the reaading passage introduces three reasons to conclude that a painting of a women

attributed to Remebrant is a fake attribution. The lecturer disagrees with these three reasons.
She sustaint that recent reexamination of the paiting has reveled that it was a creation of
Remebrant.

In the first place, the writer maintains that in the painting there are some incosistens details
related to the drees wich is wearing the women. To be more specific, she is wearing dress that
servants used to wearing, but also she is wearing a expesive collar. The lecturer sustains that
recent reexamination reveles that expensive collar was a painted over the original painting and
it not pertains to original work of art.

In the second placed, the author maintains that there are mistakes in the paiting releted to the
light and shadow what Remebrant would have never done. Again, the professors sustains that
there are flaws in the writer's arguments. More specifically, she defends that we can conclude
following recent rexamination of the painting these mistakes were consequences of to the
remodelation suffered by the original painting.

In the third place, the writer defends that Remebrand used to paint in a single piece of wood,
but the paiting of the wowam is created in panel made of several piecce of wood wich
Remebrant would never have used to create his works of arts. Again, the professot thinks that
we can appel to the recent reexamination to explain this fact from a different perspective.
More specifically, one conclusion of this reexamination was that the original painting was
created in a single piece of wood wich, indeed, belonged to the same tree used by Remebran
to other work of arts. Again, the others several pieces added to original painting was a
consequence of the remodelation suffered by the original remebrant's creations.
No one can deny that in the last year scientist have invented a large number of techonological
innovation that modified the ways in wich nations interect each other. But, if I were forced to
choose, I would definitely sustain that the most important invention in the last years was
internet. It is my firm belief that the interaction between nation has been profoundly modified
by internet, and I will develop my reasons to defend this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.

In the first place, I think that nowadays a large number of political interactions happen
throught internet. For example, when someone become president, other presidents usually
congrat him or her via twitter. Also, polics often public his or her ideas via social medias. This
kind of interactions between nations is really important for societies. For example, if some
president want to declare an important political position releted to one issue that it happen in
other country, the presiden will use twitter to acommplish this goal. As a consequence of this
strategy, more people, including people of the other country, will know the political position of
the president and will build a political opinion of him or her.

In the second place, I think that the next genaration of wars will happen as consequence of an
irreposable use of internet. Internet can be an amazing tool if we use it with responsability and
maturiy. But, as we know, iternet also can be the mother of huge social issues. Nowadays we
know that some politics kept being president thanks to stool private information from social
media. This kind of irresposable use of internet threat the democracy systems of our nations.
If we do not create some kind of restrincion in the use of internet for politician purposes, we
will facing a lot of social and political issues releted to internet.