SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT ON CURRENT FIELD SITUATION IN TERMS OF

POD / FLOWER DEVELOPMENT

A. Personal data of CEA.

1. Name of CEA…ENOCH WILBERFORCE
ANTWI………………………………………………………………………………..
2. Staff ID…3200603………………………………………………………….
3. Region……BAR…………………………………………………………
4. CHED District……DADIESOABA…………………………………………………
5. Operational Area ……MANKESIM……………………………………………….
6. Contact No. (s)…0244835665……………………………………………………..

B. 10 COCOA FARMS WITH THE BEST OUTLOOK IN TERMS OF POD LOAD

S/ NAME OF FARM FARM GPS AVERAGE NO. COMMITTAL OR

N FARMER LOCATION SIZE COORDINAT OF PODS OMISSION(CAUSES)
ES OF THE COUNTED AT
FARM HAND HEIGHT
1 ADUNU MANKESIM 1.30 -2.367404 30 Timely application of flower
FRIMPONG 6.791831 inducers and good pruning
2 ASAKI MANKESIM 2.3 -2.373806 28 Timely application of flower
YEBILLA 6.787365 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
3 MOSES MANKESIM -23733490 35 Frequent application of flower
SACKEY 6.792890 inducers,pruning and weed control.
1.21
4 ADDO MANKESIM 3.2 -2.377219 25 Timely application of flower
DANKWA 6.792376 inducers and good pruning
5 YAW OFORI MANKESIM 3.39 -2369331 27 Timely application of flower
6.788218 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
6 YAW OFORI MANKESIM 0.38 -2.366929 26 Frequent application of flower
6.789480 inducers,pruning and weed control.
7 SEIDU BAAKWANTE 3.7 -2.387544 30 Timely application of flower
ABDULAI 6.786233 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
8 EMMANUEL BAAKWANTE 0.66 -2.388715 25 Frequent application of flower
ADJEI NTEM 6.86452 inducers,pruning and weed control.
9 ESTHER BAAKWANT 0.53 -2.388542 27 Timely application of flower
DWAMENA 6.787213 inducers and good pruning
10 OSEI BAAKWANTE 1.75 -2.398133 26 Frequent application of flower
KWABENA 6.791873 inducers,pruning and weed control.
NB: In the remarks: The CEA MUST give a brief and clear account of extension service committal or
omission for the good or bad situation of each farm. (List of GAPs adopted)

NB: Please farms selected should not be in one community.

 C. 10 COCOA FARMS WITH THE BEST OUTLOOK IN TERMS OF FLOWER
DEVELOPMENT

S/ NAME OF FARM FARM GPS FLOWER COMMITTAL OR

N FARMER LOCATION SIZE COORDINA DEVELOPMENT OMISSION(CAUSES)
TES OF (MORE OR FEW)
THE FARM
1 ADUNU MANKESIM 1.30 -2.367404 MORE Timely application of flower
FRIMPONG 6.791831 inducers and good pruning
2 MOSES SACKEY MANKESIM 1.21 -23733490 MORE Timely application of flower
6.792890 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
3 ERNESTAPPAU BAAKWANTE 0.86 -2.397449 MORE Frequent application of flower
6.793161 inducers,pruning and weed control.
4 AGYEI PETER MANKESIM 2.54 -2.374360 MORE Timely application of flower
6.782377 inducers and good pruning
5 JAMES OWUSU MANKESIM 2.32 -2.384823 MORE Timely application of flower
MENSAH 6.785318 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
6 AKUA FORKUO MENTUKWA 1.60 -2.390054 MORE Frequent application of flower
6.781581 inducers,pruning and weed control.
7 AKOSUA HAWA MENTUKWA 1.22 -2.380028 MORE Timely application of flower
6.785011 inducers,insecticides and good
pruning
8 SIAKA SAMARTA MANKESIM 1.40 -2.348932 MORE Frequent application of flower
6.780273 inducers,pruning and weed control.
9 SODOMA SEIDU BAAKWANTE 0.58 -2.392592 MORE Timely application of flower
6.785103 inducers and good pruning
10 MOHAMMED BAAKWANTE -2.393118 MORE Frequent application of flower
ANTWI 6.788237 inducers,pruning and weed control.
NB: In the remarks: The CEA MUST give a brief and clear account of extension service committal or
omission for the good or bad situation of each farm. (List of GAPs adopted)

NB: Please farms selected should not be in one community.

 D. 5 COCOA FARMS WITH THE WORST OUTLOOK IN TERMS OF POD

S/ NAME OF FARM FARM GPS AVERAGE NO. OF COMMITTAL OR

N FARMER LOCATION SIZE COORDINATES PODS COUNTED AT OMISSION(CAUSES)
OF THE FARM HAND HEIGHT
1 SALIFU KRAMO MANKESIM 1.01 -2.365593 6.789745 17 Timely application of
GAPs but lack of rain
btn june -August
2 EVANS OPPONG BAAKWANTE 0.57 -2.388865 6.784019 16 Infrequent insecticides
spraying regime
3 KWABENA MANKESIM 1.58 -2.381916 6.792716 19 Infrequent application of
ASANTE flower inducers
4 OTI SENIOR BAAKWANTE 0.43 -2.386790 6.788341 17 Untimely application of
insecticide
5 ABDULAI MENTUKWA 1.55 -2.386817 6.787222 15 Timely application of
HARUNA GAPs but lack of rain
btn june -August

E. 5 COCOA FARMS WITH THE WORST OUTLOOK IN TERMS OF FLOWERS

S NAME OF FARM LOCATION FAR GPS FLOWER COMMITTAL OR

/ FARMER M COORDINATES DEVELOPMENT OMISSION(CAUSES)
N SIZE OF THE FARM (FEW OR NO
FLOWERS)
1 NIMO HANNAH BAAKWANTE 0.52 -2.389340 few Timely application of
6.787483 GAPs but lack of rain btn
june -August
2 ISSIFU AMADU MANKESIM 1.30 -2.379373 few Infrequent application of
6.791742 flower inducers
3 AFIA BIRAGO SALAMALEKUM 0.58 -2.3833646 few Untimely application of
6.787096 flower inducers
4 AMPOFO MANKESIM 1.43 -2.374888 few Infrequent application of
TWUMASI 6.797260 flower inducers
5 MORO SARFO KAMIREKROM 4.58 -2.501050 few Untimely application of
ERNEST 6.743039 flower inducers
NB: In the remarks: The CEA MUST give a brief and clear account of extension service committal or
omission for the good or bad situation of the each farm. (List of GAPs adopted) NB: Please farms
selected should not be in one community.

SIGNATURE OF THE CEA……………………………………

DEC……………………………………………………………
REO……………………………………………………………..

DATE OF SUBMISSION……………………………………….