Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ch07 BBVMDS
ch07 BBVMDS
Similarly, other things remaining the same, social surplus (shown by the triangles A and B) is higher in a
market with a steeper supply curve.
4. How will the social surplus change if the quantity sold is restricted below the equilibrium quantity?
Answer: If the quantity sold is restricted below the equilibrium quantity, the social surplus will become
smaller due to the presence of deadweight loss.
5. Can the government do a good job of the invisible hand? Explain your answer with the case of Korea
discussed in the chapter.
Answer: North Korea is a command economy, where a centralized authority determines the goods and
services produced, whereas South Korea is a market economy based upon price signals and strong
economic incentives. Exhibit 7.16 in the chapter shows that the growth rates of the real per capita GDP in
North Korea and South Korea from 1950 to 2008 are 33% [($1,133 – $850)/$850 100] and 2059%
[($18,356 – $850)/$850 100], respectively. This dramatic difference indicates the inability of the
government to do the job of the invisible hand.
6. What could explain why South Korea’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita increased so much
faster since the 1970s than North Korea’s GDP per capita?
Answer: One of the factors that could explain the divergence between South Korea’s and North Korea’s
per capita GDP is the fact that South Korea is a market economy while North Korea is a command
economy. The price mechanism allocates resources in market economies to their most efficient use. It
also aligns the incentives of sellers and buyers. Central planners in command economies, however, face
coordination and incentive problems. The central planner does not fully understand consumer wants and
the production capabilities of every sector of the economy, and it is difficult to provide workers with
appropriate incentives.
7. There are always debates on minimum wages between policymakers and economists. While
policymakers may support the raise of minimum wage, economists usually object to it. What are the
rationales behind them?
Answer: The policymakers support a higher minimum wage because they aim to increase equity by
redistributing incomes from high-income groups to low-income groups. However, the economists usually
object to it because they aim to increase efficiency by allowing the labor market to operate under the
invisible hand.
8. Suppose the need for babysitters increases in all countries. How does it cause different consequences
in the market economies and the planned economies?
Answer: In market economies, the increase in the demand for babysitters raises the price and the quantity
of babysitters. However, in planned economies, the government may not be willing or able to meet the
need as rewards are based on meeting quantity targets, not prices. If that is the case, there will be a
shortage of babysitters. On the other hand, if the government is willing to meet the need, it can assign
more people to be babysitters, which would increase their supply. Therefore, the price of babysitters does
not change, while the quantity increases.
9. Sofia, a political science student, thinks that the government should intervene to revive declining
industries like video rentals and print newspapers. The government, she reasons, can resolve the
coordination problem of getting the agents in these markets to trade. Do you agree with her? Explain
your answer.
Answer: Sofia’s reasoning is flawed because declining industries do not face a coordination problem. A
coordination problem results when economic agents with coinciding interests cannot be brought together
to trade. However, in this case, falling demand is responsible for the decline of industries like video
rentals and print newspapers. Even if the government attempted to bring together economic agents in
these industries, it is unlikely that demand for rented videos and newspapers will increase.
10. Is the introduction of unemployment insurance a policy to increase efficiency or equity? Explain.
Answer: Unemployment insurance can increase equity because it redistributes incomes from working
people to unemployed people as the premium is paid by the employed population.
11. Are there real-world markets that resemble double oral auctions? Suppose you had to organize a
double oral auction for a good that has perfectly elastic demand. Do you expect prices to approach the
competitive equilibrium?
Answer: Double oral auctions are similar to how trading actually works on stock exchanges—traders
announce bids and asks and if they match, a trade is executed.
Double oral auction experiments with many different market variants - including varying the elasticity of
supply and demand and the numbers of buyers and sellers - have shown that the equilibrium price in the
market will be very close to where the supply and demand curves intersect. So, the price in a double oral
auction for a good with perfectly elastic demand is also expected to approach the equilibrium price.
12. Imagine you are a buyer in a double oral auction with a reservation value of $10 and there is a seller
asking $8.
a. How much will you gain from accepting this offer?
b. If you are the only buyer, and you know that the lowest ask price is $2, should you accept this
offer?
Answers:
a. By accepting this offer, you will gain $2 ($10 – $8).
b. Yes. By accepting this offer, you will gain $8 ($10 – $2). If you choose to accept an offer from a
different seller, your surplus will be lower. By accepting the lowest ask price of $2, you will
maximize your surplus from this trade.
Problems
1. The following diagram shows the market demand and market supply for sweaters. Calculate
consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social surplus in this market.
Answer: Producer surplus is the area of triangle I and is equal to ½ x 100 x (60 – 20) = 2000. Consumer
surplus is the area of triangle II and is equal to ½ x 100 x (90 - 60) = 1500. Social surplus is the sum of
consumer surplus and producer surplus and is equal to 1500 + 2000 = 3500.
2. Suppose the market for live lobsters is perfectly competitive. After the lobsters are caught, the
fishermen have to sell them as soon as they can before the lobsters die. Assume that no one buys dead
lobsters from the fishermen, and therefore, the price of dead lobsters is zero. Explain the price
elasticity of supply of live lobsters at the daily market.
Suppose that no consumers are willing to pay $50 or higher for each kilogram of live lobsters, and
2,800 kilograms of live lobsters are traded at the price of $20 per kilogram every day. Calculate the
consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social surplus.
Answers:
At the daily market, the fishermen are willing to sell all the live lobsters at any prices because it is
assumed that no one buys dead lobsters. Therefore, the price elasticity of supply of live lobsters is
perfectly inelastic.
3. There are four consumers willing to pay the following amounts for an electric car:
Consumer 1: $70,000 Consumer 2: $20,000 Consumer 3: $80,000 Consumer 4: $40,000
There are four firms that can produce electric cars. Each can produce one car at the following costs:
Firm A: $30,000 Firm B: $60,000 Firm C: $40,000 Firm D: $20,000
Each firm can produce at most one car. Suppose we wanted to maximize the difference between
consumers’ willingness to pay for electric cars and the cost of producing those cars; that is, we wanted
to maximize social surplus.
a. How many electric cars should we produce?
b. Which firms should produce those cars?
c. Which consumers should purchase those cars?
d. Find the maximum social surplus in the electric car market.
Answers:
a. We should produce three cars. The value of the fourth car would be just $20,000 and would cost
$60,000 to produce.
Consumer Firms
s
(I) (II)
$80,000 3 $20,00 D
0
$70,000 1 $30,00 A
0
$40,000 4 $40,00 C
0
$20,000 2 $60,00 B
0
a. When the price is $40,000, three consumers (all except 2) are willing to buy an electric car
because their willingness to pay is greater than or equal to price. Three firms (all except B) are
willing to sell an electric car since their cost is less than or equal to the price. Therefore supply
equals demand when the price is $40,000.
b. Firms A,C, and D
c. Consumers 1,3 and 4
d. Consumers 1, 3, and 4 are willing to pay a total of $80,000 + $70,000 + $40,000 = $190,000 for
three cars. At a price of $40,000 they will pay 3 x $40,000 = $120,000 for those cars. Therefore
consumer surplus equals $190,000 - $120,000 = $70,000. It will cost Firms D, A, and C a total of
$20,000 + $30,000 + $40,000 = $90,000 to produce those cars. At a price of $40,000 their
revenues equal 3 x $40,000 = $120,000 Therefore producer surplus equals $120,000 - $90,000 =
$30,000. Social surplus is the sum of consumer and producer surplus. Therefore, social surplus
equals $70,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
e. The point here is that competitive markets lead to efficiency. The market outcome here leads to
the maximum social surplus we found in problem 3.
5. Sara and Jim are going to lunch together and rank the restaurant options in the following way. Which
restaurants are Pareto efficient?
Sara’s Jim’s
Preferences Preferences
Answer: Naf Naf, Potbelly, and Blaze are Pareto efficient. Chipotle is not Pareto efficient since both Sara
and Jim are better off going to Potbelly. Naf Naf is Pareto efficient since Sara is worse off anywhere else.
Panera is not Pareto efficient since both Sara and Jim are better off at at Naf Naf. Potbelly is Pareto
efficient since Chipotle and Blaze are worse for Sara, yet Naf Naf and Panera are worse for Jim. Finally,
Blaze is Pareto efficient since Jim is worse off anywhere else.
6. The market for electric drills in a certain country is characterized by a large number of buyers and
sellers and every buyer who wants a drill and can afford one has bought one. In other words, the
market for drills is in equilibrium.
a. Does this also mean that it is Pareto efficient? Explain your answer.
b. If some of the buyers in this market are now willing to pay more than they did earlier, would your
answer change?
Answers:
a. An outcome is Pareto efficient if no individual can be made better off without making someone
else worse off. A competitive market maximizes social surplus which means there are no further
gains from trade. A gain from trade would imply that two people (a buyer and a seller) are made
better off (while all others are not affected). This means that if there were a gain from trade, the
market would not be Pareto efficient. However, since there are no such gains from trade, the
market is Pareto efficient.
b. Initially the market may not be efficient if the price has not had time to adjust upward. However,
once a new equilibrium price is achieved, the market will be Pareto efficient as before.
7. Compared to the market for cars, the market for vintage buttons has fewer buyers and sellers. Social
surplus is likely to be higher in the market for cars than in the vintage button market. Is it then correct
to assume that the outcome in the car market is Pareto efficient while in the vintage button market it
is not? Explain.
Answer: No. The outcome in both markets are Pareto efficient. Pareto efficiency is not a concept meant to
judge whether one market is better than another market. Instead, it is intended to judge whether an
outcome is acceptable, relative what else could have happened within a particular market.
8.
9. Masumi is a Japanese company producing 10,000 pairs of chopsticks every month in Madagascar at
the average total cost of $0.8. The manager of the company has found that while the average total cost
of producing 3,000 pairs of chopsticks in Japan is $1.2, the average total cost of producing 7,000
pairs of chopsticks in Madagascar is $0.5. Should Masumi shift the production line of 3,000 pairs of
chopsticks to Japan? Explain.
Answer:
If Masumi produces 10,000 pairs of chopsticks in Madagascar, the total cost will be 10,000 $0.8 =
$8,000. However, if Masumi moves the production line of 3,000 pairs of chopsticks to Japan and
produces 7,000 pairs in Madagascar, the total cost will be 3,000 $1.2 + 7,000 $0.5 = $7,100, which is
smaller than $8,000. Therefore, Masumi should shift the production of 3,000 pairs of chopsticks to Japan.
10. Suppose a market for cheap sunglasses is in a long-run competitive equilibrium and that the price is
$10. Every producer of sunglasses sells 5,000. A cloudy summer decreases the demand for
sunglasses, which causes the market price to change. As a consequence, in the short run, will each
firm sell more sunglasses, fewer sunglasses, or the same number of sunglasses? Also, describe what
will happen in the long run?
Answers: Market demand shifts in, which causes the market price to drop. In the short run, each
individual firm will produce fewer than 5,000 sunglasses (they will slide down and to the left along the
marginal cost curve). In the long run, some firms will exit, which will shift the supply curve to the left,
until the price rises back to $10. Each firm will return to producing 5,000 sunglasses.
11. The equilibrium rent in a town is $500 per month and the equilibrium number of apartments is 100.
The city now passes a rent control law that sets the maximum rent at $400. The diagram below
summarizes the supply and demand for apartments in this city.
Producer Surplus
Social Surplus
b. Use your answers to part (a) of this problem to answer the following questions:
i. Did consumer surplus definitely rise, definitely remain constant, definitely fall, or is the
direction of the change in consumer surplus unclear?
ii. Did producer surplus definitely rise, definitely remain constant, definitely fall, or is the
direction of the change in producer surplus unclear?
iii. Did social surplus definitely rise, definitely remain constant, definitely fall, or is the
direction of the change in social surplus unclear?
Answer:
a. The completed table is as follows:
Before Rent After Rent Control Change
Control
Consumer Surplus I + II I + III III – II
but the equilibrium price in the market will increase. However, since the government does not
allow cab fares to increase, the number of cabs demanded exceeds the supply. This explains why
commuters are unable to find a cab when they need one.
As can be seen in the figure, the increase in demand and decrease in supply have actually
increased the equilibrium price from P to P’. The equilibrium quantity should also have increased
from Q to Q’. The distance between Q0 and Q1 shows the extent by which demand exceeds supply
as a result of the price control.
b. To fill out the table, you can pick numbers off the graph, or ask yourself: Given those
willingness-to-pay values, how many people (between Ashley, Bill, and Carrie) would want to
buy? Finally, when the price is exactly equal to a person’s willingness to pay, by definition this
person is indifferent between buying and not buying. Thus, there is more than one right answer to
the question “what is quantity demanded?”
Price Quantity (Q)
(P)
$0 3
$1 2 to 3
$2 2
$3 2
$4 2
$5 1 to 2
$6 1
$7 0 to 1
$8 0
c. Consumer surplus can either be viewed as an area or as the sum of some numbers. In this case it
is the surplus that Ashley enjoys ($7 - $2 = $5) and the surplus that Bill enjoys ($5 - $2 = $3), or
$8 total.
d. This shifts the entire demand one unit to the right: