You are on page 1of 1

www.pwc.

com/ng June 2016

TAT agrees with PwC on


deductibility of expenses
incurred outside Nigeria

On 31 May 2016, the Tax Appeal expenses incurred for another


Tribunal (TAT) sitting in Lagos company.
ruled that under the provisions
of section 27(i) of the Companies The TAT agreed with PwC’s
Income Tax Act (CITA), an argument and held that section
expense that is wholly, 27(i) only applies where a
reasonably, exclusively and company incurs an expense
necessarily incurred for the outside Nigeria for and on behalf
generation of taxable profits of a of another company.
company can only be disallowed
if the expense was incurred on Put differently, section 27
The TAT agreed with PwC’s behalf of another company. precludes a company from
argument and held that taking deductions if expenses
section 27(i) only applies The Appellant had paid buying incurred were on behalf of
where a company incurs an commission and handling another company. Therefore, it
expense outside Nigeria for charges to a related foreign would not apply where the
and on behalf of another company for the procurement of expenses were incurred by the
company. goods from outside Nigeria. company for its own benefit.
While submitting its tax returns
it took deductions for the buying The Tribunal reaffirmed the
For a deeper discussion, please commission and handling general test for tax deductibility
contact any member of our charges. The FIRS disallowed the which is that the expense must
Dispute Resolution team below deductions relying on section be incurred wholly, reasonably,
or your usual contact with PwC 27(i) of CITA and raised exclusively and necessarily for
Nigeria: additional assessments for the generation of taxable profits
Companies Income Tax and (the WREN test). According to
Taiwo Oyedele Education Tax. The Appellant the Tribunal, to remove any
+234 1 271 1700 Ext 50002 objected and appealed to the Tax expense from the ambit of this
taiwo.oyedele@ng.pwc.com Appeal Tribunal. general rule will require a
specific provision of the law. In
Moshood Olajide Section 27(i) of CITA disallows
“any expense of any description this case, section 27(i) is not that
+234 1 271 1700 Ext 50005
moshood.olajide@ng.pwc.com incurred outside Nigeria for and specific provision.
on behalf of any company except
Folajimi Olamide Akinla of a nature and to the extent Takeaway
+234 1 271 1700 Ext 52008 that the Board (“FIRS”) may
folajimi.akinla@ng.pwc.com consider allowable” This decision provides clarity on
the interpretation of section 27(i)
Adeoluwa Akintobi PwC argued on behalf of the of CITA in respect of expenses
+234 1 271 1700 Ext 50077___ Appellant that section 27(i) does incurred outside Nigeria. This
adeoluwa.akintobi@ng.pwc.com not apply to an expense that is decision goes against the long-
incurred for the business of the accepted interpretation adopted
company but rather applies to by the FIRS.
expenses incurred on behalf of
another company. The FIRS Where there is sound legal basis,
countered by submitting that the taxpayers should not hesitate to
section applies to expenses challenge the interpretation of
incurred for the company and tax statutes by tax authorities.

© 2016 PricewaterhouseCoopers Limited. All rights reserved. In this document, PwC refers to
PricewaterhouseCoopers Limited (a Nigerian limited liability company), which is a member firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal
entity.

You might also like