Capacity Building For Educational Action Research and Innovation © 2023 Gsdigo

Capacity Building for Educational Action Research and Innovation © 2023 GSDigo
Republic of the Philippines

SORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY
Graduate School
Magsaysay Street, Sorsogon City
Tel. No.: (056) 211 0178; E-mail Address: ssc@sorsu.edu.ph
Graduate School
MECHANICS FOR THE SEARCH FOR

BEST ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSALS
a. Venue, Session Managers, and Action Learning Teams

1. The following sets were created for the parallel presentations: (a) AR and
Innovation in Mathematics Education – Set A; (b) AR and Innovation in Language
Education – Sets B & C; (c) AR and Innovation in Science Education – Set D; (d)
AR and Innovation in Technology Education – Set E.
2. The session managers are as follow: Educational AR and Innovation in
Mathematics Education – Ms. Karen Palabrica; AR and Innovation in Language
Education – Mrs. Mabel D. Buen and Ms. Frances Grace Jetomo; AR and
Innovation in Technology Education - Rogelio Las Pinas Jr.; and (e) AR and
Innovation in Science Technology Education – Mrs. Imelda Dino. The complete
committee members may be found in Annex D.
3. The schedule, venue, and order of presentation for the Action Learning Team can
be found in Annex A.
4. Corporate attire shall be prescribed for all the attendees.
b. Guidelines for Paper Presentation

5. Copies of the PowerPoint presentation must be uploaded to the Google Drive
assigned for each set.
6. PowerPoint presentation is 15 minutes only and will be strictly observed.
7. Each presenter will be given a cue of “5 minutes left”, “2 minutes left”, and “time is
up” through a flash card.
8. Question and answer session is 5 minutes only after every presenter.
9. One best action research proposal shall be selected from each set. The best action
research proposal shall undergo preliminary and final evaluations and must be
uploaded to the assigned Google Drive per set a week before the research
symposium.
10. The preliminary evaluation of the action research proposal shall be conducted
using the rubric for action research proposal which can be found in Annex B.
11. The action research proposals that obtained a rating of at least 80% shall qualify
for the award.
12. Final evaluation shall be done during a research presentation using the criteria
found in Annex C for the selection of the Best Action Research Proposal.
c. Awards and Prizes

13. Each presenter shall be awarded with a mentor and shall be announced by the
moderator from each set.
14. The Best Action Research Proposal that received the highest average ranking from
each set and shall receive Lapis Lazuli, a rare gem stone as symbol of wisdom,
fellowship, and service; and a Certificate of Commendation.
15. The decision of the panel of evaluator, after the review of the tabulators is final.
Annex A
Graduate School
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH

AND INNOVATION
2023 ACTION LEARNING TEAM

Set A: Set B: Set C: Set D:
Set E: Technology
Mathematics Language Language Science Education
Presenter Education Time
Education Education Education (Library Multimedia
(Old Boardroom)
(Dormtel) (Social Hall) (e-Library) Rm)
1 Improving the The Using Google Enhancing Grade 12 Promoting 10:00

learning Effectiveness of Classroom and Students’ Awareness and
experience of first Using Google Meet to Engagement Level Understanding on
year BSED, BEED Multimedia Improve the in Social Science Proper Storage of
and BPED Resources in Reading Skills of Through Social Tools and
students of SLMCS Improving Struggling Media Platforms Equipment of
in Mathematics in Reading Readers of Integration into Grade 11
the Modern Comprehension Grade VI in Bolo Classroom Automotive in
World through Elementary Instructions MNVHS
Google Meet School
Associate Elmer Atutubo Patricia Aleli Alona G. Nito Gain de la Rama Argel L. Placer
Rabulan
2 Exploring the Improving the Development of Game-based Electronic 10:20

Impact of Reading Skill of Self-paced Instruction: Its Component
Electronic Grade 9 Reading Effect on Upholding Testing Manual
Strategic Struggling Intervention for Interests in
Intervention Readers of San ID learners Teaching Grade 3
Materials on the Francisco NHS Science
Academic through
Performance of Phonological
Struggling Grade Awareness
11 Learners in Activities
Statics and
Probability
Associate Anthony C. Dolar Madielyn L. Zenith Joy Janet N. Gubot Noel P. Jalmasco
Penos Dumo
3 Investigating the Effect of Video The Use of Utilization of Virtual Project EDSA 10:40
Effect of Reduced Lesson in Modular Laboratory (Electrical Design
Instructional Time Reading Distance Simulation of Grade using Simulation
in Mathematics Performance of Learning for 5 Science in Apps): Addressing
for SHS Grade 4 Children with Talaonga Difficulties of
Struggling Pupils Special Needs Elementary School Buyo National
During Class High Schools’
Suspensions Grade 9 Learners
in Electrical
Installation and
Maintenance
Associate John Mark Aurea D. Escurel Emie Rose Jeanne Frances Pamela Altarejos
Estorninos Dominguiano Furio
4 Enhancing the Video-Based Effectiveness of Technology Effects of the Lack 11:00
Least Learned Reading Podcast-based Integration : Its of Technological
Competencies in Materials in Lessons in Impact on Integration in TVL
Mathematics of English: It's Improving the Improving Student Subjects of MNHS
the Grade 6 pupils Effect on the of Least- Engagement of
of Sta. Lourdes Reading Mastered Grade Four
Elementary Attitudes of Competencies in Students of Oras
School with the Grade 5 Oral Elementary School
Utilization of Struggling Communication
Electronic- Readers of TVL-11
Strategic Learners
Intervention
Material
Associate Julie Ann J. Patrick Nicolas Gui D. Denely Alarzar Christian Behil
Hubilla Cervantes
5 Effects of Game- Common Effectiveness of Ability of Power Factors Affecting 11:20

based Learning on Writing and using Educo Quest to Pique 5s Practice among
Pupils' Attitudes Speech Errors of Learn Gamified Learners'' Interest Grade 11
Toward Grade 11 App Reading in science Students
Elementary Students in their Tool to the
Mathematics Reading and Reading Level of
Writing Class: Grade 3 Pupils
Basis for in Tinanogan
Creating Elementary
Technology- School
Aided Games
Associate Jessa I. Quinones Francis l. Marianne Robhel Lacostales Leonard Lacdang

Lovendino Avisado
Health Break
6 Effects of Video The Improving Integrating Effectiveness of 1:00

Lessons as an Effectiveness of Reading Technology within a Using ICT in
Instructional Tool E. S. Claveria Performance of Play-based learning Teaching PE to
in Teaching Strategies in Grade 2 Non- Environment at the Grade 8 Students
Numbers 0-100 to Teaching Readers in Kindergarten Class
the Six Grade 1 Reading English Filipino using
Non- Numerates among Marungko
of Gimagaan Struggling and Approach
Elementary Non-reader through Video
School Grade 4 Pupils Lesson in J. P.
of Pamurayan Laurel
Integrated Elementary
School School
Associate Lianna Andrea Maria Teresa D. Doddie Boy Aila Mae R. Viñas Mark Vargas
Alvarado Belardo Granadil
7 Effectiveness of Interactive Projector and 1:20

ICT-DCP (DepEd Marungko Video Speaker: Its Effect
Computerizatio Presentation: Its in the Teaching
n Program) in Effect on the Delivery in the
Teaching Reading Skills Non-Formal
Reading on Grade 1 and Education or ALS
2 Students of
San Jose Lower
ES
Associate Maria Beth Nikita Enory Jayson Lagco

Godelo Mendizabal
8 Use of Video-based Effectiveness of 1:40
Audiobooks in Lesson using Digital Field Trip
Reading English Marungko as Teaching
for Grade-7 Approach: A Strategy of
Non-reader Way to Enhance Selected Grade 11
Students in the Beginning Student of
Selected Section Reading of Sorsogon National
in Sta Grade 1 High School
Magdalena NHS Learners of Bolo
Elementary
School
Associate Lorena D. Maricel Jocielyn Acuña

Fuellas G.Gardon
9 Project LAKAN: Project Integrating 2:00

A Reading Magbasa Instructional
Intervention to Intervention Materials in the
Assist Grades 1- Towards the Classroom
6 to be Grade Improvement of
Ready Grade 5 Pupils
Literacy Skills of
Quezon
Elementary
School
Associate Rosemarie Ana Faith B. Fatima Ann

Baylon Francisco Bartolome
10 Improving the Interactive 2:20

Performance Marungko Door
Level in Literacy Game: Its
of Monbon Effectiveness as
Elementary Beginning
School’s Reading
Kindergarten Remediation
Pupils through Tool to seven
Manipulatives Grade 3
Struggling
Readers of San
Ramon
Elementary
School
Associate Reza Habig Fil Anthony N.

Aquino
11 Enhancing Innovative 2:40

Reading Ability Instructional
in Grade 1 Game in
Pupils through Enhancing the
Talking Book: An Literary
Action Research Appreciation
Study Skills of
Students
Associate Cedric Nica Eva

Divinagracia
12 Factors that 3:00

Affect the
Communication
Skills of Grade 9
Students
Associate Joselle Lorete
Annex B

Graduate School
Rubric for Action Research Proposal Evaluation

Prof. Gerry S, Digo, EdD
Direction: Please use the following 4-point Likert scale to evaluate the action research proposal: 4 –
Strongly agree; 3 – Agree; 2 – Disagree; 1- Strongly disagree.
Title of the AR Proposal: _________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________
Author(s): _____________________________________________________________________________________
Score
Criteria and Indicators
1 2 3 4
1. Title. Identifies the key issues or topics under consideration.
2. Introduction. Frames the research problem and its context.

States the research focus clearly.
3. Literature Review. Reviews, critiques, and synthesize the applicable literature to identify key
issues to clarify barriers, knowledge gaps, or practical needs.
Makes for a strong case for the significance of the study with sufficient and recent relevant
literature and recent studies.
4. Action Research Framework. Describes a recent action research framework and explains its
appropriateness and relevance for the study.
5. Research Questions/Objectives. States the purpose, goal, objectives, or question that are
aligned with the research problem, literature review, and action research framework.
6. Research Design. Describes action research method as an interpretive approach to inquiry that
is appropriate to the research purpose, goal, objectives, or question.
7. Participants or Associates. Describes the context, ethical considerations, method of

recruitment and selection of participants.
8. Needs Analysis Procedure. Uses appropriate instruments for data collection and data analysis
to describe the need for the intervention or innovation.
9. Intervention. Describes the actions taken to improve the situation identified.

Describes an intervention that matches the literature review and the question asked in
the research question.
10. Evaluation of the Intervention. Uses appropriate instruments for data collection procedure
and data analysis to evaluate the intervention vis-à-vis the research questions or objectives.
11. References and In-text Citations. Follows the APA format (7th edition) for the in-text citations
and references.
12. Quality of Writing. Follows the general standard for academic writing for a proposal that is
easy to read and understand.
Total
Percent
Evaluated by: _______________________________________________ Date: ________________
Annex C

Graduate School
Criteria for Best Action Research Proposal

Prof. Gerry S, Digo, EdD
Title of the AR Proposal: ________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________
Author(s): ____________________________________________________________
Criteria Percent Score

a. Contribution along the identified
10
research agenda or priority
b. Clarity of voice, coherence, style,
confidence, and quality of 15
presentation
c. Quality of proposed intervention or
innovation to address the research 20
problem
d. Relevance and impact of the action
research proposal to identified 25
beneficiaries
e. Appropriateness, adequacy, and
30
efficiency of research methodology
Rating
Evaluated by: _______________________________________ Date: __________
Annex D

Graduate School
WORKING COMMITTEES
CONVENOR
Dr. Gerry S. Digo
Parallel Sessions
Set A: AR & Innovation in Math Education

Moderator: Jamie Ann Dollentas
Chairperson: Karen Palabrica
Members: Anthony Madrazo, Ana Liezel D. Dedase, & Klief Gratela
Secretary: Lyn Besustringue
Tabulator: Kelvin Fulay
Venue: Vivian Abejuro
Meal and Snacks: Mr. Elmer Atutubo
Set B: AR & Innovation in Language Education

Moderator: Mary Anne Evangelista
Chairperson: Fraces Grace Jetomo
Members: Cristine D. Romorosa,& Maria Crestina Dolorica
Secretary: Aba Marie Bembo
Tabulator: Alex Furio
Venue: Eric Gelilio
Meal and Snacks: Ms. Maricel Gardon
Set C: AR & Innovation in Language Education

Moderator: Edna Dionglay
Chairperson: Mary Jean N. Gamba
Members: Mabel D. Buen, & Ralph Recto Burton
Secretary: Sherryl Sano
Tabulator: Jan Julius Foster
Venue: Manie Rose Duaman
Meal and Snacks: Ms. Lorena Fuellas
Set D: AR & Innovation in Science Education

Moderator: Christian H. Dipon
Chairperson: Imelda Dino
Members: Cyra Soreda, & Mylene J. Lascano
Secretary: Charlyn Camposano
Tabulator: Joland Dellomas
Venue: Glady Joy Mella
Meal and Snacks: Ms. Jovelyn Acuña
Set E: AR & Innovation in Technology Education
Moderator: Hilger Tarraya
Chairperson: Rogelio Las Pinas Jr.
Members: Edna Hermida; Susan Mae A. Jamoralin
Secretary: Maria Cristina Elli
Tabulator: Alberto Espenida
Venue: Sarah Rojo
Meal and Snacks: Ms. Aila Mae R. Vinas
Program
Chairperson: Celeste Polo
Co-chairperson: Ralph Burton
Members: Jamie Ann Dollentas
Edna Dionglay, Mary Anne Evangelista
Hilger Tarraya, Cristian H. Dipon
Proceedings
Chairman: Ms. Charlyn Camposano
Members: Ms. Lyn Rose Besustringue
Mrs. Sherryl Sano, Ms. Aba Marie Bembo
Ms. Maria Cristina Elli
Venue and Sound System

Chairperson: Mr. Rogelio B. Las Pinas Jr.
Co-chairperson: Ms. Glady Mella
Mrs. Vivian Abejuro, Ms. Manie Rose Duaman
Mr. Eric Gelilio, Mr. Sarah Rojo
Token and Tarpaulin Printing

Chairperson: Zenith Joy Dumo
Participants and Extensionists Profile,

Attendance and Evaluation
Chairperson: Mrs. Ana Liezel Dedase
Members: Ms. Glady Mella
Ms. Cyra Soreda
Mrs. Mylene J. Lascano
Mr. Anthony Madrazo
Certificates, Posters, Tarpaulin, and Invitations

Chairperson: Mrs. Mabel D. Buen
Member: Susan Mae A. Jamoralin
Extension Accomplishment Report and News Feature

Chairperson: Ms. Frances Grace J. Jetomo
Members: Ms. Glady Joy M. Mella
Ms. Christine D. Romorosa
Dr. Mary Jean N. Gamba
Meet our Resource Person:
Ms. Frances Grace Jetomo is a language instructor at Sorsogon State University. She has been
teaching for 7 years in SorSU. She graduated cum laude at Bicol University with the degree of Bachelor
of Arts in English in 2011. She finished her Master of Arts in English Education at Bicol University
Graduate School in 2019. She conducted action research at SorSU Laboratory High School in 2020.
She presented the results of her study during the 2nd Research, Education, Business, Science, & Arts
International Conference via Zoom in August 2021, organized by Asian Intellect, in which she bagged
awards such as best presenter and 2nd best paper. Her research article about the same action research
was published by the National Research Council of the Philippines this year. Her research interests
revolve around education, literature, language, and social sciences.
Meet our Resource Person:
Dr. Gerry S. Digo is a licensed professional teacher with a demonstrated work experience as faculty
and administrator in the higher education industry. He earned the degree of Doctor of Education major
in Educational Management from Bicol University in 2010. To date, he is a Professor VI at Sorsogon
State University, Sorsogon City, Philippines, and the designated Head of the Sorsogon State University
Policy Research Center. Prof. Digo was also a CHED scholar in the Philippine Higher Education Career
System – Executive Development Program (PhilHECS-EDP) in 2017 and in the Flagship Course on
Academic Excellence for Middle Managers in 2014. Moreover Prof. Digo is the Top 7 scientist in
Sorsogon State University as declared by the Alper-Doger (AD) scientific index world scientist and
university rankings for 2023. He is also a Career Executive Service Eligible (CESE) and was recognized
as the Top 6 in the March 2018 Career Executive Service Written Examination. Likewise, as a Philippine
Quality Award (PQA) assessor, he is passionate along his goal of enhancing the quality outcomes of
higher educational institutions. His research interest is on school effectiveness and school improvement,
leading teachers, leadership for learning, and leadership for change

Capacity Building For Educational Action Research and Innovation © 2023 Gsdigo

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Capacity Building For Educational Action Research and Innovation © 2023 Gsdigo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Capacity Building for Educational Action Research and Innovation © 2023 GSDigo

Republic of the Philippines

MECHANICS FOR THE SEARCH FOR

a. Venue, Session Managers, and Action Learning Teams

b. Guidelines for Paper Presentation

c. Awards and Prizes