Professional Documents
Culture Documents
China's "Quiet Diplomacy": The International Department of The Chinese Communist Party
China's "Quiet Diplomacy": The International Department of The Chinese Communist Party
ource: Shambaugh, David, “China’s ‘Quiet Diplomacy’: The International Department of the
Communist Party”, China: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2007),
pp. 26–54. NUS Press Singapore, reproduced by permission of the East Asian Institute,
National University of Singapore, NUS Press.
David Shambaugh
1 The author is grateful to anonymous readers of earlier drafts of this article for posing a vari-
ety of questions about the ID, and has attempted to respond to those for which data is avail-
able. However, given the relative dearth of information available about the ID, many good
questions are simply not answerable. Scholars wishing to learn about the ID are forced to
work with a handful of published materials and an inability to systematically interview per-
sonnel in the ID.
© koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi ��.��63/9789004302488_013 David Shambaugh - 9789004302488
Downloaded from Brill.com10/25/2021 06:28:26PM
via University of British Columbia
China ’ s “ Quiet Diplomacy ” 337
2 Scholars of Chinese foreign policy have similarly been neglectful of the ID’s roles and activi-
ties. A. Doak Barnett’s and Lu Ning’s studies include only very brief descriptions of the CCP/
ID. David M. Lampton’s (ed.) similarly contains only one limited discussion of the ID (in Lu
Ning’s chapter—which is lifted verbatim from his book), and Yufan Hao and Lin Su’s (edited)
volume contains no references to the ID. See A. Doak Barnett, The Making of Foreign Policy
in China: Structure and Process (Boulder: Westview Press, 1985); Lu Ning, The Dynamics of
Foreign Policy Decision Making in China (Boulder: Westview Press, 2000); David M. Lampton
(ed.), The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform (Stanford:
Stanford University Press, 2001); Yufan Hao and Lin Su (eds.), China’s Foreign Policy Making
(Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2005).
3 “IDCPC Minister on CPC International Work in 2005”, Renmin ribao internet edition, in FBIS,
28 Dec. 2005.
4 While the Foreign Ministry is involved in making foreign policy in China, it is also well under-
stood that many foreign policy issues are debated and decisions made among Chinese lead-
ers through the Foreign Affairs Leading Group (FALG), leaving the Foreign Ministry (and
other organs) to implement them. The ID has always had a seat on the FALG, although Lu
Ning claims that it lost this seat in 1998 (in Lampton, op cit., p. 53). Bureaucratically, as a
Central Committee Department, the ID reports directly to the Central Committee’s Foreign
Affairs Office (Zhongyang waiban) and General Office (Zhongyan bangongting).
5 Nor is there a scholarly study available on global party-to-party relations.
“under the radar” as its activities have gone essentially unnoticed by foreign
media, scholars, governments and intelligence agencies.
However, the ID has not always maintained such a relatively low profile.
As discussed below, it was a prominent foreign policy actor during the 1950s
and 1960s, playing a particularly important role prior to and during the period
of the Sino-Soviet Alliance (1950–60) and Split (1960–2), as well as in China’s
Third World revolutionary diplomacy during the 1960s. In those days, some
observers noted that “The International Liaison Department (ILD) had an
almost unlimited charter in external affairs, wielding far greater influence than
its government counterpart, the Foreign Ministry. . . . The ILD operated both
behind and above the government.”6 This was certainly true in intra-bloc rela-
tions, but also throughout the developing world and Europe. After the Cultural
Revolution, as China moved into the reform era, the ID lowered its profile
and altered its activities while the Foreign Ministry simultaneously expanded
the PRC’s governmental ties around the world. As the ID has concentrated its
efforts on political parties and non-governmental organisations, its work has
been complimentary to that of the Foreign Ministry and other ministries that
deal with their government counterparts abroad. Today the ID plays a number
of important roles in China’s relations with foreign countries all around the
world, as well as being a key conduit to different organisations and reforms
inside China.
6 John Byron and Robert Pack, The Claws of the Dragon (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992),
p. 324.
7 The others are the Organisation Department, Propaganda Department, United Front
Department and the Central Discipline Inspection Commission.
8 The name conversion occurred around the same time that the CCP Propaganda Department
changed its English name to Publicity Department (although also maintaining the original in
Chinese). The abbreviations ILD and ID are used interchangeably throughout this article.
While exchanges with political parties abroad can be sub-divided into a num-
ber of different types (see below), the above list of ID responsibilities and
activities is the broad range of current ID work. Chinese documents, however,
do not define them as such. A survey of a variety of CCP books and documents
published over the past decade invariably list an identical (verbatim) set of
seven functions for the ID:
Such generic descriptions do not reveal much about the actual work of the ID,
but it is nonetheless useful to see how the ID’s work is defined in inner-Party
discourse.
The ID receives about 200 delegations from abroad and dispatches approxi-
mately 100 delegations overseas every year.10 In recent years the ID has been
directly involved—more so than in the past—in sensitive diplomatic issues.
According to Director Wang Jiarui, “[In 2005] we actively mediated the nuclear
issue on the Korean Peninsula through inter-party channels; kept communica-
tion between parties in difficult times of China-Japan relations; promoted talks
at a sensitive time when the Palestine-Israel situation is variable; discussed
9 Translated by the author from Wang Fuchun, Waishi guanli xue gaikuang (Survey of Foreign
Affairs Work) (Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2003). Virtually identical wording can
be found in the following CCP descriptions of the ID: Zhongguo gongchandang da zidian
(Encyclopedia of the Chinese Communist Party) (Beijing: Zhongguo guoji guangbo chuban-
she, 1991); Zhongguo gongchandang dangwu gongzuo da Zidian (Encyclopedia of CCP Party
Work) (Beijing: Xinhua chubanshe, 1993); Zhongguo gongchandang zuzhi gongzuo quanshu
(Encyclopedia of CCP Organisational Work) (Beijing: Baishan chubanshe, 1996); Zhongguo
gongchandang dangyuan xuexi xiuyang da zidian (Encyclopedia for Study and Training by
CCP Members) (Jinan: Shandong renmin chubanshe, 1991).
10 “External Relations of the Communist Party of China” (25 Sept. 2003), printed description
given to the author by the CCP/ID in October 2003. This figure coincides with ID Minister
Wang Jiarui’s claim that in 2005 “over 300 delegations and 2000 members have exchanged
visits through inner-party channels”. Ibid.
The history of the CCP’s (and the ID’s) interactions with foreign communist
parties is long and complex. It has evolved considerably over the years.
Following its establishment in 1921, the CCP engaged in exchanges with the
Soviet Communist Party and Comintern during the First, Second, and Third
Internationals.12 During this time, the Comintern advised the CCP on tac-
tics during the Shanghai underground period and (following the 1927 “White
Terror”) in the Jiangxi Soviet base area.13 From 1922 (when the CCP became a
11 Ibid.
12 The classic study on the Comintern is Julius Braunthal, History of the International, 1914–
1943 (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1967).
13 Much of this section draws upon Wang Fuchun, Waishi guanli xue gaikuang, ibid.; and
Li Jian, Tianqian tongtu: Zhongguo gongchandang duiwai jiaozhu jishi (A Natural Moat
and Thoroughfare: Recollections of the Chinese Communist Party’s Foreign Exchanges)
member of the Comintern) until 1943, the Comintern dispatched a total of ten
representatives to advise the CCP on revolutionary strategy and tactics.14
The advice given by the Comintern advisors, and the training received by
CCP personnel (especially the so-called “28 Bolsheviks”) in the Soviet Union at
the Comintern-run “Toilers of the East University” and Sun Yat-sen University
was often at odds with Mao’s thinking about revolutionary strategy and tac-
tics.15 At first, the Comintern encouraged the CCP into a united front with the
Kuomintang (KMT) in order to penetrate the KMT and organise “a bloc within”.16
The strategy was intended to disrupt some KMT activities and to use the united
front cover in order to expand CCP recruits and organise trade unions among
the urban proletariat. This Comintern advice was a classic urban insurrectional
strategy, as the Soviet Bolsheviks had experienced. This strategy collapsed with
Chiang Kai-shek’s sudden purge and massacre of the suspected communists in
Shanghai in April 1927.
Thereafter, the CCP split, with one faction remaining underground in
Shanghai and another following Mao and Zhu De to the rugged mountains
in Jiangxi Province. In their new base area, in 1931, the CCP assigned Wang
Jiaxiang to direct the Party’s foreign affairs, and in 1934 the CCP established its
first “foreign ministry” with Wang in charge (Wang would subsequently go on
to lead the ID).17 Otto Braun and other Comintern advisors continued to coun-
sel Mao on tactics against the KMT military’s tactics of “annihilation”. Mao and
Zhu ultimately rejected this advice, as they had done earlier in Shanghai, and the
Red Army broke through the KMT cordon and embarked on the Long March.
Nearly two years after fleeing the Jiangxi Soviet the Red Army remnants
reached the mountain base area of Yan’an in northern Shaanxi Province. There,
in 1937, the CCP recouped and reorganised. One of Mao’s first moves was to
(Beijing: Dangdai shijie chubanshe, 2001). Also see Ye Yuehai, Jianguo hou zhongguo
gongchandang zhengdang waijiao lilun yanjiu (Theoretical Research on the Chinese
Communist Party’s Party Diplomacy since the Establishment of the Country) (Beijing:
Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2003).
14 Cai Wu, “A Review and Reflections on the 80 Years of Foreign Contacts of the Communist
Party of China” (1 July 2001) on the International Department of Central Committee of
CPC website at <http://www.idcpc.org.cn/english/ article/20010701.htm> [28 Nov. 2006].
15 For more on the Comintern’s training programs and efforts in Asia see Peter Hopkirk,
Setting the East Ablaze: Lenin’s Dream of an Empire in Asia (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1995).
16 See Tony Saich, The Origins of the First United Front in China (Leiden: Brill, 1991).
17 Michael Hunt, The Genesis of Chinese Communist Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia
University Press, 1996), p. 227.
dispatch Wang Jiaxing to Moscow.18 Wang returned a year later, in August 1938,
and was assigned to direct the daily work of the CCP Military Commission.
From 1939–49, Wang shuttled between a number of Party positions—including
running the Central Committee Research Department (1941–2), managing the
daily needs of Military Commission members (1942–3) and administering
the CCP Propaganda Department (1943–4). In 1946, after becoming a member
of the Central Committee at the Seventh CCP Congress, Wang was sent back
to Moscow for another year. When he returned in May 1947 he worked in the
northeastern liberated cities on propaganda and Party organisational work.
As part of the CCP’s Yan’an reorganisation, the “communications section”
(jiaotongju), which had existed since 1927 to liaise with the Comintern and inter-
act with other foreigners,19 was upgraded to a Central Committee department
and provided a larger staff.20 It was this organ that hosted the “Dixie Mission”
of the US Army, and the CCP-KMT mediation missions of Generals George C.
Marshall and Patrick Hurley. The Communications Office had close ties with
the “Social Department” (Shehui Bu), established in February 1939, which
was the intelligence agency forerunner to the CCP Investigation Department
(1941–83) and contemporary Ministry of State Security (1983–).21 In 1942,
according to one source, the CCP replaced the Communications Department
with an Overseas Work Commission (Haiwai Gongzuo Weiyuanhui, usually
abbreviated simply as the Hai Wei), which added the responsibilities of
“researching the revolutionary potential in Eastern countries and among
overseas Chinese”.22 The Hai Wei also established a training bureau (peixun
ban) to train Asian communists from Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines,
Thailand, Japan and Burma.
In September 1948, after the Xibaipo Conference, the CCP established the
Third Bureau of the United Front Department (Tongzhanbu Disanshi) to take
over responsibility for overseas Chinese and liaison with foreign parties—
thus “merging together the Party’s united front and international work”.23
In March of 1949, after the Red Army had seized Beijing and the CCP occupied
18 Wang’s biography for this period is derived largely from Zhang Heng and Jian Fei (eds.),
Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhi renshi jianming tupu (Brief Atlas of Central Committee
Organisational Personnel) (Beijing: Zhongguo guangbo dianshi chubanshe, 2003), p. 163.
19 Ibid., p. 108.
20 Michael Hunt, The Genesis of Chinese Communist Foreign Policy, op cit., p. 315 (n. 31).
21 Zhang Heng and Jian Fei (eds.), Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhi renshi jianming tupu, op cit.,
p. 109.
22 Wang Fuchun, Waishi guanli xue gaikuang, op cit., p. 212.
23 Ibid.
the Zhongnanhai next to the Forbidden City, the Third Bureau changed its
name to the Second Bureau. In February 1950 the Central Committee directed
that the Second Bureau be converted to the “Eastern Countries Revolutionary
Situation Research Office”, as a step towards expanding CCP assistance to other
revolutionary movements in Asia. But, in August of that year, United Front
Work Department Head Li Weihan recommended that the CCP needed its own
international [liaison] department (Guoji Lianluo Bu). The Central Committee
approved the recommendation on 12 January 1951.
Thus, in March 1951, the CCP/ILD (Zhongyang Lianluo Bu) was formally
established and its work demarcated from that of the United Front Department.
Wang Jiaxiang was recalled as ambassador to Moscow and was appointed the
first director of the ILD.
For the first half of the 1950s, the new ILD concentrated on building rela-
tions with Asian communist parties on the one hand and the East European
and Soviet Communist Parties on the other. Before and after the 1955 meet-
ing of the Afro-Asian People’s Solidarity Organisation meeting in Bandung,
Indonesia, the ILD expanded its links with socialist parties and movements
in Africa and the Middle East. This included inviting numbers of youth, wom-
en’s, and worker’s delegations from these countries to China. At the CCP’s
Eighth Party Congress in September 1956, 290 representatives from commu-
nist and worker’s parties in 56 countries sent delegates at the invitation of
the ILD.24 However, two months later, things would change for the ILD. In
November, Nikita Khrushchev delivered his “secret speech” to the Twentieth
Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU)—thus
beginning the Sino-Soviet fissure and competition for allegiance among com-
munist and other “national liberation” movements worldwide.
Chinese and Soviet Communist Party relations became progressively more
strained in the wake of the secret speech, and the ILD found itself at the nexus
of the frictions. In 1961 the ILD established a temporary office (linshi banzi)
to draft propaganda in the “polemical war” (lunzhan) against Soviet “revision-
ism”, including the renowned “Nine Letters” and “Twenty-Four Articles”.25 The
dénouement came in an explosive confrontation between an ILD delegation
(led by Peng Zhen) and a CPSU delegation (led by Mikhail Suslov) in Bucharest
in 1962. Thereafter, for the next 20 years, countering the CPSU and Soviet Union
became the core mission of the ILD.
Also in 1962, as the famine and economic catastrophe of the Great Leap
Forward gripped China, ILD Director Wang Jiaxiang and Deputy Directors
24 Ibid., p. 213.
25 Ibid.
Wu Xiuquan and Liu Ningyi wrote to Zhou Enlai, Deng Xiaoping and Foreign
Minister Chen Yi, suggesting that the only way out of China’s crippling eco-
nomic difficulties and international isolation was to improve relations with
the US and the Soviet Union, avoid needless warfare with neighbours such as
India (which China had just attacked) and reduce support for revolutionary
insurgent struggles around the world. These heretical policy recommenda-
tions became known as the “three peaces (reconciliations) and one reduction”
(san he yi shao).26
Wang’s advocacy was attacked by Kang Sheng, Politburo czar for intel-
ligence and internal security. Kang had long had misgivings about Wang
Jiaxiang, and they developed a personal animus and institutional rivalry. As
Kang’s own political star was rising and his involvement in the Sino-Soviet
polemics increased, he had designs on the ILD. Wang’s advocacy of relaxing
tensions with the West provided just the opening Kang needed, and he used
it as a pretext to remove Wang from his position—arguing that Wang’s “three
peaces” should be replaced with an uncompromising policy of the “three
non-peaces” (san wu he): no peaceful competition, no peaceful coexistence
and no peaceful transition to socialism. Under attack, Wang lived at home
under a form of house arrest and reportedly spent his time reading.
When the Cultural Revolution broke out in 1966, the ILD was quickly
affected. Kang Sheng, now a member of the infamous “Cultural Revolution
Small Group (CRSG)”, turned his sights on the ILD soon after he and the CRSG
had disposed of Beijing Mayor Peng Zhen.27 First, Kang Sheng dispatched his
deputy in the Central Cultural Revolution Group, Wang Li, nine times to inves-
tigate the ILD, and Wang also wrote the big-character poster (dazibao) attack-
ing Wang Jiaxiang on 9 June 1966, accusing him of pursuing a revisionist and
capitulationist line in foreign affairs by advocating the “three peaces and one
reduction” policy.28 Kang then personally confronted Wang at a “struggle ses-
sion” (douzheng hui) of all ILD staff on 21 June 1966, charging him with turning
the ILD into a “bastion of revisionism”. Wang was purged. A year later his depu-
ties Wu Xiuquan and Liu Ningyi, and a number of other ILD cadres, followed.
29 Wang’s tortuous experiences during the Cultural Revolution are described in detail in Xu
Zehao, Wang Jiaxiang zhuan (Biography of Wang Jiaxiang) (Beijing: Dangdai Zhongguo
chubanshe, 2006), pp. 374–96.
30 Xu Zehao, Wang Jiaxiang nianpu, 1906–1974 (Chronicle of Wang Jiaxiang) (Beijing:
Zhongyang wenzhai chubanshe, 2001), pp. 500–3.
31 Ibid., p. 505.
32 Ibid., p. 507.
33 Dai Bingguo, “Exploiting the Advantages of Party Diplomacy in the Service of the Overall
Interests of the Work of the Entire Party and Whole Country—In Commemoration of the
50th Anniversary of the Establishment of the International Department of the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of China” (Jan. 2001), available on the International
Department of Central Committee of CPC website at <http://www.idcpc.org.cn/english/
article/200101.htm> [28 Nov. 2006].
34 These are described in Xu Zehao, Wang Jiaxiang nianpu, op cit., pp. 496–502.
35 Wang Fuchun, Waishi guanli xue gaikuang, op cit., p. 214.
ties, the Vietnamese Communist Party, Pathet Lao, Khmer Rouge, and insur-
gent communist parties in Burma, Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines. The
ILD, in conjunction with the PLA General Logistics Department, funnelled
small arms and money to these groups, and set up a number of long-range
radio transmitters in Yunnan Province for broadcast into Southeast Asia. In
1965, on the eve of the Cultural Revolution, the ILD had also been instrumen-
tal in sending arms and advice to the Indonesia communists (PKI) prior to
their failed 1965 coup d’etat attempt (and subsequent bloodbath). The col-
lapsed coup stained the ILD’s reputation domestically, and China’s reputation
regionally. The ILD also continued to be deeply engaged in the polemical war
against the “revisionist and social-imperialist” Soviet Union during these years.
To the extent that China maintained a presence on the global stage during
the Cultural Revolution years, as the Foreign Ministry ceased to function, it
was through the subversive activities of the ILD. During these years the ILD
was overseen by Kang Sheng who became de facto Director during 1967–71
following the purge of Liu Ningyi.
In 1971, the ILD experienced a partial recovery with the appointment of a
new director, Geng Biao, although until the Gang of Four was overthrown in
1976 the Department remained traumatised and its activities attenuated. Like
everything else in China, the ILD enjoyed a full reconstitution and revival after
the downfall of the Gang. The ILD was given responsibility for establishing
party relations with African liberation movements in 1977 (in order to com-
pete with the Soviet Union), Yugoslavia in 1978, West European Communist
parties in 1979, the Soviet and East European communist parties in 1985 and
European social democratic parties in 1986.36 The decision to engage the
latter was a significant step for the CCP, as it had previously eschewed ties with
such parties, but was part of the broader normalisation of Chinese diplomacy.
It also helped China in several aspects of domestic reforms (see below). This
opening to the non-socialist world and revitalisation of ties with fraternal par-
ties was overseen by Wu Xueqian and Qiao Shi. Both had spent more than 15
years in the ILD before being appointed as deputy directors in 1978 following
the Third Plenum.37 During the mid-1980s, Wu was appointed Foreign Minister
while Qiao was promoted to the Politburo Standing Committee (following a
one-year stint as ILD Director). For these two individuals, a career in the ILD
served as a springboard to much higher office.
36 Ibid., p. 215.
37 Thomas Kampen, “The CCP’s Central Committee Departments”, op cit.
Except for a brief time in the early 1980s, the directors of the CCP/ID have
enjoyed fairly lengthy tenures. Table 1 lists CCP/ID Directors from 1951. The
first six were political “heavyweights”, while the last five have been of substan-
tially lower profile and lesser rank in the Party hierarchy (at the time of their
service).
Unlike most of his predecessors, current Director Wang Jiarui’s career path
was not within the ID. He worked his way up through the Jilin and Shandong
provincial apparat, as well as serving in the State Council Economic and
Trade Commission in Beijing during the early 1990s. In 2000 Wang’s career
track changed as he was appointed Vice Minister and Deputy Director of the
CCP/ID.39
Wang is currently assisted by five deputy directors: Ma Wenpu, Zhang
Zhijun, Liu Hongcai, Chen Fengxiang and Tan Jialin. All of their career paths
illustrate that work in the ID tends to be a lifelong job, except that spending
some time working in a city Party Committee (gaining first-hand experience at
the local level) seems to be a requirement for promotion from Director General
38 Zhang Heng and Jian Fei, Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhi renshi iianming tupu, op cit., p. 110..
39 Wang’s biography can be found on the International Department of Central Committee
of CPC website at <http://www.idcpc.org.cn/english/profile/wjr.htm> [28 Nov. 2006].
40 Biographies of all these individuals are available on China Vitae website at <www. chinavi-
tae.com/biography> [20 June 2006].
41 Zhang Zhijun, “Speech at the 42nd Munich Conference on Security Policy”, available on
Munich Conference on Security Policy website at <http://www.securityconference.de/
konferenzen/rede.php?menu_2006=&menu_konferenzen=&sprach&=en&id=173&>
[20 June 2006].
42 This is a personal impression, but also one shared by American and European colleagues
who have interacted with the ID.
ambassador to the US, Zhou Wenzhong. Zhang returned to Beijing in 1975 after
two years in London and was immediately assigned to work in the ID. Over
the past 31 years, Zhang has worked his way up through the ranks, spending
21 years in the ID Research Bureau (a euphemism for the intelligence collec-
tion arm of the ID) before being assigned to work in the Party Committee of
Zibo City, Shandong. In September 2001, he was brought back to Beijing and
appointed as ID Vice Minister.43
Liu Hongcai was born in 1955 and is a native of Liaoning Province. He
attended Beijing Second Foreign Language Institute from 1971–5 and studied
Japanese. He joined the CCP in his final year and was assigned to the ID upon
graduation. From 1975–89, he worked his way up through Bureau II (Northeast
Asia and Indochina) and then served as First Secretary (Political) at the Chinese
Embassy in Tokyo. After returning to China in 1992, Liu spent a year serving as a
Vice Warden on a city district court in Jining, Shandong. There is then a seven-
year gap in his resume before he returned to the ID Bureau II, becoming the
Director General in 2000. In 2003 he was appointed as ID Vice Minister.
Chen Fengxiang was born in 1955 and is a native of Inner Mongolia. A grad-
uate of the Russian Department at Beijing University in 1974, he also joined
the Party while at Beida. However, rather than immediately going into the ID
upon graduation, Chen returned to work in Inner Mongolia for three years
before returning to teach in the International Politics Department at Beida
from 1979–84. In 1984, Chen was recruited into the ID where he was assigned to
the Soviet/East European Department (Bureau VI). In 1987–8 he was sent
to Moscow as an exchange student for a year of further language training. He
returned to work in Bureau VI as Deputy Director from 1988–1992 and was then
sent back to Moscow to serve as First Secretary in the Chinese Embassy from
1992–4. There is then a three-year gap in his published curriculum vitae. From
1997–8, Chen was assigned as a county magistrate in a court in rural Shaanxi
Province. He returned to the ID in 2003, serving as Deputy Secretary General
and then Vice Minster in 2004.
Finally, Tan Jialin’s background is the least clear. Born in 1954 in Jilin Province,
Tan joined the Party in 1984. He started to work in the ID in 1975, but it is unclear
in what capacities he served before his appointment as Deputy Director of the
ID General Office in 1994, a position he served in through 2003. The General
Office is the main administrative office in all CCP organs—responsible for all
personnel affairs, arranging meetings, document classification and circulation,
43 Zhang Zhijun biography (mimeo); and from China Vitae website at <http:ww.chinavitae
.com/biography_display.php?id=2142> [20 June 2006].
archiving, etc. In 2003 he became the Deputy Party Secretary of the ID and was
promoted to the rank of Vice Minister in 2004.
Organisationally, the ID is composed of six functional offices, eight geo-
graphic bureaus, one affiliated “front” association and a publishing house (see
Figure 1).44 Altogether, in 2005, the ID had approximately 300 staff working in
China and another 30 abroad.45
The functional offices include:
44 See “Office Lineup” on the International Department of Central Committee of CPC web-
site at <http://www.idcpc.org.cn/english/profile/office.htm>; interview with ID official
[17 July 2004] Washington, DC.
45 Estimate given in interview with ID personnel, Nov. 2005.
The ID also maintains a “front association” for liaison with foreigners: the
Chinese Association for International Understanding (Zhongguo Guoji Jiaoliu
Youhao Xiehui), or CAIFU. CAIFU maintains office, reception, meeting and
hotel space in and adjacent to the Wanshou Hotel in western Beijing. CAIFU
has published the monthly journal Guoji Jiaoliu (International Understanding)
since 1981, which offers an interesting survey of ID activities, party-to-party
relations, conferences held in China on foreign affairs, China’s foreign policy
and international diplomatic events. While the CCP/ID’s new high-rise build-
ing on West Chang’an Boulevard contains modern reception and conference
facilities, the ID continues to use the refurbished Wanshou Hotel facilities for
lodging and receiving many foreign visitors (the Wanshou is owned by the ID).
Many ID staff live in this neighbourhood.
The ID still maintains a large compound at 4 Fuxing Road in western Beijing
(still the Department’s formal address). This is the old headquarters of the ID
and is still used for ID staff housing, research offices and some other ID pur-
poses. Several buildings in this compound have also undergone renovation,
reopening in 2005. This is also where the ID’s publishing house is located—the
Contemporary World Publishers (Dangdai Shijie Chubanshe). The press pub-
lishes a range of studies on foreign political parties,46 the international socialist
movement,47 and a very useful annual compendium on the ID’s exchanges. A
sampling of its publications can be found at: <http://www.worldpress.com.cn/
introduction.index1.asp>.
The ID’s eight geographic bureaus are organised in a somewhat unorthodox
way, but this system dates back several decades:
46 See, for example, Editing Group, Xingshuai zhilu: Waiguo butong leixing zhengdang jian-
she de jiangyan yu jiaoxun (The Road of Rise and Decline: Lessons and Experiences in the
Building of Different Types of Foreign Political Parties) (Beijing: Dangdai shijie chuban-
she, 2002).
47 Ding Hongju, Fengbei yu jingshi: 20 shiji de shehuizhuyi (A Monument of Vigilance: 20th
Century Socialism) (Beijing: Dangdai shijie chubanshe, 2002); Editing Group, Zhongguo
gongchandang duiwai gongzuo gaikuang (Survey of the Chinese Communist Party’s
External Work) (Beijing: Dangdai shijie chubanshe, 1992–2004 annual editions).
Director
Vice-Directors
General
Office
China ’ s “ Quiet Diplomacy ”
Bureau i Bureau ii Bureau iii Bureau iv Bureau v Bureau vi Bureau vii Bureau viii
(South and (Northeast Asia (West Asia and (Africa) (Latin (Central Europe (North America, (West Europe)
Southeast Asia) and Indochina) North Africa) America) and Central Asia) Oceania, Scandinavia)
Chinese Association
Contemporary
for International
World Press
Understanding
Figure 1 The International Department.
353
48 Ibid.
49 “External Relations of the Communist Party of China” (25 Sept. 2003), mimeo. The infor-
mation in this document was also published on Zhongguo wang (internet edition), 25
Sept. 2003, in FBIS, ibid., CPP20030926000053.
50 Ibid.
51 Ibid.
age, we bring a foreign group to China every day and send a delegation out
every other day.”52 In 2004 for example (the last year for which detailed data is
available), the ID exchanged the following number of delegations with these
selected countries:53
• Asia: 1–3 per country except for North Korea (10); South Korea (7); Laos (9);
Malaysia (4); Mongolia (5); Singapore (4); Japan (13); Thailand (4); India (6);
Vietnam (10).
• Africa: 2–3 per country, except for Angola (6) and South Africa (4).
• Europe: 1–3 per country except for Poland (5); Germany (12); Russia (6);
France (8); Romania (4); Malta (4); Spain (4).
• Americas: 1–2 per country except for Argentina (3); Brazil (3); Cuba (4);
Chile (4).
• Oceania: Australia (5); New Zealand (4); Micronesian islands (6).
Although, by the end of 2001 the CCP/ID maintained formal ties with 418 politi-
cal parties in 147 nations, there is one notable exception to this rule: the US.54
This is not for wont of trying. Efforts by the ID to establish formal and infor-
mal links with the Republican and Democratic National Committees, and the
affiliated International Republican Institute (IRI) and National Democratic
Institute (NDI), date to the late 1980s. In early 1989 the ID approached
Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Lee Atwater and apparently
achieved agreement (according to the ID) on establishing a formal CCP-GOP
relationship—but the initiative was scuttled by a combination of the June 4
Incident and Atwater’s declining health and subsequent death.55 Various
approaches to the RNC and DNC were subsequently made through the US
Embassy in Beijing and the Chinese Embassy in Washington, but to no avail.
Establishing such ties is a very high priority for the ID, and they are constantly
pressing and probing for openings to establish such ties. This even figured
in the 2005 US-China “Senior Dialogue” discussions between Vice Foreign
52 Ibid.
53 Editorial Board, Zhongguo gongchandang duiwai gongzuo gaikaung 2004 (Survey of CCP
External Work, 2004) (Beijing: Dangdai shijie chubanshe, 2005). This volume (series) lists
every delegation, their members, mission, interlocutors, itinerary and working agenda,
agreements signed and their general conclusions.
54 Figure given in Dai Bingguo, “Entering a New Phase in Party Diplomacy with Chinese
Characteristics that Reflects the Tenor of the Times”, Qiushi (8 Oct. 2002) on the
International Department of Central Committee of CPC website at <http://www.idcpc
.org.cn/english/article/20021008.htm> [28 Nov. 2006].
55 Information courtesy of former US Foreign Service Officer.
Minister Dai Bingguo and then Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick.56 As
the former ID Director, Dai has a particular interest in pursuing the subject and
establishing formal links with the two principal US parties.
Although the ID has been frustrated in establishing formal ties with the two
US political parties, links have been developed with the IRI and NDI—both of
which were permitted to establish training programmes in China in the areas
of rule of law, local election monitoring and civil society. The NDI also arranged
for a small delegation of ID personnel to attend the 2004 Democratic National
Convention in Boston, apparently the first time that such a courtesy had been
extended to the CCP. This caused some conflicts, as the NDI also hosted delega-
tions from Taiwan political parties—but, in the end, the ID decided that it was
more important to have a foot in the door and attend the convention than to
uphold its usual position of not participating in any activities where Taiwan
officials or political personages were present.
The ID engages in a number of different varieties of exchanges. Seven dis-
tinct types can be distinguished. The first is sending Party leaders abroad. These
trips are undertaken under Party auspices, although in the case of the CCP
General Secretary, who doubles as State President, they are joint Party-state
visits. In 2005 these included Hu Jintao’s visits to North Korea and Vietnam,
while Politburo members Wu Guanzheng visited Europe, Li Changchun visited
Africa, Luo Gan visited Latin America and all Central Committee department
heads led delegations abroad.57 Travel abroad for all Politburo and Central
Committee members who do not hold a government position is arranged
through ID channels. The ID also sends abroad provincial and municipal Party
secretaries.
A second category is hosting foreign party leaders, usually from social-
ist countries. All four of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il’s secretive visits to
China during 2000–6 have come under ID auspices. Kim has been shown an
array of sites aimed to impress him about the key components of China’s eco-
nomic reforms: China’s “Silicon Valley” in Zhongguancun, Beijing agricultural
research institutes, the Shanghai skyline, Three Gorges Dam, bustling seaport
of Yantian in Guangdong Province, five-star White Swan Hotel in Guangzhou
and the export-processing Zhuhai and Shenzhen Special Economic Zones.58
56 Author’s discussion with Vice Foreign Minister Dai Bingguo, 4 Nov. 2005, Beijing.
57 “IDCPC Minister on CPC International Work in 2005”, Renmin ribao, 28 Dec. 2005, in FBIS,
ibid., CPP20051228501009.
58 Philip Pan, “In China, Kim Vows Commitment to Talks”, Washington Post, 19 Jan. 2006;
Joseph Kahn, “The Secret’s Out: North Korea’s Leader Did Visit China”, New York Times, 19
Jan. 2006.
Kim’s January 2006 visit, which took him for the first time to the booming
southern province of Guangdong, clearly had an impact on Kim. “The progress
made in the southern part of China, which has undergone a rapid change, and
the stirring reality of China deeply impressed us,” Kim said in a banquet toast
to Chinese President and CCP General Secretary Hu Jintao at the end of his
visit.59 The ID has also hosted a series of delegations of North Korean bureau-
crats, managers, economists and officials to China to receive briefings and view
the economic reforms first-hand. This kind of “economic reform diplomacy” is
an important part of China’s broader strategy for North Korea.
More broadly, the ID is responsible for maintaining ties with the four
remaining ruling communist parties in the world: North Korea, Vietnam, Laos
and Cuba. A number of delegations are dispatched to/from these countries
every year.60 For example, in 2004, the ID exchanged ten delegations each with
North Korea and Vietnam, nine with Laos and four with Cuba.61
Cuba has been of growing interest in recent years. One ID assessment effu-
sively praised the Cuban Communist Party’s accomplishments, including:
combining indigenous ideology (Marti Thought) with Marxism-Leninism;
refusing to adopt a Western multi-party system; rejecting the Soviet model as
incompatible; stressing social stability above all; organising special study ses-
sions for Party members; using the mass media to mobilise patriotism; creat-
ing Party organisational linkages to urban neighbourhoods and rural villages;
establishing a system whereby Party officials must meet with and “report back”
(hui bao) to citizens and conduct opinion polls among the population; allowing
two or more candidates to stand for local Party elections; not permitting spe-
cial privileges among officials and senior Party members; maintaining a “zero
tolerance” policy towards corrupt officials; promoting Party members based on
merit and careful vetting; and streamlining central and provincial level govern-
ment to promote efficiency.62 Clearly, the “Cuban model” contains elements
of growing interest to the CCP. CCP General Secretary Hu Jintao reportedly
heaped praise on the Cuban Communist Party at the Fourth Plenum of the
16th Party Congress in 2004 which discussed the lessons of other ruling parties
for the CCP.63
This study has explored the roles, history, organisation and activities of the ID
of the CCP. We have seen that the CCP/ID has played an important role in Party
affairs and the foreign affairs of the PRC for more than eight decades. Although
it naturally focused on managing relations with other communist parties for
much of this time, during the 1980s (before the collapse of communist parties
elsewhere) the ID began to diversify its partnerships.
This diversification was a by-product of China’s broadened diplomatic rela-
tionships after the 1970s, but it was also mandated by a desire to use the ID as
a conduit to enter into exchanges with and study foreign political parties and
foreign social and economic practices. It is difficult to measure with much pre-
cision just how much has been learned from these exchanges that have ben-
efited China’s domestic reforms, but each delegation sent abroad is required to
write up its principal observations for circulation to other Central Committee
departments and state organs.76 To be sure, such ID exchanges have provided
an important prism through which the CCP and other organisations in China
monitor the outside world and absorb lessons for China’s own modernisation.
This kind of information gathering goes well beyond traditional intelligence
collection (although, to be sure, the ID also engages in this activity).
One key dimension of this function has been to expose CCP leaders at the
provincial and sub-provincial levels to the outside world—often for the first
time. Many provincial Party secretaries, governors, mayors and other leading
local cadres are taken abroad on ID delegations every year. A related role that
it has, but shares with the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs (CPIFA),
is to invite noteworthy ex-politicians to China. While CPIFA tends to invite for-
mer heads of state and ministerial-level officials, the ID concentrates on those
who are important within their political parties. During 2005, for example, for-
mer Republican Party stalwarts Tom Ridge and Newt Gingrich were hosted by
the ID. This is another example of how the ID tries to “talent spot” and cater
to current or ex-party officials who may one day assume (or reassume) official
office. On occasion, it has also facilitated research in China by foreign China
specialists. Another supplementary role played by the ID has been to assist
in the external propaganda work (duiwai xuanchuan gongzuo) of the CCP, by
“telling China’s story” abroad to various foreign audiences.77
Given the vast range of inter-party relationships that the ID now engages in
(400+ in 140+ nations), the CCP/ID must be considered as an important com-
ponent of China’s foreign relations work. While its work decreased for awhile
following the Sino-Soviet Split, and again immediately after the collapse of
the former Soviet bloc, the ID has reinvented itself in the post-Cold War era
and now operates globally as never before. Given its exchanges with so many
democratic parties abroad, it could even become a conduit for fashioning
transformation of the CCP from a Leninist Party into some new kind of proto-
democratic hybrid.78 At a minimum, analysts of China’s diplomacy and foreign
affairs would be well advised to keep their eye on the CCP’s ID. Its diplomacy
may be quiet, but it is effective.
78
See David Shambaugh, China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation, op cit.,
Chapters 4–5.