Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Music
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
University of Michigan Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The American Stravinsky
72
This content downloaded from
99.23.147.26 on Sun, 08 Oct 2023 21:30:44 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
decade, Copland strove to combine his modernism with Americanisms
drawn from African-American jazz and blues. African-American vernacu-
lar music—sacred and secular, rural and urban—could be used by Ameri-
can composers, black and white, as a musical resource for art music.
While the embrace of American musical vernacularisms resonated with
the aesthetics of Cocteau and Les Six, it also echoed the nationalism of
earlier generations even as it simultaneously signaled a departure from the
parochial Romantic nationalist style. In France Copland found a nation-
alism, if you will, that was anti-Romantic, that is, anti-German, but that
embraced the vernacular of the composer’s immediate cultural environ-
ment: the neoclassicism of Cocteau, Satie, and Les Six (particularly that of
Milhaud) prized French popular and folk influences. Influenced by their
aesthetic position and stylistic choices, Copland turned even more exten-
sively toward using elements of jazz , blues, and other popular American
idioms in composing his new American music.
Copland read the music criticism of The Dial’s Paul Rosenfeld, which ex-
posed him to ideas about the new music and gave him the impression that
Paris was the most prominent center of musical modernism. The young
composer was not drawn to study with a particular teacher, but to be in
the midst of the latest musical trends of the early twentieth century, which
ultimately led to him to seek out “popular” sources. As influential as his
private lessons with Boulanger was the musical milieu to which Copland
gained entrance. Though Boulanger was not then active as a composer,
she moved in circles of composers who were shaping twentieth-century
music. Copland analyzed their music, along with that of Palestrina and
Monteverdi, in her Wednesday afternoon analysis and sight-singing
classes. Boulanger also presented the music of Stravinsky, Schoenberg,
Milhaud, and Honegger in these analysis classes. Among her personal
friends were Stravinsky and Milhaud. Through Boulanger Copland came
into contact with the leading French composers of new music in Paris. He
met Ravel, Stravinsky, Roussel, Milhaud, Honegger, Poulenc, and Auric
in Boulanger’s salon teas. Copland found Paris outside the salon stimulat-
ing. He heard many of the works he encountered in class in concert per-
formance, regularly attending premieres at the Concerts Koussevitzky, a
series at the Paris Opera every spring and fall. In fact, the first evening he
arrived in Paris, Copland attended a performance of the Suedois Ballet’s
collaborative work, Les Mariées de la Tour Eiffel, which included Mil-
haud’s Le boeuf sur le toit. As he documented in his travelbook, that sum-
mer he also heard Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande, Milhaud’s L’homme et
son desir, works by Schoenberg and Ravel at the Concerts Koussevitzky,
Modernism as Nationalism
Harlem had not yet been discovered by the snobs and aesthetes: we
were the only white folk there. The music I heard was absolutely dif-
ferent from anything I had ever heard before, and was a revelation to
me. Against the beat of the drums the melodic lines criss-crossed in a
breathless pattern of broken and twisted rhythms. A negress whose
grating voice seemed to come from the depths of the centuries, sang in
front of the various tables. With despairing pathos and dramatic feel-
ings, she sang over and over again, to the point of exhaustion, the
same refrain to which the constantly changing melodic pattern of the
orchestra wove a kaleidoscopic background. This authentic music had
its roots in the darkest corners of the negro soul, the vestigial traces of
Africa no doubt. Its effect on me was so overwhelming that I could
not tear myself away. From then on, I frequented other negro theatres
and dancehalls. In some of their shows, the singers were accompanied
by a flute, a clarinet, two trumpets, a trombone, a complicated per-
cussion section played by one man, a piano and a string quintet.8
Copland believed that the composers of Les Six represented “new atti-
tudes in music and the spirit of the period.” For Copland, this neoclassi-
cism of the young French composers was both nationalist and mod-
ernist.10 It was modernist because of what it had rejected. “They signified
the absolute end of the Germanic Brahmsian and Wagnerian approach.” It
was nationalist because it asserted a distinctly French musical identity and
profile. Most struck by Milhaud and his anti-German musical statements,
Copland believed that Milhaud had a “program” or agenda for French
music: it had to be “anti-German, anti-grandiose, anti-impressionist, and
even anti-impressive.”11 This directly summarizes for Copland the Satie-
Cocteau aesthetic that informed the musical styles of Satie, Poulenc, and
Milhaud and to some extent set Copland’s own agenda for use of Ameri-
can idioms.
For Copland, rejection of German Romanticism made Les Six mod-
ern composers. Defining modernism in 1942, assessing the later develop-
ments of the thirties, he moved beyond general references to “nineteenth-
century Germanic ideals,” and identification of Debussy and Ravel as the
two chief composers who had inaugurated the move away from the
styles and aesthetics of Wagner.12 As Copland understood the term,
“Modernism is generally taken to mean the Debussy-Ravel aesthetic.”
Their French nationality and their decided anti-Wagner/anti-German
stance made Les Six not just modern, but also nationalist composers. The
crux of Copland’s consideration of their aesthetic was based on the con-
trast he saw with German Romanticism, that is, German music. Copland
saw the nineteenth-century Romantic or conservative composer who
attempted consciously to avoid imitating German musical style or suc-
cumbing to German musical aesthetics as a forerunner of modernism.
This led to a certain identification of anti-German nationalism with mod-
ernism itself. Copland drew a parallel between the nineteenth-century
Russian nationalists such as the Mighty Five and Glinka, whose break
The paucity of American musical works was brought into sharp relief
against the backdrop of the latest in musical composition.
While abroad, Copland began to feel the need to find a style that
would express or represent modern America. He began to associate jazz
with Americanism, internationalism, and modernism. That Copland
should have his first thoughts of American music nationalism while
abroad rather than at home was so not unusual for those of his genera-
tion who found themselves abroad after World War I. Writer Malcolm
Cowley, one of Copland’s contemporaries and a fellow expatriate in
Paris, described how expatriation served to awaken artistic Heimweh.
From a distant perspective, Americans could look at the United States
through a different lens: “We saw the America they wished us to see and
admired it through their distant eyes. . . . We had come three thousand
miles in search of Europe and had found America, in a vision half-
remembered, half-falsified and romanced. Should we ever return to our
own far country?”15 According to Cowley, in Paris the artists also found
art. From his European vantage point Copland too felt he could envision
and realize a distinctly American music.
Had Copland stayed at home and not gone to Europe, perhaps pop-
ular music and ragtime would not have significantly influenced his musi-
cal development. However, hearing jazz in Europe shaped his musical
thinking regarding modern American music as he became increasingly
aware that the United States lacked an art music that Europeans could
identify as typically American. As a consequence, Copland first fastened
on the “stereotypically American” idiom of jazz. He did not hear jazz in
the concert hall or in the French cabarets; the latter were too expensive
and he could not afford to frequent them. He wrote of the summer of
1923, “In Vienna that summer I listened to jazz in bars and hearing it in
a fresh context heightened my interest in its potential. I began to consider
that jazz rhythms might be the way to make an American-sounding
music.”16 The popular composers had developed a style of music that the
whole world recognized as American; why could not the same be done
for American art music?17
Seeing the French adopt jazz awakened in Copland the idea that it could
be the idiom of the modern American composer. Gradually and through
his study with Boulanger, imitation of his models Milhaud and Stravin-
sky, and his travels, he was brought to the realization that Americans too
could contribute distinctively and uniquely to the nationalist-modernist
ferment. Copland’s epiphany that jazz was dually a nationalist and mod-
ernist music was precipitated by several circumstances and conditions.
First, his European counterparts understood the music’s value. Ameri-
cans were stunned to learn of the respect European composers such as
Milhaud, for example, had for this music. During his 1922 visit to New
York, Milhaud informed American reporters that he was inspired by
jazz, and caused a minor sensation:
Second, Copland’s eyes, ears, and mind were open and receptive to the
idea that the United States had something unique to offer, a receptivity
that only came about because he was viewing his nation from distant
shores. Once again, Boulanger in particular was important to Copland’s
sense of American musical identity and his sense of modernism. She did
not overtly suggest that Copland compose in a distinctly American style,
or—since his earliest pieces were jazz-influenced works—that he adopt
the jazz idiom with the deliberate intent to be an “American composer.”
While avoiding the jingoism that excised any “foreign” influence from
French music, she did subscribe to a sort of nationalist sentiment, believ-
ing that the culture and spirit of a nation could be captured and expressed
in modern music, and that composers as diverse as Fauré, Debussy, and
Stravinsky, among others, had done this for France (and Russia). Though
she never prescribed any particular style of composition, she did encour-
age students to find their own voice within their respective national cul-
tures. That is, she saw her students not only as individuals but as citizens
of their respective nations.19
Copland, through Boulanger, first began to believe that the personal
style he was refining was both modern and recognizably—though at first
unintentionally—American. Studying with Boulanger particularly suited
Boulanger was the first person who pointed out to me that I had a
rhythmic sense which was very different from the Europeans. I was
unaware of it, but she was fascinated with trying to play two inde-
pendent rhythms herself, you know, one with the right hand and one
with the left hand. And I remember our doing it together at the piano
poking away at one rhythm while she was playing the other.21
Boulanger had noticed that this new rhythmic technique of Copland’s was
also a trait of Braggiotti and Europe and his band of African-American
musicians. She heightened Copland’s awareness of his own rhythmic
sense, and suggested that it was an Americanism on his part. The sophis-
ticated rhythms of jazz therefore further drew his attention.
Copland apparently did not think his sense of rhythm was unique, but
admits that Boulanger took special interest in it, intrigued by the poly-
rhythms and the cross-rhythms.
This is not so in America, nor is it going to be. Since jazz is not exotic
here but indigenous, since it is the music an American has heard as a
child, it will be traceable more and more frequently in his symphonies
and concertos. Possibly the chief influence of jazz will be shown in the
development of polyrhythm. This startling new synthesis has provided
the American composer with an instrument he should appreciate and
utilize. It should stir his imagination; he should see it freed of its pres-
ent connotations. It may be the substance not only of his fox trots &
Charlestons but of his lullabies and nocturnes. He may express
through it not always gaiety but love, tragedy, remorse.27
He argued that jazz could serve as a resource for the young composer
seeking a style that was both modern and American. Knowing that Eu-
ropean composers were using jazz further validated and legitimized Cop-
land’s own use of the idiom, which (as we have seen) had begun as early
as his study with Goldmark. Copland had heard the way Krenek, Mil-
haud, Stravinsky, Debussy, and Ravel used jazz. As he wrote in retrospect
toward the end of his active composing:
I think it was mostly the fact that the Europeans themselves seemed so
interested in jazz, that Stravinsky and even Debussy and Ravel, Mil-
haud, were all using jazz materials that possibly gave some of us the
notion that if they could do it, certainly Americans could do it better,
since it was the music we were familiar with and had grown up with.28
It is crucial to point out that Copland saw jazz as a music that needed to
be refined and further developed by the composer. Polyrhythms and
cross-rhythms in his view made jazz what it was, music compositions to
be combined with new harmonic techniques. Yet, in and of itself, the jazz
idiom—the music created by jazz musicians such as Duke Ellington, the
Fletcher Henderson Orchestra, or Louis Armstrong—was not suitable
Grohg and a work that incorporates parts of it, Dance Symphony, were
the first large-scale orchestral works Copland composed. Originally titled
Le Nécromancien and intended primarily as a study in orchestration and
form, Grohg was inspired by the grotesquerie of the German horror film
Nosferatu. Begun in Berlin in June 1922, Copland completed the ballet in
Paris under the instruction of Boulanger. His Paris roommate, Harold
Clurman, wrote the scenario. In Berlin Copland had seen Nosferatu, the
story of a vampire magician with the power to make corpses come to life.
At the time, he was contemplating writing a ballet and was searching for
a story. Latching upon this story-line, he felt that the bizarreness of the
plot, “the need for gruesome effects,” gave him an excuse to use “‘mod-
ern’ rhythms and dissonances.” The characters are the magician Grohg,
an “adolescent,” an opium-eater, a streetwalker, a “woman of the
world,” a young artist, and a “beautiful young girl.”29 Grohg was never
published or performed during Copland’s lifetime. To complete a com-
mission he extracted three of the dances from the ballet and put them into
the new work, Dance Symphony.
Although it premiered after his Symphony for Organ and Orches-
tra, Dance Symphony is, in a sense, Copland’s first orchestral piece. The
opening section of the original ballet, the Procession, became the sepa-
rate work, Cortège macabre. The public performance and publication of
Cortège macabre (in Howard Hanson’s Rochester American Com-
posers’s Concerts concert series!) and Dance Symphony began to estab-
lish Copland’s reputation after he returned to the United States. The
three dances of Dance Symphony, which are actually those of Grohg
reorganized, are “Dance of the Adolescent” (Allegro), “Dance of the
Girl Who Moves in a Dream” (Slow Waltz), and “Dance of Mockery.”30
Stylistically coherent, Dance Symphony represents Copland’s amalgam
of the various stylistic, aesthetic, and technical elements assimilated
while studying in Paris. Dance Symphony reflects what Cowell identi-
fied as French in his assessment of Copland’s style in American Com-
posers on American Music, but in reality the work shows the multiple
Table 4.2 Milhaud, Le boeuf sur le toit, Overall Tonal Scheme Outlining
Interval Cycles
Sections {A} B C {A} D E {A} F G {A} Transition
Key C c Eb Eb eb Gb Gb gb A A A–G
Sections {A} H I {A} J K {A} L M {A} Transition
Key G g Bb Bb bb Db Db db E E E–D
Sections {A} N O {A} P Q {A} R S {A} Transition
Key D d F F f Ab Ab ab B B B–A
Sections {A} T U {A} Coda
Key A a C C
3/8 4/8 2/8 6/8 4/8 2/8 6/8 | 6/8 4/8 2/8 2/8 2/8
2/8 3/8.
Copland frames the phrase with 3/8, or half a measure of 6/8. The over-
all rhythmic structure results in irregular periodic phrase structure simi-
lar to that in Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring.34
Copland’s Grohg and Dance Symphony are then truly the first products
of his study and experiences in Paris. They are in fact a “French” devel-
opment of a set of earlier pieces, Petites Valses. Copland originally com-
Example 4.6 Waltz from Petites Valses, later used as “Theme of the
Adolescent” in Dance Symphony