal ht of cap = 0x 2.5 x 0.38 = 0.000 t-m
367
368 Weight of Pedestal
369
370 Left Side
371
372 Nos of Pedestal = 2
373
374 Weight of all Pedestals = 2x 0x 0x 0x 2.500 = 0t
375
376 Right Side
377
378 Nos of Pedestal = 2
379
380 Weight of all Pedestals = 2x 0x 0x 0x 2.500 = 0t
381
382 Total Wt of Pedestal = 0.000 + 0 = 0.000 t
383
384
385 Wt of Pier Cap (D3 )
386
387 Vertical Distribution factor = 1.000
388 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
389 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
390 D3 23.940 0.000 0.000
391
392
393 1.2.2.1 Dead Wt of Pier Stem ( Up to Int Checking LVL)
394
395
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
396
397 Plan of Pier at Top of Pier
398
398 Y
399 L :17 L :17
399
400
400
1.200
X X
RECTANGULAR
401
401 L :11
402
402
403 0.600 4.800 Y
403 L :17
404 Rec portion Nos Circular portion
404 m2
405
2
405 Prop Area = 1.200x 4.800 + 2x PI 0.600x 0.600 =6.891 m
406
407
408 Plan of Pier at Intermediate Level
409
409 Y
410
410
411
1.200
411 X X
412
412
413
413 0.600 4.800 Y
414
RECTANGULAR
444 Y
445 L :18 0.600 L :18
445
446
446
1.200
447 X d= X
447
448
448
449 0.600 4.800 Y
449 b
RACTANGULAR
464 Height from Bottom of Bed Block to Top of Foundation h= 17.911 m L :12
465 Volume = A1 + A2 + A1 A 2 h/3 = 123.42 m3
466
3
467 Total Volume = 123.42 = 123.42 m
2
468 Weight of Fill = 0.785 x 1.200 x 0.000 x 1.800 = 0.000 t
469 Total Weight up to Top of Foundation = 123.42x 2.500 = 308.5 t L :20
470
471
472 Wt of Pier Stem up to TOF (D5 )
473 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
474 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
475 D5 308.548 0.000 0.000
476
477
478 Total Dead Load up to INT CHK LVL (DL1)
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
479 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
480 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
481 DL1 = DG+D3+D4 338.520 0.000 0.000
482
483 Total Dead Load up toTOF (DL2)
484 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
485 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
486 DL2 = DG+D3+D5 492.788 0.000 0.000
487 DL2a = DG+D3+D5( For All Pier) 492.788 0 0.000
488
489
490 1.2.3 Weight of Foundation
491
492
493 5.1.5 Plan of Pier at Bottom of Foundation
494
495 Y
496
497
498
499
8.000
500 X X
501
502
503
504 Y
505 7.000
506
507 Rec portion
508 m2
2
509 Prop Area = 8 X 7.000 = 56.000 m
510
511 Rec Portion
3
512 7.000x 8.000
Ixx = = 298.667 m4
513 12
514
515 Zxx = 298.667 / 4.000 = 74.667 m3
516
517 Rec portion
3
518 8 7.000
Iyy = = 228.667 m4
519 12
520
3
521 Zyy = 228.667 / 3.500 = 65.333 m
522
523 5.2.3 At Bottom of Foundation
524 Total
525 Top Area at Top of Foundation A1 = 6.890 m2
526 Area at Bottom of Foundation A2 = 56.000 m2
527
528 Depth of Trapezoidal portion h1 = 0.000 m
529 Depth of Rectangular portion h2 = 1.800 m
530
531 Volume of Trapezoidal portion = A1 + A2 + A1 A 2 h/3
532 V1 = 0.000 m3
533 Volume of Rectangular portion A2 x h2
534 V2 = 100.800 m3
535 Total volume, V1 + V2 = 100.800 m3
536
3
537 Net volume of Concreting = 100.800 = 100.800 m
538
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
539 Weight of Foundation = 100.8 x 2.500 = 252.000 t L :31
540 Total Weight up to Top of Foundation = 308.5 t L :469
541 Total Weight up to Bottom of Foundation = 252.000 + 308.5 = 560.548 t L :470
542
543
544 Weight of Soil of Over Foundation = 56.000 - 6.890 x 0.405 x 1.8
545
546 = 35.801 t
547
548
549 Final Weight of Foundation = (D6 ) = 308.5 + 344.349 = 652.9 t
550
551
552 Total Dead Load up toBOF (DL3)
553 Moment - t-m
Vertical ( t )
554 Load Long ( ML) Tranvesre ( MT)
555 DL3= DL2a+D6 1145.684 0.000 0.000
556
557
558 1.3 Super Imposed Dead Load (SIDL)
559
560 1.3.1 Track Weight
561 Nos of Track = 1 Distribution Factor = 1.000
562
563 Eccentricit Eccentricit
Total Nos of Distrubutio Moment- Net Net
564 Wt/m n Factor
Reaction y-Along- y-Trans-
Along- ML Moment- Moment- Moment-
Side Span Track eL eT
565 Along- ML Trans- MT Trans- MT
566 t/m m t m m t-m t-m t-m t-m
567 Left 6.200 13.380 1.000 1.000 41.478 0.335 0.000 13.895 0
0 0
568 Right 6.200 13.380 1.000 1.000 41.478 0.335 0.000 13.895 0
569 Total 82.956
570
TSL
723 Due to Inclination 0.000 0.000 Due to Inclination 0.000
724 Nos of Track 1 Nos of Track 1
725 Net Load (Total) 63.000 63.000 t Net Load (Total) 84.000 t
726
727 2.4.1 Frictional Resistance of Bearing- LEFT SPAN
728
729 Dead Load Reaction = Rg 121.63 t
730 Live Load Reaction =Rq= 135.19 t
731 Longitudinal Force = Fh = 63.00 t
732
733 Type of Bearing 2.0 Type of Bearing (1 = Fixed, 2 = Normal, 3=Free)
734 Material of Bearing 1 Bearing Material ( 1=Conc, 2 = Steel 3 = Elastomeric 4= ROCKER, 5=PTFE )
735 Coff of friction = m = 0.5
736
737 Dead Load Resistance = m Rg = 0.5 x 121.63 = 60.81 t
738
739 Live Load Resistance = m Rq = 0.5 x 135.19 = 67.60 t
740
741 Total Bearing Resistance= m(Rg+Rq) = 128.41 t
742
743 For Concrete Bearing
744
745 Max
746 Fh/2 = 31.5 t
747 mRg = 60.81 t
748
749 Final Horz Froce for Concrete Bearing = 60.81 t
750
749
750 Final Horz Force = 60.81 t
751
752 2.4.2 Frictional Resistance of Bearing- RIGHT SPAN
753
754 Dead Load Reaction = Rg 121.63 t
755 Live Load Reaction =Rq= 135.19 t
756 Longitudinal Force = Fh = 63.00 t
757
758 Type of Bearing 2.0 Type of Bearing (1 = Fixed, 2 = Normal, 3=Free)
759 Material of Bearing 1 Bearing Material ( 1=Conc, 2 = Steel 3 = Elastomeric 4= ROCKER, 5=PTFE )
760 Coff of friction = m = 0.5
761
762 Dead Load Resistance = m Rg = 0.5 x 121.63 = 60.81 t
763
764 Live Load Resistance = m Rq = 0.5 x 135.19 = 67.60 t
765
766 Total Bearing Resistance= m(Rg+Rq) = 128.41 t
767
768 For Concrete Bearing
769
770 Max
771 Fh/2 = 31.5 t
772 mRg = 60.81 t
773
774 Final Horz Froce for Concrete Bearing = 60.81 t
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
775
774
775 Final Horz Force = 60.81 t
776
777
778 Load Condition L - GIRDER R - GIRDER
779 O.S.L. 63.000 /2 = 31.500 t 63.000 /2 = 31.500 t
780 Long Load = 0.5 x Total Load x L1/(L1 + L2) Long Load = 0.5 x Total Load x L2/(L1 + L2)
781 T.S.L. 84.000 13.380 84.000 13.380
= 21.000 = 21.000
782 2 13.380+ 13.380 2 13.380+ 13.380
783
784
785 Summary of Horizontal Force
786
787 Levels
788
789 Top of Bed Block L- Side = 253.802
790 Top of Bed Block R- Side = 253.802
791 Int Checing LVL = 243.947
792 Top Of Foundation = 234.991
793 Bottom of Foundation = 233.191
794
795
806
807
808
809 4 WATER FORCE
810
811 4.1 BUOYANCY FORCE
812 Plan of Pier at AHFL Level
813
813 Y
814
814
815
1.200
Rectangular
815 X X
816
816
817
817 0.600 4.800 Y
818
818 Rec portion Nos Circular portion
2
819 Prop Area = 1.200x 4.800 + 2x PI 0.600x 0.600 =6.891 m
820
533 Y
543
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
534
544
Rectangular
0.000
535 X X
545
536
546
537 0.000 4.800 Y
547
538 Rec portion Nos Circular portion
2
548 Prop Area = 0.000x 4.800 + 2x PI 0.000x 0.000 =0.000 m
549
1029 Response Reduction Factor = 2.5 ( As per Table-3 )- IRS Seismic Code
1030 Importance Factor = 1.5 ZONE FACTOR
1031 Zone No = II
1032 Zone Factor = 0.1 IRS-Seismic Code
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1033 D.L & L.L of Super Structure = 6102.4 kN Zone No a
1034 Period (T) = 1.484 II 0.1 0.1
1035 P= 11079 N III 0.16 0.16
1036 Type of Soil = Medium Soil IV 0.24 0.24
1037 Sa/g = 0.916 V 0.36 0.36
1038 Horizontal Coefficients = 0.0275
1039
1040
1066
d= PL3
1067 3 EI
1068 P = d *3EI / L
= 164712 N
1069 Response Reduction Factor = 2.5 ( As per Table-3 )- IRS Seismic Code
1070 Importance Factor = 1.5
1071 Zone No = II
1072 Zone Factor = 0.1
1073 D.L & L.L of Super Structure = 6102.4 kN
1074 Period (T) = 0.385
1075 P= 164712 N
1076 Type of Soil = Medium Soil
1077 Sa/g = 2.500
1078 Horizontal Coefficients = 0.0750
1079
1080 For Foundation
1081 Response Reduction factor = R = 2 ( As per Table-3 )- IRS Seismic Code
1082 Ratio of R for FND /STEM LONG = 2.5 / 2 = 1.25
1083 Ratio of R for FND /STEM Trans = 2.5 / 2 = 1.25
1084
1085 As per Cl 7.2.1 of IRS Seismic Code
1086
1087 Ah(longitudinal)= ELx +0.3 ELy = 0.0275 + 0.3 x 0.0750 = 0.0500
1088
1089 Ah(transverse)= ELx +0.3 ELy = 0.0750 + 0.3 x 0.0275 = 0.0832
1090
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1091
1092
1132
1133 Rad. of Enveloping Cylinder-a 3.000 0.600 Fig 7 Sub Str.
Height / Radius Ratio 2.630 13.148
c Effect
1134
1135 Cefficient, Ce 0.675 0.730 Table 5 Sub Str.
1136 Wt of Enveloping Cylinder, We 222.929 8.917 p a2 H gw
1137
1138
1139 5.3 At Top of Foundation
1140
1141 Dist between INT LVL to TOF = 8.956 m
1171
1172 Rad. of Enveloping Cylinder-a 3.000 0.600 Fig 7 Sub Str.
Height / Radius Ratio 5.615 28.073
c Effect
1173
1174 Cefficient, Ce 0.730 0.730 Table 5 Sub Str.
1175 Wt of Enveloping Cylinder, We 476.011 19.040 p a2 H gw
1176
1177
1178 5.4 At Bottom of Foundation
1179
1180 Dist between TOF to BOF = 1.800 m
1210
1211 Rad. of Enveloping Cylinder-a 3.000 0.600 Fig 7 Sub Str.
Height / Radius Ratio 6.215 31.073
c Effect
1212
1213 Cefficient, Ce 0.730 0.730 Table 5 Sub Str.
1214 Wt of Enveloping Cylinder, We 526.879 21.075 p a2 H gw
1215
1216 Note for Hydrodynamic Force at Bottom of Foundation
1217 1 Radius of Enveloping Cylinder up to Top of Foundation Taken
1218 2 Weight of Cylinder in Foundation Portion has been ignored
1219 3 Moment From Bottom of Foundation has been taken
1220
1221
1235 Note:- This eccentricity will be added to Lateral Eccentrictity directly in Moment table.
1236
Equivalent L.A. =
1259 (Moment on Girder
+Vehicle)/ Load
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
+Vehicle)/ Load
1260 Moment due to Load on Girder @Top of Bed Block = 0.63 x 0.00 x t-m
Moment due to Load on Vehicle for OSL @Top of Bed
1261 Block = 4.55 x 0.0 x 0.0 x t-m 0.000 m
Moment due to Load on Vehicle for TSL @Top of Bed Block
1262 = 4.55 x 0.0 x 0.0 x t-m 0.000 m
1263
1264
1265 Levels
1266
1267 Top of Bed Block L- Side = 253.80
1268 Top of Bed Block R- Side = 253.80
1269 Int Checing LVL = 243.95
1270 Top Of Foundation = 234.99
1271 Bottom of Foundation = 233.19
1272
1273
1355
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1356 LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic) +
13 WF(HFL ) + Long Seismic - (OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
523.40 63.637 5.091 523.61 36.669
1357
Description
Load
Case
ning
Moment
1377 on t t t t-m t-m t-m
1378 4 Governing - Max. Axial Load Normal 623.03 42.000 0.000 413.93 9.894 414.05
1379 1 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Normal 523.40 61.832 5.091 650.00 36.669 651.03
1380 1 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Normal 523.40 61.832 5.091 650.00 36.669 651.03
1381 8 Governing - Max. Axial Load Wind 623.03 42.000 0.000 413.93 9.894 414.05
1382 7 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Wind 568.67 43.018 5.091 419.29 36.669 420.89
1383 5 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Wind 523.40 31.425 5.091 350.32 36.669 352.23
1384 12 Governing - Max. Axial Load Seismic 623.03 21.000 41.216 206.97 366.23 420.67
1385 13 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Seismic 523.40 63.637 5.091 523.61 36.669 524.89
1386 11 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Seismic 568.67 22.018 46.307 212.32 393.01 446.69
1387 20 Governing - Max. Axial Load LWR 623.03 21.000 0.000 206.97 9.894 0.000
1388 17 Governing - Max. Long. Moment LWR 523.40 31.425 5.091 350.32 36.669 0.000
1389 17 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment LWR 523.40 31.425 5.091 350.32 36.669 0.000
1390
1391
1392 STRESS CHECKING AT INT LVL
3 3 3
1393 Area = A = 6.891 m Zxx = 1.32 m Zyy = 6.35 m
1394 L :426 L :418 L :422
1394 P ML MT
Pmax / Pmin = +/- +/-
1395 A Zxx Zyy
2
1396 Permissible Comp Stress = 1750.0 t/m Permissible Comp Stress = t/m2
1397
1398 STRESS CHECKING INT CHK- SLS Condition
1399 Conditi Vertical ML MT Pmax PmIN Comp Tensile
Gover
Description
Load
Case
ning
CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING AT CURTAILMENT LOCATION OF PIER Ultimate Limit State- As Per Table
12of IRS-CBC)
1415
1416
Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
1417 Sl. No Description
1418 Factor t t t t-m t-m
1419 BASIC LOADS
1420 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1421 1 DEAD LOADS
1422 1a DL + 1.25 423.15 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1423 1b SIDL + 2 182.50 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1424 1c Track Ecce + 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.591
1425 2 LIVE LOADS
1426 2a Foot Path LL + 1.5 19.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40
1427 2b OSL + 1.75 236.59 0.00 0.00 79.26 0.00
1428 2c TSL + 1.75 315.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1429 2d Long OSL + 1.75 0.00 106.42 0.00 1048.87 0.00
1430 2e Long TSL + 1.75 0.00 73.50 0.00 724.38 0.00
1431 2f Long OSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.00 53.21 0.00 524.43 0.00
1432 2g Long TSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.00 36.75 0.00 362.19 0.00
1433 3 LWR FORCE
1434 3a LWR FORCE + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1435 4 WATER CURRENT FORCES
1436 4a WF(HFL ) + 1.5 -81.539 1.527 7.637 8.032 40.162
1437 4b WF(LWL ) + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1438 5 SeismicForce
1439 5a Long Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 51.539 0.000 277.26 0.000
1440 5b Long Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 51.539 0.000 0.000 0.000
1441 5c Trans Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 63.087 0.000 534.19
1442 5d Trans Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 65.946 0.000 570.14
1443 5e Span Dislodged - Long Seismic 1.6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1444 6 Force Due To Curve
1445 6a Curve(OSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1446 6b Curve(TSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
1447 7 Force Due To WIND
1448 7a WIND(OSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1449 7b WIND(TSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1450 8 LIVE WITH LWR COMBINATION
1451 8a OSL (LWR) + 1.4 189.27 0.000 0.000 63.406 0.000
1452 8b TSL (LWR) + 1.4 252.652 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1453 8c Long OSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 85.140 0.000 839.093 0.000
1454 8d Long TSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 58.800 0.000 579.503 0.000
1455 COMBINATION LOADS
1456 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1457 NORMAL LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL + WF(HFL ) +
1 779.89 107.952 7.637 1136.16 59.15
1458
Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL + WF(LWL ) +
2 861.43 106.425 0.000 1128.12 18.99
1459
Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
Description
Load
Case
ning
Sr. No Moment
1499 on t t t t-m t-m t-m
1500 1 4 Governing - Max. Axial Load Normal 940.65 73.500 0.000 724.38 18.99 724.63
1501 2 1 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Normal 779.89 107.952 7.637 1136.16 59.15 1137.70
1502 3 1 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Normal 779.89 107.952 7.637 1136.16 59.15 1137.70
1503 4 8 Governing - Max. Axial Load Wind 940.65 73.500 0.000 724.38 18.99 724.63
1504 5 7 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Wind 859.11 75.027 7.637 732.41 59.15 734.80
1505 6 5 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Wind 779.89 54.740 7.637 611.72 59.15 614.58
1506 7 12 Governing - Max. Axial Load Seismic 940.65 36.750 65.946 362.19 589.13 691.56
1507 8 13 Governing - Max. Long. Moment Seismic 779.89 106.278 7.637 888.98 59.15 890.95
1508 9 11 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment Seismic 859.11 38.277 73.583 370.22 629.29 730.12
1509 10 20 Governing - Max. Axial Load LWR 940.65 88.29 0.00 362.19 18.99 362.69
1510 11 17 Governing - Max. Long. Moment LWR 779.89 106.28 7.64 888.98 59.15 890.95
1511 12 17 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment LWR 779.89 106.28 7.64 888.98 59.15 890.95
1509
1510 Equivalent Section
1511 At Shape X-Area Width Eq Length
1512 Int LVL REC =6.891 1.200 5.74
1513 L :415 L :411
1514 DETAILING OF PIER STEM
1515
1516 a Calculation of Minimum Vertical Reinforcement
1517 a1 As per Cl 15.9.4 CBC
1518
1519 Min Reinforcement Area = 0.15 * Pu/ fy
1520
1521 Pu = Max Ultimate axail Load = 940.7 T = 9406533 N
1522 L :1511
1523 fy = 500 Mpa
1524
2
1525 Min Area required = 0.150 x 9406533 = 2822 mm
1526 500
1527 Min % of Area = 2822 x 100.000 / 6890973 = 0.041 %
1528
1529 As per Cl Min % of Steel will be lesser of 1% of above
1530
1531 Min % of Steel = 0.041 %
1532
1533 a2 As per Appendix- B Cl B-3 IRS Seismic Code
1534
1535 Ductile Detailing ( 1 = YES, 2 = NO ) = 2
1536
1537 Min % of Vertical Steel For ductile Detailing = 0%
1538
1539
1540 a3 Practical Consideration
1541
1542 Length / Thickness = 4.800 / 1.200 = 4
1543
1544 Type = COLUMN
1545
1546 Min % of Vertical Steel For Practical Consideration = 0.6 %
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1547
1548
1549 Final Min % of Steel = 0.600 %
1550
1551 Reinforcement % Provided in Side
1552
1553 Width = 1200 mm Length = 4800 mm
1554
1555 Spacing 100 mm Dia = 25
1556
1557 % Provided in Side Reinforcement = 0.204
1558
1559 % of Reinforcement required along Width = 0.600 - 0.204 = 0.396 %
1560
1561
1562 b Ties
1563
1564 b1 As per Concrete Bridge Code
1565
1566 Trype of Pier Shaft = COLUMN
1567
1568 Cl No 15.9.4.3 will be applicable
1569
1570 As per Clause
1571
1572
1573 Min Dia of Bar = 32 / 4 = 8 mm
1574
1575 Provided Bar Dia = 16 mm
1576
1577 Max Allowed Spacing = 32 x 16 = 300 mm ( Max 300 mm )
1578
1578 b2 As per IRS Seismic Code- App B Cl B5.4
1579
1580 Spacing of Transverse Reinforcement ( Cl B 5.4 )
1581
1582 Min of Following
1583
1584 1- 1/5th of Least Lateral Dimension = 1200 / 5= 240 mm
1585
1586 2- 6 times Dia of Bar = 6 x 32 = 192 mm
1587
1588 3- Max 150 mm = 150 mm
1589
1590 Provide Spacing = 150 mm
1591
1592 Final Tranverse Reinforcement
1593
1594 1- In Confining Zone ( H/4 ) from Top of Slab
1595
1596 Outer Ring 16 #@ 300
1597
1598 Dia 12
1599 Link Vertical Spacing 300
1600 Horizontal Spacing 300
1601
1602
1603 2- Above Confining Zone
1604
1605 Outer Ring 16 #@ 300
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1606
1607 Dia 12
1608 Link Vertical Spacing 300
1609 Horizontal Spacing 300
1514
Stress in Stress in
Long Due to Stress Stress Depth of Depth of Conc at Steel at
Vertical Momen Axail Momen Comp Tension Comp Tecsion Rein Rein
Load
1606 oad t Stress t Side Side Area Area LVL LVL
NO ( As
1607 per above P MT Pu/A MT/Zyy Cc Ct dc dt fs1 mxfs1
1608 Table) KN kN-n KN/m2 KN/m2 MPA MPA m m MPA MPA
1609 4 9407 190 1365.1 29.9 1.4 1.3 2.933 2.807 1.30 10.4
1610 1 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1611 1 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1612 8 9407 190 1365.1 29.9 1.4 1.3 2.933 2.807 1.30 10.4
1613 7 8591 592 1246.7 93.1 1.3 1.2 3.084 2.656 1.12 9.0
1614 5 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1615 12 9407 5891 1365.1 927.4 2.3 0.4 4.820 0.920 0.40 3.2
1616 13 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1617 11 8591 6293 1246.7 990.6 2.2 0.3 5.150 0.590 0.22 1.8
1618 20 9407 190 1365.1 29.9 1.4 1.3 2.933 2.807 1.30 10.4
1619 17 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1620 17 7799 592 1131.8 93.1 1.2 1.0 3.106 2.634 1.01 8.1
1621
1622 Max Stress in Concrete = 2.292 MPA
1623
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1624 Max Stress in STEEL = 10.396 MPA
1625
1626 Checking of Pier as per Cl 15.6.3.2 - IRS-CBC
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641 h
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647 As1 As2
1648
1649 b
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654 d2 d d'
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659 0.0035 STRAIN
1660
1661
1662 fc2
1663
1664 0.4 fck STRESS
1665
1666
1667 fyc
1668
1669
1697 CHECK FOR ALL LOAD CASES ( UNIAXIAL- ALONG)-INT CHK LVL
Load Depth of ULT
Case Comp Stress in Vertical ULT Applied Applied
NO ( Area Steel Load Moment Load Momentt
Design Ratio Vertical Design Ratio Moment ( Over All
1698
As per Load ( P/Pu ) < 1 M/Mu ) < 1 CHK
1699 dc fs2 Pu Mux P ML
above
1700 Table) m MPA KN KN-m KN KN-m
1701 4 749 27.446 69499 17852 9407 7244 0.135 OK 0.406 OK OK
1702 1 679 51.122 70070 18501 7799 11362 0.111 OK 0.614 OK OK
1703 1 679 51.122 70070 18501 7799 11362 0.111 OK 0.614 OK OK
1704 8 749 27.446 69499 17852 9407 7244 0.135 OK 0.406 OK OK
1705 7 735 28.818 69532 18023 8591 7324 0.124 OK 0.406 OK OK
1706 5 747 23.345 69400 17901 7799 6117 0.112 OK 0.342 OK OK
1707 12 899 8.2627 69036 15200 9407 3622 0.136 OK 0.238 OK OK
1708 13 701 38.03 69754 18347 7799 8890 0.112 OK 0.485 OK OK
1709 11 867 9.6347 69069 15921 8591 3702 0.124 OK 0.233 OK OK
1710 20 899 8.2627 69036 15200 9407 3622 0.136 OK 0.238 OK OK
1711 17 701 38.03 69754 18347 7799 8890 0.112 OK 0.485 OK OK
1712 17 701 38.03 69754 18347 7799 8890 0.112 OK 0.485 OK OK
1713
1788
Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
1789 Sl. No Description
1790 Factor t t t t-m t-m
1791 BASIC LOADS
1792 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1793 1 DEAD LOADS
1794 1a DL + 1 492.788 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 L :486
1795 1b SIDL + 1.1 91.252 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 L :569
1796 1c Track Ecce + 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.296 L :1230
1797 2 LIVE LOADS
1798 2a Foot Path LL + 1 12.790 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.599 L :640
1799 2b OSL + 1 135.194 0.000 0.000 45.290 0.000 L :671
1800 2c TSL + 1 180.466 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 L :710
1801 2d Long OSL + 1 0.000 60.814 0.000 1143.97 0.000 L :801
1802 2e Long TSL + 1 0.000 42.000 0.000 790.062 0.000 L :802
1803 2f Long OSL (50% With Seismic) + 0.5 0.000 30.407 0.000 571.986 0.000 L :1801
1804 2g Long TSL (50% With Seismic) + 0.5 0.000 21.000 0.000 395.031 0.000 L :1802
1805 3 LWR FORCE
1806 3a LWR FORCE + 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 H
1807 4 WATER CURRENT FORCES
1808 4a WF(HFL ) + 1 ####### 2.174 10.871 24.415 122.073 L :984
1809 4b WF(LWL ) + 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 L :985
1810 5 SeismicForce
1811 5a Long Seismic - (OSL) + 1 0.000 21.068 0.000 327.43 0.000 L :1165
1812 5b Long Seismic - (TSL) + 1 0.000 21.068 0.000 327.43 0.000 L :1168
1813 5c Trans Seismic - (OSL) + 1 0.000 0.000 38.687 0.000 622.8 L :1165
1814 5d Trans Seismic - (TSL) + 1 0.000 0.000 40.474 0.000 661.29 L :1168
1815 5e Span Dislodged - Long Seismic 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1816 6 Force Due To Curve
1817 6a Curve(OSL) + 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 H
1818 6b Curve(TSL) + 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 H
1819 7 Force Due To WIND
1820 7a WIND(OSL) + 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L :1279
1821 7b WIND(TSL) + 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L :1280
1822 8 LIVE WITH LWR COMBINATION
1823 8a OSL (LWR) + 1 135.194 0.000 0.000 45.290 0.000 L :1799
1824 8b TSL (LWR) + 1 180.466 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 L :1800
1825 8c Long OSL (LWR) + 1 0.000 60.814 0.000 1143.97 0.000 L :1801
1826 8d Long TSL (LWR) + 1 0.000 42.000 0.000 790.062 0.000 L :1802
1827 COMBINATION LOADS
1828 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1829 NORMAL LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL + WF(HFL ) +
1 615.96 62.988 10.871 1213.68 131.968
Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
1830
1850
1856 12 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 21.000 40.474 395.03 671.19
1857 13 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 615.96 53.649 10.871 969.12 131.968
1858 11 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 661.23 23.174 51.345 419.45 793.26
1859
1865 20 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 21.000 0.000 395.03 9.894
1866 17 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 615.96 32.581 10.871 641.69 131.968
1867 17 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 615.96 32.581 10.871 641.69 131.968
1868
1869
1886
CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ATTOP OF FOUNDATION Ultimate Limit State- As Per Table 12of IRS-CBC)
1887
1888
Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
1889 Sl. No Description
1890 Factor t t t t-m t-m
1891 BASIC LOADS
1892 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1893 1 DEAD LOADS
1894 1a DL + 1.25 615.98 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1895 1b SIDL + 2 182.50 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1896 1c Track Ecce + 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.591
1897 2 LIVE LOADS
1898 2a Foot Path LL + 1.5 19.185 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.398
1899 2b OSL + 1.75 236.59 0.000 0.000 79.258 0.000
1900 2c TSL + 1.75 315.81 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1901 2d Long OSL + 1.75 0.000 106.425 0.000 2001.95 0.000
1902 2e Long TSL + 1.75 0.000 73.500 0.000 1382.61 0.000
1903 2f Long OSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.000 53.212 0.000 ####### 0.000
1904 2g Long TSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.000 36.750 0.000 691.304 0.000
1905 3 LWR FORCE
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1906 3a LWR FORCE + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000
1907 4 WATER CURRENT FORCES
1908 4a WF(HFL ) + 1.5 ####### 3.261 16.306 36.622 183.110
1909 4b WF(LWL ) + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1887 5 SeismicForce
1888 5a Long Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 33.709 0.000 523.89 0.000
1889 5b Long Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 33.709 0.000 523.89 0.000
1890 5c Trans Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 61.899 0.000 996.51
1891 5d Trans Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 64.758 0.000 1058.07
1892 5e Span Dislodged - Long Seismic 1.6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1893 6 Force Due To Curve
1894 6a Curve(OSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
1895 6b Curve(TSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
1896 7 Force Due To WIND
1897 7a WIND(OSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1898 7b WIND(TSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1899 8 LIVE WITH LWR COMBINATION
1900 8a OSL (LWR) + 1.4 189.27 0.000 0.000 63.406 0.000
1901 8b TSL (LWR) + 1.4 252.652 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1902 8c Long OSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 85.140 0.000 1601.56 0.000
1903 8d Long TSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 58.800 0.000 1106.09 0.000
1904 COMBINATION LOADS
1905 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1906 NORMAL LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL + WF(HFL ) +
1 880.16 109.686 16.306 2117.83 202.10
Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
1907
1896 8 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 73.500 0.000 1382.61 18.99
1897 7 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 959.39 76.761 16.306 1419.23 202.10
1898 5 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 880.16 56.474 16.306 1116.86 202.10
1899 TRANSVERSE SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic) +
9 WF(HFL ) + Trans Seismic - (OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
880.16 56.474 78.205 1116.86 1198.61
1900
1904
1910 12 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 36.750 64.758 691.30 1077.06
1911 13 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 880.16 90.183 16.306 1640.75 202.10
1889 11 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 959.39 40.011 81.065 727.93 1260.17
1890
1896 20 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 70.459 0.000 1215.19 18.99
1897 17 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 880.16 90.183 16.306 1640.75 202.10
1898 17 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 880.16 90.183 16.306 1640.75 202.10
1899
1915
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1916
1964 4 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 42.00 0.00 865.66 9.89
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1965 1 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 515.16 65.00 20.92 1329.47 163.60
1966 1 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 515.16 65.00 20.92 1329.47 163.60
1967 WIND FORCE COMBINATION
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic)
5 515.16 34.59 20.92 76.03 163.60
1968
+ WF(HFL ) + WIND(OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
1972 8 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 42.00 0.00 865.66 9.89
1973 7 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 560.43 46.18 20.92 896.40 163.60
1974 5 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 515.16 34.59 20.92 76.03 163.60
1975 TRANSVERSE SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic) +
9 WF(HFL ) + Trans Seismic - (OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
515.16 34.59 155.47 76.03 1280.46
1976
1980
1986 12 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 21.00 136.78 432.83 1178.88
1987 15 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 560.43 134.88 20.92 1323.35 163.60
1988 11 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 560.43 25.18 157.70 463.57 1332.58
1989
1995 20 Governing - Max. Axial load 777.29 21.00 0.00 432.83 9.89
1996 19 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 560.43 25.18 20.92 463.57 163.60
1997 17 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 515.16 34.59 20.92 76.03 163.60
1998
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1999
2016
X
2017 Area = A = 8.000 x 7.000 = 56 m2
2018
2020
2021
Y
Y
2032
2033 Summary of Result at Bottom of Foundation
2034
Load P ML MT P/A ML/Zxx MT/Zyy Pmax Pmin eL eT
2035 S.NO Case Result
2036 No t t-m t-m t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 m m
2037 1 4 777.29 865.66 9.89 13.88 11.59 0.15 25.63 2.14 1.11 0.01 OK
2038 2 1 515.16 1329.47 163.60 9.20 17.81 2.50 29.51 -11.11 2.58 0.32 REDIST
2039 3 1 515.16 1329.47 163.60 9.20 17.81 2.50 29.51 -11.11 2.58 0.32 REDIST
2040 4 8 777.29 865.66 9.89 13.88 11.59 0.15 25.63 2.14 1.11 0.01 OK
2041 5 7 560.43 896.40 163.60 10.01 12.01 2.50 24.52 -4.50 1.60 0.29 REDIST
2042 6 5 515.16 76.03 163.60 9.20 1.02 2.50 12.72 5.68 0.15 0.32 OK
2043 7 12 777.29 432.83 1178.88 13.88 5.80 18.04 37.72 -9.96 0.56 1.52 REDIST
2044 8 15 560.43 1323.35 163.60 10.01 17.72 2.50 30.24 -10.22 2.36 0.29 REDIST
2045 9 11 560.43 463.57 1332.58 10.01 6.21 20.40 36.61 -16.60 0.83 2.38 REDIST
2046 10 20 777.29 432.83 9.89 13.88 5.80 0.15 19.83 7.93 0.56 0.01 OK
2047 11 19 560.43 463.57 163.60 10.01 6.21 2.50 18.72 1.30 0.83 0.29 OK
2048 12 17 515.16 76.03 163.60 9.20 1.02 2.50 12.72 5.68 0.15 0.32 OK
2049 Normalised Stress ( Wing/Seismic/LWR /1.25 ) = 30.177 -13.28 2.581 1.902
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2050 Over All Result = REDISTRIBUTION
2051
2052 Avg Pr
Pmax = 4*P /
Load eL eT L' = L -2 B' =B -2
2053 Case P eL eT Eff Area A' = L'*B' 3*A' CHK t/m2
2054 4 1.11 0.01 777.29 5.7726 6.9745 40.2614 25.8 OK 13.88
2055 1 2.58 0.32 515.16 2.8386 6.3649 18.0672 38.1 OK 9.1992
2056 1 2.58 0.32 515.16 2.8386 6.3649 18.0672 38.1 OK 9.1992
2057 8 1.11 0.01 777.29 5.7726 6.9745 40.2614 20.6 OK
2058 7 1.60 0.29 560.43 4.801 6.4162 30.8041 19.5 OK
2059 5 0.15 0.32 515.16 7.7048 6.3649 49.0402 11.3 OK
2060 12 0.56 1.52 777.29 6.8863 3.9667 27.3161 30.4 OK
2061 15 2.36 0.29 560.43 3.2773 6.4162 21.0280 28.5 OK
2062 11 0.83 2.38 560.43 6.3457 2.2444 14.2423 42 OK
2063 20 0.56 0.01 777.29 6.8863 6.9745 48.0289 17.3 OK
2064 19 0.83 0.29 560.43 6.3457 6.4162 40.7148 14.7 OK
2065 17 0.15 0.32 515.16 7.7048 6.3649 49.0402 11.3 OK
2066 Normalised Stress ( Wing/Seismic/LWR /1.25 ) = 42 OK
2067 Over All Result = OK
2068
2069
CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION Ultimate Limit State- As Per Table 12of IRS-
2070 CBC)
2071
Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
2072 Sl. No Description
2073 Factor t t t t-m t-m
2074 BASIC LOADS
2075 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2076 1 DEAD LOADS
2077 1a DL + 1.25 615.98 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2078 1b SIDL + 2 182.50 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2079 1c Track Ecce + 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.591
2080 2 LIVE LOADS
2081 2a Foot Path LL + 1.5 19.185 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.398
2082 2b OSL + 1.75 236.59 0.000 0.000 79.258 0.000
2083 2c TSL + 1.75 315.81 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2084 2d Long OSL + 1.75 0.000 106.425 0.000 2193.52 0.000
2085 2e Long TSL + 1.75 0.000 73.500 0.000 1514.91 0.000
2086 2f Long OSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.000 53.212 0.000 0.000 0.000
2087 2g Long TSL (50% With Seismic) + 1.75 0.000 36.750 0.000 757.454 0.000
2088 3 LWR FORCE
2089 3a LWR FORCE + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000
2090 4 WATER CURRENT FORCES
2091 4a WF(HFL ) + 1.5 -325.30 6.277 31.384 46.111 230.554
2092 4b WF(LWL ) + 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2093 5 SeismicForce
2094 5a Long Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 175.505 0.000 1375.65 0.000
2095 5b Long Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 175.505 0.000 1375.65 0.000
2096 5c Trans Seismic - (OSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 215.269 0.000 1786.99
2097 5d Trans Seismic - (TSL) + 1.6 0.000 0.000 218.843 0.000 1870.37
2098 5e Span Dislodged - Long Seismic 1.6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2099 6 Force Due To Curve
2100 6a Curve(OSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
2101 6b Curve(TSL) + 1.75 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
2102 7 Force Due To WIND
2103 7a WIND(OSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2104 7b WIND(TSL) + 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2105 8 LIVE WITH LWR COMBINATION
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2106 8a OSL (LWR) + 1.4 189.27 0.000 0.000 63.406 0.000
2107 8b TSL (LWR) + 1.4 252.652 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2108 8c Long OSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 85.140 0.000 1754.81 0.000
2109 8d Long TSL (LWR) + 1.4 0.000 58.800 0.000 1211.93 0.000
2110 COMBINATION LOADS
2111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2112 NORMAL LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL + WF(HFL ) +
1 728.96 112.701 31.384 2318.88 249.54
Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
2113
2117 4 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 73.500 0.000 1514.91 18.99
2118 1 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 728.96 112.701 31.384 2318.88 249.54
2119 1 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 728.96 112.701 31.384 2318.88 249.54
2120 WIND LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic) +
5 WF(HFL ) + WIND(OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
728.96 59.489 31.384 125.37 249.54
2121
2125 8 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 73.500 0.000 1514.91 18.99
2126 7 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 808.19 79.777 31.384 1561.02 249.54
2127 5 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 728.96 59.489 31.384 125.37 249.54
2128 TRANSVERSE SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS
DL + SIDL + Track Ecce + OSL + Long OSL (50% With Seismic) +
9 WF(HFL ) + Trans Seismic - (OSL) + Curve(OSL) + Foot Path LL +
728.96 59.489 246.653 125.37 2036.53
2129
2133
2139 12 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 36.750 218.843 757.45 1889.36
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2140 15 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 808.19 218.532 31.384 2179.22 249.54
2141 11 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 808.19 43.027 250.227 803.57 2119.92
2142
2148 20 Governing - Max. Axial load 1133.49 212.255 0.000 2133.10 18.99
2149 18 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 808.19 218.532 31.384 2179.22 249.54
2150 17 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 728.96 234.994 31.384 1501.02 249.54
2151
2175
2176
ZYY = 8.000 x 7.000 2
= 65.3333 m3
Y
Y
2177
2178 6
2179
2180 8.000
2181
2182
X
2183
2184
2185 Open Foundation Type = ( 1 = Normal 2= RAFT ) = 1
2186
2187
2188 Summary of Result at Bottom of Foundation
2189
Load P ML MT P/A ML/Zxx MT/Zyy Pmax Pmin eL eT
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0
Load Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
P ML MT P/A ML/Zxx MT/Zyy Pmax Pmin eL eT
2190
S.NO Case
2191
No t t-m t-m t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 m m
2192 1 4 1133.49 1514.91 18.99 20.24 20.29 0.29 40.82 -0.34 1.34 0.02
2193 2 1 728.96 2318.88 249.54 13.02 31.06 3.82 47.89 -21.86 3.18 0.34
2194 3 1 728.96 2318.88 249.54 13.02 31.06 3.82 47.89 -21.86 3.18 0.34
2195 4 8 1133.49 1514.91 18.99 20.24 20.29 0.29 40.82 -0.34 1.34 0.02
2196 5 7 808.19 1561.02 249.54 14.43 20.91 3.82 39.16 -10.29 1.93 0.31
2197 6 5 728.96 0.00 249.54 13.02 0.00 3.82 16.84 9.20 0.00 0.34
2198 7 12 1133.49 757.45 1889.36 20.24 10.14 28.92 59.30 -18.82 0.67 1.67
2199 8 15 808.19 0.00 249.54 14.43 0.00 3.82 18.25 10.61 0.00 0.31
2200 9 11 808.19 803.57 2119.92 14.43 10.76 32.45 57.64 -28.78 0.99 2.62
2201 10 20 1133.49 2133.10 18.99 20.24 28.57 0.29 49.10 -8.62 1.88 0.02
2202 11 18 808.19 0.00 249.54 14.43 0.00 3.82 18.25 10.61 0.00 0.31
2203 12 17 728.96 1501.02 249.54 13.02 20.10 3.82 36.94 -10.91 2.06 0.34
2204
2212
2213 RCC OPEN FOUNDATION
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224 1.800
2225 Critical Sec For Shear
2226
2227
2228
1.800
2229
2230 1.800
1.800
2231
2232
2233
2234 3.400
2235
2236
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242 Average Foundation Pressure = 23.8 t/m^2 ( ULTIMATE )
2243
2244
2245
2246 Max Projection of Toe Slab = 3.400 m
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2247
2248
2249 Max Pressure = 237.9 kN/m ( Taking Unit Width in Consideration )
2250
2
2251 237.9 x 3.400
Max Moment = = 1374.9
2252 2
2253
2254 Ultimate Moment = = 1374.9 kN-m
2255
2268 Here :-
2269 fck = 35 N /mm2 Mu = 1374.9 KN - m
2270 fy = 500 N /mm2 Ast = 1856.4 mm2
2271 b = 1000 mm Dia Of Main Bar = # = 32 mm
2272 d = 1730 mm Dia Of Bar on Comp Side = # = 25 mm
2273
2
2274 Min Steel Required = 0.2 % = 0.2 x 1000 x 1730 / 100 = 3460 mm
2275
2
2276 Steel to be Provided = 3460 mm
2277
2278 Spacing of Main Bar required = 803.84 x 1000
= 232 mm
2279 3460.0
2280
2281 So Provide Spacing = 100 mm < 3d = 5190 O.K
2282 % of Steel Provided = p = 8038.4 x 100
2283 1000 x 1730
2284 = 0.465 % > 0.20% OK
2285
2286 Steel on Other side Parallel to Main Steel
2287
2288 Area of Stee Required = 0.12 % = 0.12 X 1000 X 1730
2289 100
2290 = 2076 mm2
2291 Required Spacing = 490.63 x 1000
2292 2076
2293 236 mm
2294 Provide Spacing = 200 mm
2295
2296 Checking for ONE WAY Shear Stress
2297
2298 Ultimate Shear, Hu = 184.3 x 1.600 x 1.000 = 294.9 kN
2299 Avg Pr
2300 b = 1000 mm
2301 d = 1709 mm
2302 As per Clause 15.4.3.1 of CBC
2303 Shear stress, v = 295 x 1000 = 0.17 N/mm2
2304 1000 x 1709 < 0.75 √fck = 4.437 OK
2305 As per Clause 15.4.3.2.1 of CBC
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
1/4
2306 Depth factor, s = 500 or 0.7, whichever is maximum = 0.735
2307 d
2308
1/3
2309 Ultimat 0.27 100 As 1/3
x fck
2310 Ym bd (Cl 15.4.3.2.1)
2311
2 1/3
2312 As = 8038 mm vc = 0.27 803840 1/3
x 35
2313 Ym = 1.25 1.25 1709000
2314 = 0.549
2315
2316 s vc = 0.735 x 0.549 = 0.404 N/mm2
2317 v = 0.17 N/mm2
2318
2319 Dia of Shear stirrups = 12 mm having nos of leg in 1 m = 4
2320
2
2321 Asv = 452 mm
2322
2323 As per Cl 15.4.3.2 (Table - 14)
2324
2325 v ≤ s vc
2326
2327 sv = 0.87 fyv Asv / 0.4 b = 196789 / 400 = 492
2328
2329 It should not be more than 0.75 d or 450 mm As per Clause 15.4.3.2.4 of CBC
2330
2331 Therefore required, sv = 450 (0.75d = 1281.75 mm)
2332
2333 So provide Sv = 200 mm
2334
2335 Crack Width Check ( cl-15.9.8.2.1.- CBC)- Bottom of FND- TOE
2336 acr = Distance from Surface of Main Reinfrocment 75 mm
2337 cnom = Actual clear cover provided to main steel = 75 mm
2338 ceff = Effective cover provided to main steel = 91 mm
2339 h = Overall depth of section = 1800 mm
2340 b= Width of the Section 1000 mm 2
2341 Grade of Concrete fck 35 N/mm
2342 Grae of Steel fy 500 N/mm2
2343 Ast provided= 8038.4 mm2
2344 Total Moment for SLS condition (Gr 1) (Mw= Mq+Mg) 13.7 t-m
2345 Mq = Moment Due to Live Load 3.4 34372970 Nmm
2346 Mg = Moment due to Permanent Load 10.3 103118910 Nmm
2347 Mw = Mq + M g = Total Moment tm
2348 Distance from Comp Face to Main reinforcement ( d - x) = 1709 mm 2
2349 Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel = 200000 N/mm
2350 Ec = Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 31000 N/mm2 Cl 5.2.2.1 CBC
2351 Modular ratio "m"= Es/Ec = 6.452
2352 bx2/ 2 = m Ast (d - x)
2
2353 500 x = 6.5x8038.4 1709
2354 a= 1
2355 b= 103.721 x = dc = 372.3 mm
2356 c= -2E+05
2357 d - x/3 = 1584.9 mm
2358 Mw = Ast.fst.z; 1E+08 =8038.4 fxst1584.9
2359 fst = 10.8 N/mm2 < (0.8 x 0.87 fy)
2360
2361 es = fst / Es =
0.000054
2362 e1 = 0.000058
2363 em = Calculated strain at level where cracking is being
2364 considered allowing for stiffening effect of concrete in
2365
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2366 3.8 bt h(a' - dc) Mq x 10-9 But not more than e1
2367
em = e1 - es As (h - dc) 1- Mg
2368
2369 bt = width of section = 1000 mm
2370 a' = 1800 mm
2371 es = 0.00
2
2372 As = 8038.4 mm
2373
2374 1E+10 3E+07 -9
em = 0.00 - 1-
2375 619 1E+08 x 10
2376
-9
2377 = 0.00 - 15769101 x 0.3 x 10
-9
2378 = 0.00 - 15769101 x 0.7 x 10
2379 = 0.00 - 0.01051 = -0.010 > 0.000
2380
2381 Therefore, em = -0.010455 (minimum of em & e1)
2382 To calculate Design crack width = 3*acr*ξm/{1+2*(acr-Cnom)/(h-dc)}
2383 Design crack width = -2.4 < 0.25 mm OK
2384
2385 Checking for Two Way Shear
2386
2387
2388 Overall Depth of Foundation at d/2 Sec = 1.800 m
2389 3.000 Eff Depth of Foundation at d/2 Sec = 1.709 m
2390
2391 Circumferential Area
2392
2
2393 1.200 2.000 x 3.000 x 1.709 = 10.254 m
2
2394 0.90 2.000 x 6.600 x 1.709 = 22.559 m
6.600
2
2395 Total= 32.813 m
4.800
2396
2397 svc = 0.404 mPa
2398
2399 Shear resistance = 32812800 x 0.404
2400 Sec for twoway shear = 13247901 N
2401 = 1325 t
2
Avg Pr = 13.880 t/m
Net Area = 56.00 - 19.80 = 36.200
2402 Total Vet Load = 13.880 x 36.20 = 502
2403 Result = OK
2404
2405 (On Safer Side Upward Pressure has been Ignored )
2406
2406 Checking For Bearing Pressure
2407
2
2408 X-Sec area of Stem at Top of Foundation = 6.890 m
2409
2410 Total Vertiacal Load = 502.5 t =
2411
2412 Allowable Bearing Pressure = 0.4 fck = 0.400 x 35.000 = 14.000 mPa
2413
2414 Bearing Resistance = 6890400 x 14.000 = 96465600 N
2415 = 9647 t
2416 > 502 t
2417 Result OK
2418
2419
2420
2421
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2422
2423
2424
PIER CAP
2425
2454
2455
2456 0
2457 0.9
2458 1.52
2459 0.9
2460
2461
2462
2463 1.20
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469 0
2470
2471 3.5 0 3.5
2472
2473
2474
2475 1.1 1.1
2476
2477
2478 0.9
2479
2480
2481
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2482
2483 7
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489 5.742
2490
2491
2492
2493 Width of Distribution across = 0.9 + 1.1 + -0.55
2494
2495 = 1.45 m
2496
2497
2498 Calculation of Load
2499
2500 Dead Load
2501
2502 Track Load = 83 x x 1.0 = = 82.96 t
2503 Super Str Wt = 160.300 = t
2504
2505 Total Dead Load = 82.96 + 160.3 = 243.3 t
2506
2507
2508 Dead Load Reaction =121.6 t ( For One Track )
2509
2510 Ultimate Load = 83 x 2+ 160 x 1.4 = 390.3 t
2511
2512 Live Load
2513
2514 CDA = 0.5628
2515
2516 Live Load = 173.016
2517
2518 Live Load Reaction = 135.194 t ( For One Track )
2519
2520 Ultimate Live Load Reaction = 135.194 x 2= 270.4 t
2521
2522 Nos of Bearing = 2 ( On Each Side of Super Structure )
2523
2524 Reaction / Bearing = 256.8 / 2 = 128.41 t
2525 = 1284.11 kN
2526
2527 Ultimate Reaction 1
=95.2 + 270.4 = 232.8 t
2528 2 = 2328 kN
2529
2530 Clear cover to reinforcement 91 mm
2531 Grade of Steel Reinforcement Fe 500
2532 Grade of Concrete of Bed Block M 35
2533
2534
2535 Design Of For Along Direction
2536
2537 Calculation of Moment
2538
2539 1 Due to Self Load
2540
2572 As per Cl 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code, taking it as Singly reinforced section
2573
2574 Effective depth, d =Mu / 0.15 b fck
2575
2576 3994750
d= = 69 mm
2577 0.15 x 35 x 160
2578
2579 0.5 fck 4.6 Mu
Ast = 1 - 1- bd
2580 fy fck bd2
2581
2582 Here :-
2583 fck = 35 N/mm2 Mu = 3.99 kN-m
2584 fy = 500 N/mm2 Ast = 11.9 mm2
2585 b = 160 mm Dia of Main Bar, # = 25
2586 d = 772 mm Dia of Secondary Bar, # = 25
2587
2588 0.2 x 160 x 772
Min Area of Reinforcement = = 246.9 mm2
2589 100
2590
2591 Spacing of Main Bar 491 x 160
= 318 mm
2592 required = 247
2593
2594 So Provide Spacing = 200 mm < 3d = 2315 O.K.
2595 392.7 x 100
% of Steel Provided, p =
2596 160 x 772
2597
2598 = 0.318 % > 0.20% O.K.
2599
2600 Distribution Bar
2601
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2602
2603
2604 0.12 x 1000 x 797
Area of Steel Required, 0.2 % =
2605 100
2606 = 956 mm2
2607
2608 490.874 x 1000
Required Spacing =
2609 956
2610 = 514 mm
2611 Provide Spacing = 200 mm
2612
2613 Crack Width Check
2614 acr = Distance from Surface of Main Reinfrocment 50 mm
2615 cnom = Actual clear cover provided to main steel = 63 mm
2616 ceff = Effective cover provided to main steel = 50 mm
2617 h = Overall depth of section = 900 mm
2618 b= Width of the Section 1000 mm 2
2619 Grade of Concrete fck 35 N/mm
2620 Grae of Steel fy 500 N/mm2
2621 Ast provided= 393 mm2
2622 Total Moment for SLS condition (Gr 1) (Mw= Mq+Mg) 10.0 t-m
2623 (Note :- Ultimate moment devided by 1.5 for SLS moment)
2624 Mq = Moment Due to Live Load 5.00 50000000 Nmm
2625 (Note :- 50% Moment has been Taken As Live Load Moment)
2626 Mg = Moment due to Permanent Load 5.00 50000000 Nmm
2627 Mw = Mq + Mg = Total Moment tm
2628 Distance from Comp Face to Main reinforcement ( d - x) =850 mm 2
2629 Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel = 2E+05 N/mm
2630 Ec = Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 31000 N/mm2 Cl 5.2.2.1 CBC
2631 Modular ratio "m"= Es/Ec = 6.452
2632 bx2/ 2 = m Ast (d - x)
2633 500 x2 = 6.5x392.7 850
2634 a= 1
2635 b= 5.1 x = dc = 63.1 mm
2636 c= -4307.0
2637 d - x/3 = 829.0 mm
2638 Mw = Ast.fst.z; 1E+08 =392.7 xfst829.0
2
2639 fst = 307.2 N/mm < (0.8 x 0.87 fy)
2640
2641 es = fst / Es = 0.001536
2642 e1 = Calculated strain at level where0.001634
cracking is being
2643 em = considered allowing for stiffening effect of concrete in
2644 tension zone
2645
2646 3.8 bt h(a' - d Mq But not more than e1
2647
em = e1 - es As (h - d1- Mg x 10-9
2648
2649 bt = width of section = 1000 mm
2650 a' = 900.0 mm
2651 es = 0.0015
2652 As = 392.7 mm2
2653
2654 3E+09 5E+07
em = 0.0016 - 1- -9
2655 505 5E+07 x 10
2656
2657 = 0.0016 - 5670033 x 1.0 x 10-9
2658 = 0.0016 - 5670033 x 0.0 x 10-9
2659 = 0.0016 - 0.00000 = 0.001634 > 0.001634
2660
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2661 Therefore, em = 0.001634 (minimum of em & e1)
2662 acr em
To calculate Design crack width3 =
2663 Design crack width = 0.245 < 0.25 mm OK
2664
2665 Checking for Shear Stress
2666
2667 Ultimate Shear, Vu = 465.6 kN
2668 b = 160 mm
2669 d = 772 mm
2670
2671 Shear stress, v = 466 x 1000 = 3.772 N/mm2 < 0.75 √fck =
2672 160 x 772
2673 4.437 OK
1/4
2674 Depth factor, s = 500 or 0.7, whichever is maximum = 0.897
2675 d
2676
1/3
2677 Ultima 0.27 100 As 1/3
x fck
2678 Ym bd
2679 (Cl 15.4.3.2.1)
2680 100*As/ b d = 0.318
2681 Ym = 1.25
2682
1/3 1/3
2683 vc = 0.27 0.32 x 35 = 0.482
2684 1.25
2685
2686 s vc = 0.897 x 0.482 = 0.433 N/mm2
2
2687 v = 3.772 N/mm
2688
2689 Dia of Shear stirrups = 20 mm having nos of leg in 1 m = 5
2690
2691 Asv = 1571 mm2
2692
2693 As per Cl 15.4.3.2 (Table - 14)
2694
2695 v > s vc
2696
2697 sv = 0.87 fyv Asv / b (v + 0.4 - s vc) = 683296 / 3739
2698 = 183
2699
2700 It should not be more than 0.75 d or 450 mm Clause 15.4.3.2.4 of CBC
2701
2702 Therefore required, sv = 183 (0.75d = 750 mm)
2703
2704 So provide Sv = 150 mm
2705
2706 Design Of For Across Direction
2707
2708 Calculation of Moment
2709
2710 1 Due to Self Load
2711
2712 X-Section Area of Projected Portion = 0.629 x 0.797 = 0.501 m2
2713
2714 Volume = 0.501 x 0.76 = 0.381 m3
2715
2716 Load = 0.381 x 25 = 9.519 kN
2717
2718 C.G of Load from Face = 2.7 x 0.266
2719 1.8
2720 0.398 m
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2721
2722 Moment = 9.519 x 0.398 = 3.791 kN-m
2723
2724 Moment Due To Trolley Refugee
2725
2726 Mtr = 150 x 2 x 1.5 = 225 kN-m
2727 2
2728
2729 Total Moment = 3.791 + 225.0 = 228.8 kN-m
2730
2731
2732 2 Due to Reaction from Bearing
2733
2734 Moment = 1284 x 0 = 0 kN-m
2735
2736
2737 Total Moment about Face228.8
= + 0 = 228.8 kN-m
2738
2739 Ultimate Moment228.8
= x 1.9 = 434.7 kN-m
2740 Ultimate Fac
2741
2742
2743 Clear cover to reinforcement 91 mm
2744 Grade of Steel Reinforcement 500
2745 Grade of Concrete of Bed Block 35
2746
2747 Mu = = 434.703 kN-m
2748
2749
2750 As per Cl 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code, taking it as Singly reinforced section
2751
2752 Effective depth, d =Mu / 0.15 b fck
2753
2754 434702768
d= = 330 mm
2755 0.15 x 35 x 760
2756
2757 0.5 fck 4.6 Mu
Ast = 1 - 1- bd
2758 fy fck bd2
2759
2760 Here :-
2761 fck = 35 N/mm2 Mu = 434.703 kN-m
2762 fy = 500 N/mm2 Ast = 1331 mm2
2763 b = 760 mm Dia of Main Bar, # = 16
2764 d = 776 mm Dia of Secondary Bar, # = 25
2765
2766 0.2 x 760 x 776
Min Area of Reinforcement = = 1180 mm2
2767 100
2768
2769 Spacing of Main Bar required = 201.1 x 760 = 115 mm
2770 1331.4
2771
2772 So Provide Spacing = 100 mm < 3d = 2328 O.K.
2773 1528 x 100
% of Steel Provided, p =
2774 760 x 776
2775
2776 = 0.259 % > 0.20% O.K.
2777
2778 Distribution Bar
2779
2780
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2781
2782 0.12 x 1000 x 796.5
Area of Steel Required, 0.2 % =
2783 100
2784 = 955.8 mm2
2785
2786 490.874 x 1000
Required Spacing =
2787 955.8
2788 = 514 mm
2789 Provide Spacing = 200 mm
2790
2791 Crack Width Check
2792 acr = Distance from Surface of Main Reinfrocment 50 mm
2793 cnom = Actual clear cover provided to main steel = 58 mm
2794 ceff = Effective cover provided to main steel = 50 mm
2795 h = Overall depth of section = 900 mm
2796 b= Width of the Section 1000 mm 2
2797 Grade of Concrete fck 35 N/mm
2798 Grae of Steel fy 500 N/mm2
2799 Ast provided= 1528.1 mm2
2800 Total Moment for SLS condition (Gr 1) (Mw= Mq+Mg) 29.0 t-m
2801 (Note :- Ultimate moment devided by 1.5 for SLS moment)
2802 Mq = Moment Due to Live Load 14.49 144900923 Nmm
2803 (Note :- 50% Moment has been Taken As Live Load Moment)
2804 Mg = Moment due to Permanent Load 14.49 144900923 Nmm
2805 Mw = Mq + Mg = Total Moment tm
2806 Distance from Comp Face to Main reinforcement ( d - x) =850 mm 2
2807 Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel = 2E+05 N/mm
2808 Ec = Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 31000 N/mm2 Cl 5.2.2.1 CBC
2809 Modular ratio "m"= Es/Ec = 6.452
2810 bx2/ 2 = m Ast (d - x)
2811 500 x2 =6.5x1528.1 850
2812 a= 1
2813 b= 19.717 x = dc = 120.0 mm
2814 c= -16759.5
2815 d - x/3 = 810.0 mm
2816 Mw = Ast.fst.z; 3E+08 =1528.1fstx 810.0
2
2817 fst = 234.1 N/mm < (0.8 x 0.87 fy)
2818
2819 es = fst / Es =
0.001171
2820 e1 = 0.001251
2821 em = Calculated strain at level where cracking is being
2822 considered allowing for stiffening effect of concrete in
2823
2824 3.8 bt h(a' - d Mq But not more than e1
2825
em = e1 - es As (h - d1- Mg x 10-9
2826
2827 bt = width of section =1000 mm
2828 a' = 900.0 mm
2829 es = 0.0012
2830 As = 1528.1 mm2
2831
2832 3E+09 144900923
em = 0.0013 - 1- x 10-9
2833 1395 144900923
2834
2835 = 0.0013 - 1911809 x 1.0 x 10-9
2836 = 0.0013 - 1911809 x 0.0 x 10-9
2837 = 0.0013 - 0 x = 0.001251 > 0.001251
2838
2839 Therefore, em = 0.001251 (minimum of em & e1)
2840 acr em
To calculate Design crack width3 =
Pier.xlsx P1
Name of work: 0 CONSULTANT
Date:
0
Revision No.: R0 Pier- P1 PN1 PN2
2841 Design crack width = 0.188 < 0.25 mm OK
2842
2843
2844 Checking for Shear Stress
2845
2846 Ultimate Shear, Vu = 690.6 kN
2847 b = 760 mm
2848 d = 776 mm
2849
2850 Shear stress, v = 691 x 1000 = 1.171 N/mm2 < 0.75 √fck =
2851 760 x 776
2852 4.437
1/4
2853 Depth factor, s = 500 or 0.7, whichever is maximum = 0.896
2854 d
2855
2856 Ultimate Shear Resistance of Concrete, vc 0.27 100 As 1/3
x fck
2857 Ym bd
2858 (Cl 15.4.3.2.1)
2859 100*As/ b d = 0.259
2860 Ym = 1.25
2861
1/3 1/3
2862 vc = 0.27 0.26 x 35 = 0.450
2863 1.25
2864
2865 s vc = 0.896 x 0.450 = 0.404 N/mm2
2
2866 v = 1.171 N/mm
2867
2868 Dia of Shear stirrups = 20 mm having nos of leg in 1 m 5=
2869
2870 Asv = 1571 mm2
2871
2872 As per Cl 15.4.3.2 (Table - 14)
2873
2874 v > s vc
2875
2876 sv = 0.87 fyv Asv / b (v + 0.4 - s vc) = 683296 / 1167
2877 = 585
2878
2879 It should not be more than 0.75 d or 450 mm Clause 15.4.3.2.4 of CBC
2880
2881 Therefore required, sv = 450 (0.75d = 750 mm)
2882
2883 So provide Sv = 150 mm