Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI - 600 025
MAY - 2023
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
DIRECTOR SUPERVISOR
I hereby declare that the project entitled A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ABSENTEESIM AND
ARANTHANGI CHEMICAL PRODUCT LIMITED in partial fulfilment of the requirement
for the award of the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION is a record of
original project work done by me, during my period of study in KarpagaVinayaga Institute of
Management, Pudukkottai under the guidance of Mrs. J. JENIFA MARY, Assistant
professor and no part of it has been submitted for any other Degree or Diploma.
Signature:
Name of the candidate:
DATE:
PLACE:
Ref : 20.02.2023
Yours sincerely
Lab Incharge
SUPERVISOR
INDUSTRY WHERE
THE ARANTHANGI CHEMICAL PRODUCT LIMITED
PROJECTS IS
UNDERTAKEN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First, I am very thankful to the almighty for showering the blessing throughout my life. I
would like to express my heartfelt thanks to my beloved parents who had sacrified a lot for my
future. This support was the foundation stone for my efforts.
I wish to express my heartfelt thanks to my parents, and my friends for their useful tips that
helped me to complete this project.
K. RAJI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 CHAPTER-I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
2 CHAPTER-II
2.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE
2.2 COMPANY PROFILE
3 CHAPTER-III
3.1 RESEARCH METHODELOGY
4 CHAPTER-IV
4.1 DATA ANALYSIS
4.2 CORRELATION
5 CHAPTER-V
5.1 FINDINGS
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
5.3 CONCLUSION
ANNEXURE
5.4 BIBLIOGRAPHY
5.5 QUESTIONARE
LIST OF TABLES & CHARTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION
For calculating rate of absenteeism two facts are taken into consideration.
They are:-
It has been observed that the phenomenon of absenteeism does not exist in
Indian industry; it is a universal fact. The difference is only in terms of
magnitude.
The rate of absenteeism is higher in night shift than in day shift. Certain
Studies shows rate of absenteeism among men is greater than woman.
Talk to employees who are absent and find out the problem.
Take measures to protect the interest of the employees.
Check from time to time that no employee is treated badly by
Seniors.
Effects of Absenteeism:
Control of Absenteeism:
Proper hiring.
Good working conditions.
Housing and Transport facilities.
Safety programs.
Incentives.
Sales of the chemical business can be divided into a few broad categories,
including basic chemicals (about 35 to 37 percent of the dollar output), life
sciences (30 percent), specialty chemicals (20 to 25 percent) and consumer
products (about 10 percent).
Technology:
History:
The process is actually very simple. First, Graymont takes the finest lime
available, which is calcium oxide, custom made for this process by one of its lime
manufacturing facilities. The calcium oxide is mixed in water and pumped to the
reaction vessel. Then CO2 rich gas is introduced into the mix to come up with
PCC. The reaction is as follows:
Of course this is all done using the latest state of the art equipment and control
technology.
Gray Mont has the ability to manufacture a wide range of products that can be
tailored for each customer's use. Contact Graymont to see how your calcium
carbonate needs can be met.
About Graymont:
Graymont is a family owned company whose management team and
employees are dedicated to meeting or exceeding customer needs. The company
is focused on high calcium and dolomitic lime, value added lime based products
such as specialty hydrates and precipitated calcium carbonates, and in the
aggregate and pulverized stone business.
Graymont takes a long term view of its business and the lime industry.
Graymont has been in the lime business for over 50 years and operates facilities
on sites that have been in operation for up to 200 years. Graymont is among the
leaders in the industry in adding new efficient plants and equipment and operates
some of the most modern facilities on the continent. Since 1989 Graymont has
built close to 2.8 million tons of new state of the art capacity and will continue to
add new capacity to meet market demand.
Graymont is the second largest producer of lime in North America. In
Canada, Graymont subsidiaries have operations from New Brunswick to British
Columbia. In the United States, subsidiary companies operate in Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Washington, Oregon, Montana, Utah and Nevada while
serving markets in a much wider geographic area. In addition to Graymont's lime
interests, Graymont Materials, located in upstate New York and the province of
Quebec, provides construction stone, sand and gravel, asphalt products and ready
mix concrete for the infrastructure and general construction needs of the area
Services
In addition to providing high quality products for its customers, Graymont
provides engineering and technical support to facilitate customer applications.
Areas covered include: product application, transportation, material handling, and
research and development.
Product Application:
Transportation:
Paper Grade
We are offering Paper Grade. These are widely used by paper industry to
manufacture alkaline media paper making. Around 70% of the total output of
precipitated calcium carbonate of the world is consumed by paper industry alone.
These improves the brightness, smoothness, and opacity of paper. It also increases
the ink receptivity.These also reduces the cost of production of paper making.
Kindly see the attached PDF.
Rubber Grade
Ink Grade
Toothpaste
Client can avail from us good quality of Toothpaste those are provided by
us with different taste and in very attractive packaging. We provide these
toothpaste in plastic tubes and we fill these tubes by latest liquid filling
machinery. Client can purchase these paste at economical price. Kindly see the
attached PDF.
Tooth Powder
These increases the nutrition ingredient and puff in food and makes them
taste better. For use in the food industry, the heavy metals like Pb, As, Hg, Fe etc.
should be controlled below prescribed standards. It is also used as a source of
calcium supplement in backing products.
Detergent Grade
Calcium Carbonate
We are engaging in offering Calcium Carbonate. These are highly pure and
available in different specifications to suit the requirements of different industry
applications. Our range is appreciated for precise composition, purity and
accurate ph value. These are prepared by coating PCC with other chemicals
(stearic acid etc.) to improve its properties. Currently MIPL does not offer this
product
2.2 COMPANY PROFILE
Over the past 25 years, our company has been maintaining a steady
growth in production, sales volume, clientele and dealer network. Thanks to the
overwhelming response and customers’ support we have gradually enhanced the
annual production capacity of our Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Activated
Calcium Carbonate to the present level of 20000 M.T & 8000 M.T., respectively
He pointed out that the cost of absenteeism & the impact there off on
productivity alone is enough to shock any human resources managers out of any
state complacency they might have toward absenteeism.____HAMILTON-
ATWELL-2003.
Achievement?
rates for persons who are absent, and higher relapse rates for persons
who have already resumed work.
(iii) That the work-resumption rate increases when sickness benefits are
exhausted, but that work-resumptions at this point tend to be short-lived.
CHAPTER III
3.1 RESEARCH METHODELOGY
RESEARCH
Research in common parlance refers to search for knowledge. One can also
define research as a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a
specific topic. The advanced learner’s dictionary of current English lays down the
meaning of research as “a careful investigation or inquiry especially through
search for new facts in any branch of knowledge.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design is the blue print of the proposed study. It represents the
overall scheme of the study. “All research design is a logical and systematic
planning and it helps directing piece of research” the research design select for
the particular study is descriptive research studies.
Descriptive research studies are those studies concerned with describing
the characteristics of a particular group. Such studies are concerned with specific
predictions, with narration of facts and characteristics concerning group or situate
SAMPLING DESIGN
Population
The population of the study comprises of all the office staff chemical
products Private Limited. The target population for the study was the office staff
of the HR department chemical products Private Limited.
Sampling technique
Non probability convenience sampling technique is used for selecting the
sample size of the respondents.
Sampling Unit
The study was aimed to collect data from office staff of the HR department at
chemical products Private Limited as the research period was short, it was not
practical to collect the responses from all the members in the population
.therefore sample size of 60 was fixed for the study.
Secondary Sources
The secondary data’s were collected from:
Company web site
Company records
Journals
Magazine
Internet
Library
STATISTICAL TOOLS
The data collected from the employees will be analyzed by using:
Simple Percentage analysis
Co-efficient of Correlation
Chi-square Analysis
1. Calculation of Simple Percentage
2.Co-efficient ofCorrelation
Is the quantity
(Ʃxy×n)-Ʃx×Ʃy
R=
(Ʃx2×n)-(Ʃx)2 (Ʃy2×n)-(Ʃy)2
TABLE NO 4.1.1
NO OF
PERCENTAGE
S.NO AGE RESPONDENTS
(%)
1 Below 25 years 12 20
2 26 to 35 years 13 22
3 36 to 45 years 20 33
4 46 to 55 years 15 25
Total 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 20% of employees are in the age group below 25
years, 22% employees are in the age group 26-35 years, 33% of employees are in
36-45 years and 25% employees are in 46-55 years
CHART 4.1.1
30
25%
25
22%
20%
percentage
20
15
10
0
Below 25 years 26 to 35 years 36 to 45 years 46 to 55 years
Age
TABLE NO 4.1.2
NO OF
S.NO DEPARTMENT RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Production 18 30
2 Marketing 10 17
3 Human Resource 12 20
4 Maintenance 9 15
5 Packing 11 18
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 30% of employees are in the production department,
17% employees are in the marketing department, 15% of employees are in
maintenance and 18% employees are in packing department, 20% employees are
in the Human Resource departments working in organization.
CHART 4.1.2
20
15
10
5
0
Department
TABLE NO 4.1.3
Total 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 30% of employees below 4000 monthly income ,
35% employees 4001 to 8000 monthly income, 25% of employees 8001 to 12000
monthly income, and 10% employees above 12000 monthly income.
CHART 4.1.3
40 35%
35 30%
30 25%
25
percentage
20
15
10%
10
5
0
Blow Rs. 4000 Rs. 4001 to 8000 Rs. 8001 to 12000 Above Rs. 12000
Monthly income
TABLE NO 4.1.4
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 1-2 years 4 7
2 3-4 years 13 22
3 5-10 years 17 28
4 Above 10 years 26 43
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 7% of the respondents are belongs under
1-2 years of experience, 22% of the respondents are under 3-4 years experience,
28% of the respondents are under 5-10 years experience, 43% of the respondents
are above 10 years experience.
CHART 4.1.4
60
43%
percentage
40 22% 28%
7%
20
0
1-2 years
3-4 years
5-10 years
Above 10
years
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.5
NO OF
PERCENTAGE
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS
(%)
1 Always 23 38
2 Rarely 16 27
3 Never 11 18
4 Not at all 10 17
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 38% of the respondents are always
motivate, 27% of the respondents are rarely motivate , 18% of the respondents are
never motivate, 17% of the respondents are not at all motivate.
CHART 4.1.5
40 38%
35
30 27%
25
percentage
20 18%
17%
15
10
5
0
Always Rarely Never Not at all
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.6
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 7 12
2 Satisfied 18 30
3 Neutral 20 33
4 Dissatisfied 9 15
5 Highly Dissatisfied 6 10
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 12% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 30% of the respondents are satisfied , 33% of the respond neutral, 15%
of the respondents are dissatisfied, 10% of the respondents highly dissatisfied
with promotional measure provided by organization.
CHART 4.1.6
35 33%
30%
30
25
percentage
15%
20
15 12% 10%
10
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.7
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 15 25
2 Satisfied 18 30
3 Neutral 13 22
4 Dissatisfied 9 15
5 Highly Dissatisfied 5 8
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 25% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 30% of the respondents are satisfied , 22% of the respond neutral, 15%
of the respondents are dissatisfied, 8% of the respondents highly dissatisfied job
security in the organization.
CHART 4.1.7
PRODUCTS
35 30 %
30 25 %
25 22 %
percentage
20
15 %
15
8%
10
5
0
Highly satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.8
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 8 13
2 Satisfied 20 33
3 Neutral 12 20
4 Dissatisfied 10 17
5 Highly Dissatisfied 10 17
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 13% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 33% of the respondents are satisfied, 20% of the respondents neutral,
17% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 17% of the respondents highly
dissatisfied with working hours in your organization.
CHART 4.1.8
33 %
35
30
25 20 %
percentage
20 17 % 17 %
13 %
15
10
5
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.9
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 12% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 25% of the respondents are satisfied , 35% of the respondents neutral,
15% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 13% of the respondents highly
dissatisfied with management response towards solving employee Problem .
CHART 4.1.9
THE SOLVING EMPLOYEE PROBLEM IN TRAINING PROBLEM
35%
35 25%
30
25
percentage
15%
20
12% 13%
15
10
5
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.1.10
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Yes 37 62
2 No 23 38
TOTAL 60 100
INERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 62% of the respondents are encouraged
to suggest new ideas and remaining 38% of the respondents discouraged to
suggest new idea .
CHART 4.1.10
No
38%
Yes
62%
TABLE NO 4.2.2
NO-OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 1 to 3 days 23 38
2 4 to 5 days 18 30
3 6 to 9 days 13 22
4 Above 10 days 6 10
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 38% of the respondents are belongs
under 1-3 days , 30% of the respondents are under 4-5 days, 22% of the
respondents are under 6-9 days, 10% of the respondents are above 10 days
usually take leave per month.
CHART 4.2.2
10 %
38 %
22 %
30 %
TABLE NO 4.2.3
NO-OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Morning shift 13 21
2 Afternoon shift 22 37
3 Night shift 25 42
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 21% of the respondents are morning
shift usually leave, 37% of the respondents are under afternoon shift, and 42% of
the respondents areunder nightshift usually take leave per month.
CHART 4.2.3
50
37 % 42 %
40
percentage
21 %
30
20
10
Morning shift
Afternoon shift
opinion Night shift
TABLE NO 4.2.4
NO-OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Sometimes 10 17
2 Rarely 17 28
3 Never 21 35
4 Always 7 12
5 Not at all 5 8
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 17% of the respondents are sometimes
take leave with prior permission , 28% of the respondents are rarelytake leave
with prior permission , 35% of the respondents are never take leave with prior
permission ,12%of the respondents are always take leave with prior permission ,
8% of the respondents are not at all take leave with prior permission .
CHART 3.2.4
35 28%
30
25
percentage
17%
20
15 12%
10 8%
5
0
Sometimes Rarely Never Always Not at all
opinion
TABLE NO 4.2.5
NO-OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Excellent 15 25
2 Good 11 18
3 Average 12 20
4 Bad 10 17
5 Very good 12 20
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 25% is excellent relationship with
supervisor and coworkers , 18%is good relationship with supervisor and
coworkers , 20%,is average relationship with supervisor and coworkers, 17%is
bad relationship with supervisor and coworkers,20% is very good relationship
with supervisor and coworkers in the organization.
CHART 4.2.5
25 %
25
20 %
20 18 % 20 %
17 %
percentage
15
10
0
Excellent Good
Average
Bad
opinion Very good
TABLE NO 4.2
NO-OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Yes 29 48
2 No 31 52
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 48% respondents are agreed that got aware the leave
facilities and 52% respondents are not get aware the leave facilities in the
company.
CHART 4.2.6
52 %
52
51
50 48 %
percentage
49
48
47
46
Yes No
opinion
TABLE NO 4.2.7
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Shift work 15 25
2 Working 10 17
condition
3 Work load 23 38
4 Job 12 20
dissatisfaction
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 25% of the respondents are shift work,
17% of the respondents are working condition,38% of the respond are workload,
20% of the respondents are job dissatisfaction of reason for absenteeism.
CHART 4.2.7
38%
40
35 25%
30 20%
17%
percentage
25
20
15
10
5
0
Shift work Working Work load Job
condition dissatisfaction
opinion
TABLE NO 4.2.8
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENDS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Interesting 21 35
2 Adjustable 19 32
3 Risky 20 33
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 35% of the respondents are interesting
the job, 32% of the respondents are adjustable the job, 33% of the respondents are
risky of the job in the organization.
CHART 4.2.8
35.5 35%
35
34.5
34
33%
percentage
33.5
33
32.5 32%
32
31.5
31
30.5
Interesting Adjustable Risky
opinion
TABLE NO 4.3.1
NO OF
S NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Yes 23 38
2 No 37 62
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 38% respondents are agreed and 62% respondents
are not agreed aware of theschemes introduced by the company.
CHART 4.3.1
Yes
38%
No
62%
TABLE NO 4.3.2
NO OF
S NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Yes 29 48
2 No 31 52
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 48% respondents are agreed and 52% respondents
are not agreed know about the schemes introduced toreduce the absenteeism.
CHART 4.3.2
Yes, 48%
No, 52%
TABLE NO 4.3.3
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 11 18
2 Satisfied 14 23
3 Neutral 10 17
4 Dissatisfied 12 20
5 Highly Dissatisfied 13 22
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 18% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 23% of the respondents are satisfied , 17% of the respondents neutral,
20% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 22% of the respondents highly
dissatisfiedwith current leave procedure. .
CHART 4.3.3
23% 22%
20%
25
18% 17%
20
15
percentage
10
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 3.4.1
NO OF
S NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Strongly Agree 14 23
2 Agree 9 15
3 Neutral 10 17
4 Disagree 11 18
5 Strongly 16 27
disagree
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 23% of the respondents are strongly
agree, 15% of the respondents are agree , 17% of the respondents neutral, 18%
of the respondents are disagree, 27% of the respondents strongly disagree the
company is enough rewards according your performance.
CHART 4.4.1
30 27%
23%
25
17% 18%
20 15%
percentage
15
10
0
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
opinion
TABLE NO 4.4.2
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 9 15
2 Satisfied 12 20
3 Neutral 14 23
4 Dissatisfied 15 25
5 Highly Dissatisfied 10 17
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 15% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 20% of the respondents are satisfied, 23% of the respondents neutral,
25% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 17% of the respondents highly
dissatisfied with the rest intervals provided.
CHART 4.4.2
23% 25%
20%
25
17%
20 15%
percentage
15
10
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.4.3
NO OF
S NO OPINION RESPONDENDS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Highly satisfied 6 10
2 Satisfied 8 13
3 Neutral 16 27
4 Dissatisfied 13 22
5 Highly 17 28
Dissatisfied
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table reveals that 10% of the respondents are highly
satisfied, 13% of the respondents are satisfied , 27% of the respondents neutral,
22% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 28% of the respondents highly
dissatisfied with the opinion about the facilities offered by the organization.
CHART 3.4.3
22%
25
20
percentage
13%
15
10%
10
0
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied Dissatisfied
opinion
TABLE NO 4.4.4
NO OF
S.NO OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(%)
1 Male 39 65
2 Female 21 35
TOTAL 60 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table shows the gender of the employees. 65% of the
respondents are male and 35% of the respondents are female.
CHART 4.4.4
70 65%
60
50
35%
percentage
40
30
20
10
0
Male Female
Gender
TABLE NO 4.4.5
SATISFICATION SATISFICATION
LEVEL OF JOB LEVEL OF
OPINION SECURITY WORKING X2 Y2 XY
(X) ENVIRONMENT
(Y)
Highly
15 8 225 64 120
satisfied
18
Satisfied 20 324 400 360
13
Neutral 12 169 144 156
9
Dissatisfied 10 81 100 90
Highly
5 10 25 100 50
Dissatisfies
(Ʃxy×n)-Ʃx×Ʃy
R=
(Ʃx2×n)-(Ʃx)2 (Ʃy2×n)-(Ʃy)2
(776×5) - (60×60)
= 0.58%
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table it reveals the job security and working environment
of a company is positively correlated.
CHI- SQUARE
Highly Highly
GENDER Dissatisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Total
satisfied dissatisfied
MALE 9 5 7 10 8 39
FEMALE 2 9 3 2 5 21
TOTAL 11 14 10 12 13 60
CHI-SQUARE CALCULATION
TABULAR CALCULATION
OBSERVED EXPECTED
O-E (O-E) 2 (O-E) 2/E
FREQUENCY FREQUENCY
0.4786
9 7.15 1.85 3.4225
0.0384
7 6.5 0.5 0.25
0.2358
10 7.8 2.2 4.84
0.0239
8 8.45 -0.45 0.2025
0.8889
2 3.85 -1.85 3.4225
3.4306
9 4.9 4.1 16.81
0.0714
3 3.5 -0.5 0.25
TOTAL
8.2842
DEGREE OF FREEDOM
= (2-1) x (5-1)
= 1x4
V=4
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE = 5%
Therefore reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS
Absenteeism affects the organization from the multiple aspects. It affects severely
the production process and the business proves.
1. www.hr-guide.com
2. www.google.com
3. www.soople.com
4. www.infosys.com
5. www.hr-guide.com
6. www.learningmate.com
7. www.agronremedies.com
QUESTIONARE
1. Name
2. Age
a) 46 to 55 years
b) 36 to 45 years
c) 26 to 35 years
d) Below 25 years
3. Which is best department in chemical product
a) Production
b) Marketing
c) Human resources
d) Maintenance
e) Packing
4. Monthly income
a) Below Rs.4000
b) Rs. 4001 to 8000
c) Rs. 8001 to 12000
d) Above Rs.12000
5. Experience
a) 1-2 years
b) 3-4 years
c) 5-10 years
d) Above 10 years
a) Always
b) Rarely
c) Never
d) Not at all
7.Is the promotional measure provided by organization
satisfactory
a) Highly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Neutral
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly Dissatisfied
a) Highly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Neutral
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly Dissatisfied
a) Highly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Neutral
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly Dissatisfied
a) Highly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Neutral
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly Dissatisfied
11. Do you suggestion if new ideas in training period
a) Yes
b) No
a) 1 to3 days
b) 4 to 5 days
c) 6 to 9 days
d) Above 10 days
a) Morning shift
b) Afternoon shift
c) Night shift
a) Sometimes
b) Rarely
c) Never
d) Always
e) Not at all
a) Excellent
b) Good
c) Average
d) Bad
e) Very good
a) Yes
b) No
17.For which reason absenteeism is high
a) Shift work
b) Working condition
c) Work load
d) Job dissatisfaction
a) Interesting
b) Adjustable
c) Risky
a) Yes
b) No
a) Yes
b) No
a) Higjhly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Netural
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly dissatisfied
a) Strongly agree
b) Agree
c) Netural
d) Disagree
e) Strongly disagree
23.Are you satisfy with the rest interval provided in training
period
a) Higjhly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Netural
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly dissatisfied
24.Are you satisfy with opinion about the facilities offererd by the
organization in traning period
a) Higjhly satisfied
b) Satisfied
c) Netural
d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly dissatisfied
25.Genders
a) Male
b) Female