You are on page 1of 3

Review

Modern diaper performance: construction, materials, and


safety review
Swatee Dey, PhD, Dianna Kenneally, BSCHE, MBA, Mauricio Odio, PhD, and
Ioannis Hatzopoulos, PhD

The Procter & Gamble Company, Abstract


Cincinnati, OH, USA A review of the literature on diapers and diaper rash reveals that many clinicians are
unfamiliar with modern diaper construction and materials as well as diaper safety testing
Correspondence
methods. Typical modern diapers do not contain ingredients of concern such as latex and
Swatee Dey, PhD
6280 Center Hill Ave disperse dyes, but use ingredients such as spandex and pigments with a favorable safety
Cincinnati, OH 45224 profile. Today’s disposable diaper is a high performance product whose carefully designed
E-mail: dey.s.3@pg.com layers and liners provide optimal urine and feces absorption and an ever more clothing-like
and comfortable fit. This is possible due to a variety of specialized polymer materials that
Funding sources: The authors disclose
receipt of financial support for the research,
provide optimal absorption of urine and feces, thereby minimizing skin exposure.
authorship, and/or publication of this article
from The Procter & Gamble Company.

Conflicts of interest: SD, DK, and IH are


employees of The Procter & Gamble
Company. MO is a former employee of The
Procter & Gamble Company.

ment is made, the product and chemicals move to confir-


Introduction
matory clinical testing. No chemical or constituent is
Estimates suggest that an infant using disposable diapers exposed to humans until the safety of the constituent is
may have more than 3,800 diaper changes before being confirmed via traditional toxicological assessment. Confir-
toilet trained, so it is critical that the materials and safety matory clinical testing includes patch testing for skin irrita-
of these diapers are well understood. tion and sensitization, as well as consumer in use clinical
studies. Once the product is in market, it is continually
monitored for quality and consumer feedback to address
Diaper safety is thoroughly evaluated
any product concerns including safety-related comments,
Today’s modern diapers are primarily made of polymers, which are investigated and addressed appropriately.1–3
including cellulose, polypropylene, polyester, and poly-
ethylene (Fig. 1). These materials are biologically inert
Modern design focuses on absorbency
and apart from cellulose, not bioavailable. They are com-
monly used in fabrics and other materials that are in con- The primary focus of an efficient diaper is to transport
tact with skin, and in foods and cosmetics. the fluid away from the baby’s skin very quickly to
Each material in a diaper is carefully evaluated for safety ensure that the skin remains dry and prevent leaks. The
based on the principles of the US National Academy of topsheet of the diaper is designed to attract water and
Science and the World Health Organization. The ingredi- transport the fluid away from the baby’s skin, passing it
ent composition is first evaluated for potential hazard and on to the next layer. Once the liquid is absorbed by the
dose–response assessment, and then the product is evalu- next layer, the topsheet feels dry against the baby’s skin.
ated for the potential exposure to the ingredient. This Topsheets are typically made from a porous nonwoven
quantitative safety assessment establishes the safe range fabric, and apertured topsheets help to remove liquid
for use of the ingredient in the diaper. Additional factors from liquid stool.
are used to compensate for the uncertainty associated with Topsheets in premium diapers today are treated with a
18 extrapolating toxicity data. Once a positive safety assess- lotion comprised of pharmaceutical grade petrolatum and

International Journal of Dermatology 2016, 55 (Suppl. 1): 18–20 ª 2016 The International Society of Dermatology
Dey et al. Modern diaper performance Review 19

Fastener tape Inner cuff

Topsheet Elastic

Fastening hook
Frontears
Lotion
Umbilical notch
Backears

Tape fastening zone

Topsheet
Wetness indicator Superabsorbent
storage layer
Backsheet SAP
Backsheet

Figure 1 Composition of a leading disposable diaper. SAP, superabsorbent polymer

Table 1 Differences between pigments and disperse dyes

Disperse dyes
Attributes Pigments (Not used in diapers)

Solubility Organic or inorganic Highly soluble in water, oil,


material and common solvents
Practically insoluble in May absorb through skin
water, oil, and other
common solvents
Very low ability for skin
penetration
Figure 2 Liquid handling of modern diaper design cores Size Larger particles with Comparatively small
molecular weights > 500- molecules with most
700 Da. molecular weights
< 100 Da
stearyl alcohol (Fig. 2). This lotion acts as both a barrier These larger particles have These smaller particles have
to moisture and a skin-conditioning agent, which helps to much lower potential for greater skin penetration
reduce skin irritation and improve skin condition. Clinical skin penetration potential
studies have confirmed that lotion technology in diapers Safety Sensitization testing shows Some disperse dyes are
there are very few potential sensitizers
effectively helps to improve skin condition by reducing
pigments that induce
skin roughness.4 sensitization
The inner core of the diaper is made of a superabsor- For example, some disperse
bent polymer (SAP), also known as Absorbent Gel Mate- dyes used in textiles are
rial. The superabsorbent polymer can absorb more than known sensitizers
Usage in Colorants used in diapers Disperse dyes are not used
30 times its own weight in fluid.5 In the inner core, fluid
diapers are pigment based as diaper colorants
is bound into the SAP and locked away. More than 450
safety studies have been done to confirm its safety, includ-
ing assessments of systemic and local safety endpoints
such as skin irritation or sensitization.3,5–11 barrier. The pores are too small for water drops to leak
The backsheet of the diaper is typically made of a through, yet they release water vapor. The result means it
waterproof polyethylene film that serves as a microporous is drier outside and has lower relative humidity.

ª 2016 The International Society of Dermatology International Journal of Dermatology 2016, 55 (Suppl. 1): 18–20
20 Review Modern diaper performance Dey et al.

lished safety pedigree, and do not contain sensitizing dis-


Color features also evaluated for safety
perse dyes or latex.
In the past there have been concerns about the use of
color in disposable diapers, suggesting usage of disperse
References
dyes.12 However, most leading disposable diaper manu-
facturers actually use pigments that are considered safe 1 Kosemund K, Schlatter H, Ochsenhirt JL, et al. Safety
for this purpose, not disperse dyes. Pigments are very evaluation of superabsorbent baby diapers. Regul Toxicol
large molecules, practically insoluble, and do not induce Pharmacol 2009; 53: 81–89.
skin sensitization. They are commonly used in cosmetics, 2 Adam R. Skin care of the diaper area. Pediatr Dermatol
2008; 25: 427–433.
food packaging, and medical applications. Traditional
3 Spraker M, Krafchik B, Leyden J, et al. Disposable
toxicological assessments of pigments ensure systemic
diapers: effective and safe. Contemp Pediatr 2000; 17
safety of these pigments. In addition, local skin effects for
(Suppl.): 11–16.
irritation and/or sensitization of colorants used in dispos- 4 Odio M, OConnor RJ, Sarbaugh F, et al. Continuous
able diapers have been tested via self-assessed sensitive topical administration of a petrolatum formulation by a
adult skin patch testing (number of subjects in various novel disposable diaper. 2. Effect on skin condition.
studies ranged from 19 to 122) and show no skin irrita- Dermatology 2000; 200: 238–243.
tion or sensitization concerns. Overall, the colorants are 5 Dyer D. Seven Decades of Disposable Diapers: A record
deemed safe for use in diapers13 (Table 1). of continuous innovation and expanding benefit. Brussels:
Even though these pigment colors are safe, steps are EDANA, 2005.
taken to limit their exposure and potential transfer to the 6 Berg RW. Containment performance: a comparison of
cloth and paper diapers. Tappi J 1993; 76: 142–145.
baby’s skin. Interior colors are incorporated in to the
7 The Absorbent Hygiene Products Manufacturers
polymer resin so they are bound to the polymer and can-
Committee of EDANA. Sustainability Report: Baby
not leach out or transfer. Exterior colors adhere to the
diapers and incontinence products. Brussels: EDANA,
backsheet and are covered by a soft layer of nonwoven 2005.
polypropylene fibers to help minimize skin contact. Fur- 8 Odio M, Friedlander SF. Diaper dermatitis and advances
thermore, todays premium diapers have eliminated the in diaper technology. Curr Opin Pediatr 2000; 12: 342–
use of natural rubber and latex components and use syn- 346.
thetic polymer Lycra, which is commonly used in cloth- 9 UK Environment Agency. Life Cycle Assessment of
ing. Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the UK. London:
HMSO, 2005.
10 Van R, Wun C, Morrow AL, et al. The effect of diaper
Thorough evaluations ensure safety and type and overclothing on fecal contamination in day-care
performance of modern disposable diapers centers. J Am Med Assoc 1991; 265: 1840.
11 Atherton DJ. A review of the pathophysiology,
Today’s disposable diaper is a high performance and
prevention and treatment of irritant diaper dermatitis.
well-tested product whose carefully designed layers and Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 645–649.
liners provide optimal absorption and have a more cloth- 12 Alberta L, Sweeney S, Wiss K. Diaper dye dermatitis.
ing-like, comfortable fit. This is possible due to a variety Pediatrics 2005; 116: e450–e452.
of specialized polymer materials that provide optimal 13 Evans EB, Helmes CT, Kirsch T, et al. Colors in
absorption of urine and feces, thereby minimizing skin disposable diapers: addressing myths. Clin Pediatr 2014;
exposure. They are designed to keep skin dry and healthy, 53(Suppl. 9): 20S–22S.
are made from common materials that have an estab-

International Journal of Dermatology 2016, 55 (Suppl. 1): 18–20 ª 2016 The International Society of Dermatology

You might also like