Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dealer SOS Services Standardization Guide - Rev F
Dealer SOS Services Standardization Guide - Rev F
1
Table of Contents
Table of Contents..................................................................................................2
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................4
II. Strategy ............................................................................................................5
III. S·O·S Services Standardization Process ........................................................7
Initial Standardization..................................................................................................... 7
Re-Standardization.......................................................................................................... 8
Subsequent/Continuous Evaluations............................................................................... 8
IV. S·O·S Services Standardization Requirements...............................................9
IV.A.I. Test Results - Required Test Offerings ....................................................10
Used Oil Testing ........................................................................................................... 10
Elemental Analysis ................................................................................................... 11
FT-IR Analysis.......................................................................................................... 11
Viscosity ................................................................................................................... 12
Water......................................................................................................................... 12
Glycol........................................................................................................................ 13
Particle Analysis ....................................................................................................... 13
GC Fuel Dilution....................................................................................................... 13
Level 1 Coolant Analysis.............................................................................................. 14
% Glycol ................................................................................................................... 14
pH.............................................................................................................................. 14
Conductivity.............................................................................................................. 14
Nitrite ........................................................................................................................ 15
Coolant Physical Tests.............................................................................................. 15
IV.A.II. Test Results - Data Quality & Monitoring Capabilities.............................15
Introduction................................................................................................................... 15
Definitions..................................................................................................................... 16
Procedures..................................................................................................................... 16
Instrument Calibration .............................................................................................. 19
Elemental Analysis.................................................................................................... 19
FT-IR......................................................................................................................... 19
Quality Control Checks............................................................................................. 20
Process Control ......................................................................................................... 21
IV.B.I. Laboratory Operations - Quality Management System ............................22
Introduction................................................................................................................... 22
What is ISO Certification?............................................................................................ 22
Costs.......................................................................................................................... 23
Initial certification..................................................................................................... 23
Training..................................................................................................................... 23
ISO Certification Process Steps ................................................................................ 24
IV.B.II. Laboratory Operations - Safety ..............................................................25
Chemical Hygiene/Safety Plan ..................................................................................... 25
Introduction............................................................................................................... 25
Purpose and Requirements........................................................................................ 25
Process Control ......................................................................................................... 25
2
Lab Safety ..................................................................................................................... 26
Material Safety Data Sheet ....................................................................................... 26
Employee Safety Training ........................................................................................ 26
Laboratory Safety Devices and Requirements.......................................................... 26
IV.B.III. Laboratory Operations - Staffing and Training Requirements ...............28
Introduction................................................................................................................... 28
Minimum Requirements ............................................................................................... 28
Lab Technicians ........................................................................................................ 29
IV.C.I. Communications - Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS)
Requirements .....................................................................................................29
LIMS Capability ........................................................................................................... 30
Customer and Equipment Information...................................................................... 30
LIMS Interface for Lab Processes ............................................................................ 30
Reporting Options......................................................................................................... 30
Monitoring the Program - Metric Calculation and Reporting ...................................... 31
IV.C.II. Communications – Internal Dealer Training ...........................................31
IV.C.III. Communications – External Customer Training....................................31
IV.D.I. Equipment Coverage Metrics - S·O·S DCAL ..........................................32
Introduction................................................................................................................... 32
Calculation Instructions ................................................................................................ 32
Standard Requirement................................................................................................... 32
Example Calculation..................................................................................................... 33
IV.D.II. Equipment Coverage Metrics - S·O·S Warranty Participation Rate .......33
Introduction................................................................................................................... 33
Calculation Instructions ................................................................................................ 33
Standard Requirement................................................................................................... 34
Example Calculation..................................................................................................... 34
IV.D.III. Equipment Coverage Metrics - S·O·S CSA Participation Rate .............35
Introduction................................................................................................................... 35
Calculation Instructions ................................................................................................ 36
Standard Requirement................................................................................................... 36
Example Calculation..................................................................................................... 36
IV.D.IV. Equipment Coverage Metrics - S·O·S Red Alert Closure Rate.............37
Introduction................................................................................................................... 37
Calculation Instructions ................................................................................................ 38
Standard Requirement................................................................................................... 38
3
I. Introduction
Caterpillar and Cat Dealerships have also increased their emphasis on Customer
Support Agreements and rental machines. To provide the highest returns, these
CSA machines and rental machines must be properly maintained. A high quality
S·O·S Services program is needed to manage CSA machines and to keep the
rental fleet operational.
In summary, S·O·S Services Standardization will provide a basis for the future of
the S·O·S Services program and sustained growth. The S·O·S Services
program must be focused on providing high quality information to the customer
and this information will be used to make critical equipment management
decisions. These qualities will separate S·O·S Services from other providers.
Ultimately, the Dealership will see parts and service revenue growth as the
S·O·S Services program is utilized by a larger customer base.
4
II. Strategy
The implementation of this strategy has been divided into four key areas of the
S·O·S Services program.
Test Results
All S·O·S Services laboratories will be required to provide a minimum number of
specific test results. The required test categories include: Elemental Analysis,
FT-IR, Viscosity, Water, Fuel Dilution, Particle Count and Level 1 Coolant. The
exact listing of tests will be covered in a later section. Providing a consistent set
of test results will help to capture the corporate customer. A consistent set of test
results will also help with Condition Monitoring.
Laboratory Operations
This is a very large topic that begins with the operation and calibration of the test
equipment. ISO9001:2008 will be used to ensure high quality test results. Each
S·O·S Services lab will be required to work with ISO to establish their individual
ISO certification.
Laboratory safety and chemical hygiene are also included under Laboratory
Operations. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA in the
United States) has developed a set of guidelines for laboratory safety. These
guidelines will be used in the S·O·S Services Standardization program.
5
Communication
A standardized S·O·S Services program must have the capability to test
samples, interpret the results, and inform the customer in a very timely manner.
These operations will require a modern Laboratory Information Management
System (LIMS). The LIMS must have the capability to electronically transfer
reports and have those reports available on the web. The LIMS must also be
capable of data retrieval from the various test instruments and it must provide a
data interpretation interface.
6
III. S·O·S Services Standardization Process
Initial Standardization
A detailed questionnaire, a checklist, and other support materials are available
from S·O·S Services. It is suggested that you make extra copies of the checklist.
Once you are satisfied that your analysis is complete and any needed changes to
meet the stated standards and measurements have been implemented, contact
your district Service Operations Representative (SOR). Your corresponding
Caterpillar Distribution Services Division (DSD) S·O·S Consultant will schedule
an audit of the program to confirm that all criteria have been met for recognition
as a Cat S·O·S Services Standardized Program.
Once the DSD S·O·S Consultant's audit is completed, you will learn immediately
of your status. If the Program complies with all the requirements, the Dealership
will receive Standardization recognition. If all requirements are not met, we will
explain what improvements are needed. It should be pointed out that the
questionnaire requires a positive response on 100% of the questions in order to
receive Standardization.
Once deficiencies are corrected, the Dealer should notify the district, in writing, of
what was done to correct the deficiencies. A second audit by the DSD S·O·S
Consultant will be necessary.
7
Re-Standardization
DSD S•O•S Consultants will schedule re-Standardization reviews every three
years. Re-Standardization reviews may be conducted more often if program
criteria changes or if there are significant changes at the Dealer level. Re-
Standardization will be recognized by a letter of appreciation from the Marketing
Organization and renewal date plates for plaques.
Subsequent/Continuous Evaluations
The goal of this process is to provide motivation and means for every Dealer to
assess where they stand today, versus where they need to be, in providing a
level of customer service that clearly separates the Cat Dealer S·O·S Program
from competitors in the "oil lab" business. The process requires continuous
improvement. Program enhancements will be added periodically as Caterpillar
develops value added program enhancements, and customer expectations
increase. The process is not a one-time event through which a program receives
a permanent rating. A STANDARDIZED program, in apparent good standing,
must be reviewed every three years. Such things as changes to Standardization
requirements, customer complaints, key personnel changes, frequent poor
performance in performance testing programs, etc. could be reason to re-
evaluate a program's Standardization.
8
IV. S·O·S Services Standardization Requirements
The Standardization requirements are listed below and details regarding each
requirement are including in the following sections:
A. Test Results
I. Required Test Offerings
II. Data Quality & Monitoring Capabilities
B. Laboratory Operations
I. Quality Management System
II. Safety
III. Staffing and Training Requirements
C. Communication
I. Laboratory Information Management System Requirements
II. Dealer Training Events
III. Customer Training Events
For Dealers who utilize Caterpillar or another Cat Dealer laboratory for their fluid
analysis services, it should be noted that the laboratory being utilized must meet
all of the requirements for test results and laboratory operations included in the
S·O·S Services Standardization Program.
9
IV.A.I. Test Results - Required Test Offerings
10
Elemental Analysis
Elemental analysis is used to determine the weight percent of the listed elements
in the used oil sample. Elemental analysis must be reported for all samples and
the results must be posted as parts per million (ppm). The required instrument
for measuring the elemental concentration is an Inductively Coupled Plasma
Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES). This type of instrument has proven
accuracy, repeatability, and durability in the measurement of used oil samples.
The ICP must be capable of producing an accuracy of +/- 10% for concentrations
of 20 ppm or higher. For concentrations lower than 20 ppm, the ICP must have
an accuracy of +/- 2 ppm. The method currently recommended is based on
processes ASTM D5185.
FT-IR Analysis
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) must be used for the
measurement of oxidation, nitration, sulfation, and soot. The FT-IR must be
configured to produce results in accordance with the ASTM E2412-04 Direct
Trending procedure. S·O·S Services uses the term Un-subtracted FT-IR Method
(UFM) to identify this procedure. Additional information on the UFM can be
found on the S·O·S Services Knowledge Network site url
https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=200084
11
Sulfation measures the presence of sulfur-containing compounds in the oil.
Sulfation must be measured on all diesel engines because these compounds are
generated as a by-product of combustion with higher sulfur diesel fuels.
Viscosity
While viscosity values at both 100oC and 40oC are acceptable for
standardization, Kinematic Viscosity at 100oC is the most useful viscosity
measurement for new and used oil analysis. Viscosity results must be posted in
centistokes (cSt). A capillary tube type viscometer must be used for this
measurement and the viscometer must be capable of measuring viscosity within
+/- 0.5 cSt according to ASTM D445.
The kinematic viscosity of an oil is essential for identifying if the correct oil is
being used in a compartment. Viscosity analysis also is an indicator of
contamination within an oil compartment. Viscosity results must be reported for
all samples.
Water
Water is a contaminant that can be present in all oil-lubricated compartments.
Water interferes with the ability of the oil to prevent wear and protect the metal
surfaces from corrosion. A simple hot plate test is sufficient for the measurement
of water in used oil samples. The hot plate test can accurately detect levels of
water in excess of 0.1%. Additional information on performing the water test can
be found on the S·O·S Services Knowledge Network site URL
https://kn.cat.com/msgget.cfm?ID=2746&type=Guides
The reporting of Water on the S·O·S Services report must follow the guidelines
listed in the chart below.
S•O•S Report
Water Result % Water Water Result Definition
E Excessive (milky appearance)
P 0.5% to 1.0% Positive (no visual indication of water)
T 0.1% to 0.4% Trace
N <0.1% Negative
12
Glycol
A glycol test is optional.
I
Particle Analysis
Particle analysis may be performed using multiple different methods. The optical
particle counter, PQ Analyzer, visual inspection, Laser Net Fines, filter patch
analysis, and ferrography are all acceptable methods for particle analysis.
GC Fuel Dilution
Gas Chromatography (GC) must be used for the measurement of fuel dilution.
The GC test can be done by ASTM D3524 or by the Perkin Elmer modified
method on the PE Clarus 500 with PreVent ModeTM. The PE method has been
submitted for approval to ASTM, and is a much quicker alternative to the
standard ASTM method. For more information on the method recommended,
copy and paste the following URL in your browser
https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=152263.
To understand why Caterpillar Inc.’s S·O·S Services is now recommending this
technology, please visit this URL https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=160042
.
A fuel analysis result, positive or negative, must be reported for all diesel engine
samples. Samples with a positive result must also include the % volume value
reported from the GC analysis.
13
Level 1 Coolant Analysis
Accurate coolant analysis also requires a complete set of test results. The chart
below provides a minimum listing of test results for Level 1 coolant samples.
% Glycol
Glycol measurements must be done with a refractometer that has been
calibrated for ethylene glycol and propylene glycol. Common refractometers
provide freeze or boiling point results. Results must be reported in percent (%). It
is recommended that a refractometer with a percent concentration scale be used.
However, freeze and boiling point results can be converted to percent if
necessary. Additional information on using a refractometer can be found at this
S·O·S Services Knowledge Network site URL
https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=200058
pH
pH measurements must be done with a pH meter. The pH meter used must be
capable of a linear calibration between the pH values of 4.0 and 10.0. The meter
must be capable of producing accurate results within +/- 0.1. Additional
information on pH meters can be found on the S·O·S Services Knowledge
Network site URL https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=200057
Conductivity
Conductivity is measured with a conductivity meter. The conductivity meter used
must be capable of a linear calibration range of 2000-10000. The results are
reported in μS/cm. The meter must be capable of producing accurate results
14
within +/- 5%. Additional information on conductivity meters can be found on the
S·O·S Services Knowledge Network site URL
https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=200055
.
Nitrite
Nitrite concentration is measured using a titration method. Common
instrumentation and supplies for performance of the titration may include: buret
(or metered titrant delivery device), magnetic stirrer, stir plate, ceramic casserole
dish or beaker, and water. A description of a test procedure and appropriate test
results is available on the S·O·S Services Knowledge Network site URL
https://kn.cat.com/know.cfm?id=200051
Introduction
A laboratory’s prime function is to produce data. As in any production
environment, the product that is built with the highest quality standards will likely
be the most successful. With lab data in particular, data quality is not only a
competitive differentiator, but also a critical success factor in itself. In other
words, even without competition, a lab producing poor quality data will not be
successful. Laboratories need to produce accurate and precise data in order to
satisfy key customer requirements.
This section will discuss specific minimum quality activities a lab needs to
practice in order to demonstrate accurate and precise results are being produced
and delivered to the customer. These activities will consist of daily measuring
and monitoring activities as well as quarterly verification by a third party
verification standard. Some or all of these elements of quality assurance should
be integrated in your ISO process. This section intends to specify, with
exactness, the measures and goals that should be met by your lab.
15
Definitions
Precision: the extent to which the results from a given set of measurements on
the same sample agree with their mean
Accuracy: the extent to which a given measurement agrees with the standard
value for that measurement
Procedures
Acceptance Criteria
Percent differences of the analytical results from the certified value are
automatically calculated if you are using VHG’s PTP service. If another vendor is
chosen, percent differences from the certified value will need to be calculated
using the following formula:
16
Elements with
≤ ±2 ppm ≤ ±3 ppm > 3 ppm
values < 20 ppm
Within 10.01%
Viscosity < 10.00% > 15.01%
and 15.00%
UFM Soot < 15% 15% to 20% > 20%
17
Corrective Actions
Inevitably labs will encounter instances when analytical results will disagree with
the certified values. When this occurs, a root cause analysis of the result
discrepancy must be done. Depending on the root cause analysis, appropriate
remediation efforts should be taken. In all situations, documentation of the
corrective procedure as well as a final re-test of the PTP sample.
Instruments with red results should be taken out of service and not be used to
produce S·O·S results. Once the instrument has been analyzed and corrected,
and green or yellow results are obtained, the instrument can be returned to
service.
Although yellow results allow the instrument to be utilized, the lab personnel
should make reasonable efforts to have all results within green parameters.
Ordering Information
Information for contacting VHG Labs and ordering PTP samples follows:
Website: www.vhglabs.com
Email address: custsvc@vhglabs.com
VHG Labs
276 Abby Road
Manchester, New Hampshire, 03103, USA
18
Name Description Part No.
Instrument Calibration
Elemental Analysis
For elemental analysis, the calibration range must span the area of interest for
each element. The recommended calibration range for Fe, Cr, Al, Pb, Mo, Cu,
Sn, Si, Na, K, Mg, Ni is 0 – 500 ppm. The recommended calibration range for Ca
is 0 – 5000 ppm. The recommended calibration range for Zn and P is 0 – 1600
ppm.
FT-IR
FT-IR instruments are calibrated at the manufacturer. However, most
manufacturers recommend system checks to be run to verify the validity of the
instrument. For the Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100, the manufacturer recommends
that the contamination, throughput, noise and abscissa checks are run daily.
Laboratories should follow the manufacturer recommendations for their specific
instrument to ensure FT-IR calibration is maintained.
19
Viscosity Analysis
Viscometers should be calibrated to span at least 5-30 cSt @ 100 Celsius.
Particle Count
Optical particle count instruments have sensors that should be calibrated
externally in accordance with ISO 11171:1999 on an annual basis. For other
types of particle analysis, refer to the manufacturer’s recommendations for
calibration.
Gas Chromatograph
Gas Chromatographs should be calibrated to include a minimum of 0-10% fuel
dilution.
pH Meter
pH meters should be calibrated to include pH values of at least 4-10.
Conductivity Meter
Conductivity meters should be calibrated to include values of at least 2000-10000
uS/cm .
20
Test Type of Process Parameter Minimum Frequency Acceptance Criteria
Control Measured
All elements that are Daily sample data must
reported within 30 - be bracketed by
ICP-OES Check Standard 100 ppm range successful Check <10% deviation
Standard attempts
All the parameters At start and end of
that are reported every shift or 8 hours.
FT-IR Used Oil Check Trend Analysis
Sample data must be
bracketed by successful
Viscosity Check Standard Viscosity at 100C Check Standard <10% deviation
and/or at 40C attempts
6 micron and 14 At start and end of Changes less than 2 ISO
micron counts and every shift or 8 hours. codes from original
Particle Counter Used Oil Check ISO Code level readings.
Sample data must be
bracketed by successful
GC Prepared Check 4% Fuel Check Standard <10% deviation
Standard Standard attempts
Process Control
The table above describes which data to track to determine if the instrument, or
process, is under control. These daily checks should be maintained for periodic
review to ensure that processes continue to stay in control. Data can be tracked
in the form of electronic files, i.e. results files, or a MS Excel spreadsheet; or
through the instruments software. Some tests may best be tracked through the
use of a lab notebook.
In some cases, it may require statistical treatment of the data to determine if the
process is in control. It is highly advisable for the data that requires statistical
analysis to use MS Excel files for tracking. Statistical analysis is recommended
for FT-IR, Viscosity, and Gas Chromatography data.
21
IV.B.I. Laboratory Operations - Quality Management
System
Introduction
A quality management system is important to the S·O·S Program because it
provides quality assurance to clients and customers. This will make a S·O·S
Program more competitive in the market place. Quality Management systems
also require that the enterprise self-examine three principle areas: practices,
product, and customer satisfaction. It requires that you not only document how
these areas are monitored, but that the enterprise actually improves these areas
year after year.
Dealers that source data from recognized Cat certified labs may use the
documentation templates as needed and combine their written documentation
with documentation from the lab that is supplying analytical data to meet
Caterpillar S·O·S Services Standardization. Marketing Organization S·O·S
Consultant's review of non-lab Dealer's program utilization, interpretation,
communications, and key performance indicators metrics is required.
22
ISO drives consensus and solutions that meet business, government and society
needs. An example of current work is creating public information symbols that
will be universally understood. ISO9001 or ISO 17025 certifications are
acceptable.
Registrar
ISO certifies Accrediting Bodies in each region of the world. ANAB is the
Accrediting Body for the United States. The Accrediting Bodies then certify
Registrars. Registrars are companies with trained and certified personnel that will
audit for conformity to the chosen ISO standard. The Registrar is itself certified to
the ISO standard defining how to conduct conformance audits.
Costs
Annual certification cost is approximately $1500 U.S. Dollars (USD), plus travel
expenses of auditor. Using local auditors will keep travel expenses lower.
Initial certification
Initial certification will take one to two years of training, documentation, and
process changes. If a Dealership has ISO 9001 certification in another area,
certification of the S·O·S Services lab will take less time.
Training
If the Dealership does not have any other areas ISO 9001 certified, a
Management Representative (MR) will be needed. As a minimum, the MR
should complete Lead Auditor training. Lead Auditor training provides the MR
with the information needed to understand what the Certifying Auditor will be
auditing. Lead Auditor training is a 4 to 5 day class. Cost is approximately
$1600 USD, plus travel expenses.
23
Internal auditors will also need to be trained. The internal auditor(s) should be
selected from the lab technicians and lab managers. Internal Auditor training is a
2 to 3 day class. Cost is approximately $895 USD per person, plus travel
expenses. There are discounts for paying early and sending more than one
person per training event. Also, some ISO trainers offer frequent customer
programs. Investigate local choices and take advantage of special offers.
Note: Consultant fees may be reduced if the MR and the Internal Auditors
create all the process documentation. If this occurs, consultant time can be
minimized to a final check before Registrar audit.
24
IV.B.II. Laboratory Operations - Safety
Chemical Hygiene/Safety Plan
Introduction
The development, implementation and maintenance of a Chemical Hygiene /
Safety Plan is a common good laboratory practice.
In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
has established two programs for employees who work with chemicals. Other
nations have similar governing bodies. Please contact the appropriate national
agency for employee health and safety for details concerning rules and
regulations.
Knowledge is the first step of safety. Reading and following recommended work
practices and procedures presented in Chemical Hygiene / Safety Plan can
greatly minimize the risk of exposure to hazardous chemicals. Following the
policies and procedures set forth in the Chemical Hygiene / Safety Plan becomes
the responsibility of the employee.
The second step of safety is employee engagement. Not only must employees
understand potential hazards of chemicals and how to work safely within a
laboratory, employees and management must communicate. Employees should
be encouraged to communicate safety questions and concerns.
Process Control
The Chemical Hygiene / Safety Plan should be readily accessible to all
employees, employee representatives, and, upon request, to a government
25
safety representative. The employer should review and evaluate the
effectiveness of the Chemical Hygiene / Safety Plan at least annually and update
it as necessary.
Lab Safety
26
2. Emergency Eye Wash Station
3. Emergency Shower
4. Appropriately labeled secondary containers
5. Proper storage of chemicals
6. Adequate ventilation for equipment (as needed)
7. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
8. Minimum of 2 outward-opening exits
27
IV.B.III. Laboratory Operations - Staffing and Training
Requirements
Introduction
The operation of a modern laboratory requires a broad array of skills and
expertise. Educational requirements for laboratory personnel are being explicitly
delineated because it is impossible for any lab guide or work instruction to
consider every possible situation that will arise in a lab. Frequently, events occur
under normal operations of a laboratory that will require action or a decision be
taken that will affect the final product of the lab, in our case, S·O·S data. It is
only through years of experience or formal training that a person can be well
equipped to understand lab processes and make appropriate decisions when a
situation arises that is not covered in a guide or manual. In other words, a
person that is directly responsible for a lab’s operation, should have the training
and education necessary to operate the lab under a variety of conditions and
environments with minimal to no supervision.
Minimum Requirements
This section will discuss the different requirements in education and training
needed according to job type and description.
General
At least one member of the staff should have a Bachelor of Arts or Science in a
scientific discipline or equivalency thereof. Acceptable scientific disciplines
include chemistry, physics, biology, and environmental sciences. Chemistry is
the most desirable.
28
Lab Manager
This is the person directly responsible for the day-to-day operation of the lab.
This person may or may not be the overall S·O·S program manager. Minimum
requirements for the Lab Manager role are as follows:
• Yearly augmentation of knowledge by actively participating in at least one
training course per year. The course subject should pertain to lab
processes, instrumentation, oil chemistries, or machinery advances.
• Achieve S·O·S Interpretation I Certification from Caterpillar Inc. For more
information on the training curriculum for S·O·S Interpretation Certification
please visit the S·O·S Services Knowledge Network URL
https://kn.cat.com/msgget.cfm?ID=18933&type=Guides
Interpreters
This is the person that is responsible for interpreting S·O·S data, whom makes
the evaluations and recommendations that are communicated to the customer.
Minimum requirements for the Interpreter role are as follows:
• Achieve S·O·S Interpretation I Certification from Caterpillar Inc. For more
information on the training curriculum for S·O·S Interpretation Certification
please visit the S·O·S Services Knowledge Network URL
https://kn.cat.com/msgget.cfm?ID=18933&type=Guides
Lab Technicians
This is the person that is responsible for analyzing the samples and producing
the S·O·S data. Minimum requirements for the Lab Technician role are as
follows:
• High School diploma or equivalency.
• Minimum skill set using Personal Computer interface such as Microsoft
Windows and Excel.
29
LIMS Capability
A Standardized S·O·S Services program must have the capability to test
samples, interpret the results, and inform the customer, in a very timely manner.
These operations will require a modern Laboratory Information Management
System (LIMS) that has the ability to manage customer and equipment
information as well as perform the functionality necessary for lab processing.
Customer and Equipment Information
A very important feature of a LIMS is the ability to manage customer and
equipment fleet information. Standardized programs need to store contact
information like but not limited to Customer name, address, e-mail, phone
number, and other pertinent contact information.
The LIMS must contain this critical information: equipment serial numbers, model
designation, equipment system sample information, sample intervals, job site
details, Customer Service Agreements (CSA) or Extended Service Contract,
contract start and end dates, starting and ending Service Meter Units (SMU).
Access to this information can be obtained through an interface with the Dealer
business system.
Reporting Options
Communicating with the customer is another feature required of the LIMS.
Communications can be in the form of a paper hard copy report that can be
mailed or faxed to the customer. It can also use electronic forms of
communication, such as: e-mailing, direct faxing, or a web interface. This helps
to expedite report handling and allows customers to access their data faster. The
LIMS must have the capability to electronically transfer reports and have those
reports available on the web or other electronic means.
30
Monitoring the Program - Metric Calculation and Reporting
The Standardized program LIMS will be capable of providing data that can
produce the operational metric reports that are discussed in more detail in
Section IV.D. of this document. A LIMS system able to provide the
data/information to then do the calculations outside the system would be enough
to meet the standards. Key reporting metrics include but are not limited to:
Every customer should be linked to at least one Dealer person. Dealer sales or
technical personnel such as PSSR’s, TC’s, ISR’s or Condition Monitoring
Specialists should have access to customer data via reports or the web tool.
Additional actions beyond the basic customer report should be performed with
top customers to demonstrate further value of the program. Examples of such
activities include: volume reports, red alerts reports for the last month, late
sample activity reports, etc.
A minimum of one S•O•S Services Training event for the Dealer personnel such
as PSSR’s, TC’s, ISR’s or Condition Monitoring Specialists should be held
annually.
A minimum of one S•O•S Services Training event for the customers should be
held annually. These events can include onsite training, an S•O•S Services
training module in customer PM training, Cat Care Meetings, etc.
31
IV.D.I. Key Performance Indicator - S·O·S DCAL
Introduction
DCAL (Dealer Customer Acceptance Level) is a percentage of actual Cat
samples processed versus the potential number of Cat samples. This metric
provides a level of acceptance in the market place for S·O·S Services.
Calculation Instructions
The formula for calculating DCAL is shown below:
The annual number of Cat samples processed from CAT Prime Product
Machines (not engines and not competitive equipment) is provided by the Dealer
LIMS. If the Dealership is using S·O·S Services Manager, this capability is
available in the Cat Prime Product Report.
The source used by Cat S·O·S Services for machine population and estimated
sample volume is Corporate PTOS. The total estimated sample volume for use
in the DCAL calculation is based upon Cat machines identified in PTOS in a
Dealer’s territory, and annual hours generated per each of these machines.
Please contact the respective Distribution Services Division (DSD) Product
Support team for your Dealer’s current total estimated sample volume for use in
this calculation.
Standard Requirement
The DCAL minimum for Standardization is 10%. In benchmarking with other
Dealers globally, a benchmark target for Dealers is 40%. DCAL should be
measured and trended for continuous improvement.
32
Example Calculation
Suppose that your Dealership processed 23,750 oil samples from Cat machines
in the previous 12-month period. According to Cat PTOS, your total estimated
samples equals 58,356.
To calculate your S·O·S DCAL, divide your actual number of Cat machine
samples by the total estimated number of Cat machine samples, and then
multiply by 100.
Most extended service coverage programs are offered for 3 years or 5000 hours.
During this coverage period, it is critical to control maintenance and repair costs.
Calculation Instructions
To calculate Warranty Participation Rate, the Dealership LIMS must be able to
provide a report that lists the sample volumes by Cat machine model. The report
must also be able to calculate sample volumes for a specified date range. For
this calculation, the date range is set at the previous twelve-month period. In
S·O·S Services Manager, this information is in the Cat Prime Product report.
33
To calculate the Warranty Participation Rate, determine the top five machine
models, by sample volume, that are under an extended service coverage
program at your Dealership. Calculate the potential number of samples for these
machines. The potential samples are based on: daily usage, number of
compartments, and compartment sampling frequency. The amount of potential
samples is the denominator of the equation. The numerator for the equation is
the actual sample volume produced by these top five extended coverage
machine models by sample volume in a year.
Standard Requirement
The minimum Warranty Participation Rate for Standardization is 60%.
Example Calculation
According to your LIMS, the top five extended coverage machine models by
sample volume are shown in the chart below.
The chart below shows these calculations for one of the machines.
34
model D6R
serial number AAX12345
average daily usage 4 hrs
hours in previous 12 months 1460
potential samples per 1000 hours 12
potential samples 13
The average usage for this particular D6R is 4 hours per day, based on a 365-
day year. At 4 hours per day, this machine operated for 1460 hours during the
previous 12 months. This machine has the potential to produce 12 oil samples
every 1000 hours. Therefore, the potential annual number of samples for this
machine is 13.
These calculations must be done for all 95 machines in this analysis. The
potential samples are then summed by model to produce the following chart.
Most CSA programs are offered for 1 year or 2000 hours. During this coverage
period, it is critical to control maintenance and repair costs. It would be very
beneficial if all CSA machines were in the Dealership’s S·O·S Services program.
This measure of CSA participation was therefore developed to emphasize the
importance of sampling during CSAs.
35
Calculation Instructions
To calculate CSA Participation Rate, the Dealership LIMS must be able to
provide a report that lists the sample volumes by Cat machine model. The report
must also be able to calculate sample volumes for a specified date range. For
this calculation, the date range is set at the previous twelve-month period. In
S·O·S Services Manager, this information is in the Cat Prime Product report.
To calculate the CSA Participation Rate, determine the top five machine models,
by sample volume, that are under CSA programs, at your Dealership. Calculate
the potential number of samples for these machines. The potential samples are
based on: daily usage, number of compartments, and compartment sampling
frequency. The amount of potential samples is the denominator of the equation.
The numerator for the equation is the actual sample volume produced by these
top five CSA machine models in a year.
Standard Requirement
The minimum CSA Participation Rate for Standardization is 60%. The EAME
target for their CSA Participation Rate is 90% on Core machines.
Example Calculation
According to your LIMS, the top five CSA machine models by sample volume are
shown in the chart below.
36
The chart below shows these calculations for one of the machines.
model D6R
serial number AAX12345
average daily usage 4 hrs
hours in previous 12 months 1460
potential samples per 1000 hours 12
potential samples 13
The average usage for this particular D6R is 4 hours per day, based on a 365-
day year. At 4 hours per day, this machine operated for 1460 hours during the
previous 12 months. This machine has the potential to produce 12 oil samples
every 1000 hours. Therefore, the potential annual number of samples for this
machine is 13.
These calculations must be done for all 95 machines in this analysis. The
potential samples are then summed by model to produce the following chart.
37
initiated by the Dealer’s S·O·S sample report is a fundamental building block of
Condition Monitoring. Following up with a customer in response to a Red Alert
fluid sample helps to build customer loyalty, and will increase the customer’s
satisfaction with the Dealership. Tracking revenue and ‘saves’ from the red alert
closure process may also help the Dealer, and their customers, build a value
story for S·O·S Services.
Calculation Instructions
The formula for calculating Red Alert Closure Rate is shown below:
The numerator for this equation is the number of Work Orders that have been
generated by S·O·S Red Alerts monitored monthly. This number will not usually
be found in the LIMS. The Dealership’s Reliability Engineer, Condition
Monitoring Specialist, or Service Manager may be responsible for providing this
number.
The denominator is the total number of Red Alert samples, produced by the
Dealership, in the same period. This number should be available from the LIMS.
Standard Requirement
The minimum Red Alert Closure Rate for Standardization is 15%. In addition to
meeting this minimum metric, the Dealership will be required to provide a
detailed description of the red alert follow-up process employed to successfully
achieve this metric.
38