Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9/10/23
EDUC2108
Albert
In Thornton’s 1995 text “Children Solving Problems,” Thornton argues that children
become better problem solvers in a social context. Thornton uses ideas from Jerome Burner, and
David Wood to support her assumptions around problem solving, and highlight the importance of
“scaffolding” as a crucial and strategic social interaction that develops a child’s problem solving
skills. Scaffolding is the interaction between a child and an adult, which allows the child to
develop and enhance their own problem solving skills, increasing the child’s confidence and
independence. Thornton makes various assumptions about children and their problem solving
through the paper based on this idea that scaffolding, and social problem solving, is the best
method for supporting children. I will address two of these assumptions, analyze their
importance, and connect them to my life as a student, and implications as a future teacher.
The first assumption by Thorton that I will address is,“The commitment children show to
solving problems whose purpose they understand is an important factor in their success”
(Thorton, p.106). Thornton describes this phenomenon as “Purposes and Meanings,” and
explains that giving a child purpose and meaning behind solving a problem motivates them, and
actually makes them better problem solvers (Thorton, p.105). Thornton also explains that giving
meaning and purpose to a problem may allow the child to better access the skills they already
have that are required for solving the problem. For example, students are often asked to make
classifications, and memorize large amounts of information. Thornton explains how, “No one
explains why these skills are useful or what the point of learning them might be” (Thorton,
p.109). The lack of a defined and accessible goal for the child, and allowing them to know why
the content of the information matters, may prevent students from being motivated to solve
problems, and can make them less confident in their ability to connect the problem to their
real-life experience.
particular, I was highly unmotivated in math largely because I found no purpose in it. While I
was always a good math student, I never understood the value in learning about parabolas, the
pythagorean theorem, or memorizing how to do long division. When I would ask my teachers
why we needed to know these procedures and concepts, the answer was usually that I needed to
know the information in order to get into college, and further, to understand math in my
highschool or college courses. I truly believe that if I was given goals, and real life context to
supplement my math education, I would have been a more motivated and willing math student.
Thornton writes that, “It is easier to teach children in contexts where they understand and share
the goals that motivate problem-solving than in contexts where the goal seems meaningless”
(Thorton, p. 105). As a future teacher, I think that math is one of the most important areas to
implement these ideas of meaning and purpose into the lessons. To give math meaning and
purpose as a teacher, I can make sure that math is hands-on and encourage manipulatives, and
real-world applications. Not only this, but making sure my students know the phrase, “I will be
able to…” pertaining to each lesson will give them access to an accomplishable goal that they
Another assumption that strongly stuck out to me was that of confidence and control, and
the impact that it has on a child’s ability to problem solve. Thornton uses an example of a study
by Robert Hartley to support this assumption. In Hartley’s study, disadvantaged students were
tested on their problem solving skills both as themselves, and while they “pretend to be the
brightest child in the class” (Thorton, p.110). The study revealed that the students actually did
have the problem solving skills needed, but they were not confident enough in themselves to
perform as well as they could. Thornton emphasizes the importance of fostering confidence,
especially by way of “providing the most positive feedback possible– praising what can be
praised and offering criticism only constructively and lightly” (Thorton, 113). As it turns out, a
large part of a child’s ability to problem solve relies heavily on if they believe themselves that
In my personal experience, I have seen the difference that a supportive teacher can make
in not only my confidence, but in my ability to solve problems. I had always seen myself as a
poor math student, but my ninth grade math teacher, Mrs. Albright, saw that I was actually quite
a capable mathematician. She not only challenged me, but encouraged me, and instilled enough
confidence in myself that I was even able to move up to the advanced math track. As a teacher, I
hope to make all of my students feel like Mrs. Albright helped to make me feel. If a student
believes that they are capable and smart, they are more likely to act in these ways. Students will
take risks, and correct their own mistakes when they trust in their abilities. As a teacher, I will try
my best to make sure that there is positive and encouraging feedback more than there is critical
Through chapters five and six of Thorton’s “Children Solving Problems”, she emphasizes
the importance of “scaffolding” as a means for children to improve their problem solving skills.
In exploring the idea of ways in which adults scaffold children's problem solving, she draws
assumptions about how important purpose and meaning is for the students and their problem
solving ability. Another important assumption made by Thorton is that the child needs to be
confident in their problem solving abilities in order for them to access the skills they need to
solve the problem. Through my life as a student, I have been scaffolded in these ways, and can
attest to their importance. Similarly, as a future teacher, I will be sure to scaffold my students’
goals and meaning, as well as confidence, especially in the math class setting.