Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ibrahim 1
Greiby , Muhammad 2
Siddiq , Ibrahim Omer 3
1Department of Biosystems & Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, , 2Department of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
3Department of Process and Food Engineering University Putra Malaysia , Kuala lumpor , Malaysia
Viscosity(Pa.s)
from a local market. The fruit was peeled and diced for 10 45C 0.040 35 °B
purees from fruits and vegetables pulps. The use of agitated thin film evaporator 60C 0.035
pulverization in a small juice extractor. The juice was then filtered, 8 0.030 45 °B
(ATFE) allows for the concentration to be undertaken at low temperature and collected in a tank and its concentration (°Brix), density and 6 0.025
short residence time, thereby resulting in reduced color and nutrient loss. For an 4 0.020
viscosity were measured. 0.015
ATFE process parameters that influence concentration include: steam 2 0.010
0 0.005
temperature, product feed rate, vacuum pressure, rotor speed, product physical 0.000
and thermal properties, and overall heat transfer coefficients. The objectives were shear rate(s-1)
25 35 45
Temperature(oC)
60
to study heat transfer coefficient (Ui) of pineapple juice/conentrate in ATFE under Fig 3: Viscosity of Pineapple juice at different
Fig 1: Rheogram of Pineapple juice at increasing Fig 2: Rheogram of Pineapple juice with increasing
different rotational speeds and liquid flow rates. Experiments were conducted with temperatures with constant concentration (35°Brix) concentration (°Brix) at constant temperature (45°C) temperatures and concentrations.
fresh pineapple juice (11.3°Brix), and three different feed concentration of Table 2: Evaporator (ATFE) performance with fresh pineapple juice as
Table 1: Overall heat transfer coefficient and performance of ATFE with
pineapple juices (14.4, 19.9, and 27.3 °Brix). Pineapple juice was concentrated fresh pineapple juice (11.3 °Brix ) at 25 ±2°C. feed (11.3 °Brix) at feed temperature of 25 ±2°C
in ATFE to different °Brix levels at rotational speeds of 200, 400, and 600rpm, Capacity Consumption
Solid% Out Steam Steam Economy
flow rates of 25, 35, and 45 liter/hour. Ui ranged from 390 to 2700 W/m2 °C and F. rate, Speed
(±0.07-±0.36) Economy Ui (w\m2.°C) STDV
Flow rate Speed Solid% Out (kg/h) (kg/h)
(kg steam/kg
(l/h) (rpm) (l/h) (rpm) (±0.07±0.36) (±0.13±0.29) (±0.12-±0.26)
increased with increase in the feed rate and rotational speed. For fresh juice (kg/kg) vapor)
(11.3°Brix) Ui was significantly higher than concentrated juice (27.1°Brix) at 45 25 200 13.04 0.558 617.5 ±14.50 25 200 13.04 2.77 4.96 0.558
litter/hour and 600 rpm . For Hunter color values there were small decrease in 25 400 13.50 0.628 706.52 ±27.05 25 400 13.50 3.56 5.68 0.628
lightness and significantly increase in redness and almost no changes in 25 600 14.95 0.751 948.46 ±22.08 25 600 14.95 5.73 7.62 0.751
yellowness at highest concentration. Total color difference increased from 1.5 to 35 200 13.86 0.669 1080.56 ±17.96 35 200 13.86 5.81 8.68 0.669
9.5 for 16.8 and 40.3°Brix, respectively. Chroma, which represents the color 35 400 15.67 0.787 1473.81 ±28.13 35 400 15.67 9.32 11.84 0.787
intensity didn’t significantly change. The hue angle for concentrated juices was 35 600 15.77 0.791 1493.57 ±27.76 35 600 15.77 9.50 12.00 0.791
shifted from 89.7 to 69.11 for 11.3 and 40.3°Brix, respectively. Vitamin C contents 45 200 14.84 0.745 1278.1 ±40.29 45 200 14.84 10.05 13.49 0.745
45 400 15.98 0.799 1570.1 ±34.78 45 400 15.98 12.66 15.83 0.799
were changed by 10.1%, and 23.13% for the 16.8, and 40.3 °Brix, respectively. The Research Approach Diagram
45 600 16.49 0.817 2089.25 ±32.64 45 600 16.49 13.72 16.79 0.817
This study demonstrated that the concentration process involves very complex
2. Agitated Thin Layer Evaporator (ATFE)
heat-mass transfer requiring process optimization in order to reduce quality 1.Nusselt number based on the arithmetic mean temperature of the fluid: 2. Nusselt number based on the evaporation temperature of the fluid
losses, which has economic significance. Eqn. 1: Nue = 3.118 ×10-7(Ree) 1.429(Pr) 2.353(Fr ) 0.186 (µf/µb)-0.154 , R2 = 0.889 Eqn. 2: Nue = 1.32×10-4(Ree) 1.097(Pr) 1.129(Fre) 0.152 (µf/µo)-0.407 , R2 = 0. 874
e
40 8 35
6
35 6
Objectives
30 4
30 4
Pridected Nu
25 2
RESIDUAL
Predicted Nu
Residual
25 2
20 0
-2
15
concentration of pineapple juice and monitor the quality degradation of the juice 15 -2
-4
during concentration 10 -4 10
-6
5 -6 5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
29.9
15 Fresh 11.3 29.92(0.31)
b
b
bc
b
bc
b
bc
b bc 10 16.8 26.91(0.70)
1. Overall mass balance: 19.9
ac 5 19.9 25.51(0.34)
9.9 ac
mf = mv+mp a a ac ac a a
a
-0.1 0 27.4 23.10(0.36)
11.3 16.8 19.9 27.4 40.3
xf . mf = xp . mp Feed and Condensate flow rate design of the Heat Transfer Layers Concentration (Brix)
11.3 16.8 19.9
Concventration (Brix)
27.4 40.3
40.3 23.00(0.35)
2.Enthalpy balance: Fig 6: Hunter lab values for fresh, diluted, and contracted Fig 7: Total Color difference and Chroma for Pineapple juices
pineapple juices after concentration by ATFE.
mf hf(Tf,xf) +ms Hs(Ts)=mvHv(Tb)+mphp(b,xp)+mshs(Ts )
Conclusions
3. Inside heat transfer coefficient(hi) 1. Ui in ATFE increased as flow rate and rotor speed increases
C p D Ds v DN
1.0 0.62 0.55 2. The Dimensionless correlations established based on the operating conditions can be used to predict the overall heat
hD Ds
nB
0.53
D transfer coefficients (Ui ) during evaporation in ATFE.
k k v 3. ATFE performed better at high flow rate and high rotor speed as well as high feed temperature.
0.014 0.96 4. Pineapple juice behaved as a Newtonian fluid at below 35 °Brix concentration
4. Overall heat transfer coefficient (Ui) Design of normal cycle of feed Design of feed recirculation 5. Pineapple juice behaved as a Power Law fluid above 35 °Brix concentration
q UAi Tlm ms H s hs mS S
6. The proposed model can be used to describe the viscosity of pineapple juice at any concentration (low or high) and
4. Performance & the variable parameters: temperature within the conditions studied.
.Capacity (kg vaporized / time) (mv) Steam Pressure =2bar(constant)
Ui
ms H s hs .Economy (kg vaporized / kg steam input)
.Steam Consumption (kg / hr)
Rotor Speed
Flow Rate
=200,400,600 rpm
= 25 kg/h, 35 kg/h, 45 kg/h
References
Ai Tlm
Stream economy =mv /ms Pawar SB, Mujumdar AS,Thorat BN. 2011. Flow pattern and heat transfer in agitated thin film dryer. Chem Eng Process 50(7): 687-693.
Consumption = Capacity/Economy Juice Conc,= 11.3,14.4,19.9 and 27.4 °Brix
Nakamura. K.. Watanabe. T. 1980. Fundamental Investigation of Flow in an Agitated Thin Film Evaporator (3rd Report, Theoretical Analysis). Bulletin of the JSME. 23, 1483.