Smoking in public spaces should be illegal according to the document. The pros are that cancer rates and diseases from secondhand smoke will drop if non-smokers are not exposed, and that smoke in public spaces can be annoying and negatively impact the experience of non-smokers. However, the cons are that a ban could infringe on personal freedom, negatively impact the tobacco industry and economy, and be expensive to enforce.
Smoking in public spaces should be illegal according to the document. The pros are that cancer rates and diseases from secondhand smoke will drop if non-smokers are not exposed, and that smoke in public spaces can be annoying and negatively impact the experience of non-smokers. However, the cons are that a ban could infringe on personal freedom, negatively impact the tobacco industry and economy, and be expensive to enforce.
Smoking in public spaces should be illegal according to the document. The pros are that cancer rates and diseases from secondhand smoke will drop if non-smokers are not exposed, and that smoke in public spaces can be annoying and negatively impact the experience of non-smokers. However, the cons are that a ban could infringe on personal freedom, negatively impact the tobacco industry and economy, and be expensive to enforce.
We will talk about Smoking in public spaces should be illegal.
Alejandro will then
talk about the pros. Smoking in public spaces should be illegal. Pros First: The rates of cancer will drop Second: People who are not smoker won´t get second hand smoke, preventing diseases. Third: Smoking in public spaces can be annoying and uncomfortable for non- smokers. The smoke and odor can be intrusive and unpleasant, negatively affecting the experience of those nearby. Respecting the space and rights of non- smokers is essential to maintain a harmonious and respectful environment. Cons First: You're overriding overrairing the freedom of the people. Second: This will have a negative impact on the tobacco industry, meaning layoffs and economic depression Third: Enforcing the ban would be expensive, and we should have different priorities