Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor’s Name
Date
2
As stated earlier, chest pains have been a great global problem, especially in America.
However, the main challenge that people patients face is the length of stay in the emergency
department because of the lack of better methods to aid in helping or diagnosing patients
suffering from the same. Due to this inefficiency, a chest pain pathway tool should be introduced
to help reduce patients' time in the emergency departments, cut costs, and reduce other risks such
as infections.
Apart from describing the importance of chest pathway tools and they should be
implemented, this chapter also summarizes the whole project, determines findings and interprets
them, interpret strengths and limitations, implications, recommendations, plan for dissemination,
and a conclusion.
This section covers the previous four chapters of the project, from the introduction to the
study in chapter one to the analysis of data in chapter four. In the introductory part of the study,
the main challenge which the inefficiency caused by the lack of better tools, which leads to a lot
of wasted time, a length of stay in the emergency department, and a waste of money. A new
method was also introduced, and its benefits were explained. This was followed by illustrating
the background of the project. Organizational needs were also assessed as reasons why quality
improvement was necessary. Still, in chapter one, a SWOT analysis was done to determine the
method's viability.
In the second chapter, a lot was also discussed, which included a lot of scientific
practice question, Validation of the HEART Pathway Tool, theoretical framework, the change
model, Integration of the Christian Worldview, and chapter summary. The third chapter was all
about project design and methodology. Some things discussed included the purpose, project
planning and procedure, potential bias, and mitigation. Regarding business, almost all project
processes encountered prejudices from quantitative methodology, sampling methods, etc. There
are also ethical considerations in this chapter and, lastly, the chapter summary.
Major findings
At the end of this research work, there were many findings that the researcher came up
with about the previous topic. After conducting a test on a sample of 145in the comparative
group and 158 in the implementation group, the results showed a big difference when a health
facility uses its standard methods and the HEART pathway tool. When a t-test was to help
analyze data, it was discovered that the device could help reduce admission time from a
evidenced by a 10.8 mean minute reduction in the admission time (formula) for the number of
recorded referrals between the comparative and implementation groups and was both statistically
Interpretation of Findings
Based on these findings, the translation of Frisoli et al.’s using the Emergency Nurses
Association’s Clinical Practice Guideline: Intimate Partner Violence may impact this
population. Recommendations include sustaining the project at the site and disseminating the
results. The results from the tests achieve statistical significance and conform to a few related
4
articles relating to the same. According to the tests, it was noted that the HEART Pathway
protocol could classify more than 20% of patients with acute chest pains for early discharge
According to Mahler et al. (2015), when a similar procedure was done with an
almost identical sample size. The results we practically the same. It was discovered in both these
tests that the HEART Pathway tool can help reduce patients' stay in the emergency departments
by 20% in terms of days, therefore, enabling them for early discharge, which comes with many
benefits. Based on this journal and the test this study contacted, it is evident that it is an
important tool because of its efficiency. In both trials, it was discovered that patients did not have
study apply in any setting, but QI (Quality Improvement) findings may only apply to a particular
environment or population. The findings interpretation bias is the maturation bias which occurs
when the pre-intervention and intervention groups are significantly different (Handley et al.,
2018). The bias might result in the LOS being different because of sample variance rather than
the HEART pathway tool. The difference in the samples may result due to age gaps and different
confounding factors, which may occur at different levels in the intervention and control groups.
Some of the confounding factors that may impact the two groups include the occurrence of other
conditions which might result in longer hospital stays. The bias will be mitigated by ensuring
that the patients in the pre-intervention and intervention groups have similar characteristics.
5
There are a lot of strengths and limitations to this study, as elaborated above in previous
chapters. The health facility has a ratio of one-to-five staffing, meaning the patients have enough
doctors and nurses to attend to them. This helps in making sure patients' needs are adhered to
precisely and are attended to efficiently. On the doctors' side, this is a good ratio to make sure
there is no burnout among staff. With enough health work, there is a mixture of skills and
experience.
The introduction of evidence-based practice culture was already established. This made it
easy for them to accept QI changes and the HEART pathway tool. Another important strength is
that the management was positive about the implementation and supported it fully. Like any
company, they needed an improvement that would yield more. The introduction of the HEART
pathway tool was a nice idea since it was to reduce patient length of stay and costs. Full
management support accelerated the pace at which the project was handled to make it completed
Implications
After a research study is done and there are findings, it is always important to discuss
how the findings will impact the world. Research may be helpful to policymakers, other future
researchers, or even the layperson. Research may be important to the researcher and his or her
colleagues or, for this instance, fellow students, but it can also be important to other generations
to come if well preserved. This section will cover both theoretical implications as well as nursing
practice implications.
6
Theoretical implications
Dorothea Orem’s self-care deficit theory and John Kotter’s eight-step change model
provided the scientific underpinnings of the project. Orem’s self-care deficit nursing theory will
be applied to support the need to evaluate ED patients with chest pain to determine whether they
have major adverse cardiac events, resulting in an accurate assessment providing an opportunity
According to this theory which mainly deals with major factors such as nursing, humans,
environment, health, and self-care, it is very important to consider patients and their conditions
before and after treatment. It was, however, of great importance that all these factors were
considered while conducting research and during tests. As stated earlier, many patients suffered
after treatment hence the need for a permanent solution that could help. While considering this
theory, many healthcare facilities should ensure that self-care is also considered, which is very
helpful for patients after treatment. There is no need to rethink a new nursing theory; this one is
sufficient.
Based on this study, four types of nursing implications are studied, i.e., medication-
related implications, all involved nurses and doctors were keen on monitoring patient responses
to the HEART pathway tool. They also ensured that patients were given the best medication
while under treatment. For treatment-related implications, they were also responsible for
ensuring they treated patients correctly, which involved selecting the right procedure.
7
Another important part was the procedure-related nurse implications. In this case, nurses
ensured that all the procedures were performed correctly. This also involved selecting the right
procedure and properly following it (Brown, 2022). Lastly, the nursing patient education-related
implications involved educating patients on their conditions. It also included instructions on how
they should handle themselves out there, the diet, the environment, and how to take medications
correctly.
Recommendations
This study suggests complementarily implementing the HEART protocols with other
guideline adherent tests, and decision aids faster patient disposition potentially. The second
recommendation includes the proposed evidence-based practice change is adopting the HEART
pathway tool.
Future researchers can compare other protocols, such as the Manchester acute coronary
syndromes, with HEART Pathway. Also, Future researchers could focus on the modified Heart
score and high-sensitivity troponins. A need for additional studies in academic and community
There are also other factors that future researchers should factor in before starting their
research work and during research work. Funding is very crucial during any project
implementation. Therefore, they should source enough funding before embarking on the project
so that it runs smoothly along the way. With enough money, the project can be implemented
swiftly without pause. It is also important to ensure enough time allocation for the project. Some
Other factors to consider include the environment and government policies. It is always
good to ensure that everything is okay and that the projects can run smoothly without issues with
the authority. There is, however, a need to conduct future research because the current one was
not done as perfectly as required because of a lack of funds and enough time. Lastly, for future
research, samples should be picked randomly from different cities to make sure many races are
represented. This way, clearer and most effective results will be obtained. These results,
combined with efficient HEART Pathway tools that would have been produced in the future, will
Several sustainability recommendations must be followed or adhered to. In this case, the
most important tool to walk with is a sustainability plan, like a guide. It is a roadmap that guides
organizations to achieve their long-term goals. The content of this plan includes the strategies,
activities, and partners involved in the project. A plan is very important since it directs the
organization on what to do considering all the steps listed, what to put in place regarding
A sustainability plan can be modified to suit the company's needs or the nature of the
project. The plan can work at the unit, organization, state, and national levels because of the
authority involved and the support needed. It also depends on the company size.
The study project was carried out at Stony Brook Southampton Hospital in America
because it was the closest hospital for the researcher. With this in mind, many local people
within the area will have the advantage of viewing the test results in person and getting a copy of
the study. Since this process needs a bigger audience, a video version of the test process shall be
9
produced and sold online, from sampling to results analysis. Lastly, people who need help
This study will tremendously help society and the nursing community in several ways.
Other hospitals and nurses specializing in this field can always use these materials to enrich
References
Brown, M. (2022). What is a Nursing Implication: Meaning & Examples. Nursing Troop.
https://nursingtroop.com/what-is-a-nursing-implication-meaning-examples/
Handley, M. A., Lyles, C. R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and
publhealth-040617-014128
Mahler, S. A., Riley, R. F., Hiestand, B. C., Russell, G. B., Hoekstra, J. W., Lefebvre, C. W.,
Nicks, B. A., Cline, D. M., Askew, K. L., Elliott, S. B., Herrington, D. M., Burke, G. L., &