Professional Documents
Culture Documents
However, your research purpose statement shouldn’t come first. Instead, start by
“[advancing] the topic or general subject matter of the research study by creating reader
interest in a few beginning sentences […]. A good first sentence—called a narrative hook in
literature composition—would create reader interest through the use of stating timely topics,
advancing a key controversy, using numbers, or citing a leading study. We suggest staying
away from quotes in the first sentence […].” 2 A good rule of thumb is to start with a general
sentence, and then write more specific, narrowing-down sentences. Add your research
purpose statement to the end of your paragraph.
1
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage,
p.127.
2
Ibid., 130.
3
Ibid., 134.
1.4 PARAGRAPH(S): SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE
Your research theme most likely belongs to a larger body of knowledge. There might
be concepts your reader needs to understand before appreciating your research question fully.
This section, the last in the introduction, is supposed to equip your reader with the necessary
background knowledge to understand your research.
Don’t write in detail here. A general overview is fine. For example, if your research
question is How can students correctly identify sources of comprehensible input?, you should
describe the origins of comprehensible input, citing Krashen’s theory in general terms. A good
summary would provide context into Krashen (he’s an accomplished researcher and an
authority on language acquisition) and offer an overview of his theory (the comprehension
hypothesis, which is built upon five smaller hypotheses). A bad summary would attempt to
describe each of these five smaller hypotheses.
Remember to encode just one main idea in each paragraph. If your research draws
from different bodies of knowledge, you’ll need a paragraph to talk about each one.
Let’s consider the example research question from before (Which criteria affect long-
term storage of information?). A possible paragraph structure would be as follows:
Present the criterium of meaning. Offer some concrete examples to make sure the
reader understand what meaning looks like in this context.
Discuss the evidence for meaning being a criterium.
Present the criterium of sense. Offer some concrete examples to make sure the reader
understand what sense looks like in this context.
Discuss the evidence for sense being a criterium.
Explain that having one of the criteria is better than having none. Offer some concrete
examples (information that has meaning but no sense; information that has sense but
no meaning).
Explain how satisfying both criteria yields the highest chance of long-term storage.
There are many right ways to structure the paragraphs—and many wrong ones too.
Regardless of how you decide to structure the answer, it is imperative that you do structure
it. Don’t start writing without a paragraph-by-paragraph plan.
4
Purdue Online Writing Lab (2018). Conclusions. Retrieved from:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/argument_papers/
conclusions.html
4 ESSAY GRADING RUBRIC