Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Below are the quarterly returns on investment (in £000s) of two different investment
projects that had the same initial outlay. There is a sample of 16 quarters of returns and
your manager has asked you to investigate the relative performance of each project. She
suspects that ‘Investment B’ outperforms ‘Investment A’ and she would like you to test
this hypothesis. Perform an appropriate statistical test that incorporates your
manager’s hypothesis.
Hint: in this question you will need to calculate the mean and standard deviation of each
investment, assume that both returns come from independent samples, are both normally
distributed and that the (true but unknown) variances are the same.
First work out the mean x , it is the sum divided by the count.
Inv 1 = 78+83+75+77+73+75+85+81+86+79+79+75+85+72+75+81=1259/16=78.687
Inv2 = 95+93+84+93+90+84+88+91+93+87+75+86+77+77+90+98=1401/16=87.562
Then calculate differences by taking each number, subtract the mean and square the result.
Sum the differences and square it to get variance s2 :
Sum squares SS = Inv 1 297.4375 Inv 2 = 685.9375
-Standard deviation s : is the average amount of variability in the data set. It tells the average,
how far each result lies from the mean. To calculate take the square root of the variance:
For mean of Investment A and B If the mean result for Investment A is less than the
Investment B, it can be interpreted that Investment B outperformed Investment A.
Where:
and are the standard deviations
Null Hypothesis:
Alternative Hypothesis:
Our test statistic, -4.384, is less than the t-critical; therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis. With a significance level of 5%, we reject the null hypothesis and
conclude that there is significant difference between the returns of Investment A and
Investment B, and that Investment B outperformed Investment A.
Question 1.b
For question 1, prepare a short report of the results and discuss the following:
It is important because it is the one which decides if your research was subjected for a
significant change just like how you’ve expected it or if none or unlikely thing have occurred
in the data you have gathered. Additionally, hypothesis testing determines which population
is best supported by the sample data. When you are able to get the sample means, it shows
that it somehow has huge difference between the samples. This is what you call sampling
error; it is the distinction between a sample and a population. Through hypothesis testing you
are more likely to get the nearly accurate possibility of what data you are trying to find,
which is in this case, the sample mean. Now, the main goal upon getting the mean is to look
if it is probably different to the null hypothesis or more closely related to the alternative
hypothesis.
Explain the process in order to get the results, the key assumptions in this
process
1. Assumptions
Both returns come from independent samples, are both normally distributed and that
the (true but unknown) variances are the same.
2. Specify the Null and Alternative Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant difference in the returns between
Investment A and Investment B.
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): There is a significant difference in the returns between
Investment A and Investment B.
3. Calculate the t-statistic
The t-test is used to compare two means (averages) in order to find out whether they
are different, and if so, how significant the difference is. There are 3 different types of
t-tests, each of which is calculated using a different t-test equation. In this case, two
sample t-test is used. The Two Sample T-Test helps to decide whether the means of
two separate groups of data significantly differ from one another.
This is a t-distribution graph for left-tailed hypothesis. The shaded part in blue is the rejection
region. It is important to know that its curve is asymptotic with respect to the x-axis so
imagine that blue extends to the negative infinity.
Question 2
A small tourist resort has a weekend traffic problem and is considering whether or not
to provide emergency services to help mitigate the congestion that results from an
accident or breakdown. Past records show that the probability of a breakdown or an
accident on any given day of a four-day weekend is 0.25. The cost to the community
caused by congestion from an accident or breakdown is as follows:
a weekend with 1 accident day costs £20,000;
a weekend with 2 accident days costs £30,000;
a weekend with 3 accident days costs £60,000;
a weekend with 4 accident days costs £125,000.
As part of its contingency planning, the resort needs to know:
we are looking for the probability that no accident will occur in the 4 consecutive days,
we are looking for P(0).
(b) The probability that a weekend will have at least two accidents
we are looking for the probability that at least 2 accidents will occur in the 4 consecutive
days, we can get it by getting the probability that no accidents or 1 accident will occur, then
subtract it from 1. (We subtract it from 1 because P(0 or 1) is the opposite of P(x ≥ 2), so
their difference is equivalent to P(x ≥ 2).)
So,
(c) The expected cost that the community will have to bear for an average weekend
period
To get the mean cost of the community, we can get it by getting the mean based on the
probability distribution and for 2,3 and 4 calculating just like the method I used above.
(d) Whether or not to accept a tender from a private firm for emergency services of
£20,000 for each weekend during the season.
By looking at the average cost per week based on the data that they currently have, the cost of
getting an emergency services of £20,000 per week is greater than what the average cost of
expense they incur which is only £18,066.41. So, it can be concluded that they not need to
accept a tender from a private firm because they currently have cheaper expense compare to
what the private firm offers based on their past data.
Question 3
Church membership and attendance is declining in established churches in the UK.
Figures from the recent census shows the proportion of people calling themselves
Christian fell from 72% in 2001 to 59% in 2011. In percentage terms, the numbers of
Christians fell by 12.4% (Office for National Statistics, 2012). More recently, published
figures from the Church of England 2015 attendance statistics show that just under 1
million people attend services each week. According to the results of a recent survey, an
average of 960,000 people attend church services each week (85% adults, 15% children
under 16). Overall, figures represent a decline in attendance of 11% over the past
decade with an average decrease of just over 1% a year (Church of England Research and
Statistics, 2016).
The pastor of a local parish wants to investigate the reasons behind the decline in
church attendance. He also wants to find out what measures could be put in place in
order to retain members and attract new ones. He has decided to commission a market
research study.
a) Which qualitative method(s) should be used and why? Discuss the techniques
you would choose and explain their advantages and potential drawbacks in
detail.
Qualitative research is a market research method that focuses on obtaining data through an
open-ended and conversational communication. It focuses on the why and how factors that
affects the decisions of the target market. For this type of case, the best, qualitative method to
be used is the focus groups. It is the way of interviewing about eight to five participants and
spending time to talk to them regarding the problem. I think that this is way faster than one-
on-one interviews. This is because the pastors can freely interact with them and do not
require to take up too much time asking about the related questions that made them unable to
attend to church. Aside from that, it (the interview) can be taken online through group chats
or group meetings through videoconferences. But then, it can possibly make people shy or
intimidated by others and keep themselves silent throughout the meeting.
First technique is by setting up meetings in where they will openly interact with each other
once in a week. However, the disadvantage of it is that, maybe those who cannot attend
church are unable to attend the seminars and meetings too.
Second, they can send cards, letters, and directly chat with the families about their reasons
and approach them if they may have problem or such. But then, most families would likely
decline the church calls especially if they were busy.
Third, they can have held a celebration or a program which can make people attend and then
lecture them about the essence of going to churches. Although, it is costly and the church,
must not lure out people by money or foods to go to church- they must do it willingly.